free counter with statistics Wicked by Gregory Maguire | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

elphaba_galinda.jpg

100 Books in One Year #9: Wicked: The Life and Times of the Wicked Witch of the West by Gregory Maguire

Cannonball Read / AlabamaPink

Book Reviews | October 21, 2008 | Comments (54)


There’s a bumper sticker that reminds me of Gregory Maguire’s particular oeuvre of literature. It’s generally found on the backs of cars papered with so many other stickers that it appears the entire rear-end is being held together by vehicular decoration. Stickers that read “COEXIST,” “My other car is a broom,” and “Keep Your Laws Off My Body.” I’m thinking of the bumper sticker that proclaims “EVE WAS FRAMED.”

Maguire’s successful career has been based on his knack for taking the vilest villains of well known, traditional literature and giving them a soul and a credible history. He posits that these evil, heartless characters were just misunderstood and maligned. They’ve had horrid childhoods, tortured adolescences, disappointments, failures, cataclysmic losses. Those nasty villains, why, they aren’t that different from the rest of us! Except maybe having crappy skin as a teenager and getting one’s heart stomped on freshman year in college doesn’t always lead to taking up magic and recruiting a flying monkey army to do your bidding. This is where Maguire’s gift comes and fills in that gap with a seriously meaty biography. I’ve only read one other Maguire book, Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister, where he took the much maligned stepsisters, normally portrayed as jealous cows out for poor Cinderella’s crystal footwear and marriage prospects, and put their story of against the backdrop of 17th century Holland on the eve of the Tulip Market Crash. Since I was never a huge fan of old Ashenputel, it wasn’t a hard sell making the stepsisters into believable, sympathetic victims of warped storytelling. Now, the Wicked Witch as sympathetic? That crazy green bitch in the pointy hat with a serious shoe obsession (Again with the shoes!) and a thing against dogs?

According to Wicked, the future Wicked Witch of the West was born as Elphaba, the daughter of a noble-born mother and minister father in Muchkinland (Not all Munchkins are shorties, according to Maguire). Her mother, already miserable in her marriage, retreats into a drugged fog after the birth of her pea-green, razor-teethed bundle of joy, while her father further ensconces himself in his religious fanaticism. Maguire spends much of the first section of the novel laying the groundwork for Elphaba’s wretched childhood and focuses mostly on her tortured parental lineage and their faulty relationship. When the novel shoots forwards 15 years in the second section, Elphaba has grown, not surprisingly, into a brittle, anti-social, but intelligent teenage girl. She arrives at Crage Hall, a women’s university, and by the very nature of her appearance and background (After the birth of her sister Nessarose, her parents became missionaries to the primitive Quadling people), Elphaba is automatically an outsider. As a result of a mishap involving a chaperone and a rusty nail, she is stuck rooming with her beautiful social-climbing Galinda. Polar opposites, the girls at first give each other a generous berth, but Elphaba senses a strong intellect underneath her flibbertygibbit exterior and prods Galinda into revealing it. They establish a tenuous friendship and become the central figures in a close-knit clique of college students from throughout Oz.

During her second year in college, Elphaba becomes swept up in a radical movement against the reigning Wizard’s tyrannical, Naziesque regime, and in the third section, she disappears into her new identity as a revolutionary. After a doomed love affair with a former classmate and botched assassination attempt, Elphaba retreats into a nunnery. Upon leaving the convent years later, she makes a journey of penitence and self-imposed exile into the wilderness of the Vinkus. This fourth section of the novel chronicles Elphaba’s ascent to her Wicked Witch title, her growing paranoia, and dabbling in the magical arts and a scientific sorcery akin to the work of Doctor Moreau. In the novel’s final section, Elphaba’s story collides with the familiar tale of displaced Dorothy and her dramatic arrival in Munchinland. Nessarose has assumed her inherited position of leadership in Munchkinland and rules her diminutive populace with a blind religious zealotry and a dash of sorcery. Her death by house is celebrated as a liberating gift to the Munchkins, but Elphaba is convinced Dorothy is an agent of the Wizard. She is further enraged when she discovers Galinda, now known as Glinda the Good Witch of the North, is working to protect the foreign interloper and her filthy dog. And of course there is the matter of the enchanted shoes, a gift to Nessarose from their father, which have become something of a touchstone amongst the Munchkins. Upon learning of Dorothy’s visit and bargain with the Wizard, Elphaba retreats to her stronghold in the Vinkus to await her fate at the hands of Dorothy and her companions.

And that, dear friends, was the most difficult plot summary I think I’ve ever tried to write. Maguire’s novel is incredibly dense; it’s an immersion, not just into the life and times of the title character, but of the people and fabric of the Land of Oz. He fashions an entire tapestry of myth, culture, architecture, politics, fashion, races, and religions. Oz seems to exist somewhere between Victorian England and Middle Earth. Since it’s been a good 25 years since I picked up a Baum book, I can’t say how much Maguire takes from the source novels, but I did recognize references to iconic images and themes from both the book and the film: the yellow brick road, silver shoes, Ozma, tiktoks, and Elphaba’s allergy to water (Yes, the Witch succumbs to anaphylactic shock.). Maguire even establishes connections to Elphaba between the characters who will be known as the Tin Woodsman and Cowardly Lion. The only disappointment in all this lush reimaging of Oz was in Maguire’s characterization of Dorothy. She’s given very little in the way of fleshed-out truthfulness in her character and is as blowsy as the storm that brought her into Elphaba’s world. But then again, this is the Witch’s story.

With so much going on in one novel, it is no surprise that Maguire wanted to revisit his Oz and has penned two sequels to Wicked. The first, Son of a Witch, was published in 2006, and the second, A Lion Amongst Men, was just recently released. I expect Maguire may continue to write tales of his Oz considering the magnificent groundwork he laid down in telling Elphaba’s story.

Fantasy novels aren’t often on my bedside table, so admittedly, the fanciful dialogue and prose that is part and parcel of the genre feels a bit burdensome to me after a few hundred pages. For me, reading fantasy is akin to wearing an angora sweater; at first I enjoy the thick, fuzzy fabric, but after a while the hairs start getting in my eyes and driving me insane and I’ve got to take the damn thing off. Around the fourth section, the novel really lost a lot of its energy or perhaps my angora/fantasy fatigue was setting in; either way, I had to actually put the book down for a day or two to recover my interest. For as talented a fantasy author as Maguire is, there were occasions in the novel that read too modern. Dialogue between two characters would lose that otherworldly tone and sound all entire world like some snappy quips lifted straight from of a sitcom (think classic “Will and Grace”).

Back to my original question: Does Maguire succeed in revealing The Wicked Witch of the West as less villainous and more misunderstood? I will say that in the end you don’t like Elphaba; she’s full of faults-prickly, misguided, paranoid, self-loathing-and in many ways completely blinded to reality by those faults. But you sympathize with her. You cringe at her mistakes and her misinterpretations. Through the novel, you become in a way her travel companion on the strange, sad road of her life and in being privy to those bumps and missteps along the way that shape her persona, you view her as not so much a hook-nose wretch but a scarred, lost soul. While her death is not a surprise, it is frustrating in its futility. Maguire sends his Witch off in a more delicate style than the Dorothy of silver screen did: The body apologizes to the soul for its errors, and the soul asks forgiveness for squatting in the body without invitation.


This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. You can read more about it, here.


DVD Releases 10/21/08 | Hope Davis and John Mahoney to Join In Treatment



Comments

I thought this book was interesting, but not engaging.

Maguire threw in a ton of interesting details but took them nowhere. It was like a school exercise -- take this well-known story and flesh out one of the minor characters. It was all much too detached and disjointed for my taste. He's certainly not the first author to mine the fairy tale realm for plots, and he's not even the best. Just one of the more commercially successful.

Posted by: Wednesday at October 21, 2008 9:25 AM

I found this to be a book I respected more than I ever could have liked it. You know: way to create so much backstory, but there is no way that it's an enjoyable read.

It's a (bit) less nerdy version of The Silmarillion.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at October 21, 2008 9:29 AM

I think the interesting thing about this book, that you touch on, is that the wicked witch is not just portrayed as an innocent victim. She's a complicated, prickly, difficult-to-love character who gets involved in revolutionary activities and sort of loses her soul.

Posted by: Sarah at October 21, 2008 9:34 AM

I love your sweater analogy.

Thanks for this review, which I anxiously read and which confirmed my lack of interest. With all the hype for both the book and the musical, one sometimes wonders if her impressions are incorrect.

Posted by: Cindy at October 21, 2008 9:40 AM

I liked the musical treatment, but I think Maguire is generally writing thinly-veiled fanfic.

So much of his story is completely original, disguised beneath a thin membrane of a story everyone's familiar with, so that he's ensured to have some kind of audience.

If this story had been written about his own world, it would have been just as interesting and unique, but would anyone care?

Posted by: twig at October 21, 2008 9:51 AM

I only read about 1/2 of Wicked. It just felt like a big weight to me.

I used to dredge thru books even when I lost interest. But I have come to the conclusion that if it's keeping my interest, I'm not obligated to finish it. Plus I know how it ends.

Posted by: wsapnin at October 21, 2008 9:53 AM

I only read about 1/2 of Wicked. It just felt like a big weight to me.

I used to dredge thru books even when I lost interest. But I have come to the conclusion that if it's not keeping my interest, I'm not obligated to finish it. Plus I know how it ends.

Your review didn't convince me to pick it back up.

Posted by: wsapnin at October 21, 2008 9:54 AM

Damn double post! Please disregard the 1st one!

Posted by: wsapnin at October 21, 2008 9:55 AM

Nicely written and it kind of reminds me of Ahab's Wife in creating a space around small parts of existing novels. Good or bad I don't know. It always seemed like an English assignment grown into a novel.

Of course, the musical was such a smash hit it's sometimes hard to focus on the book. What the Land of Oz have wrought: many books, a movie, a musical oh my!

Posted by: amanda47 at October 21, 2008 9:55 AM

Any time you need to explain why a character turned out warped, twisted and bitter, insert a cliched religious fanatic into the history.

And you wonder why cliched religious fanatics take it personally.

Posted by: bucdaddy at October 21, 2008 10:01 AM

Around the fourth section, the novel really lost a lot of its energy or perhaps my angora/fantasy fatigue was setting in

Totally agree, though I found the first three quarters to be engagingly delightful -- I'm always looking for a book or a film that shows me something that I haven't seen before, something completely out of the world of formula, and setting a revolution in Oz, with the backdrop of the witches having gone to school together, was a stroke of genius. The story needed stronger editing to make it flow better to the ending, but it's a very strong work overall.

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at October 21, 2008 10:06 AM

This is usually not my genre (at all), but you have made me very curious. Thanks for the reconnaissance work and brilliant sweater analogy (you know I´m totally going to steal it).

Posted by: Pants at October 21, 2008 10:21 AM

I always felt that this novel got sloppy when it got away from Maguire's vision of Oz (having Glinda named Galinda to start with? Is either bad research or a sloppy storytelling method to demonstrate some sort of shallow transition). I didn't find it a particularly interesting book and, frankly, it seemed like Maguire didn't either. Like the story he wanted to tell was somewhere in there but given the parameters he'd chosen, he was too restricted to tell it.

Likening it to a school assignment is getting close to the problem. I had an assignment in high school that involved re-writing the Beowulf-Grendel battle from a new perspective. This felt more like literary flexing than an inspired work in it's own right.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at October 21, 2008 10:30 AM

I loved this book and Son of a Witch. The parts that bogged me down were the political bits. In fact, I liked it so much that I read his entire repertoire a few years ago (his schtick got tired when I reached the one about Snow White and the Dwarves).

I keep meaning to re-read Wicked, but haven't for the silly reason that it's awfully big to carry on the subway to and from work.

Maybe I'll stick it on the bedside table and see if it holds up with a second reading. That's my litmus test for all books.

Posted by: Pea at October 21, 2008 10:34 AM

I typically devour fantasy novels, but this one was slow-going for even me. I've not picked up anything else by Maguire since. I didn't hate it, and yes, there are parts that are interesting, but in the end, it didn't captivate me.

Posted by: tt_marie at October 21, 2008 10:34 AM

I picked up this book a few months ago after seeing a few scenes from the musical. I wanted to see what all the fuss was about - several of my friends are huge fans of the show. I guess I'll just have to see it for myself, because the book didn't hold my interest in any way close to the fanatical obsession the musical inspires in my friends.

I agree with the assessment that, at the end, you don't really like Elphaba, but you understand her.

It's a (bit) less nerdy version of The Silmarillion.

Excellent comparison. I still haven't finished that book, despite restarting it several times.

Posted by: Melissa at October 21, 2008 10:50 AM

The musical completely pre-packages the myth and distills the book down to, basically, two axioms--Girlz Rule!!! Friends are 4Ever!!! Which is not surprising, given the market they aimed for. But the book goes a lot deeper.

Posted by: tommytimp at October 21, 2008 11:00 AM

I... actually loved it. I mean, I was a sullen teenager at the time of reading and therefore his target audience, but I'm pretty sure it's more significant than a high school English project. Yes, it is weighty, but I felt like the narrative was so smooth that I sort of got pulled along by the story and finished it easily. I found it thoroughly enjoyable, completely transcending the pomp and fireworks of his subject matter. Couldn't put it down. Wept at the end. One thing that shocks and delights me about the writing is that you are never allowed inside Elphaba's head; Maguire writes predominantly from the perspective of every character but her. You think you know her but you never actually know her; you are forced to watch her self destruction from the outside, and are only allowed in when her rift with reality has made her utterly incomprehensible.

Translation: OMG srsly guys? Wicked is lik TEH BEST Elphie ROX and if u dont think so SUK IT u cold-hearted turds. (What can I say? I never said I stopped being a sullen teenager.)

Son of a Witch is good, but it isn't as compelling. If you want a fleshing-out of Dorothy, that's where to get it.

(Request: Can we get a Pajiba article on the rumours surrounding the announced 2010 Wicked film adaptation?)

Posted by: Ling at October 21, 2008 11:01 AM

This is good timing because A Lion Among Men comes out today. I loved Wicked and really found no fault with it. I can see how some can think it drags but I liked the conversations regarding the true nature of evil and wickedness and I loved Elphaba as a character. I rarely read fantasy novels (the sole expection is Discworld), but I don't consider Maguire's books to be your standard fantasy. Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister has a tighter narrative, but Wicked is still the best novel Maguire has written simply for the characterizations and setting. And with that I'm off to pick up A Lion Among Men.

As for Wicked: The Movie in 2010, I seriously doubt it. But it would be great to get Idina Menzel and Kristin Chenoweth together again for it. What can I say, I'm a purist.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 21, 2008 11:21 AM

I remember really loving this book when I read it fresh out of college BUT (there's always a big But) - I read it again a couple of years back for my book group and found it really hard going.

The musical, however, I just love. I'm not a Wicked-head by any stretch (those bitches are scary) but I've seen it twice.

Posted by: amanda at October 21, 2008 11:51 AM

Not all Munchkins are shorties, according to Maguire

Also according to Baum. That was a cinematic thing. The Munchkins were simply the people of the East in the original Oz books, and they preferred the color blue. The Winkies preferred yellow, the Quadlings, red, the Emerald City, green (until you got into the actual city itself and everything was uncolored), and...I don't remember the fourth country.

Also, Glinda was NOT the same witch that sent Dorothy on her way in the first book, but the witch that helped her home. The first good witch was old and wrinkly.

Also, there's a lot of royal politics in the Baum book that got shuffled aside in the Macguire retelling.

Posted by: Kat at October 21, 2008 12:03 PM

Ugh...Kristen Chenoweth. I always wanted to punch her out like Martin Short did on stage at the "Night of Too Many Stars" the one year. Her voice is just too...well, Disney. Not the fun classic Disney, but that annoying Little Mermaid Disney. You know, that "spoiled little princess bitch who gets everything she fucking wants from her daddy, but still bitches because she wants fucking MORE" annoying.

And thanks to her performance, I won't be reading this book. Blonde, perky, sunny, and a vocal register that could make men sterile just puts me off anything it touches.

As for the book, it sounds a little too much like Ragtime for me. If I want Ragtime, I'll read Ragtime. Good review though, I almost changed my mind on this book. Goddamn you Kristen Chenoweth.

Posted by: Mike R. at October 21, 2008 12:08 PM

Did she sing that song "Popular" that was always playing on AMC theater muzak? That always made my day a little worse.

I mean, I already think she's really unattractive, but I'll grant that that's not her choice. It's totally someone's choice to sing that way though.

Posted by: Jay at October 21, 2008 12:27 PM

Yes Jay, she did. And for that she'll burn in the corner of Hell I consign her to when I take over. Nothing says "popular" like your ass being passed around the inmates of Hell more times than a Stephenie Meyer book. (Note: Ms. Meyer has the corner diagonally across from Ms. Chenoweth, to further maximize the pain of my Hellish plan.)

Posted by: Mike R. at October 21, 2008 12:40 PM

Jay & Mike R: I'm gonna go out on a limb and say you're not big fans of Pushing Daisies, then?

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 21, 2008 12:50 PM

I was surprised by how political this book turned out to be. I haven't read it in years, so much of the plot escapes me know, but I remember fully enjoying Elphaba's character until the very end.

Posted by: Julie at October 21, 2008 12:50 PM

NOW. Jeezy creezy, I need to stop typing fast.

Posted by: Julie at October 21, 2008 12:51 PM

Well my life is already whimsical blueballs, so I don't need to see it dramatized. Chenoweth doesn't have a chance to become a factor.


I've halfassedly intended to read the Maguire books for years, but who knows what'll happen?

Posted by: Jay at October 21, 2008 1:05 PM

I read this a few years ago, and I, too, found it dense and hard to follow. I didn't find Elpaba to be a sympathetic character at all. I always wondered how such a complex novel could be translated into a stage musical. Some of my friends who saw the play assured me that "it's nothing like the book." I don't know if that's a recommendation to see the play, or a warning away from it. However, it's coming to my city next spring as part of a Broadway tour, so I will probably see it.

I haven't read anything else by Maguire, but I think I saw a television movie based on "Confessions of an Ugly Step-sister." Its sisters were the standard misunderstood characters in need of redemption. I think it was a cute, lightweight movie.

Incidentally, "Elphaba" is based on L. Frank Baum's name. I thought that was pretty clever. I don't remember if the witch's name is given in the original book.

Posted by: rlr260 at October 21, 2008 1:12 PM

TylerDFC, I haven't seen much of Pushing Daisies. What I have seen though tells me that I'll enjoy the show, regardless of her presence. (Bewitched, on the other hand, suffered massively from her casting. Not even Michael Caine and Stephen Colbert could save the day.)

Posted by: Mike R. at October 21, 2008 1:13 PM

I didn't even know Chenoweth was IN Bewitched. I just assumed it sucked because it's Bewitched. It never crossed my mind there could be another reason.

Posted by: TylerDFC at October 21, 2008 1:37 PM

Well, the fact that it was Bewitched didn't help any either, but Nicole Kidman was too fucking cute in that movie. Plus, any movie with Sir Michael Caine and Dr. Stephen Colbert deserves to be better than this was.

Excuse me, I need to dream up another, better reason for those two to star in a movie together.

Posted by: Mike R. at October 21, 2008 1:49 PM

I actually loved this book (of course, it's been years since I read it). I read Son of a Witch, Confessions and the Snow White one. Wicked was bar far the best. I liked Son of a Witch, it just left me hanging. I especially liked all of the politics and teenage angst. I felt like I was right back in college!

Posted by: MissNev at October 21, 2008 2:01 PM

Ugh, I could not stand this book. Nothing against Maguire, because I actually really enjoyed "Confessions of an Ugly Stepsister." Possibly because it was actually set in real life, and wasn't introduced to me through this girl I hate who absolutely loooooves the musical and was completely obnioxious about it. She even dressed as "Elphaba" for Halloween, and had her equally annoying boyfriend dress as "Fiyero," when he was really in the almost exact costume the scarecrow wore in the Wizard of Oz. See, this wouldn't be so bad if she didn't get all pretentious and huffy and correct anyone who dared to call them the Wicked Witch and the Scarecrow. Oh well, I guess the confused "Whatever, bitch" looks she got were good enough compensation.

Posted by: Erin S at October 21, 2008 2:49 PM

Ooh this review was right on the spot. I really enjoyed the first half of the book; it was funny, strange, but dark (like other Maguire books I've read, there's bits that made me really uneasy) and really engaging. But the book completely lost me in the last third or so, when Elphaba goes to Vinkus. In fact, the second time I tried to read this I just completely stopped reading after the love affair, and haven't been able to pick it up again.

It's a great concept and some really good writing, but just like Ugly Stepsister, there are points where the book gets so damned JOYLESS, gloomy, and dense (confusing!) with the political crap that I couldn't keep reading.

I'd still like to give the sequels a try, because Maguire really is a good writer, just a particularly joyless one.

Great review!

Posted by: figgy at October 21, 2008 3:04 PM

While I love the books in terms of storyline, Maguire's storytelling is dense (as the review states) and you can seriously get bogged down in terms of like, what the fuck am I reading?

The only bits that I don't like about his writing are him laying out random things that make no sense. Like characters randomly getting pregnant but no one really knows how and in Wicked there is a strange scene where some characters go to a club and see a Tiger fuck a woman or something. I couldn't really figure out what was happening in that part of the book and he never returned to it. Like it was just a part of their lives that had no real impact. It just seemed he wanted to write something weirdly vulgar. I dunno...all of his books have weirdly vulgar aspects to them and aside from that and the denseness, I love the stories.

Posted by: NotBlonde at October 21, 2008 3:07 PM

NotBlonde, I totally agree about the vulgarity. And Godtopus knows I like a little raunch now and then, but Maguire's brand of vulgar is just so...crude and disturbing, and it makes for some very uncomfortable reading moments.

Posted by: figgy at October 21, 2008 3:18 PM

Actually, NotBlonde, if you read a bit farther you'd see that the "vulgarity" has an affect on events miles down the road. It also serves as both an explicit and implicit metaphor for the state of Oz at that moment. I could go of for hours but nobody wants that, now do they?

Erin S: Give that girl two tight slaps for me, won't you?

NOT Idina and Kristen for the movie. You can't have 40 year olds playing teenagers. You just can't. This isn't Grease.

Posted by: Ling at October 21, 2008 5:07 PM

I LOVED Wicked. It was brilliant for every reason you listed. It's by far one of my most favorite books of all time.

Son of a Witch? Not so much. I think it was far less organic and felt very forced. And nothing much happened.

I'm tentative about the new one. I'll give it a try, but I don't think McQuire can top Wicked.

Posted by: Saint Saturn Sunshine at October 21, 2008 5:56 PM

PS: Fabulous review. You write such beautiful work and I love reading your stuff. For Wicked, you enumerated all the reasons to love the book in a far better way than I've ever heard.

Posted by: Saint Saturn Sunshine at October 21, 2008 5:59 PM

Ling I need to ask what the Tiger having sex with someone had to do with anything, because I've read the entire book twice and couldn't find any reason for it other than just being crude.

Posted by: NotBlonde at October 21, 2008 7:05 PM

I figured the tiger sex was a way of fucking with and ultimately psychologically scarring and subduing the populace.
In a completely repulsive and over the top way.

Posted by: Saint Saturn Sunshine at October 21, 2008 7:35 PM

I loved this review Miss Pink. I really wanted to like this book. When I was reading it, I reminded myself repeatedly of that fact. However, I just couldn't. I liked the first half and then it just got so weighted down and dreary.

I was shocked when they made it into a musical and it got such great reviews. I wonder how close the musical is to the book?

Posted by: Lainey at October 21, 2008 8:01 PM

Yes--count this as one more query as to the purpose of the tiger fucking--WT(T)F?

Posted by: Sally at October 21, 2008 8:25 PM

abuh-wha? tiger what now?
i did read that book a while ago... somehow i must have missed that. or was so scarred i just put a mental block on it so i could still enjoy the rest of the book.
this is still one of my favorites, though i'm
skeptical about sequels and not too thrilled to read them.
and i still don't know how it can all be shoved into a musical, but i'm curious enough to maybe see it. i'm not a fan of musicals though...

Posted by: yeratomato at October 21, 2008 10:10 PM

This review is great - I haven't read Wicked yet but now I want to, despite the generally negative reactions in the comments above. Color me curious!

Posted by: Another Jen at October 22, 2008 12:05 AM

The musical is about 5% of the book I would say. They borrowed the names, the girls being at school together, the wizard being a dictator, the anti-Animal sentiment and that's about it. The musical is truly a beast of its own, and a wonderful one inherently (one of my faves). But if you're a fan of the book, don't expect to see it on-stage. The musical is a 2 and half hour long spectacle with a love story, lots of one-liners and a happy/sappy ending. Incidentally, it got Maguire's blessing (they threw boatloads of money at him, I'm assuming)

Oh, and don't mess the with the Cheno! Glinda's the best thing about that show!

Posted by: BMG at October 22, 2008 12:33 AM

Thank the lord someone else agrees with me! It was the first book that my mom and I both read since I was 5 and so I told her I loved it and we talked about it at great length (omitting the fact that it dragged like a leviathan on a hook) thinking it no great harm.
Then the musical came out and we had to go. Ugh. Lesson learned: don't lie to your mom, even about a book, for you will be forced to spend lots of money and sit through 2 hours of brain-deadening retarded singing and dancing. And have to pretend to like it.

Posted by: Rebecca at October 22, 2008 1:12 AM

I tried to read this book. I really did. And it was good! Until the halfway point, when, without much of any foreshadowing, she sleeps with Fiyero in one of the most awkward sex scenes I've ever read (and believe me, I've read my share of them). And then he's killed. And then she becomes a nun. And then I close the book.

I did enjoy the musical, though. That is, until the drama nerds at my school just sort of bore it into the ground. One of these people happened to be my friend. She stopped speaking to me after I celebrated Avenue Q's win of a Best Musical Tony, since Wicked was in competition for that particular award.

I haven't spoken to her since.

Posted by: Bailey at October 22, 2008 1:26 AM

Well, the dwarf TELLS you. "This is Kumbricia, this is Ozma, etc, etc" (all worshipped figures at the time) and has them in compromising positions competing against each other. And the incident splits up the group of friends. And it speaks to the shittiness of Oz under the wizard's reign. and it fucks up Tibbet (or was it Crope?) for life, perhaps he got AIDS, and when he goes to the nunnery to die and he encounters Elphaba and forces her to regain some of her old fight. Plus it's not THAT awkward to read. There's definitely more to it but I"m late for class.

Posted by: Ling at October 22, 2008 11:07 AM

I picked this up a couple years ago to read on a plane and, oddly, re-read it last week. I still think the beginning is the most interesting because, really, who doesn't want to read about the strange monstrous green baby with shark teeth? That shit is just funny. The end drags, but I found it easier going the second time around. I haven't read any other books by Maguire, but am tempted to try Son of a Witch. Just as a good follow-up.

Posted by: Sharon at October 22, 2008 2:09 PM

Sharon:

DO read Son of a Witch. From someone who loved both books but thought the second even better than the first.

Posted by: NeoCleo at October 22, 2008 6:35 PM

Son of a Witch to me wasn't better; just different. It has an oddly different feel to it. It's a good book though. I look forward to reading about the Cowardly Lion because he was my favorite as a child in the Baum books and in the film. And I'm curious as to what Maguire will do with him.

I hope Maguire does a whole series about the different characters, including Glinda because she is a wonderfully complicated character.

Posted by: NotBlonde at October 22, 2008 10:28 PM

I didn't really care for this book. At all, really. I thought it had some good points but ultimately drown in its own politics and poor characterization. I really liked Elphaba as a student and revolutionary, but then she totally lost it and lost pretty much all of my sympathy. Or rather, I just didn't care by the time she died.

I actually have a lot more respect for the musical interpretation. A bit cheesy? Yes, but I felt it better captured the tone of Oz and added some of the more sinister politics involving the Animals and the Wizard. I think it achieved much more of what Maguire hoped to accomplish insomuch as it better delivered on the very idea of telling the Witch's story.

Posted by: major_blueglory at November 11, 2008 4:06 AM