free counter with statistics Box Office Results July 26, 2009 | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

the_ugly_truth_1.jpg
27 Million More Rainbows Murdered Over the Weekend


The Weekend Box-Office Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Box Office Round-Ups | July 27, 2009 | Comments (46)


How was your weekend, folks? Good, good. Glad to hear it. I had a great weekend, myself. Three of our “cabal” was at Comic-Con this weekend (we may have a couple more pieces going up today from the floor, but don’t miss Steven Lloyd Wilson’s flat-out brilliant man on the ground post. I’m really fucking proud of that piece. Otherwise, a few of the other writers also made it up to Maine to hang out for the weekend. We drank and OH MY FUCKING GOD A TALKING GUINEA PIG MOVIE IS THE NUMBER ONE FILM AT THE BOX OFFICE.

This is what it’s come to, huh? A poorly-reviewed, Bruckheimer-produced live-action talking animal movie featuring guinea pigs. Why won’t children listen to the critics?! What’s wrong with those goddamn seven year olds — have their brains been addled by too much Kool-Aid (do kids still drink Kool Aid, and if so, where is the Kool-Aid Man’s movie already?). Why do these snot-nosed brats always go for the lowest-common denominator? Have they no respect for themselves? Has Dora the Explorer ruined their minds? You know, back in my day, we were happy with movies about talking robots, like Short Circuit, or aliens that ate Reese’s Pieces, which everyone knows helps develop brain function. Now these goddamn kids want talking animals and CGI. The minds of our youth are being destroyed by Tracy Morgan! Can you imagine how upset the 8-year-olds of today will be in 20 years when they remake G-Force? Ha! They deserve it for making the movie the hit that it’s become.

Indeed, G-Force opened this weekend at number one, racking up an unexpected $32 million, which put it ahead of last week’s box-office victor, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince, which itself put up another $30 million. It represented a precipitous 61 percent drop, but with $221 million already, it’s five days ahead of where its predecessor was in terms of box office (It’s also added another $405 million internationally).

Katherine Heigl’s The Ugly Truth came in third place, with $27 million ($5 million short of where the other summer’s big romantic comedy, The Proposal, opened. Ha!). “The chemistry between Katherine Heigl and Gerard Butler is a blast. It’s really a lot of fun, everything we’d hoped it would be,” Rory Bruer, head of distribution for Sony said. “From sneak previews to word-of-mouth screenings we had on the movie, we knew people liked the movie. If I have a choice of deciding between what the audience’s opinion is going to be versus the critics’, I’ll definitely go with the audience’s every day, and they spoke loud and clear.”

Indeed they did, Rory. Indeed they did. Audiences just loved the talking guinea pig movie and The Ugly Truth. You must be so fucking proud. How refreshing that vapid, blathering idiocy spoke to the masses this weekend.

Orphan landed at number four this weekend, with $12.7 million, which is a much better showing than I expected. I have no idea where that puts it among evil children movies, but it’s good to see Peter Sarsgaard have his biggest opening since Jarhead in 2005.

It was a decent weekend for indie flicks, too. (500) Days of Summer continues to perform exceptionally well in limited release — it put up $1.6 million in only 85 theaters, landing in 11th place behind Bruno, which was still screening in nearly 2,000 theaters. The Hurt Locker expanded to over 200 theaters and added $1.5 million to its total while maintaining a decent per-screen average of around $6,000 per theater. In the Loop also opened solidly in four theaters, grossing $25,000 per location.

Last week, a few people quibbled with the relevance of per screen average for indie theaters, reasoning that they were strongly targeted in major markets and the numers were thus skewed. And while that’s true, and while it also may be unfair to compare the per screen average of a movie that opens in 8 theaters to one that opens in 4,000, the figures are still important in terms of whether the movie will continue to expand. A successful platform release needs at least $18,000 to $20,000 per screen in its first weekend to justify further expansion. (500) Days of Summer recorded $31,000 per screen last week, and held strong with nearly $20,000 in its second week in 85 theaters, which bodes well for its prospects (and more importantly, smaller markets are more likely to pick it up in coming weeks). In the Loop, likewise, should see modest expansion next week. However, Kevin Spacey’s Shrink opened in only two theaters and only grossed $8500 per screen. Based on those per screen numbers, the chances of it making it to Austin, much less Tulsa, are fairly slim. The Answer Man, likewise, opened poorly ($2,000 per venue in 13 theaters), and likely won’t get much play next weekend.

Anyway, for the curious, here are the top five movies of 2009 so far, all summer releases:

1. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen ($379 million)

2. Up ($273 million)

3. Star Trek ($254 million)

4. The Hangover ($247 million)

5. Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince ($221 million)

And finally, a local buddy of mine sent me this, which rivals the Wolverine slurpee in terms of ridiculous movie tie-ins: Transformers Bowling Gear. Yeesh.


transformersbowling.jpg


Stargate Universe Comic Con | TRON Legacy Teaser Trailer



Comments

you know, you coulda just LIED to us. put up some clever header pic, painted us a pretty picture.

i mean, jesus, i have to get up in the morning. and how am i going to get a good night's sleep NOW?

Posted by: gp at July 27, 2009 12:11 AM

OK...

WHAT THE FUCK, AMERICA?

What happened to Harry Potter mania? Really? What...what the hell is with that? what's going on?

Wasn't this supposed to be Warner's Huge Mega Awesome Hit of the Summer?

That just goes to show you don't make people wait an extra 6 months for your movie. In a way, I'm glad, because studios fucking around with release dates, then having it bite them in their asses is a good thing to watch. On the other hand...it's Harry Potter. It deserves better. Twilight: The Turditude 2 is going to make more money.

Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 12:44 AM

Where's the Battleship Potemkin review?

Here's what I think of you and your hipster douchebag Cabal


*grabbing my massive genitalia*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 27, 2009 12:46 AM

Ah, but you forgot to mention that that guinea pig monstrosity was shown in 3D at ridiculously hiked-up prices, which might be the reason it's #1.

Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 12:52 AM

Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 12:52 AM


Shouldn't you be joining a guerrilla?

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 27, 2009 12:58 AM

I AM the guerrilla!

Or...something. It's late.

Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 1:00 AM

...the chances of it making it to Austin, much less Tulsa, are fairly slim.

And yet, Rainbow Killer will be on at least two screens at the Eton Square Googolplex (nearest venue to my little place). One of the drawbacks to living in Tulsey-Town.

That said, Ms. Spender and our squiddo saw the latest Harry potter today. They are both huge fans of the books and the movies. Both were hugely disappointed and when fangirls of their order are disappointed that's honest criticism.

Posted by: Spender at July 27, 2009 1:01 AM

Twilight: The Turditude 2 is going to make more money.
Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 12:44 AM

Dear Fig:
Please to come and help me clean up beer what is now snorted out my nostrils and over my keyboard and tiny computer tv screen.
Many thank yous

Mister Spender

Posted by: Spender at July 27, 2009 1:07 AM

And I love Guerilla Girls. Really. Girls with guns... it's an obsession. And I hate guns.
But GIRLS with guns... Guerilla Girls with Guns... I just like the idea. Not sure why... just do.
And Yoplait fruit yogurt in the freezer. Awesome. You should try that. Just put one in the freezer and when it freezes, just eat it. Drink tequila when you eat it. Good tequila, not that Cuervo stuff. That is like the PBR of tequila. Seriously. And y'know what else? Monkeys are fucking cute as hell... on film. But even those really cute spider monkeys will bite the fuck out of you.
Mahhg.alnsoui1po48yu9p28

Posted by: Spender at July 27, 2009 1:14 AM

BWAHA. My work here is done.

And....yeah! tequila! woo!

But I don't think I'll have it with the yogurt. That sounds nasty.

Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 1:32 AM

*without

Dammit. I need to go to bed.

Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 1:38 AM

Actually, that movie tie in does make sense, if you really think about it. The movie has a transformer with balls, which ties in to bowling balls, and the bowling pins are compensation for Michael Bay's tiny dick.

Posted by: CptCrckpot at July 27, 2009 2:19 AM

My son and I have seen Harry Potter twice.

Not really because it was so all-fire great -- because it really wasn't -- but because we HAD to see it on opening day, but we couldn't tell my husband that we did that when he had to WORK all that day and into the evening and was too tired to even THINK about trying to see it by the time he got off work and besides by the time he DID get off work all the screenings were sold out anyway and then... when he was finally free to see it come Saturday... Terry and I agreed to just... pretend we hadn't seen it.

So there you have it. The beginning of lying for my son, and it began with me and Harry Potter and a blatant treachery against his father... and sure, it was to spare his feelings about having seen the movie without him... but still.

Now we have this cloud of guilt hanging over us. And what's worse... the only screening we could get into on Saturday was the 10PM show... and Terry fell asleep. So now Adam thinks that Terry hasn't seen the complete film. When, of course, he has. So -- get this -- now we have to COMPOUND the deception by waiting till Adam gets another job... and then telling him that I've taken Terry to see it AGAIN...

Oh, god.

And the weird thing is, you know... we didn't really LOVE the damned movie the first time around. It was... you know, okay. Certainly not as good as the book. It's not like they were able to do it justice. I mean, if they're going to split up The Deathly Hallows into two films (ostensibly to do IT justice, but we all know it's just to MILK the damned series for all it's got left), well, The Half-Blood Prince is just as long, for chrissakes. Did it it occur to anyone who was doing the long-range planning that they might as well split THAT one up, too? Hell, Potterites will suffer ANYTHING to make this thing last longer. Except -- as we've now seen -- having the release date yanked out from under us.

Assholes. Best not think about doing THAT shit again, eh?

(Actually -- I have to say -- Terry, the KID, thought it was "just okay." I actually thought it sucked. Really sucked. These films have got progressively worse as the series has moved along from The Goblet of Fire.. I thought maybe it was just me, that maybe I'm too picky, maybe I'm expecting miracles... but no. I know that it's only been two films since The Goblet of Fire, so maybe that's a harsh assessment, basically calling it a precipitous drop when perhaps it's just a stumble -- but hell, they've only GOT two films left of one book. They've fucked up part of Order of the Phoenix AND all of Half-Blood Prince - Prisoner of Azkaban and The Goblet of Fire were really the only thoroughly good ones after the two childish beginner films. So... what the fuck? Better hit a goddamned double with Deathly Hallows or you'll be the scourge of all fucking time.)

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at July 27, 2009 2:34 AM

eeeh, am i drinking to much or was maryscott's post a trancript of jane's addicttion "been caught stealing"

No

really?

why am I naked...

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at July 27, 2009 2:46 AM

What happened to Harry Potter mania? Really? What...what the hell is with that? what's going on?

I saw every film opening night at midnight when it came out...I have yet to see this one.

Posted by: Deistbrawler at July 27, 2009 4:02 AM

Maryscott makes me think and BSlim makes me laugh out loud.
I love this place.

Posted by: Spender at July 27, 2009 4:07 AM


I gotta agree with 'maryscott', the whole thing I felt was basically an insult. BUT I had to see it a second time. My mom was in mexico and maybe seeing it with her instead of the indifferent boyfriend, I wouldn't rant for 20 mintues afterward.

Le sigh, my mom even proclaimed that she wasn't gonna see the next one... Yeah that's obvs not gonna happen and that's how they've got us 'Potterphiles/whatever the fuck you wanna you wanna call us.

Seriously no end battle! Grrr, my sister called home from camp and she goes into the errs of HP. Even as a movie it sucked. Harry should've been immbolized! That I feel is some Han shot first thing that I'm too young to remember, except it was the other dude, with helmet head.

Anywhoo, it's 6am in rainy Toronto and I can't sleep.This has got me all riled up maybe I'll work on my resume and find an adult person job, Le sigh.

Posted by: kilmo at July 27, 2009 6:10 AM

Yeah, the last two HP novels were, to me, a let down after the 5th, which makes the movies less enticing.

That said, the reason for the big drop could also just be that true-to-the-bone Harry Potter fans rushed out opening weekend before the movie could be spoiled (much like how I read the 7th book in the weekend it came out so no one at work on Monday could ruin the ending, boy wasn't that a waste of a weekend...).

If the Twilight movie saw a similar drop in numbers from opening weekend to the second, it could be so. I don't remember, and I'm too lazy to look it up.

Posted by: Lindsay at July 27, 2009 7:58 AM

I can’t until “Funny People” comes out, the sack sniffers will be out in full force no doubt, what with Martin Scorapatow directing it.

Posted by: Guess Who! at July 27, 2009 8:20 AM

*wait*

Posted by: Guess Who! at July 27, 2009 8:27 AM

Lindsay, you and many like you are the main reason we now find ourselves in this economic calamity. You all will go out and read all seven books of Harry Potter but will not spend two minutes reading the fine print on your credit card agreement.

Posted by: Guess Who! at July 27, 2009 8:39 AM

In a rare case of cinematic compromise, I'm willing to forgive the omissions committed by the Harry Potter movies. I shouldn't be; in all other aspects of the "genre" movie world, I'm bitter and angry and cynical and realistic and all of that stuff that a smart person who loves movies is driven toward by the state of "fun" cinema these days.

I loved the Potter books, and at no time did I ever finish one of them and think, "that would've been PERFECT if they had just gutted out about 1/3 of it." I have no hope of understanding the minds of people who think that something that is excellent can be too long, be it a book or a movie.

In some way, however, I've been able to accept the Potter films as abridged and beautifully shot curiosities. I think it's because all 7 years of the story have already been shown in the best cinema there is, my noodle. I've already "seen" the ultimate version of this property, so anything that some folks make in a studio is going to be second rate anyway.

However, some properties are still waiting for an intelligent and legitimate turn at having their stories told. When I was a child in Tulsa, where indie movies come late if at all (Moon, YAY!) and I was playing with my G. I. Joe and Transformers toys, at no time do I remember ever thinking, "WOW, this is awesome, I hope that one day they make feature length movies of this stuff wherein they take the stupidest and most retarded aspects of the subject matter and their ham-handed cartoon storytelling formats and blow that up to silver-screen proportions".

Maybe that's why I can handle the Potter movies; they're abridged and sometimes gutted versions of the books, but they're still good movies, and they still have some dignity.

Posted by: laredo at July 27, 2009 9:37 AM

Last week, a few people quibbled with the relevance of per screen average for indie theaters, reasoning that they were strongly targeted in major markets and the numers were thus skewed. And while that’s true, and while it also may be unfair to compare the per screen average of a movie that opens in 8 theaters to one that opens in 4,000, the figures are still important in terms of whether the movie will continue to expand.

I quibbled and thanks for addressing it. It's appreciated. It was so much the figure itself being reported, rather how it was reported, comparing per screen figures for small indie flicks against per screen figures for mega-releases, which sort of implied the "had this indie film opened in that many theaters, it would have made more money" argument.

I actually think the comparisons above, among similarly situated indie flicks (e.g., Shrink and In The Loop and The Hurt Locker and 500 Days of Summer), is really quite interesting for the reasons you mentioned.

Thanks for the hard work and keep it up.

Posted by: Forbiddendonut at July 27, 2009 9:39 AM

Up until the posted box-office results, my deluded hopes of "G-Force" not finding an audience were still in play (I know, I know it was about as baseless as hoping the Earth was flat). With the movie's success of milking the "idiot family" demographic, we are assured a further affliction of cinematic bubonic plague as brought to us by various incarnations of related sequels, TV animated series and a tsunami of merchandising dreck.

But that's not the worse of it. I would like to speak of the impending guinea pig holocaust in the form of the spoiled crotchfruit everywhere who will be demanding their chuzzel-wit parents to go out to their local pet store and purchase a hapless rodent of their very own- only to be thoroughly outraged when the hapless creatures cannot talk, walk upright, or otherwise entertain them. The carnage will shift into overdrive, when they decide to force them to make like Lee Majors and participate in involuntary stunt work in inadvertent mass homage to "Beavis & Butt-Head".

Actually in all likelihood, these kids will be just be disappointed that guinea pigs are just like most animals; you have to feed them, water them, clean up after them and give them time and affection- none of which the majority of them will want to bother with. If it cannot act like participant in a Michael Bay wet dream and have an "OFF" switch, it will be neglected and discarded when the next noisy thing comes along.

And while this rant may sound silly, it isn't without precedence. Anytime Disney has released a "101 Dalmatians" related project, the demand for the spotted dog skyrocketed. The breed was never a good one for children to begin with and due to over breeding, it has left many people with deaf or otherwise defective dogs. The difference being that dogs are far more likely to gain public sympathies over something that would just as likely chew your electrical wires as let you pet it.

Posted by: bleujayone at July 27, 2009 9:39 AM

What happened to Harry Potter mania? Really? What...what the hell is with that? what's going on?

Could it be that word got out the latest entry ain't all that?

Hot damn, it was good to spend a week at the beach with no idea what was happening back in movie-land.

Posted by: Cindy at July 27, 2009 9:42 AM

wait.
the earth isn't flat?

Posted by: gp at July 27, 2009 9:45 AM

Harry Potter might make some more coin this weekend...it's being released in IMAX as of Wed. night. That's right, I waited for IMAX! If I'm going to be disappointed, it's going to be on a scale that fills my field of vision and makes love to my ears. (Besides, I saw Transformers in IMAX, so this is the tonic to wash away the pain.)

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at July 27, 2009 10:05 AM

Dustin, you've got it all wrong. It's not the kids fault that they go and see a shittastic movie about hamsters; It's the parent's fault. It's the parent's fault because they figure it's just easier to give the spoiled little shits what they want instead of teaching them that life is hard and most kids movies suck flacid donkey dick.

It's the parents fault for handing their child money that the little parasite hasn't earned and, therefore, has no respect for it's value. It's the parent's fault for not making the kid understand that by throwing your money away on crap, they will only encourage the production of more crap. This is why, in twenty years, the little bastard will be up to his neck in shit because he doesn't know any better and will consider themselves normal.

Parents, why won't you think of the children? I believe I make a strong argument for mass sterilization.

Posted by: admin at July 27, 2009 10:14 AM

The term "idiot family demographic" is both amusing and gutting, because, dammit, it's true.

IFDs. It's like the stateside equivalent of an IED.

"We were enroute to the movie when we came across an IFD at 41st and Yale; giant pickup with fishing stickers on it, trying to make a left turn from the right-hand lane. Then we took another hit from a different IFD in the theatre; yep...fat kid in race car t-shirt kicking the seat".

Posted by: laredo at July 27, 2009 10:30 AM

I am a bit confused by those that are disappointed in HP6. In the books there is so much info that is internalized that it cannot be placed on a screen very well, unless you give the characters cartoon bubbles to express their thoughts.

Are there priceless little things missing, sure. I would have loved to have seen the opening part in the Prime Minister's office, I thought that exchange to be really well written. I thought the biggest oversight was nothing with the Gaunt house. To see Voldemort's mother and father as well as tying up the part of Dumbledore's withering hand. Especially since it was the second horcrux to be found and would have explained why Dumbledore was a bit lax about his life at the end, and we lost the exchange of Snape asking whether or not he wanted him offed in his office. (It was the only place he has ever showed a sense of humor). Bottom line is along as they begin with the funeral, then all major points were hit.

I have no issue with Harry not be immobilized, because he would have been attacked 7 to 1. The next movie will start with the funeral and will cut to a rebuilt Burrow for the wedding and Dumbledore's will. They had best not cut the part of Harry saying good-bye to his family but I feel as though that will go.

I have looked at this series as book two and six as being bridges to more important points, and hopefully the last two movie will show this to be true. I think the last two installments will be a bit more thorough since they have 5 hours to do it in.

Posted by: richmac at July 27, 2009 11:06 AM

My friends and I want to see Harry Potter, however they don't release the IMAX version until this week, so we've been waiting. Which doesn't make any sense to me since I believe previously the IMAX version came out at the same time.

Posted by: DoubleH at July 27, 2009 11:13 AM

I would like to speak of the impending guinea pig holocaust in the form of the spoiled crotchfruit everywhere who will be demanding their chuzzel-wit parents to go out to their local pet store and purchase a hapless rodent of their very own

bleujayone knows of what he/she speaks. I was in the pet store this weekend for fish food, and saw this phenomenon in action.

Posted by: Drake at July 27, 2009 12:04 PM

Not surprised that Harry Potter 6 fell like it did. When the fanboys/girls' reaction is one akin to the "Lucas raped my childhood" antics, you can be sure you are not going to get their repeat business.

As for G-Force, i blame the parents of America; overstressed and undersexed and grateful for the talking CGI stereotypes and their ability to distract junior long enough for dad to get a handjob in the popcorn tub and mom to get diddled with the box of Raisinettes.

Posted by: Fredo at July 27, 2009 12:21 PM

I haven't seen the 6th Harry Potter yet, but...it can't be worse than #5 can it? #5 was pretty horrible.

Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 12:32 PM

Have we considered the idea that maybe lemmings are forgoing cliffs and buying movie tickets instead?

I mean, lemmings really are just even crazier guinea pigs right?

Posted by: Kayanne at July 27, 2009 1:01 PM

And I love Guerilla Girls. Really. Girls with guns... it's an obsession. And I hate guns.
But GIRLS with guns... Guerilla Girls with Guns... I just like the idea. Not sure why... just do.

Posted by: Spender at July 27, 2009 1:14 AM

I AM the guerrilla!

Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 1:00 AM
---
Be it here resolved: That Pajibanation will allow a "Commando" remake to go forward IF and only IF figgy stars. And it's called "Grrrrrlla."

All in favor signify by posting "aye."

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at July 27, 2009 1:36 PM

I saw the latest Harry Potter movie and I wasn't too impressed with it. I was expecting it to end with a bang in anticipation of the two part conclusion of the series but instead it really ended kind of blah.

Posted by: John W at July 27, 2009 3:27 PM

Aye! But she has to make cookies too.

Posted by: admin at July 27, 2009 3:58 PM

Hey Dusty - if you're going to apprehend my material for your own unfunny bits at least give me the courtesy of a reach-around.

That being said I’d like to take this opportunity to comment on a very disturbing trend (More disturbing than Dan Carlson’s hairline actually…or that Dusty can actually have the gall to name himself Pajiba Publisher, which I’m certain just means that he’s the one who pays the hosting fees for this schlock - if that’s true please do us all a favor and get a faster server {Jesus, and I thought ScienceGeek was slow…})…

Now where was I…? Oh yeah, the disturbing development that is the ‘Apatow that ate my Cineplex’ phenomenon…When I first saw the poster for Funny People featuring Seth Rogen with his head of Adam Sandler’s shoulder I threw up a little in my mouth. Now if someone had told me that Apatow had remade Jules & Jim and there would be at least one scene where Leslie Mann pleasured herself whilst Rogen porked Adam Sandler I would be the first one in line for that spectacle. Now however, I am vaguely aware that this film will feature no such porking and thus I can only mutter the famous online slogan: WTF?!?!?

Not since Jerry Lewis thought it would be a good idea to make a holocaust movie would I have thought Judd Apatow could conceive of a notion like this one… Attention. Attention Ladies and Germs: We have a train wreck leaving on Platform 9.

NOW, I also see the ad for “Paper Heart” (Advertised by our good buddies at Pajiba!) and I think to myself that we are just mere moments away from the merciful backlash that this misbegotten Rat Pack so richly deserves… It would be akin to each of Dusty’s posse striking out on their own and littering cyberspace with their own unique brand of independent “bits” that they were absolutely certain would delight and tickle the funny bone only to discover that the only thing it’s tickling is my ball sack… oh…’Slowly going ba…what?’ … uhh…never mind…

Here’s the thing about the Seth Rogens of the world – he’s this generation’s Tiny Tim: Take away the ukulele and “Tiptoe through the tulips….” from Tiny and you got…nuthin’ much…Take away Rogen’s bong pipe and you’ve got…Tiny Tim… There’s a mathematical equation in there somewhere but I’ll let ScienceGeek and BucDaddy hash that out (Get it? Rogen…hash…?! Hey! I’m a Funny Person! Can I pork Leslie Mann while Sandler teabags me?!)

Posted by: The Real Joe at July 27, 2009 4:48 PM

Remember when Tina Fey said if McCain/Palin won the election she was leaving Earth? In light of recent events (that fucking steaming pile of shit talking gerbil movie being number one), I'm thinking of putting something together to do just that. There is clearly no hope for the human race, if this is the kind of drivel that is created for and watched by the youngest generation. So I'm peacing out.

Posted by: Jeni at July 27, 2009 5:06 PM

"...I’m really fucking proud of that piece. Otherwise, a few of the other writers also made it up to Maine to hang out for the weekend. We drank and OH MY FUCKING GOD A TALKING GUINEA PIG MOVIE IS THE NUMBER ONE FILM AT THE BOX OFFICE...."


Somewhere Ernest Hemingway is reinserting the shotgun in his mouth...top notch writing there Dusty. So...oh I don't know...fucking great...?

Posted by: The Real Joe at July 27, 2009 5:07 PM

Also, Harry Potter movies are for the fun, cool, and festive fall/holiday season and not the sticky gross flip-flops and parking-lot diapers summer months.

I guess Warner Bros. looked at the schedule for the summer and thought, "against that shit? hell, why not..."

Posted by: laredo at July 27, 2009 5:31 PM

I didn't know Transformers was that far ahead. I literally do not know a single person who's seen it. OR else they're keeping that info from me.

Saw Hurt Locker and really dug it. Liked 2-5 on the toppers so far and probably going to see Half-Blood Prince one more time. Deathly Hallows, the book, of course, is coming to me in the mail at this moment.

Posted by: Jackseppelin at July 27, 2009 5:31 PM

So, I got dragged to Rainbow Killer's latest abortion by my mother and sister-in-law. We all got fucking food poisoning from the movie butter on our popcorn. The food poisoning was more fun and I had better chemistry hugging my toilet than Kathryn Heigl had with Gerard Butler. That is all.

Posted by: jlynn_9 at July 27, 2009 7:09 PM

I didn't know Transformers was that far ahead. I literally do not know a single person who's seen it. OR else they're keeping that info from me.

Consider yourself lucky, Jacksepplin. I have a coworker who won't stop talking about it. He thinks it was absolutely hilarious - especially the "twin robots" (I assume he means the ones that are being criticized for being blatant racial stereotypes). He's already seen it twice.

Posted by: MelBivDevoe at July 27, 2009 10:20 PM

I win the contest for Worst Relative.

My brother invited us all to watch Harry Potter this weekend. My sister actually said these words:

"I'm gonna go watch Transformers 2 again. I'd rather give that my money than Harry Potter."

That, added to her honest love for Twilight, has led me to almost completely shun her out of my life. Good God I can't look at her the same way again.

Posted by: figgy at July 27, 2009 11:49 PM