free counter with statistics Barcelona | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

barcelona01.jpg
Boozehound Cinephile: Origins

Barcelona: Ted Boynton

Boozehound Cinephile | October 17, 2008 | Comments (32)


Pop Culture Item Consumed: Barcelona, the Official Favorite Film of the Boozehound Cinephile, for approximately the 22nd time. Barcelona is the second film in director Whit Stillman’s triptych study of the maturation process of naïve American youth, along with Metropolitan and The Last Days of Disco.

Beverage Consumed: As long as we’re on favorites, the Vesper, Official Cocktail of the Boozehound Cinephile. Ian Fleming first introduced the Vesper as James Bond’s tribute to love interest Vesper Lynd in Fleming’s Casino Royale. Tersely described by Daniel Craig in the film version, the Vesper certainly may consist of “three measures of Gordon’s, one of vodka, half a measure of Kina Lillet … shake it over ice, and add a thin slice of lemon peel.” Some of the more bucktooth-stupid recipes I’ve seen crassly refer to this drink as the “James Bond Martini” - even the New York Bartender’s Guide, generally beyond reproach, inexplicably uses this term. Would you call a Mustang GT Fastback “The Steve McQueen Ford”? No, you would not. Actually, it’s worse than that, since a Vesper is not a martini at all, though it should be served in a martini glass.

In any event, after thousands of hours of research, I can report to you that the well-made Vesper is only slightly more complicated than Fleming envisioned, though Bond generally has the right of it. The crux of the Vesper is the subtle interplay between the complex, herbal flavors of good gin and the lilting, wine-like taste of Lillet blanc, accented by the fragrant oil of the twisted lemon peel - imagine a few hours of deep tongue-kissing with Eva Green, occasionally pausing to ensure that her oral pleasuring is taken care of, all under the watchful eye of her citrus flower perfume.

Let’s just let that concept marinate for a moment.

Now. Where were we? A six-to-two-to-one ratio of gin, vodka, and Lillet is both too much gin and not enough at the same time, and Bond further obscures the matter with the proposed treatment of the lemon peel. Beginning with our measures, the proportion of Lillet should be far less than that of the gin - just as a good dry martini involves a healthy splash of vermouth against about a cup of gin, the measure of Lillet should fall into the “splash” category. At the same time, going with a heavy measure of gin essentially converts a traditional dry martini with a different mixer, which is not the point at all. Lillet is a shy and delicate lover and will not stand up to gin the way vermouth does. Diluting with water is out of the question; even if one were interested in emasculating this drink by diluting its punch, the flavor would suffer terribly with such an interloper. Instead, our good friend vodka rides to the rescue, providing essentially the same octane as the gin while also offering a crystalline platform upon which the beefy, masculine gin and the elegant, feminine Lillet may conduct their foxtrot. For best results, increase the measure of vodka to equal that of the gin, which makes for simpler preparation and easier recipe-remembering. Everyone has their own favorite brands (more on that concept in a moment), but for gin, I like Boodles; for vodka, I tend to stick with Stoli, though I have a long list of alternatives suggested by your e-mails.

Combine the gin and vodka with the splash of Lillet in your favorite cocktail shaker; Mrs. socalled found my best shaker at an antiques show years ago: a stainless steel container cast in the form of a rocket ship, complete with a small stand that allows the fuselage/shaker to sit on the rocket’s “fins.” Mrs. socalled is just the best.

Now for that lemon peel. I’ve never been good at cutting “twists” of lemon from the peel, and several kitchen-toy outfits offer a tool for cutting optimum widths and lengths of peel. The critical thing here is to cut directly over the glass - the whole point of using a lemon twist is to capture the lemon’s essence without adding lemon juice to the mix. Lemon juice is to lemon peel oil as sweat is to blood - it’s not just the location that makes it different. In terms of how much peel, I say go nuts. I usually cut about six inches of lemon peel over the glass, then immediately pour the ice-cold shaker directly on to the peel, effectively mixing in with the lemon.

And that, folks, is my favorite cocktail. I don’t know what it is about Lillet blanc, but just as tequila can affect the temper toward aggression, Lillet imparts a sense of sweet well-being. I don’t care for Lillet rouge at all, but the golden version is an essential for the well-stocked bar.

Summary of Action: Barcelona is perfect in its own way, but it might be a surprising choice for a “favorite” film. The relationship between the “greatest” of anything and one’s “all-time favorite” of the same category endlessly fascinates me, given that they are rarely the same for most people, and Barcelona epitomizes the distinction. While clearly not in the same class as Casablanca, my personal choice for GFOAT, or even modern quasi-classics like Trainspotting, Barcelona somehow lodged itself in my brain as the preference for repeat viewing over all other contenders.

In Barcelona, Chris Eigeman and Taylor Nichols play Ted and Fred Boynton, “so-called only cousins,” as Ted phrases it, meaning that each of them is the other’s only cousin in the family. Ted works in Barcelona as a sales executive for an industrial company based in Chicago. As the movie opens, Fred, a lieutenant in the Navy, pays Ted an unexpected visit as the advance man for the fleet’s shore leave in Barcelona. Despite the tense relationship between the cousins, based on some obscure family history, Fred ends up staying with Ted for an extended period, during which they romance a pair of Spanish girls, Montserrat (Tushka Bergen) and Marta (Mira Sorvino). (Yes, that Mira Sorvino.)

Ted’s and Fred’s relationship difficulties, both with each other and with the girls, play out against the political anti-Americanism of Barcelona’s youth, based on the United States’ interference in other countries’ affairs. The political backdrop provides important context for the characters’ motivations and the dramatic opportunities for the narrative. The tensions between Ted and Fred, and between each and his self-perceived failures, escalate over the course of the film until a breathtaking act of violence unites them in an entirely unexpected way, opening a third act that brings a set of romantic twists which, even after a couple dozen viewings, never fail to satisfy.

Beyond the leads, the supporting cast is terrific, particularly the succession of Spanish girls successfully capturing the wide-eyed awkwardness of open-hearted natives endeavoring to understand and get along with puzzling foreigners. Sorvino does well as the backstabbing slut whom it’s impossible to despise; she’s young and foolish, but not evil, and her dalliance with Fred drives critical parts of the story. Tushka Bergen, as Ted’s girlfriend Montserrat, is wonderfully expressive, and it’s our loss that she was marginalized to the ghetto of TV drama guest spots and crap secondary releases in the U.S.

On a deeper level, beyond the surface comedy/drama, Barcelona uses the political backdrop to function as an examination of the conflicting personalities of the United States, the two sides of the same identity: the friendly, open-minded yet somewhat moralistic side, contrasted with the reactionary, somewhat dimwitted, partially xenophobic side. “Barcelona, Spain,” intones the opening title card; “The last decade of the Cold War,” and the grappling of Ted and Fred with the culture and sociopolitical realities of Barcelona nicely reflect the fumbling interactions of a young American culture with its wizened, pragmatic European allies as the U.S. finds its place in maturity. (There was reason for optimism when Barcelona was released in 1994, following the measured restraint of Gulf War I and Bill Clinton’s approach to the world as a community of nations; little did Stillman know the U.S. would date-rape its European admirers a decade later.)

Stillman brings a non-hostile appreciation for how ridiculously paranoid and misinformed overseas views of the United States can be, even when the underlying anger is completely justified. Montserrat’s ex-boyfriend grimly informs his Spanish friends that the “A.F.L.-C.I.A.” is an intelligence network of American labor unions undermining other countries by poisoning their workers’ movements. As Marta parrots, “It is America’s largest labor union, terribly right wing and facia [fascist].” When Fred and Ted stare at her blankly, she adds indignantly, “It’s amazing what Americans don’t know about their own country.”

At the same time, Stillman has a great ear for true thematic irony, with Fred consistently acting as the poster boy for American thickheadedness in ways that don’t even register with the credulous Spaniards listening to him, such as when he responds to another Spanish girl’s disgust over violence in the United States:

Girl: You can’t say that Americans are not more violent than other people.
Fred: [shakes head] No.
Girl: All those people killed in shootings in America?
Fred: Oh, shootings. That doesn’t mean Americans are more violent than other people. We’re just better shots.

As Fred later puts it, “I did not confirm their worst assumptions. I am their worst assumption.”

For all that, however, Barcelona is a witty, talky, friendly film that plays primarily as an extended riff on an uncomfortable relationship between two very different young men who nevertheless relate more closely to each other than to anyone else. If whip-smart dialogue is a dying art, then Barcelona may have represented its modern zenith. There is virtually no cursing, no self-indulgent cultural references, and no snappy patter. Many of the characters speak English as a second language; Fred is an unapologetic jackass; Ted speaks with a slight habitual stammer that renders his line readings utterly naturalistic. It all clicks in a way that requires no packaging, no flim-flam, no misdirection. It’s a complicated yet straightforward story that expects you to pay attention and savor the individual moments.

Indeed, the joys of Barcelona are found in the chatty, sometimes moody interactions between Ted and Fred:

Ted: Spanish girls tend to be really promiscuous.
Fred: You’re such a prig.
Ted: No, I wasn’t using “promiscuous” pejoratively, it’s just a fact. They have a completely different attitude towards sex.
Fred: Well I wasn’t using “prig” pejoratively.
Ted: [pauses] Okay. I’m a prig.

A true mark of Stillman’s writing is the conversational soliloquy, and Barcelona brings the observational quasi-monologue with a vengeance. Such devices are risky, and less confident writers or directors can bog down a film with characters’ self-conscious monopolization of the proceedings, taking the viewer right out of the film’s reality. Throughout the film, Stillman keeps the words crisp and believable, using the technique to render the characters more endearing, as with Fred’s consternation over literary undertones:

Fred: Since I’ve been waiting for the fleet to show up, I’ve read a lot, and one of the things that keeps popping up is this about “subtext” … plays, novels, songs, they all have a “sub-text,” which I take to mean a hidden message or import of some kind. So, sub-text, we know, but what do you call the message or meaning that’s right there on the surface, completely open and obvious? They never talk about that. What do you call what’s above the subtext?
Ted: [bewildered] The text.
Fred: Okay, that’s right, but they never talk about that.

How the Pairing Held Up: In all seriousness, for a smart, sophisticated viewing experience, mix up a Vesper and sit down with Barcelona. It will be a pleasant mental and emotional buzz, and you’ll thank me later.

Tastes Like: Did I mention the Eva Green/oral sex thing? Will I ever get tired of comparing cocktails to tail-tails?

Overall Rating: An earnest ten out of ten.

Ted Boynton is a dedicated sot who plans to leave his barstool to stalk Whit Stillman, now that someone has found Whit Stillman. Ted also manages to hold down a job and a wife, three hours each per day, whether they need it or not. Readers may scold, hector, admonish or taunt Ted by e-mailing him at thecarygrantrules@hotmail.com.


Amy Adams Leap Year | Pajiba Love 10/17/08



Comments

OK Ted. You lost me at the deep tongue kissing Eva Green. Now if it had been deep tongue kissing Daniel Craig, I would have kept reading.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 17, 2008 9:23 AM

Wow! The origin, explained! I...I don't know how to feel right now. Faintly relieved, I guess, because I'd always assumed "So-called only cousins" had a more...backwoods connotation, shall we say?

That doesn't mean Americans are more violent than other people. We're just better shots.

Okay, Fred Boynton/Whit Stillman rocked my world a little bit with that. Too funny.

Posted by: meaux at October 17, 2008 9:25 AM

You certainly have a way with words Mr. T.; reading your reviews is a pleasure whether or not I've seen the film. In this case not - and I'm more interested in the cocktail after your loving description.

Posted by: Cindy at October 17, 2008 9:33 AM

imagine a few hours of deep tongue-kissing with Eva Green, occasionally pausing to ensure that her oral pleasuring is taken care of, all under the watchful eye of her citrus flower perfume.

/shiver

Um, yeah. I'll be back to read the rest in a few minutes.

Posted by: Sean (Llama) at October 17, 2008 9:37 AM

Meaux: 'Wow! The origin, explained! I...I don't know how to feel right now. Faintly relieved, I guess, because I'd always assumed "So-called only cousins" had a more...backwoods connotation, shall we say? '

Yeah! Me, too. I thought it had more of a "Deliverance" feel to it.

Posted by: BWeaves at October 17, 2008 9:46 AM

Finally!!!! For how many years have I been requesting you do this review? I was beginning to think it would never happen.

I have been thinking so much over the past couple of months about how relevant this film is to now even though it was set in a different political era.
(I'm paraphrasing) "You see the United States is an ant farm and the rest of world wants to see what we're doing and thinking, but they can't see the US ants directly so there are other ants called journalists who tell them what they see." Oh the horror when I think how many people are listing to Murdoch journalists! And for all that, it's not a political film. That's its cleverness.

And oh how right you are about the excellent dialogue. I could listen to this film on the radio and enjoy it just as much.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 17, 2008 9:51 AM

Oh and I forgot: the beautiful homage to hamburgers at the end. Perfect.
(Warning: I may be on this thread to an annoying degree today).

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 17, 2008 9:54 AM

I have all three of these films on freakin VHS, I think you've inspired me to upgrade so I can watch them again. Although I didn't love Last Days of Disco like I did the other two.

It's good to hear that Stillman finally resurfaced again. I sincerely hope the new project involves Eigeman in some way. He was the muse and I haven't seen him really since that sitcom effort.

Posted by: MG at October 17, 2008 9:58 AM

MG:

Eigeman did a guest stint on Gilmore Girls in the penultimate season. He still has the talent for rapid witty dialogue (why did Aaron Sorkin never use this guy's talents?) but he has broadened quite a bit physically.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 17, 2008 10:02 AM

Ah! I was never a Gilmore Girls watcher, but from what I heard, there was no shortgae of rapid fire line delivery on that show either. I agree, I always did think he'd have been great on a Sorkin show. You know, before Sorkin went all Studio 60 on us.

Posted by: MG at October 17, 2008 10:10 AM

GAAAH. Whenever you describe a cocktail, I feel like I need a cigarette after. And the ability to roll over, give the cocktail a smooch, and fall asleep with my head on its chest.

Where does one find Lillet Blanc at the liquor store? With what treasures is it hidden? It's 10 AM here in Ohio, and all I can think about is pleasuring Eva Green and sipping that drink! My husband is gonna have a good night, methinks...

Posted by: Tammy at October 17, 2008 10:13 AM

...imagine a few hours of deep tongue-kissing with Eva Green, occasionally pausing to ensure that her oral pleasuring is taken care of, all under the watchful eye of her citrus flower perfume.

Goddamnit, I am at work and trying to solve a major crisis. I thought I would pop over to Pajiba for a brief respite and here you are putting images like that in my head. Coupled with the out-of-left-field-yet-entirely-welcome sex dream I had about Meg Ryan (circa "Innerspace" era) last night and I'm a walking bag of hormones, even more so than usual. Do you know how hard it is the adjust your junk in an open floor-plan office? I look like I'm doing the Lambada at my desk!

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 17, 2008 10:32 AM

I look like I'm doing the Lambada at my desk!

BAAAHAHAHAHAHA! That's an image that will stay with me for a while.

Posted by: Tammy at October 17, 2008 10:35 AM

At least you have dirty dreams (I like "City of Angels" Meg as well), mine always fall apart, or I demur, or there's a bunch of people around and, well, it just never ever works.

Yes, I "oh, I can't take advantage of this person, and we don't know each other very well either and this is gonna get so awkward" in my dreams (and there's never celebrities present). I completely believe my dreams, bad to worse or just dull, no matter what surreality they've taken on, and all my morals and manners are present and accounted for. And then I wake up and realize, once again, that I was dreaming and maybe it could've been fun for once were I bit more objectively aware. A lot different from the relief of having a nightmare disproven.

See what my life is? And today's the day when my work schedule goes all wonky and hassling for the rest of the month. Can I just have a big Long Island Iced Tea in a mason jar, like you get at the Roadhouse restaurants (all due credit to Ted's more finely tailored recipe)?

Fuck.

Eigeman Forever!

Posted by: Jay at October 17, 2008 10:47 AM

Jesus Christ, Jay!! Your dreams are so guilt-ridden I'm beginning to think my mother raised you on the side. So that's where she disappeared to on Wednesday nights.

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 17, 2008 10:56 AM

Now I've GOT to bump this up the queue.

Chris Eigeman was so good in Kicking and Screaming.

Posted by: Julie at October 17, 2008 11:04 AM

This review has given me the courage to get drunk and watch this movie.

Long live Metropolitan!

Posted by: Maples at October 17, 2008 11:17 AM

Yes, my sex life is the Four Yorkshiremen of the Apocalypse.

Posted by: Jay at October 17, 2008 11:28 AM

Yes, my sex life is the Four Yorkshiremen of the Apocalypse.
Luxury!
((Hope we're talking about the same sketch. Eat a handle of COLD gravel, clean box, and work for 18 hours in mine before we got home and my father would murder us all with a broken beer bottle. IF WE Were Lucky!))

Posted by: Optimus Drunk at October 17, 2008 11:50 AM

Eigeman was fantastic as the bitter resentful teacher to Malcolm's (in the Middle) gifted class.

Even though I thought this movie a little dull "We're just a better shot" is still my favorite lines ever.

Posted by: amanda47 at October 17, 2008 12:05 PM

Quite.


I don't think enough is said for "Kicking and Screaming" either, Julie.

Posted by: Jay at October 17, 2008 12:09 PM

Check out Mr Jealousy too for some sweet snarky Eigeman action.

Posted by: MG at October 17, 2008 12:52 PM

Eeeeeh, I didn't enjoy this one as much as did Metropolitan, it felt kinda disjointed and I didn't buy Chris Eigeman as a U.S. Navy officer, for one second.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at October 17, 2008 2:33 PM

B'Slim:

So you don't believe well-to-do idiot sons ever get shuffled into the military officer system where they can cover up their low intelligence with a uniform and stop embarassing the family? Have you ever heard of John McCain?

Posted by: PaddyDog at October 17, 2008 3:00 PM

Jay, if it makes you feel any better, it wasn't until two or three years ago that my sex dreams stopped being censored.

Yeah, all the naughty bits got blurred out or the scene would fade to black. Big whoop, wanna fight about it?

Posted by: Munkymack at October 18, 2008 2:12 AM

Wow, I was sure it was my own personal disease!

Posted by: Jay at October 18, 2008 6:50 AM

The ironies in this review, pile up like a ten car mash up. The anti-Americanism prevalent in Spain in the early 1980s is only less virulent than that which coursed through places like India.
Not surprisingly examples of these, like the US creating the AIDS crisis, and the CIA killed Kennedy was abetted by KGB disinformation. Agee, whose book the discount Antonio Banderas photographer character sees as his bible, had been a KGB contact since at least 1968; his research into CIA operations, were basically laundering the conclusions of East German state researchers like Hans Mader. Agee gave addresses, former places of residence, other contact information that groups like Nov 17th used to target Richard Welch; who hadn't even been on the continent during the time of the notorious Greek junta. The photo journalist published his misunderstandings and nearly got an American naval officer killed. THe bombings were not insignificant affairs either; among them were the Hezbollah attack on Torrejon Air Base in 1985.

That Murdoch press, you despise, was more right on that field; than you're willing to admit. And
the 'ant farm hypothesis' explains it quite clearly. The inability of most of the press to understand remote parts of this country; eg; areas where 'bitter people cling to their guns and religion' makes it unlikely that they can explain foreign cultures to us, or vice versa.
Fred is a pig, but he happens to be more right
than Ted; who tries to rationalize the Spanish hatred for America.

Posted by: narciso at October 18, 2008 9:18 PM

The ironies in this review, pile up like a ten car mash up.

?

Lots of analysis; no ironies revealed. tb

Posted by: ted boynton at October 19, 2008 10:42 AM

By "ironies," he meant semi-colons. By "this review," he meant his comment.

Posted by: meaux at October 19, 2008 2:54 PM

Okay I just Netflixed this after reading the review last week and watched it last night after work (no drinking involved; rather I was sacked out on the couch in one position for so long my eye started watering a puddle on that side). I liked it...the tone was clear, consistent, and...delicate? That's the word that comes to mind anyway.

The dialogue you chose in your review didn't strike me as funny until I heard the characters say it. And while nothing in this movie made me laugh out loud, as it were, I found myself wrily smiling a lot. Especially liked "Positive thinking is fine in theory. But whenever I try it on a systematic basis... I end up really depressed." There was something Woody Allen-esque about the whole thing, minus the mania. And I hate the mania of Woody Allen.

Anyhoo it was a decent movie. And I'd be impressed if somebody wanted to show it to me on a date. But I really found it hard to relate to any of the characters, especially the women. Actually, it's not that I couldn't relate to them - the problem was they didn't seem like real people. They sounded natural enough, but they all acted like nobody ever would in the real world.

Posted by: AM at October 23, 2008 9:04 AM

They sounded natural enough, but they all acted like nobody ever would in the real world.

See also: Hal Hartley. Puts some people off but I enjoy that style.

Posted by: Jay at October 23, 2008 9:26 AM

I like it too, sometimes. It's completely arbitrary for me when it works and when it doesn't. I've made no secret of my love for Moonstruck, which is completely stylized. But something about this movie didn't do it for me - Kicking and Screaming felt the same way.

Posted by: AM at October 23, 2008 10:23 AM