web
counter
 

Under the Dome by Stephen King

By Jen K. | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (38)



stephen-king-3-high.jpg

I probably would have waited to buy this until it was released as a paperback if it hadn’t been for the fact that it was on sale for $9 when I saw it. Despite its size, I read it over a weekend, so it was definitely quickly paced and a bit of a page turner. However, I don’t think it really had to be over 1000 pages, and could easily have been trimmed. And while it was entertaining, it also had its share of weaknesses. First off, as usual, King cannot end a story effectively. His endings have a tendency to come out of nowhere after a few crazy twists that make no sense, or they’re just weak. This one was definitely more on the weak side of things. However, I think that’s a flaw that most people recognize about King so I’m not really going to get into it too much more.

The main thing is that just doesn’t really bring anything new to the table. It’s very much like things King has written before — this is isn’t necessarily a weakness as much of a warning — so don’t expect anything super-original.

Naturally, the story is set in a small town in Maine. One day in October, the town suddenly finds itself surrounded by a dome. No one knows where it came from or what caused it, but it is solid and unbreakable. Nothing can come either in or out (with the exception of a few drops of water and a little bit of air but not enough to really be of any consequence). While there are questions of where the Dome has come from (government conspiracy? terrorist attack?), most of the novel focuses more on what happens within the town after they are cut off from the rest of the world. Yes, they can still watch TV and the internet still works but the outside has no way of enforcing their rules upon the town. The fact that King chooses to just accept the Dome presence, and to explore the effects of this new isolated status on the town is definitely a strength of the novel. A local politician that already had most of the town in his pocket sees this as his chance to gain even more power and control, and convinces most of the population to blindly follow him while only a few are smart enough to see through him and try to set up a type of resistance.

And this is where King starts treading into familiar territory — it just seems like he’s already done that before — the sheep-like populace that follow the wrong person with a few brave men to fight against him. Many of the characters are recognizable from his other novels — Chef, the meth addict, had a rather striking similarity to The Stand’s Trashcan Man, in my opinion. There are of course a few intelligent children and a genius boy who help the adults figure things out. Junior seemed like a rehash of some his other lower-level villains. While King never makes his protagonists into perfect people, in this novel especially, his villains are just plain mean and evil. They have absolutely no redeeming qualities or complications to their character, and I think this weakens the novel. Plus it’s easy to tell who’s bad because they early on make racist and sexist statements. I mean I’m glad the good guys aren’t making those comments, but it just seems like it’s so easy that way — give me something a little more complex. Was the rape scene really necessary other than to establish who the bad guys were? I think it was already clear from other parts of the novel that thugs were taking over without having to add that as well.

There were also a few internal continuity issues that I noticed. At first, Dale Barbara ends up being a former Army captain. Then in the last half of the novel, they keep saying that he’d been a lieutenant. It kind of bugged me that they couldn’t even get his rank straight and also made a comment about him retiring from the Army — if you get out before 20 years, it’s an honorable discharge (hopefully), not retirement.

It’s not to say that this is a bad novel. It’s just it’s basically a lot like reading other Stephen King novels, with a few different elements. And while the ending was weak, I appreciated that he really didn’t start focusing too much on the Dome til much later in the novel and stayed focused on the human side of it.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Jen K’s reviews, check out her blog, Notes from the Officer’s Club.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Box Office Results 11/22/09 | Season of the Witch Trailer









Comments

I'm on page 50 right now. I've had to start a 2nd book to read at work (picked "Running with Scissors") because I'm already tired of lugging this brick around with me. I too bought the $9 Amazon pre-order special. I like it so far, and it moves quickly, but JEBUS this book is huge.

I have no hope for the dome to be explained or an adequate ending. King sucks balls when it comes to endings. But more than any other writer he excels at introducing residents of a small town and than destroying them over the course of the book. So far the best of those was "Needful Things".

Good review.

Posted by: TylerDFC at November 23, 2009 8:16 AM

I didn't read the whole review because I'm about to start this. I got sucked in by a conversation at Borders, where a staff member was rating the book an A- and comparing it to The Stand. I'm hoping for at least a close fourth or fifth?

Posted by: Cindy at November 23, 2009 8:21 AM

His endings have a tendency to come out of nowhere after a few crazy twists that make no sense, or they’re just weak.

You mean, like, the giant spider from outer-space that totally ruined IT for me? Superb story up until he trashed it with that crap.
I dropped King like a bad habit, cold-turkey, that day.
I shoulda billed the fucker for the costs of repairing the hole in the wall made as his book went sailing through it. I don't live up there anymore, but it should still be there, between the walls; sealed-away so that there's one less chance the piss-poor ending will drive another person insane with rage.

Posted by: Rykker at November 23, 2009 8:30 AM

Stephen King saw The Simpsons Movie and decided to make it into a straight horror story?

Posted by: Soulless Merchant of Fear at November 23, 2009 8:37 AM

TylerDFC, I loved Needful Things. This one shows the small town destructiveness very well, but Big Jim is kind of a caricature. I wish he hadn't tried to explain the Dome at all, but he does - I did, however, admire his restraint because he waited until there were less than 50 pages left in the book instead of ruining the last 200 to 300 pages with it. I know King is a horror author, but that tends to be my least favorite part of his books sometimes (such as in Bag of Bones).

Posted by: Jen K at November 23, 2009 8:46 AM

Nice review, Jen. I think you articulate the flaws of King's writing pretty well. There will always be a place on my bookshelf for the SK books that were my gateway drug from Hardy Boys Mysteries to more serious reading, but some of these books really don't hold up to scrutiny very well in adulthood.

The sheep-like populace... a genius boy who helps the adults figure things out... a flawed protagonist and villains that are just plain mean and evil. I do feel like I've read this all before.

Speaking of feeling like I read this before, I made a joking reference in Pajiba Love that it sounds like the plot of the Simpson's Movie but now that I read Jen's review it sounds more like the comic series Girls created by the Luna brothers put out by Image Comics a couple years ago. The premise is the same: small town inexplicably cut off from the rest of the world by an impenetrable, invisible dome of some kind. Then a mysterious naked women is discovered by a main character. She doesn't talk much, just kind of repeats what she hears. And she is affectionate. And violent. And... well it gets really cool and sci-fi but I don't want to spoil it too much. It's not as good as Y:The Last Man, but, if you like Y you might want to give Girls a chance. No superheros just a really compelling science fiction story.

Posted by: Yossarian at November 23, 2009 8:56 AM

Nice review Jen K. I haven't read any Stephen King since he started fucking with The Gunslinger and I can't say I'll start again anytime soon.

Posted by: admin at November 23, 2009 8:57 AM

Sweet, I found issue one of the comic series Girls online as a free preview from Image Comics. I love free stuff online. If I piqued any curiosity with my recommendation above you should check out the link. Although I hope your local library or someone can help you because buying 4 graphic novels for the complete series gets expensive.

Girls issue 1

Unfortunately, I don't think the dome gets introduced until the next issue, so it won't have much in common with the Steven King book yet and it will seem kind of random and out of place. Oh well.

Posted by: Yossarian at November 23, 2009 9:05 AM

Oh, also, one last thing... there may be some, uh, tasteful nudity (comic book nudity) in the above link...so, you might not want to open it at work or anything.

My bad.

Posted by: Yossarian at November 23, 2009 9:16 AM

There has been a lot of talk online that King took The Simpson's movie and ripped it off, but apparently he started the book in the 80's or thereabouts and has written and re-written parts of it on and off until it was published this year.

It's still a strange coincidence, though.

Posted by: ZombieNurse at November 23, 2009 9:44 AM

There was one redeeming quality to Junior, in my opinion - the love he had for the Dorphans. I kept hoping that something would overcome his evil nature to further elucidate his (small) good side. The other thing I liked about Junior was his possibly mental reappearance at the end. I read this last week and have been mulling over it ever since. Some really interesting characters, to me, but def. reminded me of Needful Things or 'Salem's Lot. I love the man anyway, tho.

Posted by: Jenn at November 23, 2009 10:28 AM

I pretty much quit on King after I think it was "Insomnia." If I read him at all now it's strictly short stories because, yeah, these gazillion page novels all start to look alike.

Posted by: , (just , cause I'm tired of typing that other shit) at November 23, 2009 11:18 AM

Under the Dome what a great novel. I love it listening through the audiobook.

Posted by: jhon34 at November 23, 2009 11:27 AM

I think he should just retire already. The last 'new' book of his I read was from a Buick 8 and that suuuuuuuuuuucked. So I've been re-reading his old work and staying away from the new.

Posted by: figgy at November 23, 2009 11:43 AM

figs, I skipped "Buick" because really, how many haunted car novels do we need? King recycles himself, and "Buck" was about as big a clue to that as anyone should need.

Also? "Christine" wasn't very good either.

Posted by: , (just , cause I'm tired of typing that other shit) at November 23, 2009 11:49 AM

I, too, read this in just two long sittings. It is certainly a page turner, but you're absolutely right about it being recycled. Here:


It + Insomnia + The Stand = Under the Dome

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at November 23, 2009 12:44 PM

I just saw King on "The Hour" and he explained that he has been working on this book since the 70s, and he was sure pissed when he heard about the Simpsons movie plot.

I am sure I will read this eventually, as I have read most of his works, but after reading this review, I will not hurry too much.

Posted by: Alli at November 23, 2009 1:11 PM

Thanks for a great review, Jen. I started this book but I don't think I'll finish. Mainly because I agree with what you've written above - it really feels like I've read it all before in his other books. Perhaps I'm just over King. I think the end for me was The Cell and the telepathic flying zombies.

Posted by: Jiffyzen at November 23, 2009 1:55 PM

Stephen king looks like a lizard.

Posted by: Mr. Tusks at November 23, 2009 2:05 PM

At first, Dale Barbara ends up being a former Army captain. Then in the last half of the novel, they keep saying that he’d been a lieutenant.

Since no one has dared to edit King since the late 1980s for fear of either running off the cash cow or shrinking the bigger profits available from printing longer books, stuff like this should be no surprise.

Posted by: Brett at November 23, 2009 4:15 PM

The only Stephen King novel I didn't enjoy was "Dreamcatcher". I also thought "Dolores Claiborne" was pretty weak, but I loved his other novels. My favorite is Bag of Bones. I'm really looking forward to reading Under the Dome.

Posted by: JRM at November 23, 2009 11:31 PM

"Dolores Caliborne," however, is a very good movie. I'd kind of forgotten that.

Posted by: , (just , cause I'm tired of typing that other shit) at November 24, 2009 1:13 AM

I was surprised at how much I liked this book. There were similarities to his other works, yes, but most of them were his strengths, things we've seen before but I didn't mind seeing again (aside from the weak ending. Seriously, someone tell him to just skip the ending).
I thought it would have been possible to cut it down, yes, but only if King had lessened his scope. My favorite aspect was that he showed every single part of that town, whether it was absolutely relevant to the plot or not. It was there and it was happening to someone, therefore it was important.
The experience of reading a book this long is hard to come by, and I appreciated the effort he put into making it incredibly detailed and exhaustive. I thought it was an enjoyable ride and was glad I'd picked it up, even if it did weigh ten pounds. I would definitely reccomend it. If you've got the time, this book will absolutely absorb you.

Posted by: BiblioGeek at November 24, 2009 2:19 AM

When Barbara was recalled to service after the dome went up, Cox told him he'd received a rank promotion. I'm pretty sure it was from captain to lieutenant.

Other than that, it's a fair review. People that love King will love this book. People that love originality will probably be a little disappointed in its similarities to some of his past work.

Posted by: Jim at November 24, 2009 10:22 AM

Jim, captain is a higher rank than lieutenant. He got promoted to colonel. Granted, there are two colonel ranks - lieutenant colonel (LTC) and colonel (COL), but generally, both are just referred to as colonel in conversation. In fact referring to a LTC as lieutenant would earn you a serious ass kicking for disrespect.

Posted by: Jen at November 24, 2009 2:17 PM

I stopped reading King long ago for all the reasons Jen states, but mostly because after my fourth or fifth book I felt like I could write a King novel in my damned sleep. In fact I believe King actually died in that terrible hit and run years ago. He is sitting with Paul McCartney on a cloud somewhere, toking on a number, while 15 randomly chosen high school seniors write all the new "Stephen King" novels from the same rulebook King himself used for so many years.

Posted by: ed newman at November 24, 2009 11:36 PM

I have been a Stephen King fan since the very beginning. Last night I burned this book in our fireplace. I tolerated his many references to Bush and Iraq and so forth. I was seriously enjoying the book, but I lost it close to the end.

How long are you people going to blame Republicans for all of the world's woes?

I have been reading King since his very first book: I AM DONE. As a Republican/Conservative, I am so goddamn Sick and Tired of hearing how horrible George W. Bush and all of the rest of we Republicans are.

WHY CAN'T AUTHORS STICK TO THEIR SUBJECT?
I buy books for entertainment. I do not buy them to listen to the political rants of the authors' about their personal feelings concerning ANY current political situation.

SK has had a fantastic career as a writer. BUT, his obsessive need to incorporate his political beliefs into his writings have lost him at least one fan.

The remainder of his books that I own, (all), will be thrown into the bonfire later.

Posted by: Cariad at January 10, 2010 7:04 PM

To Cariad:
"The remainder of his books that I own, (all), will be thrown into the bonfire later."

You seriously will burn all his books? Do you think that book burning will give Republicans a better name?

Posted by: Terry at January 12, 2010 10:48 PM

I have read SK since the very early 70's and used to enjoy/get a 'thrill' out of all his work. However, he lost me years ago with books Desperation and A Buick 8.

BUT, I bought 'Under the Dome' because I read a good review....blah blah.

I was some 3/4 of the way through it when I realized that the hatred he has for Republicans is even worse than it was 30 years ago. I started a fired in the fireplace and burned the book. I have plans to fry the rest of them. I am tired of having what used to be one of my favorite authors insisting on making his political views a HUGE part of his writing.

I will never buy another book by Stephen King.

Posted by: Liz at January 14, 2010 6:09 PM

Cariad:

I agree with you completely. Thank you so much for saying what I also feel! As the Marines say" Semper Fi!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Liz at January 14, 2010 6:13 PM

Burning books is disgusting when it is on an official scale. Burning a book in our fireplace is a choice that we can make. If SK had left his politics behind and finished the book as proposed, it would have been great. But he chose not to. And because of that he has alienated/lost a great many of the fans he first gained in the early years of his career.Let us not forget that he is a novelist and therefore must depend on the public to PURCHASE his novels/works.

I do not want to hear/listen/be subjected to his POLITICAL VIEWS.

I want him to write a novel that lets me escape from THIS for a while.

Enough. Simple explanation: Either be a FICTION writer or become a POLITICAL COMMENTATOR. I much prefer the first. But to end it all: I am done with Stephen King. I have given all of my books by him to Charity. May they prove to be insightful to others.

Good Night.

Posted by: Liz at January 14, 2010 6:25 PM

Whatever SK's political views are a part of his mentality and that mentality calls me back to everything he writes. Some I don't enjoy as much as others but that will not keep me from getting my hands on the next new one down the line.
And I did get a kick out of "Simpsons The Movie"!!!

LT

Posted by: LaLa at June 4, 2010 8:30 PM

I just finished Under the Dome and I also felt that some of the characters in this book seemed familiar and was disappointed in the ending. And speaking of the ending, I have this really strange "itch" in my brain....I keep seeing a scene where faceless alien children are gathered around a box playing a game that only ends when they are called for lunch, a game which is actually affecting people on earth....I am sure I saw this in a tv show (Twilight Zone or Outer Limits, something like that). Does this ring any bells for anyone else? I mean, what I am remembering is alien children whose faces look like angular boxes with white felt or suede pulled over them. Strangely similar to King's "leatherheads".

Posted by: Leeanne at July 11, 2010 10:36 AM

I just finished the book last week.

For the most part, it flowed well and was fast-paced, which helped hold my interest, but the ending was so rushed and silly, it kinda killed the rest of the book for me. I was about 20 pages from the end, and kept wondering when things were gonna start building to the climax,then it was just over.

Julia's plea, using her's and other's memories to get sympathy from the alien was just a lazy and convoluted way to end the book. No big surprise, seeing who wrote this thing.

Posted by: ben at July 16, 2010 9:32 PM

Just finished this yesterday. Much as I enjoyed reading it and it is a page-turner....the ENDING BLOWS!!!

Posted by: AC at July 26, 2010 3:35 AM

It's not often that you can say a 1000 page book is a page turner, but this one was. Yes, it was all SK's "been there, done that" but it was...comforting nonetheless.

At the end though, I kept thinking that a far more interesting book would have been "Life After the Dome"...

Posted by: Janice at July 26, 2010 3:04 PM

I just started the book and am about a third of the way thru.

As for Barbara's military rank, I'm not sure if it is an inconsistency or a lack of clear story telling. If Barbara is about 30 years old and a product of West Point or ROTC then it could make sense.

The standard compulsory hitch for either of those tracks is 6 years which means, if one keeps their nose clean, they may make captain (O-3) about a month before their mandatory time expires. Therefore, serving the majority of their time as a first or second lieutenant but officially a captain at the time of separation.

Also, officers are not "discharged" unless it is dishonorably. When an officer walks at the end of his required service, it is more commonly referred to as separation, resignation, or sometimes, though not often, "retirement". However, no pay benefits are available before the 20 year mark.

Hope this helps.

Posted by: BenJamin at January 9, 2011 10:00 PM

I've read every book King has written, excepting "Cell" and "Under the Dome." I gave up on "Cell" when I figured out (after the first twenty pages) that it was just another zombie survival story (so unoriginal). I tried reading "Under the Dome," but was sadly disappointed by the rehashed characters and plot devices. King has gradually become more and more tiring from "Bag of Bones" on. I had read that it was about this time that his publisher no longer required King to work with an editor, and it shows. Unfortunate.

Posted by: TJW at March 20, 2011 12:24 AM