web
counter
 

American Filmgoers Prove Once Again How Boring and Predictable We Are

By Dustin Rowles | Posted Under Box Office Round-Ups | Comments (12)



Saw 7 Movie in 3D.jpg

Another Halloween, another Saw installment taking the top spot over the weekend, putting up a respectable $24 million, which is better than last year’s $14 million, but less than the $30+ million that Saws II through V put up on their opening weekends.

If we keep returning to the trough, they’ll keep feeding us gruel. If they give us gruel in 3D, we’ll pay more for it. We are in movies as we are in politics: We take the predictable choices, the easy ones, the ones we understand. We’ll choose between the two major parties (Saw or Paranormal Activity, which knocked back another $17 million, good for second place), rather than look to the often superior, less predictable third-party candidates (in many cities, you also had choices like Catfish, Buried, Conviction, The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest, or Monsters.

But why challenge ourselves when we can watch another iteration of the same goddamn movie? We reward the rich, and then claim it’s superior because it made the most money.

I saw this comment left over on Deadline today, and it sadly illustrates the thought process behind too many moviegoers:

This is the reason so many in Hollywood love this site. Saw which makes money is trashed. While Lena Dunham gets lauded for transforming a crappy festival film no one will see into an HBO show that no one will watch and a movie deal for the female Greenberg. The only people who will make any money on that deal is UTA who convinced their friends at the studios to flush stockholder’s money down the toilet. I’ve said it many times, there’s a reason 70% of Hollywood films lose money. These people hate their audiences and have nothing but contempt for stockholders.

I’m powerless to refute that argument. The reasoning behind it makes me too sad.

We’ve become a country that’s run by stockholders.

Red, Jackass 3D and Hereafter round out the top five.










Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 10/31/10 | Blitz Trailer | The Statham. 'Nuff Said.









Comments

Commie

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 31, 2010 8:23 PM

loser^^

Posted by: Taylor Kozakar at October 31, 2010 8:34 PM

I believe the phrase you are looking for is "Commie pinko".

Posted by: Brenton at October 31, 2010 8:48 PM

Money talks, bullshit walks.

Posted by: Jen at October 31, 2010 9:06 PM

I am wondering when "OW My Balls" will come out. When it does Dustin, you should see it, it's a comedy and it might cheer you up *G*.

Posted by: mc-rox at October 31, 2010 9:56 PM

Personally I'm looking forward to the film adaptation of the TV classic "The Munsters" starring Dwayne Johnson and Megan Fox as the eponymous couple.

*twitch* I hope no one in Hollywood was listening. My girlfriend would kill me. So hard.

Posted by: Wintermute at October 31, 2010 11:02 PM

Eh, it was Halloween weekend. Horror movies always make bank this weekend; unfortunately the horror movies that came out recently are crap.

Posted by: Maureen at October 31, 2010 11:20 PM

So, you're saying that the movie made 20% less than its predecessors, despite the supposed value-add of 3D and generally higher ticket prices? A glass-full sort of person would say this indicates theater-goers are quite well aware that crap in 3D is crap, squared.

And as Maureen points out, you're supposed to go see these kind of movies on Halloween weekend, and unfortunately Hollywood offered no other option this year.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at November 1, 2010 2:16 AM

I looked through the movie listings trying to find something to see. Guess what? Didn't see anything. Not cause I didn't want to, but because my only choices were overpriced gruel. So I didn't eat at the trough.

Always take that into account. Yes, Americans like to see shiny crap, but at times, it's all that's offered. So what comes first -- the shitty movie or the audience making the shitty movie a success?

Posted by: Fredo at November 1, 2010 2:38 AM

How dare people see a horror film on Halloween!


And then you have the gall to list several shit films to see instead. Give me a break.

When The Social Network was number 1, do people say things like "oh how sophisticated of the US"
France can have The Visitors or Heartbreaker be huge successes but god forbid similar films become successful over here. We're just too dumb to like anything else I guess.

Posted by: please at November 1, 2010 5:06 AM

This critique comes from the same guy that creamed all over himself, his chair, his staff, the internet and his readers over Jack-off Abram's Star Trek: The Shaky Cam Generation.

Cry me a fucking river, Susan.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at November 1, 2010 7:40 AM

I saw "RED" as a horror movie because now all those old actors will go home to die.

Sweet mother of Godtopus, did Helen Mirren look old, even made up to the 9s. Looked great in a dress, though.

Posted by: , at November 1, 2010 10:56 AM