web
counter
 

It's Funny Because He's Fat!

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (25)



the-hangover-wallpaper-535x401.jpg

It was a fairly uneventful weekend at the box-office, as two holdovers managed to maintain the top two spots of the week. After the final numbers came in last week, The Hangover had managed to barely eke out a win over Up. This week, their positions stayed the same: The Hangover added another $33 million to its total take, bringing it to $105 million in 10 days. It’ll be the year’s biggest R-Rated film by end of business Monday, surpassing The Watchmen’s $107 million. I think it’s also fair to say, if there’s such a thing anymore, that The Hangover is the year’s biggest sleeper hit.

Up on the other hand, is shaping up to be quite likely the biggest movie of the year, and like last year’s The Dark Knight, it deserves it. I love it when we get the amazing confluence of critical and box-office success. After only three weeks, Up is already approaching $200 million, and given the dearth of broad family-friendly movies this summer, it has a very good chance of surpassing Star Trek, which is the number one film of the year so far, at $232 million (it’s finally slowing, adding only $5.5 million this last weekend).

In third place, Denzel Washington’s The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 put up respectable numbers for an adult-targeted film, grossing a decent $25 million. Sony head, Rory Bruer insist he’s pleased with the opening. “Third place and happy about it,” he said. Uh huh.

Well, we know who’s not happy about a sixth place opening, and that’s Eddie Murphy, whose family film, Imagine That, despite reviews that were not atrocious, only eked about $5.6 million, in line with the debut of last summer’s Eddie Murphy flick, Meet Dave, which opened with $5.1 million. I suppose we all know what that means: Norbit sequel. Either that, or Murphy best jump on that Beverly Hills Cop sequel before he loses all of his box-office clout.

Our review of Imagine That will be up later today.

Meanwhile, in limited release, Francis Ford Coppolla’s Tetro put up a solid $15,000 per screen average, though reviews are mixed, and I’m not sure we get paid enough to review a Vincent Gallo black-and-white film. We’ll see. However, Sam Rockwell’s Moon put up even better numbers in more theaters, averaging $18,000 per screen. We’ll have that review up later today. Likewise, Food, Inc., a documentary about the corporate-controlled food industry, put up a big $21,000 per screen. We’ll have that review later this week.

Here are your top five:

1. The Hangover ($33 million, $105 million)


2. Up ($30 million, $187 million)


3. The Taking of Pelham 1 2 3 ($25 million)


4. Night at the Museum II< (9.6 million, $143 million)


5. Land of the Lost ($9.1 million, $34 million)









The Outlander Series by Diana Gabaldon | Michael Moore's Wall Street Teaser Trailer













Comments

The Hangover was fun, funny and deserving of it's box office take.

Posted by: Spender at June 15, 2009 12:40 AM

The Hangover is the year’s biggest sleeper hit

Can you consider it to be a "sleeper hit?" What with the advertising everywhere?

Watched HULU a few weeks back and I can swear that every second commercial was a fucking ad for this movie. Not to mention on TV in general, or all over the internet, or word of mouth, or...

Posted by: DeistBrawler at June 15, 2009 12:59 AM

I just added some cash to the star trek coffers, and it was simply, wonderfully, happily fantastic. Money well spent, and suddenly...it's like there's even more worthwhile films to spend my money on. First Obama and now this? Well, it is the age of aquarius after all.

Posted by: replica at June 15, 2009 4:30 AM

@DeistBrawler:
The Hangover is non-remake, non-franchise, no famous names, and non-Pixar. Films like that barely exist anymore – and when they do exist, nobody expects them to be hits. No matter how much advertising is thrown around first. It's hugely unexpected & unusual for it to do so well, and that's still the primary definition of "sleeper hit" – yeah?

Posted by: thoapsl at June 15, 2009 6:56 AM

@replica: amen to that! I finally was able to go to the movies the other day and I had my pick of Star Trek, Up, Drag Me to Hell, and The Hangover. How the hell do you decide? Well, showing times helped me pick Star Trek and it was great.

Last time I had free time sans kids to see a movie I picked Indiana Jones (didn't read reviews....stupid swinging with the monkeys). What a contrast.

Posted by: fifteenkeys at June 15, 2009 8:40 AM

Really looking forward to the Moon review.

Posted by: twig at June 15, 2009 8:54 AM

i'm looking forward to seeing the 'imagine that' review. i heard it was so bad that people were demanding their money back before half of the movie was over. ha!

Posted by: gem at June 15, 2009 9:02 AM

Well, we know who’s not happy about a sixth place opening, and that’s Eddie Murphy, whose family film, Imagine That, despite reviews that were not atrocious, only eked about $5.6 million, in line with the debut of last summer’s Eddie Murphy flick, Meet Dave, which opened with $5.1 million.

That's alotta commas!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at June 15, 2009 9:09 AM

Does Pajiba really need to review Imagine That? Based on the garbage Eddie Murphy's been churning out as of late, it's pretty safe to say that it's a train wreck.

Posted by: benjamin at June 15, 2009 9:26 AM

That's alotta commas!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at June 15, 2009 9:09 AM
---
Yeah? You gotta problem with commas? ;-)

Was flipping channels last night, and there, gloriously, on the CW, was the original "Pelham 123," and I thought, there ought to be a channel that shows nothing but the original versions of reboots currently in theaters, so people can (more or less) instantly compare. In the little remaining downtime,they could show earlier installments of sequels currently in theaters.

Who thinks this would work? Anyone? Anyone?

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at June 15, 2009 9:30 AM

bucdaddy-

I saw it too!! So good.

Posted by: Smokin at June 15, 2009 9:38 AM

Love the idea, tcfkab. We can call it the Preboot Channel.

Posted by: branded at June 15, 2009 9:42 AM

due to the success of the hangover, i bet they're planning a remake/reboot/retcon RIGHT NOW.

Posted by: gp at June 15, 2009 9:44 AM

Saw The Hangover Saturday night and laughed my ass off. Everyone in the theater except the uptight couple two seats away from us, for some reason, was having a great time. For a Saturday night showing the theater was surprisingly only half full. Good to see that it did well overall. The previews, however, sucked. The new Jack Black thing looked completely unwatchable. I cringed through the whole trailer. I did get a chuckle out of Betty White in The Proposal trailer, although I'm not usually a rom com kind of girl.

Posted by: slower lower at June 15, 2009 9:54 AM

, Bucdaddy: ". . . there ought to be a channel that shows nothing but the original versions of reboots currently in theaters . . ."

There already is. It's called all of them. I'm always seeing the originals pop up on TV channels when a remake or sequel comes out in theaters. It kinda guaratees that someone will watch it instead of going to the new movie, because they're cheap. Or compare both, because you can do it for the price of one movie ticket. Showing movies on TV is cheap cheap cheap for the TV stations. Better to show something that's currently on peoples minds.

Posted by: BWeaves at June 15, 2009 10:00 AM

You must get better channels than I do, bweaves.

Wait ... EVERYBODY gets better channels than I do, except people who get no channels at all, and sometimes they don't know how lucky they are,

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at June 15, 2009 10:08 AM

If you don't see or hear advertising for a movie a year in advance then I think it can be considered a sleeper.

Posted by: John W at June 15, 2009 10:51 AM

What's, with, all, the comma, action?,

Is, it, save, a comma, day?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 15, 2009 11:00 AM

What's, with, all, the comma, action?

We all, get a little, Shatner, sometimes.

Posted by: jM at June 15, 2009 12:52 PM

I'm happy about the success of The Hangover for two reasons. First, it means that we're likely to see Bradley Cooper in more movies. Second, it demonstrates that an R-rating needn't kill a movie. And if you, too, are putting these facts together and thinking "Re-release 'Wet Hot American Summer' as 'The Uncensored Version!'", well, that's just kinda pervy and I don't know where you'd have come up with such an idea. (Certainly not from the amateur film studio and Bradley Cooper mannequin in my basement)

Posted by: Shay at June 15, 2009 1:02 PM

There's a new Eddie Murphy movie?

Posted by: Jay at June 15, 2009 1:11 PM

Star Trek just opened here last Friday, and I FINALLY saw it and loved it. So, so much. I honestly never thought I'd like a STAR TREK movie this much. I'd gladly go watch it again and add to the Worldwide Box Office. Though...there really weren't that many people in the theater. I went at 4 and there were only 20 of us in the theater, and only a handful more for the next showing. I guess not many people here know Star Trek. They'd rather go watch Terminator *shudder*

Now I need to go give "Up" my money. It opened on Friday as well, but I decided to give it to ST, and I'm so very glad I did...

Posted by: figgy at June 15, 2009 1:57 PM

*EYEROLL*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at June 15, 2009 2:15 PM

HA!

Posted by: figgy at June 15, 2009 4:23 PM

Umm...so I guess 2011 will bring us The Hangover 2?

Posted by: Gigi Worthington at June 15, 2009 7:59 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time