free counter with statistics Twilight by Stephenie Meyer | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

twilight.jpg

Bite Me, Suck It, and Fuck Off

Twilight by Stephenie Meyer / Sarah Larson

Book Reviews | September 10, 2008 | Comments (95)


Publisher’s Note: Due to some internal miscommunication, we assigned a review for both the last book in Stephenie Meyer’s series , which was posted last week, and this, the original book in the Twilight series, the source material for the upcoming film. Also, we can’t get enough of Twilight around her. Love it!

In the interest of full disclosure, let me start off by saying that I was predisposed to dislike Twilight. I hate romance novels and I am ambivalent at best with regard to vampires. I tried reading Anne Rice when I was about 13 and she was at the height of her popularity, and I haaaaaaated her books. They gave me hives. I’ve never read the Anita Blake series, but I’m familiar with the premise and they sound like the dumbest damn things in the world. I have a friend who reads them and forces me to endure painful phone conversations wherein she yammers about Anita Blake for, like, an hour and a half … and I play Mario Kart on my Super Nintendo and make noncommittal noises of faux-listening at random intervals and only absorb about every forty-fifth word she says. To be fair, Super Nintendo is usually what happens whenever I’m involved in a phone conversation lasting longer than ten minutes, but holy shitcakes, Anita Blake is boring. I did like “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” but not because it had anything to do with vampires. It was just an awesome show that happened to have vampires in it.

Twilight? Is not awesome. Not at all. I tried; I really tried to take a mental step back from my preconceived notions and see if I could find the secret of the big hairy deal about this book. What I found? Was a pile of ass. With hemorrhoids on it. And also a barnacle. In summary, awkward teen Bella (who has a messed-up relationship with her needy, immature mother) moves in a fit of pique exiles herself to a tiny, gloomy, perpetually rainy Pacific Northwest town, where she lives with her father (with whom she has a messed-up relationship, because he is absentee to the point of inconsequence). Enter angsty “heartthrob” Edward, who is basically an Abercrombie & Fitch mannequin stuffed with obsessive tendencies and halfheartedly animated, like the shadow puppet version of a compulsive stalker who ate a boxful of waterlogged fireworks. Oh, and he’s a vampire, which is apparently supposed to be inherently sexy or something. Commence messed-up relationship, complete with an alarming degree of isolation and bizarre, psychotic mood swings.

None of the relationships in this book are even remotely healthy. I guess Edward fits the darkly mysterious archetype, and I know the tortured hero is classically romantic or whatever, but the intensity of his focus on Bella is frankly unnerving. Bella doesn’t really have a personality, as such; she’s just a bit of fluff to be tossed about by the furious winds of manipulation around her. Her identity is defined by the needs of others, and she’s so subservient it’s genuinely disturbing. The closest she comes to asserting any independence of mind is by asking a bazillion questions, and even then she seeks permission to do so. I am mystified and bothered in the extreme that hordes of tiny tots are reading this drivel and finding it romantic. I mean, I get that young girls love dramatic moodiness, but this garbage is just so profoundly unsettling.

The jacked-up stalkerish creepiness of the codependent relationship at the centre of this book has been much-ballyhooed by many, of course, but by no means is it the only stink emanating from this dump. Let’s start with the sparkling, shall we? Edward, who is a vampire, sparkles. He SPARKLES. What the fucking fuck? Are you kidding me? And then there are the names. Bella Swan and Edward Cullen? What the hell is this, Undead Sweet Valley High? Oh wait, that’s exactly what it is, except dumber and more psychotic.

Meyer’s prose didn’t exactly blow my mind either, to put it mildly. I once taught a short story workshop for junior high students, and aside from the unnecessarily excessive length, Twilight is pretty similar to the stuff those kids produced. There are lukewarm character motivations, overly wrought dramatic moments and histrionics aplenty, and none of it is executed with particular skill. Now, having read the book, I’m still lost as to the reason for its phenomenal popularity. I know part of the disconnect here is my own lack of interest in this sort of fanciful tomfoolery, but I still spent 498 pages searching for the elusive magic that has made so many people swoon over this book. I never felt like I found any magic, and I’m more confused about the appeal of Twilight than I was before reading it.

Sarah Larson is not the scorpion-eating famewhore who once dated George Clooney. She lives in Minnesota, where she is usually up to no good. You can find her monitoring the imminent undead armageddon at Zombie Forecast, or hardly ever updating her woefully neglected blog at Unscheduled.


Pajiba Love 09/10/08 | Your Superhero Powers



Comments

I worked at a borders for the releases of her third book in that series and for "The Host," her first "adult novel." I haven't read one damn page of any of them, but I can tell you I don't understand what the hell my 34 year old male manager was doing reading all of them, and trying to tell me that "The Host" was "gritty" and that the twilight series itself was "really well written...Stephanie Meyer is like...a good author."

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at September 10, 2008 12:57 PM

As someone who actually digs vampires (I was an Anita Blake fan before they devolved into straight-up porn), I cannot get enough of reviews that say how much this series sucks. It's just so, so very bad.

I'll also must add that apart from Edward's magical sparkle powers, he's also cold, and hard like marble , something that Bella inexplicably finds swoon-worthy. WFT girl? When he ditches in the second book, I half expected her to go around molesting statues in the park. "Their total lack of emotion and cold embrace remind me of my beloved!"

Posted by: RocketsandRoses at September 10, 2008 12:58 PM

so what you're saying is that it's basically Buffy and Angle fanfic?

Posted by: Estelle at September 10, 2008 1:06 PM

Any book/film/play that insists upon a "perpetually rainy" backdrop loses me instantly (except Se7en).

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 10, 2008 1:07 PM

Combine this with the disturbing photos from the upcoming movie and... yeah. Passed a tweenster clutching the final book and sobbing over the miracle that is modern print - "I can't believe I'm holding it. I'M HOLDING IT!!" Wanted to let her know that's probably a phrase she should lose before she touches her first cock.

Posted by: Megan at September 10, 2008 1:14 PM

He... sparkles? Fucking sparkles?? Like a vampire Jem or something? What kind of shit is that?

Posted by: TK at September 10, 2008 1:21 PM

FOR TK!!

Jem (Jem is excitement) oh
Jem (Jem is adventure) oh
Glamour and glitter
Fashion and fame

Jem (Jem is truly outrageous)
(Truly, truly, truly outrageous)
Oh whoa Jem (Jem)
The music contagious (outrageous)

Jem is my name
No one else is the same
Jem is my name

But we're the Misfits
Our songs are better
We are the Misfits, the Misfits
And we're gonna get her

Jem (Jem is truly outrageous)
(truly, truly, truly outrageous)
Oh whoa Jem (Jem)
The music contagious (outrageous)

Jem is my name
No one else is the same
Jem is my name

Jem Theme Two

Me and my friends are Jem girls
Jem, Jem is my name
Exciting adventure
Fashion and fame
Once you're a Jem girl
You're never the same

Common, common and be a Jem girl
Jem, Jem is my name

Me and my friends are Jem girls
Jem, Jem is my name
Truly outrageous
That's a Jem girl
Glamour, fashion and fame

Exciting adventure
Fashion and fame
Once you're a Jem girl
You're never the same

Common, common and be a Jem girl
Jem, Jem is my name
(Jem)
---------------------------------
No thanks necessary, ma'am.

Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 10, 2008 1:25 PM

Like a vampire Jem or something?

Kinda. Except subtract all the awesome and cram in a bunch of suck. Also, you know how Jerica was, like, the smart side of Jem? There is no Jerica here.

Posted by: Sarina at September 10, 2008 1:27 PM

These kids nowadays have no idea what a real vampire goes through day-to-day. There's no romance, no sparkling, no star-crossed lovers bullshit - none of that. Christ, you know what I spent this morning doing? Traipsing about through the sewers of Wismar looking for rats. Yeah, rats. Great nutrition, right? And don't get me started on women - every goddamed week some woman pure in heart tries to make me forget the rooster's first crowing. For those of you who watch/read shit like Twilight, "rooster's first crowing" means dawn. Yeah. That'll do it. Some broad thinks she can blood-roofie me into hanging out with her until the sun comes up and thinks she's doing the world a favor by tricking me into burning to a friggin' crisp... Ooh, how romantic! Please...

Posted by: Count Orlock at September 10, 2008 1:36 PM

"I asked wikipedia about Twilight and the internet died."

Pretty much sums up my sentiments on this book. Also, funniest teeshirt ever.

I think what bothers me most is this was Stephanie Meyer's first attempt at a full length novel. She openly admits to writing it, and it's subsequent drafts, sending it to publishers, and getting a deal in something like six to nine months. That is a laughably short time to birth a novel. And I think there's something in there about how her editors never really told her to change anything.

This crap gets published, but my novel about the were-platypus and the Sex Teacher (who's taken a vow of celibacy, until she, you know, meets the were-platypus and falls for his...nose) will never see the light of day. Life is cruel.

Posted by: Ava at September 10, 2008 1:41 PM

Ew.

Going back to my pile of books to be read (thankfully lacking anything from this series) for comfort now...

Posted by: Kizzer at September 10, 2008 1:45 PM

The more people squeal over Twilight the more I want to retreat into a cave with a copy of Dracula.

Posted by: minorblue at September 10, 2008 1:46 PM

B-Slim, I'll bet you didn't even need to look that shit up. You knew it by heart, didn't you.

Yeah, I thought so.

Posted by: TK at September 10, 2008 1:46 PM

were-platypus

Oh God oh god Rule 34--there--on the horizon--RUN EVERYBODY RUN!

Posted by: Jerce at September 10, 2008 1:48 PM

My mom recommended this series (which she is currently reading for the 2nd time), along with "Wicked Lovely" by Melissa Marr. I read the Melissa Marr book, and this series sounds like pretty much the same concept: outsider girl with zero personality is lusted over by a member of some fantasy world (in Marr's book, he's the king of the summer faeries), then has to make some dramatic choice.
All of the melodramatic, retarded dialog and "romance" led me to believe that although I love her dearly, my mom's current literary tastes match mine from the 7th grade. I should have guessed, considering she was really into bodice-rippers before this.
Moral of the story: if you like Tom Robbins and your mom spends much of her time on fanfic sites for TV shows starring David Boreanaz, avoid any books she recommends like the plague.

Posted by: scurvyplease at September 10, 2008 1:51 PM

Kick Ass! I love the Twilight bashing. I read them all because the dumb asses at my work kept telling me how great they were. Now I assume these co-workers are either slightly retarded or so boring and so lacking in any kind of love they think this is high romance. One woman even brow-beat her wimpy husband into reading it. And guess what? He said he liked it. The poor, stupid, hen pecked bastard. There is so much good Teen reading out there, it's depressing that this is so popular. But let's face it, nothing new or interesting has come out of the vampire genre in...forever? Actually that's not true. Octavia Bulter's Fledgling really kicked ass. The only vampire book I would recommend to anyone. It's sexy, smart and so well written (it even has internal consistency). In other words everything Stephenie Meyer is incapable of writing.

Posted by: grinder at September 10, 2008 1:56 PM

I'm gonna go ahead and guess that Stephanie Meyer has a lot of cats.

Posted by: MG at September 10, 2008 1:57 PM

Estelle I can hear you giggling maniacally all the way over here.

Posted by: tamatha at September 10, 2008 1:58 PM

"Buffy and Angle?" An acute observation. How obtuse.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 10, 2008 1:59 PM

No, because Buffy had something Bella doesn't: a personality. (Tangent: You misspelled Angel as Angle, which made me imagine Buffy getting it on with a protractor.) I worked at Borders and was in charge of the midnight release party for Breaking Dawn. Thus, I had to read all three books. At the midnight event, the crowd was divided by Edward and Jacob fans, bitterly arguing against each other. It wasn't until one person announced that "Bella is just a twit who doesn't deserve either," that the crowd united in applause. We can take solace in the fact that the hordes of teenage girls figured out that she wasn't a role model, but an unbearable waste of a character.

Posted by: Just Me at September 10, 2008 2:01 PM

Heavens, even Buffy and Angel at their most overwrought weren't as aggravating and downright puzzling as Bella and Edward.

I'm two and a half books into the four (because the story is mildly interesting, I suppose, and I'm one of those people that MUST see a book/series through to the end once I start) but I find it...incomplete. It's like the ghost of an idea that might have been good in the hands of a better writer.

It should be noted that if any man tried to treat me the way Edward treats Bella, I'd kick him square in his undead junk.

Posted by: sandra at September 10, 2008 2:03 PM

"Buffy and Angle?" An acute observation. How obtuse.

:Groans. Then cackles.:

I'll be reading at least the first book in the series, my curiosity has gotten the better of me. I can't help it, I bend so easily to peer pressure.

Posted by: Julie at September 10, 2008 2:05 PM

I'm just here to make a joke about how I'd like to bend Julie to some peer pressure of my own.

Posted by: Mella at September 10, 2008 2:08 PM

Ha!

Posted by: Julie at September 10, 2008 2:09 PM

Don't do it, Julie. Seriously, it'll just piss you off and make you want to punch strangers. I was nearly arrested for assault a good half dozen times before I finished the book.

Posted by: Sarina at September 10, 2008 2:12 PM

In the interest of fairness, I suspect that Sarina wants to punch strangers regardless of what she's reading.

I know I do.

Posted by: TK at September 10, 2008 2:13 PM

But but Sarina...curiosity! Peer pressure! MASOCHISM!!

Posted by: Julie at September 10, 2008 2:16 PM

I keep forgetting that you know all my secrets, TK. It's true; I kinda want to punch everyone no matter what.

And Julie, if you add "morbid" to reason #1, I might be willing to accept it. I refuse to consider #2 a reason to do anything. And #3... well, it won't be a good hurt. Just so you know.

Posted by: Sarina at September 10, 2008 2:20 PM

Estelle, Buffy and Angel, for all the drama, had character motivations. And well developed arcs. And histories. And their relationship, while not exactly easy or always awesome, at least was not abusive or seriously unhealthy. And when it got that way, everyone said "hey, that's f-ed up...fix it!". Which is not what happens, to my knowledge, in these books..though I refuse to read them.

Posted by: KatSings at September 10, 2008 2:21 PM

I will not be reading this as I tend to avoid books that are super popular with everyone and his brother. I will not read this just like I flat ass refuse to touch Harry Potter.

Sarina, I also hated Anne Rice. I remember it took me 4 months to slog through The Queen of the Damned.

Posted by: Melody at September 10, 2008 2:23 PM

Actually, I completely agree with pretty much everything you said.

And yet, I own all four books, and have read all but the last one. Go figure.

Posted by: lizzieborden at September 10, 2008 2:25 PM

I have a friend who reads this stuff. She admits it's not well-written and the characters are cheesy, but she says the plot drags her along and the writing does improve. (Which I take to mean, she doesn't notice how bad it is when the plot gets ahold of her).
Whatever. It does not appeal to me at all. I won't even try it, because if it did drag me under, I would just feel so soiled...

He sparkles? Oh well, I guess that saves on lightbulbs...

Posted by: Tarn at September 10, 2008 2:28 PM

You know, this is going to be one of those things I probably regret saying, but anyone looking for Vampire/supernatural related romance is probably better off with Charlaine Harris than this dreck. I've only read the first book in the Southern Vampire series, but if it wasn't necessarily better (I've never read any of the Twilight books) it was at least shorter.

Oh, and everyone's a full grown adult rather than petulant adolescents. That might make a big difference too.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at September 10, 2008 2:34 PM

Mr. Sparkle is a magnet for foodstuffs...he will banish food particles to the land of wind and ghosts.

I'm disrespectful to dirt! Can you see I am serious! Get out of my way, all of you!

This is no place for loafers. Join me or die.
Can you do any less?

For lucky best wash, use Mr. Sparkle!

Posted by: TK at September 10, 2008 2:35 PM

re: Anne Rice

I have tried desperately to get through her books. I really want to like them. The only one I have successfully finished is The Witching Hour, and I couldn't get more than hlafway through the second in that series. They're just too damn dense.

However, under the pen name A. N. Roquelaure, she wrote a series about Sleeping Beauty which was.. well, let's just say it's not for children. By which I mean it's loaded with sadomasochistic sex. It's pretty hot. I made it all the way through the series of 3 of those.

Ooohhh, Mr. Sparkle!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 10, 2008 2:37 PM

I totally shared your concerns about how unhealthy Bella's relationship is with Edward. Seriously - when they fight, he is strong he enough to literally bend her to his will, and further, he pretty much spends all of his waking hours watching her - like less than spending time with her, he stares at her. It's totally creepy. Even before they were dating, he would sneak into her room and watch her sleep. Romantic... or the precursor to an abusive boyfriend? It really troubled me.

HOWEVER, I will say I read this at the pool in a day, and... moved onto the next book. And now I'm reading the third. I can't really say what is motivating me to continue reading them, except that it's obviously fluff, and nothing really happens in them. Like, I can describe in about a sentence the plots of all three combined, and sometimes that's just what a generally literate reader needs.

Posted by: J at September 10, 2008 2:38 PM

The Buffy and Angel storyline from "Buffy" had already been done, so I have no idea why this lesser (least?) version was unleashed onto the populace.

In the hands of a better author, a story about how two people in a complicated, doomed relationship (If Bella and Edward make out, she could die) could be intriguing, and that's what I thought after I read "Twilight." And then I realized, uh, just watch "Pushing Daisies" instead.

Posted by: kay at September 10, 2008 2:38 PM

Mr. Sparkle...in your pants!

Posted by: Melody at September 10, 2008 2:44 PM

Okay, I know that I'm the minority, but I like the books. Not in an "OMG Edward is so sexy why can't a magical creature fall madly in love with me and buy me a fast car too!!??" kind of way, mind you. More in a PG-13 rated movie I'd take my little sister to kind of way. I admit they are fluff, and absolutely a horrible example of relationships for the early teenage girls they are written for.

But, when I force myself to put aside my cynicism of mad romance, I can enjoy them for what they are. By no means fantastic literature, but a guilty pleasure.

Also, I just have a thing for vampires.

Posted by: christine at September 10, 2008 2:49 PM

Oh, christine. It's a good thing you're so pretty.

Ha! Kidding. You know I finished them before you did, and I didn't start reading them until you told me you were. I have some kind of love/hate relationship with them. Well, more like/hate. I couldn't put them down, yet I didn't really enjoy them, per se. I did in a way, but not. I don't even know how to explain it... it's like she laced them with cocaine, somehow.

Plus, I already stated yesterday that I enjoyed The Mists of Avalon, so I think we all know I have no taste in literature.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 10, 2008 3:01 PM

I totally agree with your review, Sarah. I thought I'd see what all the fangirl squeeing was about and read the book... and I don't get it. Bella is just about the lamest female protagonist EVER. Seriously, I hate to think of any teenagers looking up to her... is having an obsessive, controlling stalker something you should want? Absolutely not!
As for your question, Estelle... it's Buffy/Angel fanfic if Buffy has had a lobotomy.

Posted by: Vitality at September 10, 2008 3:10 PM

If you think the books are bad... go to www.etsy.com and search twilight. There are like a 1000 arts and crafts items completely dedicated to this series. The Twilight fandom is completely scary!

Posted by: spaztastic at September 10, 2008 3:14 PM

TK, you officially just gained my undying love and affection. Anyone who supports joint ventures between Matsumura Fishworks and Tamaribuchi Heavy Manufacturing Concern is tops in my book.

Posted by: Kizzer at September 10, 2008 3:30 PM

I can be a fan of romantic books, but for the most part, they're crap without good context. This book, terrible development of anything, including sympathy for the main character. Also, as good looking as a statue is, how is that good in a boyfriend? I will never understand.

Posted by: kelsy at September 10, 2008 3:31 PM

"If you think the books are bad... go to www.etsy.com and search twilight."

Whoa. Well, now I know where to head if I ever get a hankerin' for some tacky charm bracelets or a bunch of crap shaped like swans and covered in glitter.

However, this shirt did amuse me, as I like the implication that the Twilight universe is for the mentally delayed kids that the other magical places don't want.

Posted by: Sarina at September 10, 2008 3:35 PM

best.fucking.book.review.
E.V.E.R!

Posted by: hater from siloam springs at September 10, 2008 3:45 PM

I said it before in the "Breaking Dawn" thread, and I will say it again - I devoured every. single. one. of these books, not because I liked them, but because I was compelled to get through them.

As only a 12 year old girl can do, I wanted to have hot Vampire-related relations (whatever that means) with Louis from "Interview With a Vampire", but my affections waned fairly quickly. I can only hope that my daughter's Edward Lust (we've already had the discussion about how creepy and stalker-y it is to hang out in someone's bedroom watching them sleep) also just becomes something she's mildly embarrassed about when she's older (like the Jonas Brothers, Uggs, and America's Next Top Model).

Also, as much as it pains me to say it, I will be sitting with a group of 'tween girls on the first day the movie opens, rolling my eyes so hard they might just expel themselves onto the popcorn-and-soda befouled floor.

Posted by: snarkcitysweetie at September 10, 2008 4:09 PM

I went through my vampire stage with the Anne Rice books. The first two were OK, then the series jumped the shark big time. I don't seek out other books in the vampire chronicles anymore, but if I find one I haven't read (in a used bookstore, for example) I will read it. I just read "Blackwood Farm" this summer, and it sucked moose dicks, but I had to read it to the end. I guess I'm just a masochist at heart. I don't think I need to start the Twilight series.

However, the Sleeping Beauty books were hot. I loaned mine to my brother, and never got them back.

Posted by: rlr260 at September 10, 2008 4:34 PM

I don't think you can rip on fanfic like that, Estelle. At least buffy and Angel fanfic has actual characters you might care about. And ends.

Posted by: lilianna28 at September 10, 2008 4:35 PM

I won't lie, I read all the books in like a week. They weren't good but once I commit to something I see it through to the end, even if it causes great physcial or mental harm. The series in it's entirety caused great mental anguish, and the bith scene in the last book had me dry heaving in my office, and had me considering a tubal.

However the following is shit that will give me nightmares for eternity:
http://www.etsy.com/view_listing.php?ref=sr_gallery_2&listing_id=14802816

Posted by: spaztastic at September 10, 2008 5:00 PM

Try reading Nancy Collins' "Midnight Blue: Sonja Blue Collection"... she's got one clunker in there, but generally the stories are kick ass and fun. Lots of violence and gritty sex *wink wink*.

Posted by: snapnhiss at September 10, 2008 6:25 PM

@ spaztastic: this is my favorite part of the etsy listing: "non-removable shirt (sorry, ladies)"
it's a doll made of yarn. uhhh?

Posted by: scurvyplease at September 10, 2008 6:36 PM

whatever, you smarmy bastards...ESL and shit.

plus I was referencing Buffy and Angele (see what I did there?) FANFIC, not the actual show.

Posted by: Estelle at September 10, 2008 7:24 PM

SPOILAGE!!!! (just so you know)

Some ancient dead guy spends every night for weeks breaking into your bedroom to watch you sleep without your permission or knowledge. Does anyone else find that more wrong and criminal than sexy?

SM is actually a horny 14-year-old, right?

Posted by: YeahButNoBut at September 10, 2008 7:35 PM

I fucking love Mario Kart. Best game of N64. That and Zelda.

Also - I am so so sorry they felt the need to subject both of us to this rubbish. But thank you for sharing my pain, Sarah.

~ dsbs (aka Donna Sherman)

Posted by: dsbs at September 10, 2008 7:58 PM

I find it fascinating how I hated this book, yet was unable to put it down. Her writing was ridiculously soppy, melodramatic and repetitive, yet it totally sucked me in.

Something I found drastically annoying was the way that Meyers doesn't follow that basic piece of storytelling advice that most students are taught in highschool - show don't tell. So rather than actually explain how or why Bella's loins are all aflutter over Edward, the reader is just meant to accept her repeated statements without demonstration or explanation.

So really, what I would like to know is how on earth did this slushy, soppy, sentimental schmaltz (I love alliteration!) manage to suck me (an educated, sensible person with pajiba-taste who should know better) into its hypnotic depths???? This is not rhetorical, someone tell me!

Spoilerish: Also, something I found so very odd and frustrating was how the big climax of the book (ie the big rescue) was never fully explained - we never really found out how Edward and Co got there and what they did along the way. Meyers spends the first 4/5ths of the book with little plot, just romantic dribblings, and when she finally gets to the action it's meagre and not fleshed out and incomplete. Odd.

Posted by: JJ McCLay at September 10, 2008 8:09 PM

Thank you baby jesus... I work in the industry as well and can not stand these books, refuse to crack em open and will only tell people when asked how they are "Well, they sell well.."
(By the way, you get that answer from a bookseller anywhere and it translates to "It's Crap-tastic!")

Posted by: bookslut at September 10, 2008 8:27 PM

"I fucking love Mario Kart. Best game of N64. That and Zelda."

N64? Get outta here with your terrifying newfangled technology, devil woman! I wasn't kidding when I said Super Nintendo. I guess I could buy a fancy new game console... but all I ever play is Mario Kart, Street Fighter and Clue, so what would be the point? I used to have Zelda, but then my sister borrowed it like five years ago and I haven't seen it since.

Posted by: Sarina at September 10, 2008 8:29 PM

Well the best game of Super Nintendo is clearly that one where Mario and Luigi use their arms to switch around bases while block thingies fall on them from above, and three of a kind in a column makes all three disappear, and the goal is to empty the screen of all block thingies.

I am the only one who has any idea what I'm talking about, aren't I?

Also, Clue in all forms is awesome. I should have thrown in a flames on the side of my face reference somewhere in the Twilight review. Ah, life is just full of regrets.

Posted by: dsbs at September 10, 2008 8:54 PM

I've been told to "give this series a chance," but sparkling vampires? No thank you.

Posted by: Shaun at September 10, 2008 8:57 PM

Except worse.

Posted by: Kathryn at September 10, 2008 8:59 PM

can tell you I don't understand what the hell my 34 year old male manager was doing reading all of them, and trying to tell me that "The Host" was "gritty" and that the twilight series itself was "really well written...Stephanie Meyer is like...a good author."

As another former Borders employee, I can attest the BI is one of those companies where people certainly do get promoted to their level of incompetence. Your manager sounds like the usual semi-literate dork whom gets fast-tracked.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 10, 2008 9:48 PM

For the love of all the innocent grizzly bears and mountain lions that the sparkly and FABULOUS vamps fight/kill/feed on, why won't Pajiba review a better vampire story? We have del Toro's 'Cronos' and...Twilight? UGH. Please, I need a review of GOOD vampire fiction (*cough*"Let The Right One In" by John Ajvide Lindqvist*cough*) before my brain explodes, kthx.

(Don't take that to think that I'm opposed to all the wonderful VENOM spewing forth from intelligent people across the globe, because I love it to bits, truly, but all my eloquent, hate-filled diatribe can be summed up beautifully in the form of a comic. EVIDENCE: http://headtripcomics.comicgenesis.com/d/20080505.html)

Do carry on.

Posted by: Cookie at September 10, 2008 9:56 PM

Ye gads. I gave you a bad link. My day is forever RUINED by the unspeakable sins I have committed, the HORRORS that the world has endured by my hand, oh how can Pajiba ever forgive me for such TRESPASSES against your maiden virtue, when all I ever wanted was to stare at you unblinkingly from across the room and DAZZLE you into total subservience to my will, so I could watch you sleeping ALL night, EVERY night in the hopes that one day I could call you MINE and kill any other mere mortal male that DARES approach your spineless and yet utterly "unique" BEAUTY, because they would NEVER understand you like I would, because I BROOD and GRIMACE all the time and thus only I can love you the way you DESERVE TO BE LO@#*(Y#ROEFVHWSKE*#---

Right, the comic.

http://headtripcomics.comicgenesis.com/d/20080505.html

THAR.

Posted by: Cookie at September 10, 2008 10:09 PM

I misread your blurb-bio and thought that you were in fact the very same Sarah Larson who bumped humps with George Clooney, and I'm ashamed to say that I'm now more than a bit disappointed.

Stephanie Meyers' Twilight series is popular now because it's saccharine, and diddles the cerebrum for a short while. At least most people have the good sense not to take it too seriously -- re: starring Robert "Tweeny-Shower-Masturbation-Material" Pattinson as Edward Cullen. Now take Nicole Krauss' The History of Love, which has been optioned, with Alfonso Cuarón at the helm. Leo Gursky, who's just such a crazy old man, he modeled once for an art class! (NAKED!) And that Alma Singer, man, she's such a weirdo. Not to mention all this true, true, true love and undying, unconditional devotion flying around.

I just keep hoping R.L. Stine's Goosebumps will make a comeback in a big way, à la Britney Spears.

Posted by: Jessica at September 11, 2008 12:05 AM

I was going to say roughly what RocketsandRoses said about Anita Blake, so I'll just leave it at ditto.

And possibly add that there has never, in the history of ever, been an excuse for a single sex scene (interrupted only by angst that anyone in her mid- to late- twenties should have gotten over a decade previously) to last three or more chapters.

I keep getting pointed in the direction of these books, and I absolutely cannot bring myself to read them. And the more I hear about them from trustworthy sources, the less interested I become.

Posted by: Tyburn Blossom at September 11, 2008 12:34 AM

As a reader of all supernatral literature (The Vampire genre is my favourite) and a fan of the Anita Blake series before it went happily down the smut trail into really bad Sadomasochism with ware-thingies I was given these books to read.

I liked them at first, but I also liked Virginia Andrews at first too, and that was about incest. The most shocking thing about those books was that I was given them to read saying that "I would like them!" and that is just wrong, I get my kicks away from my family, no from them!

The protagonist is two-dimensional and the vampire is like an abusive husband. If it was in real life, her family and friends would try to take her out of the relationship and into a womens shelter

It isnt really a relationship anyway, it's stalking with a bit hero-worshiping on the side

In the second novel when the Vampire pisses off, cue the depression because if you can't get an emotional unstable creature without a soul to love you, then who the hell will?

I think it might be my life mission to stab people who say this is a good book.

Posted by: caity at September 11, 2008 1:28 AM

Brilliantly entertaining and amusing review!

Posted by: daeyeth at September 11, 2008 3:23 AM

Yeah, these books bother me, too. Bella is such a simpering, spineless, mealy-mouthed little pussy - I don't want my daughter getting her eyeballs on these books until I am sure she's old enough and raised-right enough to be able to "meet" Bella and then promptly loathe her for being a panty-waste. UGH. And the other characters are the culinary equivalent of goddamn Cream Of Wheat: bland, thick, and unpalatable.

Anita Blake can piss off, too.

Posted by: Cletus at September 11, 2008 7:00 AM

i so hope that meyer reads this.

That will show her.

i can totally relate. kids these days, do they even know how stupid they sound by siding wit this pile of crap?

barely made it to the end. the movie looks to be horrible as well. and i had such, high hope for Cedric. he can pull off the vampire look though, i'll give him dat much.

Posted by: haplo at September 11, 2008 8:32 AM

MARY SUE

Posted by: jasper at September 11, 2008 10:58 AM

I had major issues with the book as well. Did you notice that the big fight and rescue scene at the end takes place while the narrator Bella is unconscious? So what would conceivably be the big action finale is told to her, secondhand, by other people. I keep imagining the movie is going to come to a screeching halt and the screen will fill with text ("And then, Bella was rescued by Edward") because that's the cinematic equivalent.

My other problem was with characterization - in one chapter, Bella almost faints at the sight of a drop of blood during bio class, and has to be escorted from the room, at which time she tells her classmate not to remove his pin-pricked finger from his pants (that's not a metaphor) or she'll pass out. This is the very same girl who, just a chapter or two earlier, sat in a hospital examining room and watched another classmate's bloody bandages be removed from his sliced-up head and had no reaction. So, is she freaked out by blood or not? The lame part is that you'd expect this character trait to have some payoff in a novel about VAMPIRES, but it never comes up again (at least in this volume, and for the amount of page her bio class freakout got, the gun shouldn't go off in a sequel.)

That type of thing annoyed the hell out of me and I couldn't even be bothered to hate how annoying the character was or how almost nothing happens in the novel except Bella gushing over how gorgeous this guy is. Oh, but I forgot, she's also "clumsy" which becomes a character trait so ridiculous as to almost obscure the blood thing. She can barely walk without falling down! She has never gone to a school dance! I think her parents should have taken her to a neurologist instead of chuckling about her silly accidents.

Oh, yeah, I hated this book.

Posted by: medusa at September 12, 2008 6:49 AM

if i was a 14 year old girl i may be all a-twitter over edward and his brooding tendencies, but the idea of someone who watched me while i sleep every freaking night is a little too richard ramirez for me.

Posted by: karmicbacklash at September 12, 2008 11:38 AM

it is EXACTLY buffy & angle fanfic. ...I kind of like it. Mind you, I have some mild brain damage from a car accident three years ago. I don't know, I cannot explain why I like these books. I know I should be downright ashamed of myself, I am aware of the pithy writing & the fact that the characters in the book are devoid of any actual human behavior. The guilty pleasure center of my brain wants what it wants, I guess.

Posted by: Ninjajeje at September 12, 2008 7:24 PM

Her young adult fiction sucks, but The Host was exponentially better. It was actually a good book. The vampire novels and The Host are not even on the same level, and it makes me sad that smart, discriminating readers will avoid The Host simply because it has her name on it.
Clarification: it isn't smart. It's still fluff, but it's interesting fluff.

Posted by: KVA at September 13, 2008 12:52 AM

I find Stephanie Meyer's The Host as a far better read than this series. As for Laurell K. Hamilton's Anita Blake series, I gave up after book 8. The series turned into something S&M and bondage and the sex scenes are a tad too overshare. Also, constantly adding new characters makes the whole plot line convoluted. They all are half-cooked and stagnant due to their lack of charcter development. I'm hoping she'll revert back to her old writing style and bring back the Anita Blake that wasn't lamenting about the men in her life, but kicking ass and didn't take shit from anyone.

ok, i just realized I've made this into a Laurell k. Hamilton rant.

Posted by: carrie at September 13, 2008 5:20 PM

Another annoying thing about these books is that, with prominent use of the word Twilight, they are easy to mix up with Sergey Lukyanenko's Night Watch, Day Watch and Twilight Watch books. Except that the latter are actually good, and Lukyanenko portrays the vampires as cannon fodder.
The books are not very closely related to the films (which are reviewed here). Can we have those books reviewed?

Posted by: ChrisD at September 16, 2008 6:47 PM

And now the new book in the "Warriors" series is called "Eclipse", and has basically the same audience.

I don't need this confusion.

However, with such general words, I get a little "Better Off Dead" thrill from saying "Meyer?"

Posted by: Jay at September 16, 2008 7:06 PM

I THINK THE BOOK IS REALLY COOL AND IAM DOING I PROJECT AND I LOVE THE BOOK IF YOU DONT LIKE THE BOOK SO YOU ARE HATERS

Posted by: VALERIA at October 23, 2008 6:56 PM

I THINK THE BOOK IS REALLY COOL AND IAM DOING I PROJECT AND I LOVE THE BOOK IF YOU DONT LIKE THE BOOK SO YOU ARE HATERS

Posted by: VALERIA at October 23, 2008 6:56 PM

I THINK THE BOOK IS REALLY COOL AND IAM DOING I PROJECT AND I LOVE THE BOOK IF YOU DONT LIKE THE BOOK SO YOU ARE HATERS

Posted by: VALERIA at October 23, 2008 6:56 PM

yeah, now that i think about it, the book does suck, and a hate how edward and bella are just like falling all over eachother. and please bella like collapses when edward kisses her one time. bull. even when my boyfriend kisses me, i don't collapse, and he is so much better than edward, like edward seriously treats bella like she's a baby. and she LIKES it. it's insanely retarded.

Posted by: hayz at October 27, 2008 2:04 PM

yeah, now that i think about it, the book does suck, and a hate how edward and bella are just like falling all over eachother. and please bella like collapses when edward kisses her one time. bull. even when my boyfriend kisses me, i don't collapse, and he is so much better than edward, like edward seriously treats bella like she's a baby. and she LIKES it. it's insanely retarded.

Posted by: hayz at October 27, 2008 2:04 PM

yeah, now that i think about it, the book does suck, and a hate how edward and bella are just like falling all over eachother. and please bella like collapses when edward kisses her one time. bull. even when my boyfriend kisses me, i don't collapse, and he is so much better than edward, like edward seriously treats bella like she's a baby. and she LIKES it. it's insanely retarded.

Posted by: hayz at October 27, 2008 2:05 PM

your so damn gay...twilight is amzing so fuck off.

Posted by: sloan at November 9, 2008 6:23 PM

I am very late to the party but I knew Pajiba would bring me back to the reality that these books are fluff that are really poorly written. In fact, I would say pure, shitty drivel. I'm only reading the rest of the series because I too need to take a series to the end. I'm in the second book and I'm glad Edward peaced out. He's really annoying. My friends, however- even English PhD students- are all looking forward to the movie and I bought my ticket before I finished the book. I'm kind of regretting it. Stupid peer pressure. But don't tell my friends, they will lynch me for sure. I'm forcing my way through the books so once I see the movie I can wash my hands of it. At least until the other movies are made...

Posted by: Katherine at November 18, 2008 10:50 AM

I'm thirteen years old and I would like to clarify that not every teen is in love with this book. A majority do, and I notice that they are mostly the one's who have this "too long; won't read it" tendencies if the book isn't about romance popping up in every page. Those people also have no patience/short attention span and are short-tempered.

Everyone here pretty much stated what I wanted to say... What annoys me more than Twilight fans who like solely because they find it "romantic" and "the second Romeo & Juliet" (Romeo and Juliet wasn't very good, but at least it was better than Twilight) are the fans who like it because it's a fad.

Posted by: Hooplah at November 22, 2008 12:54 AM

And seriously, the name 'Breaking Dawn'?
Sounds like a Dawn/Everyone smut fic.

Posted by: Icykins at November 23, 2008 2:20 AM

It jumped the shark with the second book. The first book is perfect for teenage girls, and if I had been that age when it came out I would have been hooked. I thought the movie was thoughtful in the sense that it let's teenagers be awkward and really ridiculous, except of course Edward and Bella...however what I really hated about the second and third book was the whole Jacob Werewolf thing...that was REALLY bad. The movie is worth it if you liked the first book, which was a sweet nice vampire book for 13 year old girls. What is so wrong with that? Why do we have to lambast something that girls like anyhow?

Posted by: tonia at December 3, 2008 1:23 AM

It jumped the shark with the second book. The first book is perfect for teenage girls, and if I had been that age when it came out I would have been hooked. I thought the movie was thoughtful in the sense that it let's teenagers be awkward and really ridiculous, except of course Edward and Bella...however what I really hated was the whole Jacob Werewolf thing...that was REALLY bad. The movie is worth it if you liked the first book, which was a sweet nice vampire book for 13 year old girls. What is so wrong with that? Why do we have to lambast something that girls like anyhow?

Posted by: tonia at December 3, 2008 1:25 AM

I understand this book was meant for teenage girls, so I'm not going to critcize it, mainly because as an adult and a self-proclaimed well read one at that, I feel quite embarrassed for even having read the book and even more so wanting to comment on it. Anyway, I really do not see why it is so appealing. I mean I understand whole star cross lover's theme coupled with the main characters rather redundent professions of love not to mention having a plain Jane, very awkward herion with low self-esteem finding her so called soul mate in the most attractive boy in her school or on the planet (yeah whatever), who just so happen too feel the exact same way (yeah). Plus it turns out he's an immortal blood sucking mythical creature (vampire). Yeah that would seem cool, especially if you were an akward teenage girl. But honestly could anyone awkward teenage girl or not suspend the their disbelief long enough to think that falling in love and cuddling up to an animated version of DaVinci statue of David with a thirst for blood and yours more than anyone else, really be romantic. However, seeing that the book is so popular I guest I have my answer. go figure

Posted by: Nyki at December 6, 2008 6:53 PM

thanks for writing this...it makes me feel better, 'cause now I know that being a teenage girl and hating the fuck out of this crap is not abnormal.
FUCK, this book was BAD!
But the author, good ol' stephanie meyer, is even worse, she is such a whiny pussy!

Posted by: Miriam at December 31, 2008 8:29 PM

Come on do not quit the series.Who cares about the 5 th book.200 pages okay change it up.I am into the 2nd book and it is good.My ant told me that the 5th one is about how Edward feels.Change something up.I know it is a big difference,but my up session with vampires is expanding cause of your books.Keep it going.Please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!I would know how you feel if you read this from an angry reader.I love the books and if you kept writing them I would greatly appreciate it.E-mail me please.So Stephanie Meyer please e-mail me.!!!!!!!!!! p.s. Email me back

Posted by: Chloe at January 5, 2009 1:14 PM

twilight is beautiful..im not fond of reading a thick book but when i started to read twilight at the very beginning of the book i had felt the romance and the kilig..thanks to my cousin whom i borrowed the book..she's so adik kasi..Edward Cullen is so handsome..I like him to treat Bella..

Posted by: Star Tabaquero at January 18, 2009 7:35 AM

twilight is beautiful..im not fond of reading a thick book but when i started to read twilight at the very beginning of the book i had felt the romance and the kilig..thanks to my cousin whom i borrowed the book..she's so adik kasi..Edward Cullen is so handsome..I like him in how he treat Bella..

Posted by: Star Tabaquero at January 18, 2009 7:38 AM