web
counter
 

100 Books in a Year #74: Urban Shaman by C.E. Murphy

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (16)



urban_shaman_cover.jpg

I really wanted to like this book more, but it felt to me like a particularly effective version of someone trying to bank on the Harry Dresden crazy. You like vampire hunters and wizard detectives? How about a shaman cop? It felt like something a housebound librarian/English major — and definitely a femme one — would scribble in her dream journal. It’s stuffed with all the elements that make the quiet girls shudder: Celtic mysticism, Native American folklore, tall gangly women who aren’t good at relationships. It’s set in Seattle, so Murphy feels obligated to mention coffee every five chapters.

It’s established exactly like everything in this ilk, namely the fantasy books with a romance-level pose of some long haired brunette in jeans with some sort of tramp stamp inked on her back. Joanne Walker nee Siobhan Walkingstick, a mechanic for the police, mysteriously spies a woman fleeing a pack of dogs and a long-coated menace from her descending plane. She tracks the woman — through preposterous logic — and ends up getting murdered in a diner by the God Cernunnos, who leads the Wild Hunt. Of course, she gets better.

The book’s clumsily well-written, in that Murphy’s done her share of reading of the genre and is able to burp it up with a klutzy charm. The story spurts like a faulty tram car from plot point to plot point, lurching in and out of the fantastic in some manner aping that of the reluctant mystic. What I like most about Dresden — and even Anita Blake back in the day and Sookie Stackhouse — was that the weird began earlier. We stepped in the story in the middle of them working shit out. It wasn’t this awful sort of tutorial first video game level style of “I’m still learning my powers and what the B button does here” motif. We’re supposed to feel and stumble along with Joanne as she pairs up with Gary the portly old cabby and Bruce, who’s a (hold on to your hats!) cross-dressing mystical believing detective!

It’s not a bad book, just sort of a TBS copy of a better book. Jo spends most of her time falling down and falling in love. Her dialogue’s not as quippy as Murphy thinks it is. And it gets all herky-jerky when it moves from fantasy to reality. It’s part of a series called The Walker Papers, and I’ll give it a fighting chance. I mean, I decided to maybe pick up the fucking Anita Blake’s again after I threw them down in disgust. Maybe this just wasn’t my cup o’ tea. But I bet some of you harridans will just eat it like that other piece of cake you don’t need.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details are here and the growing number of participants and their blogs are here.









Tommy and the Cool Mule Trailer | The Cookie Thief Trailer













Comments

i remember trying to read this a couple of years ago and forgot why i kept putting it off.

thanks for the reminder, prisco. sorry you had to review it.

Posted by: gp at April 24, 2009 9:43 AM

This kind of looks like something I'd pick up, then put right back down again. And I'm a total fantasy whore. I've just hit the point where any book that involves "woman with xxx power is drawn into/already solves crimes by xxx and also probably falls in love. And there are totally vampires or werewolves or something" doesn't do it for me.

Somehow, this doesn't stop me from being continually sucked into new series that pretty much have exactly that going on...I might give this a pass, but at the same time, it might go on the "I'd probably like it anyway if I'd ever read it" pile.

Posted by: Tyburn Blossom at April 24, 2009 10:09 AM

Although I will add that one of my current favorite series (Kate Daniels, by Ilona Andrews) had a somewhat weak first book. The second was very enjoyable, and I've just started the third, which came out earlier this month.

So maybe I'll toss this in the "give it two books to decide whether it's worth sticking with" pile.

Posted by: Tyburn Blossom at April 24, 2009 10:11 AM

I liked it well enough. But not well enough to have picked up any of the sequels.

And yeah, Harry does it all way better. Prisco, have you read Turn Coat yet?

Posted by: lizzieborden at April 24, 2009 10:12 AM

My two cents worth for fantasy:
George R.R. Martin
That is all.

Posted by: Kballs at April 24, 2009 10:31 AM

Man, if I'm going to abuse myself of something in this genre, I'd just skip over the genre and go straight for Christopher Moore's You Suck, Bloodsucking Fiends & Practical Demonkeeping. I got bad urban/modern mysticism out of my system decades ago with Shadowrun & World of Darkness RPGs.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at April 24, 2009 11:42 AM

Regarding the fantasy/paranormal genre:
I loved the Sookie Stackhouse series and have been stumbling around ever since trying to find something that was similarly interesting/funny.

These are my faves:
Karen Chance
Patricia Briggs - Moon Called series

Posted by: malechai at April 24, 2009 12:39 PM

malechai, I really love the Mercy Thompson series.

The Kate Daniels books, by Ilona Andrews, are similarly good, though the first book is a little weak.

Also, don't hold the fact that they're shelves with the romances against them: the Sazi books by CT Adams and Cathy Clamp.

Posted by: Tyburn Blossom at April 24, 2009 12:48 PM

If you like Mercedes Thompson you might also like Kim Harrison (Rachel Morgan series) and Rob Thurman.

Posted by: Kel at April 24, 2009 1:45 PM

dead on review. Weak-ass knockoff.

Posted by: ponch at April 24, 2009 2:08 PM

Ugh, I haaaaate the Rachel Morgan series. It has some interesting twists on the usual fantasy characters, but the writing is mleh and I am immediately infuriated by the author pictures on the back. I dropped it after the first three books; too many questions going unanswered and not enough plot progression to keep me intrigued.

Posted by: Geetch at April 24, 2009 3:17 PM

I'm there with you and the Mercy Thompson series, but the Blake... I only read it now out of sheer masochistic curiousity.
Plus, I don't have to buy the books. I just rent it out for a day and I'm done. Hamilton killed a potentially good series by book 6. Strangely I prefer her Merry Gentry series. (Don't ask.)

But for pure fantasy: R.R.Martin and Pratchett.

Posted by: Four Eyes at April 24, 2009 6:30 PM

Thanks for the reccos. Always looking for something to read and am currently in a fantasy-mythical beings place.

Recently read:
Kim Harrison (Rachel Morgan) - thought book 1 was meh/okay. Interesting premise, but the main chick is kind of a douche.

Rachel Caine (Ill Winds) - Better, but still not Charlaine Harris/Karen Chance good.

Nadia Singh (Angel's Blood) - a romance with an interesting premise. Not bad, but like many of the genre, the female lead is that annoying "tough-girl with a big mouth, but really only just looking for some paranormal snausage".

I've read only a short story with the Harry Dresden character. Is he really the shiznit?

Posted by: malechai at April 24, 2009 8:34 PM

When I was stranded in New Zealand my friends had almost all of James Herbert's books and I read them for the same reason that one might read this book: light, escapist entertainment. Just enough weird ju-ju to keep you mildly entertained and amused while killing time until the next "great" story arrived. I read King's books for the same reason and, to be honest, most sci-fi for the same reason. I don't regret time lost while reading these books or denigrate them as being "unworthy"... they serve a purpose and keep me semi-sane when the real world is so ungodly depressing that I think about checking out.

Posted by: Spender at April 24, 2009 9:53 PM

I dunno - the Dresden files were good to start with, but then the mythology and plot got messy. Plus, it eventually falls into the annoying fantasy novel trap where the characters have (explicitly described) sex that doesn't resemble the sex the rest of us have in the real world. That's always one of my pet peeves - it comes off as slightly creepy wish fulfillment on the author's part.

Probably the best fantasy series I've read in a while is the Night/Day/Twilight/Final Watch series. If you can get a good translation, it's awesome. Sort of a deconstruction of the whole "good vs. evil" idea and very, very Russian.

Posted by: Joe the Plumber at April 24, 2009 11:00 PM

Night/Day/Twilight/Final Watch series by Sergey Lukyanenko. Sort of a deconstruction of the whole "good vs. evil" idea
I loved that his deconstruction matched my thoughts about superhero comics. In order to make a good story the superheros end up being matched with super villains. The average amounts of good and evil remain the same, but with much wider fluctuations (e.g. supervillian derails a train and superhero is faced with a choice of doing something important or rescuing the people, he rescues the people but at the end of the day, the train line is still destroyed). I always thought we'd be better off without the superheros as long as it meant there were also no supervillians. Basically the whole premise of the Night and Day watches is that the superheros and supervillains have voluntarily cut themselves out of the loop, with the watches to ensure they stick to this treaty.
On the other hand I didn't agree with all the moral issues, quite a few strawman arguments.

Posted by: ChrisD at April 25, 2009 8:13 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time