free counter with statistics Box Office Results August 23, 2009 | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

2673_9206425276.jpg
Note to Hollywood: People Like Watching Nazis Getting Killed


The Weekend Box Office Round-Up / William Goss

Box Office Round-Ups | August 24, 2009 | Comments (42)


In a summer that gave us Transformers: The End of Western Civilization As We Know It, it’s heartening to see people turn out in ample numbers to see the mostly subtitled and fairly smart likes of District 9 last week and Inglourious Basterds this week. Granted, they each happen to have a violent climax that goes well with popcorn, but after the former managed an opening weekend of $37 million as what one presumes was the unofficial last hurrah of summer, Basterds racked up the exact same amount this time around, helping keep the Weinsteins marginally afloat and screwing with proper spelling and historical consistency for generations to come. (D-9 was number two with $18.9m, for what it’s worth.)

It’s all the more impressive because said future generations couldn’t turn out to either R-rated film on their own, leaving them to buy tickets for G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra (number three, $12.5 million) instead and then sneak in while the ushers weren’t looking. Or they went with their girlfriends to The Time Traveler’s Wife (number four, $10 million), seeing as they already knew the ending (thanks, McAdams) and were thus guaranteed some head in return for the timely supply of tissues. (Barring that, they went to see Julie & Julia — number five, $9 million — and settled for handjobs.)

The other half of the unofficial Grindhouse reunion didn’t turn out as hot, as Robert Rodriguez’s Shorts drew in a mere $6.6 million in sixth place — even less than Aliens in the Attic had when dumped as the token family option a few weeks back. At any rate, something tells me that Leslie Mann, Kat Dennings and William H. Macy’s mustache will all escape this particularly spazzy anthology unscathed, though it should be noted that this, G-Force and Harry Potter (number seven and eight, respectively) were all more welcome family options than the week’s other wide release, Post Grad, which opened at number ten with $2.8 million, likely insuring that star Alexis Bledel sticks to Sin City sequels and the next adventures of the Traveling Pants.

The Ugly Truth clung to the Top Ten at number nine. (500) Days of Summer dropped to number 13. Somewhere, Guess Who! strokes himself.

Something called My One and Only opened to the largest per-screen average of the week. It stars Renee Zellweger. I bet she squints in it.


Pegg Joins Landis' Burke and Hare | Wizard of Oz News



Comments

I'm glad to know people like to watch Nazi's get killed, Eli Roth definitely lost family in the Holocaust, which, in addition to being a sociopath, probably inspired him to be as brutal as possible for the film.

I bet that racist fuck Pat Buchanan hated Inglorious Basterds.

Posted by: George at August 23, 2009 5:58 PM

*SPOILER ALERT FOR INGLORIOUS BASTERDS*

But did no-one else feel the whole Hitler thing was a bit much?? I mean, I've seen the film & loved it, & know there's arguments for the whole tongue in cheek aspect or it being revenge-porn, but that ending still made me feel really uncomfortable.

Posted by: onewing at August 23, 2009 6:23 PM

I guess it's just good to know that Eli Roth hates something more than vaginas.

Posted by: TSF at August 23, 2009 6:23 PM

Nope. Watching the entire Nazi High Command die was extremely satisfying.

The only thing was that as I watched that scene, I began to here echoes of Saving Private Ryan in my head. "Don't Shoot!! Let 'em Burn!!"

Does that make me a bad person?

Posted by: alphawhiskey at August 23, 2009 6:39 PM

*hear

Posted by: alphawhiskey at August 23, 2009 6:46 PM

Yes, yes it does. In fact, it makes you as bad as him, how do you sleep at night??
Ha, fair enough, just me then, promise to leave my moral qualms at the door next time I watch it - which I definately will, if only for
"BONJOURNO!"
Classic.

Posted by: onewing at August 23, 2009 6:51 PM

What the fuck? Did no one see Ponyo? Ponyo wants ham! And now she can't buy any ham because no one went to see her movie! Now she's gonna have to turn tricks on Ste. Catherine to pay for her delicious ham addiction.

Please don't let me on this site when I'm drunk.

Posted by: Jeremy Feist at August 23, 2009 7:03 PM

Col. Landa: A glass of milk for the lady.

Audience: GASP!

Posted by: laredo at August 23, 2009 7:07 PM

"That's a bingo!"

Posted by: onewing at August 23, 2009 7:14 PM

Oh man, I pulled a double feature today of District 9 and Inglourious Basterds. I liked District 9 aside from having to close my eyes and tilt my head down towards my lap every five minutes because MY GOD THE SHAKY CAM!!!! I get it, it's 'edgy' it's 'raw', it makes me ill. That's not what I want movies to do. Buh. Also, it permanently colors my opinion of the movie no matter how hard I try to separate the two.

I think I giggled all through Basterds. That was just a whole lot of fun right there. I mean, yeah, it's complete fantasy but anyone going to a Quentin Tarantino movie looking for a history lesson has a few screws loose anyway. And I want the dress that Diane Kruger wore at the end. Badly.

Posted by: Rusty (formerly Genny) at August 23, 2009 7:49 PM

I loved Inglorious Basterds, as did my girlfriend, but I'm trying really hard not to over-analyze it (as I have a feeling it won't hold up well under scrutiny). With the exception of the bar scene (which was about 15-20 minutes too long), the movie entertained me from beginning to end. And the guy who played Landa was fucking excellent. Did anyone see shades of Javier Bardem in a few scenes? Because I did. Plus, he was the perfect eccentric villain. My favorite kind!

Posted by: Christian H. at August 23, 2009 7:49 PM

YES Laredo! Tarantino grabbed a handful of my shorthairs with that one.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at August 23, 2009 9:46 PM

Saw Basterds yesterday. Loved it. Hans Landa stole the fucking show!

Posted by: yocean at August 23, 2009 10:26 PM

I actually let out a groan when Michael Fassbender raises up his 3 fingers when asking for 3 drinks. I knew at that moment their cover was blown.

Damn!

As for the ending, if only we could transport Eli Roth back to 1944 and give him the chance to do it for real, I'd be willing to take every bad word I've ever said about him.

Posted by: Fredo at August 23, 2009 10:30 PM

I liked it better when there were less creepers writing things for this site. sigh....

Posted by: Kate at August 24, 2009 12:42 AM

It's amazing to me that even after the huge spoiler tag for IB in the second comment (thank you, onewing), some people still felt it necessary to include IB spoilers in their comments without giving warnings. To the people failing to give spoiler warnings, please go fuck yourself.

Posted by: little ya at August 24, 2009 12:52 AM

I saw I.B. yesterday, and...

I dunno. I'm really torn here. I, for one, did not really feel that whole argument of Tarantino striving to be young or cool or hip or what-have-you. As a matter of fact, I thought it was his most mature work to date (not including Pulp Fiction, and sorry, but Jackie Brown was so bad, I'm thankful I never saw that shit in theaters, otherwise I would've pricked my eye out with my then-four dollar soda straw). I thought it was very impressive in that standpoint.

But...

I felt that there were many scenes that were waaaaaay too long. The bar scene, the scene with Mike Myers...and a few more that I can't recall, but I felt ran a bit long. In all the other scenes, I was so anxious to see either the basterds or Landa that everything felt so long in comparison. I mean, Shoshanna (I hope that's right, but I'm betting it's wrong) and her character scenes were amazing, but even in some, and I mean very few, scenes seemed to be longer than I wished they were. I just stayed there thinking, "For a movie named after the primary group in question, they sure don't appear too often."

I dunno. In scenes without Landa or ANY of the Basterds, it seemed to drag. Too much talk that, at points, felt so unnecessary, but only served as a means to keep reading. Thank God a lot of the conversations were subtitled (thus making the audience member read), because if it were entirely in English, it would've been infinitely boring.

Again, that's my opinion, please don't kill me.

***SPOILER ALERT***

What the hell was the girl's problem after she shot that man in the back like five times, then she goes and checks on him all softly and shit? Always, always, always, and this applies to all genres of film, after the bad guy is downed by several bullets and is face down in the floor, put a bullet in the back of his head, THEN turn him over. She deserved to die if she didn't make sure that man was dead to begin with.

And...surprisingly, I didn't find the Louisville Slugger scene all that disturbing. I was expecting a prosthetic head filled with jelly to be used, and show full-on the head being crushed in with every blow. But the camera switches to a farther angle, and it wasn't as bad. Huh. Maybe just me then.

Posted by: Riley at August 24, 2009 2:14 AM

Riley >> She deserved to die? Because she made some mistake that disqualifies her from knowing the "rules" of movies? Can't we take it at face value that the character doesn't know she's just a character in a movie and might be making an error as any human being might? I think you missed the point of that scene.

Regardless of how he had snapped at her and what he and his uniform represented, Shoshanna still felt compassion for him and acknowledged his humanity. This merciful impulse differentiates her from the Basterds, Landa and the Nazis who killed her family, and anyone else who might not give mercy. That was her undoing, and it's a tragic potential peril in war.

Additionally, it was the power of film - her seeing his conflicted feelings about having killed so many soldiers from that tower on the screen - that spurred her humane impulse. It's a somewhat "meta" message given her love of film, his love of film, Tarantino's obvious love of film, the method she chose to taunt the Nazi leadership she would imminently kill, and the vicarious excitement that we as an audience would experience in reaction to this alternate-universe Nazi slaughter.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 24, 2009 4:44 AM

Oh shit, I'm going to have to see this film so that I can make my points with a degree of validity, but I get the feeling I won't like the fact that the most 'entertaining' character, and a brilliant 'villain', is a Nazi colonel. Or am I the only fucking stick-in-the-mud, joyless, earnest bastard (sic) who likes to see history and morality respected in movies?

Anyway - yeah, I'll see the movie and get back to you.

Posted by: Caspar at August 24, 2009 6:01 AM

There is one golden point about IB and that is that the utterly bizarre scene with Mike Myers reminds us the horror that would have been Austin Powers 4: Austin Fights the Nazis.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at August 24, 2009 6:20 AM

Number of ***SPOILER ALERT!!!*** notices in this comment thread so far: 2
Actual number of spoilers: 1,ooo,ooo.

Posted by: AdaHaze at August 24, 2009 7:34 AM

Fuck sake everyone. Quit complaining about spoilers... shit is so annoying, of course there are going to be spoilers in here.

EVERYONE DIES EXCEPT BRAD PITT AND BJ NOVAK!

End spoiler.

Posted by: Colin at August 24, 2009 9:20 AM

Thank you Colin. My reasoning is that the first Alert at the top of the comment page continues to apply to all following comments.

Posted by: alphawhiskey at August 24, 2009 9:24 AM

Too bad nobody thought to put up a review of Ingleryuhs Bahstids for you guys to vent your thoughts there. Feel free to just pepper the site with your brilliant insights just about anywhere you please. Dogs and lions crap wherever they want to, why not you? I understand, it's all the way down there, and this article's right up here. Besides, you might get one of those godawful full page ads and then you've lost your whole day.

Posted by: hatemail at August 24, 2009 9:51 AM

"Don't Shoot!! Let 'em Burn!!"

Why the hell was I dreaming about rooting out a Wehrmacht platoon on Normany with a faulty flamethrower last night? I mean, they were coming out of the bunker and the damn flame just wouldn't throw! It was just sitting there like a lighter and I was continually amazed that I hadn't been shot yet.

Been watching "The Longest Day" too much I guess. That or "Rushmore".

Posted by: Jay at August 24, 2009 9:57 AM

Too bad nobody thought to put up a review of Ingleryuhs Bahstids for you guys to vent your thoughts there.

It's the fourth story on the main page.

Posted by: Jay at August 24, 2009 9:59 AM

Since I haven't seen the movie, I can't possibly give SPOILERs, but . . . Stupid Tarantino. Doesn't he know that if you kill the bad guy, you can't make a sequel. Dumbass.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 24, 2009 10:10 AM

Too bad nobody thought to put up a review of Ingleryuhs Bahstids for you guys to vent your thoughts there.

It's the fourth story on the main page.

Oh, Marian the Librarian, when will somebody love you?

Posted by: hatemail at August 24, 2009 10:37 AM

Inglorious Basterds is the Watchmen of WWII movies, in that it not only is an alternate version of history but also that it could have been better while still being a good movie. As always, a few notes...

- Landa stole the movie, and that's a bingo.
- Brad Pitt should play more "matinee idol" parts that require him to grow a thin moustache.
- B.J. Novak was sorely underused.
- Samuel L. Jackson & Michael Madsen FTW.
- Eli Roth IS the Bear Jew. I'm sorry, but he's earned a pass in my book.
- Quentin Tarantino is the only person who could get away with using a David Bowie song in a WWII movie.

If there's one thing everyone should take away from this film, it's that if Quentin Tarantino was the Supreme Allied Commander, this is how World War II would have ended.

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at August 24, 2009 10:54 AM

I apologize for my lack of spoiler warning. I was responding directly to a point in the thread above, but I still should have included it.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at August 24, 2009 11:56 AM

Is it just me, or could Tarantino use a lesson from a local history book?

I mean, how can you have a Jewish revenge fantasy film against the nazis and not include Heinrich Himmler in all of this?

...He was the head of the SS, the head of the Gestapo, and in 1944 was the real 2nd in command and if anyone deserves getting beaten or shot multiple times it's him.

Posted by: Some Guy at August 24, 2009 12:50 PM

I haven't seen the movie yet, but I love how people are already nitpicking about historical accuracy.

Spoiler: It's a movie.

Goddam...

Posted by: Slash at August 24, 2009 1:11 PM

I can't help it if you're pissily ignorant. Or ignorantly pissy. There's probably a distinction there but I'm not sure.

Posted by: Jay at August 24, 2009 1:26 PM

I'm still finding it funny that people are getting pissed off because of lack of SPOILERS about a HISTORY movie.

Titantic: THE BOAT SINKS
WWII: THE GERMANS LOOSE, THE JAPANESE LOOSE

If you don't know this by now, go back to school.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 24, 2009 3:50 PM

Or: LOSE

Cause I need to go back to school.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 24, 2009 3:52 PM

SPOILER ALERT FOR WW2: Shit gets blowed up and people get machine gunned down.

Posted by: Fredo at August 24, 2009 10:28 PM

*SPOILER ALERT for THE BIBLE*

The Devil did it.

*END SPOILER*

Posted by: alphawhiskey at August 24, 2009 11:22 PM

"I'm still finding it funny that people are getting pissed off because of lack of SPOILERS about a HISTORY movie."

You haven't seen this film, have you? Either that or you & I had veeeeeeery different history books in school.

Posted by: onewing at August 25, 2009 2:48 AM

Onewing: I know they changed the ending so it doesn't match real history. Ooooooops. SPOILER. Am I late?

Posted by: BWeaves at August 25, 2009 10:00 AM

Ooooh, I'm so telling little ya on you...

Posted by: onewing at August 25, 2009 11:53 AM

Whoopsie, in my eagerness to tattle tale I went crazy with the bold. Still not as bold as you though BWeaves, you gonna be in trouble....

Posted by: onewing at August 25, 2009 11:57 AM

*SPOILER ALERT*

The French are still pussies.

Posted by: L.O.V.E. at August 25, 2009 5:10 PM