free counter with statistics A Night Watchman, The Silent Protector, The Dark Knight | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

batman-dark-knight.jpg

A Night Watchman, The Silent Protector, The Dark Knight

The Summer 2008 Box Office Round-Up / Dustin Rowles

Box Office Round-Ups | September 2, 2008 | Comments (50)


As the summer of 2008 comes to a close, it’s time to step back, take a look at the carnage, and separate the winners from the losers, and then laugh at the losers and throw things at them. It was a most unusual summer, this 2008, in that the top two movies actually deserved their spots; compare that to recent summers, where directors only had to put a 3 on the end of the title (Spider Man 3 or Shrek the Third, Star Wars Episode III), use 90% of the budget on explosives (Transformers), or taint the hell out of a surprise hit (Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest). In fact, the last time a summer movie that was certifiably decent actually came out on top was 2002’s original Spiderman (notice how I left out the LoTR films? Yeah. I did that for a reason.)

As always, it’s more fun to poke sticks at the losers, and the summer of 2008 had plenty of them. Highest on the list was the Wachowski Brothers’ Speed Racer, which ended the term with a meager $43 million, or about a tenth of its production budget (for some perspective, note that College Road Trip — starring Martin Lawrence and Donny Osmond — pulled in $45 million). The other big stinker, sadly, was The X-Files movie, which barely eked out $20 million, proving that you can’t wait six goddamn years after a long-suffering television show has left the network to resurrect it on the big screen. It’s the sort of disaster that can drive you to sex addiction. Rainn Wilson’s The Rocker also won’t top $10 million before its run ends, either. Elsewhere, both The Happening ($63 million) and Hellboy II ($75 million) underperformed, though in the latter’s case, it was because it opened the week before the summer’s big juggernaut, which basically limited most of its take to the opening weekend’s big numbers. I don’t know what to make of The Clone Wars’ ($25 million) lousy performance, except to say it didn’t deserve as much as it made. It was also a crappy summer for independent films, as nothing from the big studios’ specialty divisions broke out, with one exception: The phenomenal Under the Same Moon generated $12 million in receipts. Shame that the The Wackness ($1.8 million) got lost amongst all the big summer releases. We can only do so much here.

There were also a few sleepers, movies that quietly earned their studios millions in profits despite spending most of their days fiddling around in the lower five, notably Mamma Mia (ugh), which pulled in over $130 million (and counting) before the summer came to an end. A few comedies with strong opening weekends also quietly ticked toward or over the $100 million mark while no one was looking: Get Smart ($128 million); You Don’t Mess with the Zohan ($100 million); and Step Brothers ($98 million). August was also dominated by two comedies, Tropic Thunder ($83 million) and Pineapple Express ($80 million), both of which should eventually climb close to $100 million, making them very successful for what they are: R-Rated comedies.


And then there is the Top Ten.


10. Wanted ($134 million): One of my personal favorites from the summer, Wanted started out huge and then faded in the wake of Hancock and later The Dark Knight. But with $130 million plus, there was enough there to prompt a sequel, and the movie not only reminded us why Angelina Jolie is a big movie star, it also finally made the worthy James McAvoy one.

9. The Incredible Hulk ($134 million):Expectations mean everything, and in the case of The Incredible Hulk, $134 million makes it a winner, even though The Hulk made $132 million a couple of years ago and was considered a failure. Also, The Incredible Hulk was a better fucking film. The lesson? Don’t let an art film director near a summer blockbuster about an angry giant.

8. The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian ( $141 million): Prince Caspian has to be considered a failure for its studio, having generated nearly $150 million less than The Lion, the With, and the Wardrobe, but it wasn’t a big enough failure to prevent them from moving ahead with the franchise, already putting The Voyage of the Dawn Treader on the summer calendar in 2010.

7. Sex and the City ($152 million): Blurgh. $150 million is an awful lot for an HBO sitcom turned movie, and a lousy one at that, and while it’s certainly enough to spawn an eventual series of SaTC flicks, I’m guessing that if we passed a collection plate around to all those who were overexposed to the film’s pre-release hype, we could double the box-office loot from those paying to make it all go away.

6. Kung-Fu Panda ($212 million): Seriously? How the hell did that happen? Jack Black as a goddamn Panda? It just proves that kids have no goddamn taste in films …

5. Wall-E ($217 million): … except that they were smart enough (along with a large number of parents) to make the latest Pixar film a success, besting last year’s Ratatouille by $10 million, but falling short of 2006’s inferior Cars. The Pixar beast continues to chug right along.

4. Hancock ($226 million): The old Independence Day/Will Smith weekend worked once again. Even though the film’s twist completely fucking ruined it, Hancock crossed the $220 million threshold and, even more impressively, put up $332 million outside of the United States, where they don’t even have the 4th of July (weird calendars). Why? Because even those of us who knew it would suck went to see it anyway. That’s the power of Will Smith (and Jason Bateman sure as hell didn’t hurt).

3. Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull ($315 million): In my estimation, despite a huge box-office return ($780 million worldwide), Indiana Jones was the biggest disappointment of the summer, a George Lucas catastrophe that capitalized on nostalgia and curiosity, ultimately spawning the phrase, “Nuked the Fridge,” which will hereby replace “Jumped the Shark” as the expression used to describe the beginning of the end. Worse, like nearly every other entry on the summer’s top ten, there will likely be an eventual sequel, unless Harrison Ford dies of indignity.

2. Iron Man ($317 million): The unbelievably, out-of-this world exceptional Iron Man sits on the summer’s box-office top ten exactly where it sits on the list of the summer’s best movies (or, so think 65% of you, not including The Boozehound). Robert Downey, Jr. completely established himself in Hollywood as the coolest, smartest action hero around. Also, as the action hero more men would sleep with than any other. Dude was a force in Iron Man, and turned a pretty good movie into an outstanding one. It wasn’t the absolute best movie of the summer, but I might agree that it was the most fun to watch.

1. The Dark Knight ($502 million): … and then there was The Dark Knight, a movie that not only holds the position of the summer’s best movie, but the second highest-grossing film of all time. And it’s hard to imagine a movie that deserves it more, though it would eventually fall to iMBD’s third best reviewed movie of all time (which also caused some weird shift, moving Shawshank Redemption ahead of Godfather for number one). Anyway, there’s absolutely nothing left to write about The Dark Knight: It’s the greatest comic-book film of all time, and it has, easily, the best comic-book villain of all time in Heath Ledger’s Joker. As I said in the first box-office round-up after it was released, they really ought to simply change the Oscar to the Ledger, and you can give this year’s Ledger to Robert Downey, Jr.

And that’s your summer of the 2008. Take it in, folks. Because the summer of 2010 looks to be a real crapfest. There’s no way that Star Trek and Terminator 4 counterbalance the suck that will be G.I. Joe, Transformers 2, The Fast and the Furious 4, and The Night of the Museum II.


Pajiba Love 09/02/08 | On the Record: Stories From the Newsroom



Comments

Take a note Vivian:

*start on that Dark Knight backlash thing*

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 2, 2008 12:33 PM

Agreed on most of your comments here, but I still don't get your guys' irrational hate for the LotR films

Posted by: Dariuss at September 2, 2008 12:39 PM

(notice how I left out the LoTR films? Yeah. I did that for a reason.)

They came out in December?

Posted by: Jessimuhka at September 2, 2008 12:41 PM

*sigh* I know I'll get suckered into Museum 2 and Transformers 2 because I'm an IMAX whore.

Great write up, Dark Knight, Iron Man, and Wall-E look like the only ones that rightfully belong in the top 10, but then again I didn't see Wanted, so I'll withhold judgement on that one. Hulk was boring and silly, didn't bother with Narnia because the prequel was also boring, SatC and Kung Fu Panda both make me want to cry and set fire to members of their respective casts, Hancock looked like a rental, and Indy 4 was a GODDAMNED DISAPPOINTMENT OF LUCASFILM PROPORTIONS!

I can almost hear Conrad saying, "How can you count this as the Top 10 of the Summer?! Disaster Movie isn't finished being a blockbuster yet!"

Posted by: Mike R. at September 2, 2008 12:42 PM

the last time a summer movie that was certifiably decent actually came out on top was 2002's original Spiderman (notice how I left out the LoTR films? Yeah. I did that for a reason.)

Cause they came out in December?

Oh and Spider-Man's hyphenated. You know what I can't resist, Dustin, you sly fox.

Posted by: Jay at September 2, 2008 12:42 PM

I admit it, I'll see GI Joe because I'm a slut for Joseph Gordon-Levitt. I am embarrassed enough that I'l be wearing a fedora, trenchcoat and dark glasses, though.

Posted by: Mella at September 2, 2008 12:43 PM

I'll tell you the biggest problem with "Crystal Skull"

Shia LeBooof, he had no business being there.

At all.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 2, 2008 12:45 PM

I still wonder why Speed Racer didn't work. It was such a weird experience but altogether interesting at least. A little physical comedy, some pretty visuals and John Goodman. It's practically a Coen Brothers film.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at September 2, 2008 12:48 PM

Oh, I didn't know we were skipping the summer of 09...

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at September 2, 2008 12:48 PM

Thank God(topus) Iron Man comes out on dvd soon, I will never forgive myself for missing that in the theater. I should tie myself to a chair and force repeated viewings of From Justin to Kelly as punishment.

Posted by: Julie at September 2, 2008 12:50 PM

Julie, please don't. That's known as movieboarding, and according to the Geneva COnventions, it's an illegal form of torture, even if it's self-inflicted.

You do need to get right on Iron Man, though. If you have to give it up to someone with surround sound in order to use their system, well, all I can say is it'll be worth it. Especially if their TV is 47 inches or bigger.

Posted by: Mella at September 2, 2008 12:53 PM

...as I emerge from my Hurricane shelter on Keesler Air Force Base and begin to resume normal operations, I come across the above list.

Sex and the City and Mamma Mia! My championing of them is well-known and somewhat-documented. Both made (and continue to make) HUGE amounts of money (did you know Mamma Mia! has taken more money in the UK than TDK?) and both are unqualified successes.

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

Suck it. Bitches.

Posted by: boogs at September 2, 2008 12:58 PM

Heh Mella, seems like I'd be measuring a whole lot more than their TV.

Posted by: Julie at September 2, 2008 12:59 PM

Fast? Yes. Furious? Hell, no. Metrosexuals can't afford to be furious (nor do they know HOW to be furious.) They're little bitches. Which is okay, just don't name the fucking movie "The Fast and the Furious."

Posted by: SofĂ­a at September 2, 2008 1:03 PM

I've got a pal who hasn't had time to see Indiana Jones & The Ruination Of A Franchise, hasn't read anything about it, hasn't let anyone tell him anything about it, and refuses to listen to any review regarding it. He simply wants to enjoy it on his own, at home, after watching the previous three installments. However, in a bout of Labor day drunkasshitiness, I tried to convince him the major downfall of the movie was a Transformers-like German tank that transformed into a fifty ft. tall, fire-breathing Hitler-bot... Hopefully, he believed the ruse and never watches it, preserving the happy memories of the better Indy flicks...

Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at September 2, 2008 1:06 PM

Skitt

I haven't seen it either, but that's because I'm pretending it doesn't exist. Like global warming, alcohol poisoning and the male G-spot.

Posted by: Mella at September 2, 2008 1:08 PM

Take pictures Julie! Er, or have someone else take them.

Posted by: Cindy at September 2, 2008 1:18 PM

The 13 year old and the 40 year MSOC both await The Voyage of the Dawn Treader with bated breath. AND I SAY IT HERE IN FRONT OF ALL YOU FUCKING HIPSTERS, UNASHAMED.

Fuck all y'all motherfuckers. I'm on my third boxed set of The Narnia Chronicles of my fucking adulthood, goddamnit. And The Voyage of the Dawntreader is, arguably, the crown jewel of the series. Tough call to make, really, but I stand by it... I'll have to click Post rapidly, though, before scenes from The Silver Chair and The Magician's Nephew begin competing...

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 2, 2008 1:34 PM

Ha, I love how you tried to insult LoTR but ended up just looking silly. Everyone knows they came out around Christmas every year. Sigh.

Posted by: Cdell at September 2, 2008 1:35 PM

P.S.

I stand by my original reaction to Wall*E: The first animated fucking horror movie I've ever seen and squirmed through. Christ, what a grotesque experience. A cautionary tale, and my fellow filmgoers' giggles and guffaws were, to say the least, even MORE disconcerting than the film's not-so-hidden moral-of-the-story, and almost as nauseating as the fact that said moral was obscured by the "necessity" of that vomit-inducing Happy Fucking Ending.

As if they could not only reverse the damage done but AVOID the goddamned mistakes of their predecessors.

BLEARRRGH.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 2, 2008 1:40 PM

The hell's Maryscott doing trying to out-contrary me.

I liked "Crystal Skull". Hell, I loved "Speed Racer". "Prince Caspian" only got a slap on the wrist here. Where's my pariah ribbon?

boogs is in a different territory, but I'll say again that I don't think anyone said they wouldn't make any money.

Posted by: Jay at September 2, 2008 1:50 PM

Jay, well, your cheese stands alone, all alone, when it comes to that piece of Crystal shit, so you can have that particulat gold medal. As to the Speed Racer, well, I don't have epilepsy, but I'm afraid of developing it instantaneously -- so I AVOIDED seing THAT particular film -- so again -- KEEP that pariah status all to your lonesome, babe.

Iconoclasts of Film Love are like sexual tweakers, man -- variety make the world go 'round... and keeps the censors in business.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 2, 2008 2:15 PM

Sex and the City and Mamma Mia! My championing of them is well-known and somewhat-documented. Both made (and continue to make) HUGE amounts of money (did you know Mamma Mia! has taken more money in the UK than TDK?) and both are unqualified successes.

I've said it before and I'll say it again.

Suck it. Bitches.

Posted by: boogs at September 2, 2008 12:58 PM

*sigh* Boogs, we were in agreement over that Shield matter. I'm sorry to do this, I really am.

Worldwide take for Mamma Mia:$339,634,000
Worldwide take for Sex and the City: $388,563,871
Worldwide take for Dark Knight:$921,696,000

Dark Knight made what both of those movies and then some. Plus, Sex and the City has been out since May, and has been out of theaters for quite a bit. As for Mamma Mia actually making any money off of that "sing along" stunt, those profits are merely the product of the producers shaking it at the urinal...just to make sure they've drained it dry. It stayed 8 on the Top 10 list...Dark Knight went from 4 to 3. Like Jay said, no one said those movies wouldn't make money...but then again, no one said that because they made money they were good movies. (Just look at Indiana Jones 4.)

The corpse is dead, and the cause of death is epic failure. I'm sorry...I thought we were going to be friends too.

Posted by: Mike R. at September 2, 2008 2:15 PM

Jay...I loved Speed Racer too. There is no shame in liking it. Crystal Skull was ok, but mostly lame.

MSOC, Wall-E kinda did need a happy ending, because it clearly states in the Kidz Movie Playbook, "If your ending depresses kids beyond all repair, not only will their parents sue you for making their little spawns broken, your movie will also fail." It needed a nice and happy ending to wrap it up because...well, you weren't supposed to be punished for liking Wall-E and getting attached to him.

Posted by: Mike R. at September 2, 2008 2:21 PM

(notice how I left out the LoTR films? Yeah. I did that for a reason.)

FAIL.

Posted by: ajax19 at September 2, 2008 2:28 PM

Mike R.: Which is why I don't make movies...

Because while I don't necessarily think people should be punished for liking Wall*E the robot, I don't think they should be REWARDED for thinking the BONELESS BRAINLESS people on the spaceship WERE FUKING CUTE. I think they should be punished for not GETTING the fact that they were a FUCKING HORRORSHOW, a DIRECT RESULT OF THEIR OWN ACTIONS, RIGHT THEIR IN THE THEATRE.

GAAAAH!!!!

Oh, god. Oh, GOD. I am beyond help.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 2, 2008 2:33 PM

See? See?

I spelled it

t-h-e-i-r

instead of

t-h-e-r-e

I am rapidly losing my basic faculties, and it is all George W. Bush's fault.

And the fact that I am blaming my inability to preview my computer comments on a retarded lame duck President is simply further proof that I am beyond help.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at September 2, 2008 2:36 PM

You can count me among those who didn't hate Crystal Skull, Jay. I rewatched all three Indiana Jones movies prior to seeing Skull and I don't see how anyone can say Skull was worse than Temple of Doom. Way too many people admire the trilogy forgetting how bad that second installment was. So for me Skull was certainly flawed, but still was mindless fun. If you lose the reverence for the series and just examine Skull as a summer popcorn flick it goes down much easier.

Posted by: Ed Newman at September 2, 2008 2:41 PM

(notice how I left out the LoTR films? Yeah. I did that for a reason.)

I thought you left them out because technically, they're not sequels. It's one big story spread over 3 movies, the same as the book.

All the other movies listed ARE sequels designed to capitalize on the success of the previous movies in the various movie franchises.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 2, 2008 2:42 PM

"I don't think they should be REWARDED for thinking the BONELESS BRAINLESS people on the spaceship WERE FUKING CUTE. I think they should be punished for not GETTING the fact that they were a FUCKING HORRORSHOW, a DIRECT RESULT OF THEIR OWN ACTIONS, RIGHT THEIR IN THE THEATRE."

MSOC, in that case, I would happen to agree with you. The people were not cute, and only a couple came off as likeable, which really was only because of their interactions with Wall-E. I'm sure you and I could agree that people doing everything virtual, floating instead of walking, and not even knowing how to open/operate a fucking book. (In fact, I was in horrific awe of how fucked up society had gotten throughout the film.)

That having been said, they do deserve to be punished if they don't get the allegory. Those of us that do though (you, me, and everyone else who got it) should take Wall-E's life as a reward for getting it. I just hope there's enough kids out there that "got it", so we can avoid actually needing robots to dig us all out.

Posted by: Mike R. at September 2, 2008 2:54 PM

did you know Mamma Mia! has taken more money in the UK than TDK?

Posted by: boogs at September 2, 2008 12:58 PM

You're making that shit up, right?

Posted by: Che Grovera at September 2, 2008 3:03 PM

Indiana Jones 4? what? when did that come out?

LALALALA THAT MOVIE DOESN'T EXIST LALALALALALALA

Now let me go feed my unicorn.

Posted by: figgylicious at September 2, 2008 3:05 PM

Gross for Mamma Mia in United Kingdom and Ireland and Malta: $63,408,221 as of 8/3/08

Gross for Dark Knight in United Kingdom and Ireland and Malta: $50,108,272 as of 8/3/08

Sadly, Boogs is right. Then again, with all respect to the British, they have a higher tolerance for camp than the rest of the world.

Posted by: Mike R. at September 2, 2008 3:40 PM

You might want to check out the take for Mamma Mia in Australia, a country where they worship ABBA the way my dog worships a steak.

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 2, 2008 3:49 PM

So Dustin, you have had enough to the point that you are skipping 2009? Does that mean McCain wins and then dies, giving us The Great White Prostitute in the White House? Just curious.

Posted by: richmac at September 2, 2008 5:00 PM

Sex and the City's giant take depresses me. I was dragged to see it assuming that it would be as amusing and mildly diverting as the show. I left the cinema actually physically nauseous and offended - yes, offended - by what I had seen. And I'm not just talking about the visual offense of having to watch that unholy lovechild of a drag queen and a boiled horse and her godawful outfits, I mean literally offended by the rampant stupidity and spinelessness of every woman in the goddamn film. I'm male and hardly the most feminist of people, but it depresses me beyond words that the most successful female-lead film in quite a while is this dreck.

Posted by: Shay at September 2, 2008 5:16 PM

The ending of Wall-E works. It is not contrived or forced but was established throughout the movie. Wall-E constantly tries to touch Eve's hand bringing Eliot's "Objective Correlative" to the fore. Thus what Eve does at the end strikes me as that much more profund and poignant. No kiddie movie rule book is followed here but a moment arises from the given circumstance. The ending raises a very interesting question, What comprises "self"? Hegel might have enjoyed Wall-E.

Posted by: Mr. West at September 2, 2008 5:42 PM

Sadly, Boogs is right. Then again, with all respect to the British, they have a higher tolerance for camp than the rest of the world.

Posted by: Mike R. at September 2, 2008 3:40 PM

--------------------------------------------

Limmey bastards, I'm thinking we should have another Revolution just so we can open-up some whup ass on them again.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 2, 2008 6:41 PM

*double take*

Oh, you didn't mean Lemmy after all, Slim (although he's a Limey too). For a moment you had me thinking you had an axe to grind with British metal bands...but why not -- what's campier than them?

Posted by: Che Grovera at September 2, 2008 8:00 PM

Or, OR!...the Oscar-now-turned Ledger is given to Heath Ledger anyway, because, seriously, why the fuck shouldn't it be given to him? He may be (most unfortunately) gone, but that doesn't dim the light on the fact that he deserves it. Downey Jr. can aim for a Ledger when "Iron Man 2" comes out, but you just can't give it to anybody else (yes, that means not even Downey Jr.) this year.

...and fuck Jack Black with a fist in his ass. I fuckin' hate "Kung Fu Panda" solely because of his bovine presence.

Posted by: Riley at September 2, 2008 8:46 PM

the Oscar-now-turned Ledger is given to Heath Ledger anyway, because, seriously, why the fuck shouldn't it be given to him? He may be (most unfortunately) gone, but that doesn't dim the light on the fact that he deserves it. Downey Jr. can aim for a Ledger when "Iron Man 2" comes out, but you just can't give it to anybody else (yes, that means not even Downey Jr.) this year.

Wouldn't Ledger be up for "Best Supporting"? Leaving Downey Jr. to take "Best Actor"? Can't everyone be a winner here? WHY DO WE ALWAYS HAVE TO FIGHT?!

Posted by: Shay at September 2, 2008 8:52 PM

Why, oh why did those horsey-faced whores get in the top ten? Seriously, I thought all the middle age housewives who are trying to relate their younger, whorier days were too busy raising kids and gardening and going to their book clubs.

Posted by: Jaci at September 2, 2008 10:58 PM

BOO! Dark Knight looked barely competent compared to Ironman, and I stake the claim that the only reason it did so well was what I like to call (as of about 10 seconds ago when I came up with the phrase) Dead Ledger Blindness Syndrome.

I make this claim from the center of the DLBS epidemic (Australia, where I received 4 phone calls, read on 5 different websites and heard on the radio at least 8 times on as many stations by 10am the day he died (or the day after, I think, once you account for time differences and such)).

Ledger put in a decent performance, but it had NOTHING on Downey Jr., and the rest of the movie just wasn't that great by comparison.

TDK may have won the box office, but there is no question in my mind as to what is the better movie!

Posted by: Chugga at September 2, 2008 11:19 PM

Pork chop sandwiches.

Posted by: Lucas at September 2, 2008 11:25 PM

The X-Files movie, which barely eked out $20 million, proving that you can't wait six goddamn years after a long-suffering television show has left the network to resurrect it on the big screen

No, you have to wait 10 years like Star Trek. Altough the series wasn't exactly long running at just three years. The really big mystery of the resurrection of Star Trek is how did they get the balls to make the second movie after the crap that was the first.

Posted by: EricD at September 2, 2008 11:36 PM

"So Dustin, you have had enough to the point that you are skipping 2009? Does that mean McCain wins and then dies, giving us The Great White Prostitute in the White House? Just curious.

Posted by: richmac"

Whoa, cowboy. Put your misogyny back in the holster before someone gets hurt.

Don't we have enough reasons to disparage Palin without resorting to calling her a whore? You're embarrassing yourself and you're embarrassing me as a liberal.

Long time listener, first time caller, and life-long hotpocket owner.

Posted by: marya at September 3, 2008 11:00 AM

The ending of Wall-E works. It is not contrived or forced but was established throughout the movie. Wall-E constantly tries to touch Eve's hand bringing Eliot's "Objective Correlative" to the fore. Thus what Eve does at the end strikes me as that much more profund and poignant. No kiddie movie rule book is followed here but a moment arises from the given circumstance. The ending raises a very interesting question, What comprises "self"? Hegel might have enjoyed Wall-E.

Posted by: Mr. West at September 2, 2008 5:42 PM


Wow...pretty deep. But why would we want Rainbow Killer to enjoy anything? (/feigning ignorance)

Posted by: Mike R. at September 3, 2008 12:16 PM

Now that I've gotten that joke out of the way, might I say that I am impressed with your critique, Mr. West? For some reason I'm craving something cerebral, and that hit the spot. I swear I'm not a zombie.

Posted by: Mike R. at September 3, 2008 12:18 PM

Chugga! Word.

Posted by: HCE at September 4, 2008 9:18 PM

Mike R., good to hear that you crave not my brains. I value them. Wall-E is my favorite movie of the summer. I lived most vicarously through "Iron Man" and was shocked most by "The Dark Knight." But that Pixar film moved me in a way neither of the two could. Plus the scene where the Captain walks to the tune of "Thus spoke Zarasthrustra" operates on so many levels cinematically and thematically. Won't find anything that profound in either of the two comic book offerings.

Posted by: Mr. West at September 5, 2008 12:10 AM