free counter with statistics The Time Traveler's Wife Book Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

thetimetravelerswife.jpg
100 Books in One Year: The Time Traveler’s Wife by Audrey Niffenegger

Cannonball Read / Figgy

Book Reviews | November 19, 2008 | Comments (37)


I’m not quite sure how to even begin talking about this book. It’s quite possibly one of the most unique and beautiful love stories I have read, and one of the most haunting. I know most people cringe inwardly when they hear a love story praised, immediately picturing cloying schmaltz and cheap little romantic platitudes, but The Time Traveler’s Wife is anything but.

The book focuses almost entirely on the two central characters: Henry DeTamble and Claire Abshire. Henry is a time traveler. But this is no fun and amusing condition; for him, it is a disease that he has no control over and more often than not throws him into dangerous and possibly fatal situations. Niffenegger takes an often used science-fiction device and twists it into an entirely new (to me, anyway) concept: Henry is cursed by his “ability,” never knowing when he might vanish or where he will reappear. The only thing keeping him from disintegrating entirely is Claire, his wife, whom he meets when she is 20 and he is 28 (though when Claire first meets Henry she is 6 and he is 35) . We learn of Henry and Claire’s life together, as her life follows one straight line interrupted every now and then by a meeting with Henry as he reappears in her life - -sometimes he is 34, sometimes 41.Their story is intricate and fascinating; we learn early on that the two will eventually get married, so it is a matter of learning how they came to that point, their love growing and changing, painful and filled with absence and longing.

The story shifts between Henry and Claire’s points of views. Niffenegger gives Henry an always urgent, almost frantic voice. Because he cannot control his time traveling and can disappear at almost any time and reappear in an unknown place completely naked and lost, Henry is always on the move, always alert. Niffenegger makes Henry a very complex character; while sometimes he comes off a little unlikeable (certainly so to some of the people around him), he is always sympathetic. There are points when he knows everything that will happen, but more often than not he is thrown into horrible situations, and he rages helplessly, trying only to survive and return to Claire.

Claire could have easily been a weeping wallflower, doing nothing but staying at home waiting for Henry to return. Yet she is written as an incredibly resilient and patient woman; strong for herself but also because Henry needs her to be. She suffers, yes, but she remains always strong and hopeful; she accepts Henry’s problem without a second thought, because she believes so strongly in their love, and because they need each other to survive. She is unshakable and impressive, and she easily became my favorite character. Her family makes for a set of very interesting supporting characters, and the scenes set at her family home are as tense and strange as any family reunion you have ever been to.

Niffenegger is a gifted storyteller. She flows flawlessly through the complicated timeline and draws fascinating characters everywhere; even the supporting players are clearly written and could have great stories of their own. And she understands love. This is hard for me to explain, but Niffenegger writes Henry and Claire’s relationship with no embellishments: they have fights and problems, their characters are very different but they compliment each other. Their love is beautiful and touching because it is so real, as extraordinary as their circumstances are. It is one of the most insightful looks at relationships I have ever read. And it made me cry about four times. Claire and Henry’s love is so powerful, true, and sad, and told so simply and beautifully, that the writing never comes off as unrealistic or cloying. It’s moving without being cheaply sentimental, simply and beautifully written.

‘The Time Traveler’s Wife deserves a second read. The shifting timeline might get a little complicated sometimes, so a re-read will help sort out the threads of the story. And, like Henry discovers, knowing everything that is going to happen won’t take away any of the magic of living it.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details are here and the growing number of participants and their blogs are here. And check here for more of Figgy’s reviews.


Top Twenty Musicians Who Decided To Become Actors | Rogen Makes a Porno



Comments

Thank you for loving this book. I definitely cried a few times myself. I never would have had the guts to recommend it on here because its so sweet in a very real way that its almost too close to my heart to put it out there to be picked apart. The descriptions of the time travel are what make this book truly unique though. She really creates a complicated situation that she somehow sails through with ease. If you read this book, you'll love it. If you don't love this book, I'm not the person you want to talk to about it.

Fantastic review that actually almost had me in tears again with that last line. I think I will re-read this. Its time.

Posted by: becks at November 19, 2008 8:24 AM

I Loved this book (yes, capital-L )- so beautiful. I particularly Love how the whole time-travelling thing was not a gimmick, nor did it seem unnatural/fantastical: it was just the reality of Henry's existence. I Love that Niffernegger didn't try to give some convoluted explanation that would have cheapened it and inevitably disappointed (you know, something like "Henry's molecules temporally transform through an atttraction to the ionized protons formed when a nuclear reaction occurs in his mitochondria at a cellular level" (can anyone tell I know nothing about science?!)). Instead, the whole thing, just is. And it is beautiful.

Posted by: JJ McClay at November 19, 2008 8:27 AM

This book devastated me to the point that I forbid my wife from reading it. I walked around in a daze for about a week after I finished, absorbing everything that happenend.

I completely agree with this review, from the truth of Henry and Claire's relationship to the fringe characters' believability. I only recommend this book to less sentimental people since they have the emotional space necessary to prevent this story from overwhelming them. I can't imagine what this would do to someone who watches Oprah everyday and cries at commercials with puppies and babies.

And Niffenegger needs to write another adult fiction book, NOW. That art book is not cutting it.

Posted by: Kballs at November 19, 2008 8:32 AM

Fantastic write-up, and I really hate to nitpick, but this Clare has no I in it.

Otherwise, this was truly excellent. I think I'll just start pointing people here when I'm trying to convince them to read TTTW.

Posted by: Gabs at November 19, 2008 8:32 AM

I love this book. I cried, I am not ashamed. I recommend it to everyone and anyone who doesn't like it gets a look of disgust from me. I am a little worried about the film version though, and whether they will be able to do it justice.

Posted by: Carrie at November 19, 2008 8:49 AM

Just reserved a copy at my local library. Thanks for the great review figgy!

Posted by: Snath at November 19, 2008 8:53 AM

I've certainly opined here, there and everywhere on this book. Bittersweet but so definitely worth it, like, well, Henry and Claire's lives I suppose. Nicole has biases against but a similar kind of discontinuity in a relationship, along with cherishing what you have now even if you know something bad's coming, formed my favorite Doctor Who story this year which also took place in a library (figgy didn't mention that Henry's a librarian. Come on, minority representation's important!).

Posted by: Jay at November 19, 2008 8:55 AM

Wow, Figgy--for a book I'd heard so much buzz about, I had no idea about the actual plot. Kind of assumed it was just a generic weepy period-piece romance. After reading your review, I'm definitely going to keep an eye out for it--thanks!

Posted by: meaux at November 19, 2008 8:56 AM

(sorry, Gabs)

Oh it's not "Somewhere In Time" (no offense to Mr. Reeve and Ms. Seymour...or your mom and my mom). Without coming right out and saying "time travel" James Patterson seems to have taken the story for one of his latest "co-written" books, "Sundays at Tiffany's".

Boo.

Posted by: Jay at November 19, 2008 9:03 AM

I am a little worried about the film version though, and whether they will be able to do it justice.

Me too. :-\ I'm excited to see it, and trying to keep in mind that book and movie are two different things, but with how much I love the story I'm afraid there's no way they'll possibly come close to getting it right.

Posted by: Gabs at November 19, 2008 9:15 AM

I am one of the few people in the world who really hated this book. For a book called "The Time Traveler's Wife," I found Clare one of the most passive characters in literature. I don't want to spoil anyone who hasn't read the book, but the book's ending sealed that impression for me.

Posted by: EGT at November 19, 2008 9:17 AM

I've been meaning to read this book. . . Now I really have no excuse not to.

Posted by: adam at November 19, 2008 9:19 AM

I second that, Adam.

Posted by: Optimus Rhyme at November 19, 2008 9:37 AM

EGT-- I disliked it, too. I thought it just wasn't that great. They have, like, two friends? Who are unbelievable poorly drawn. I get that it's a love story, I just didn't feel like they lived in a world.

Posted by: Pheagan at November 19, 2008 9:52 AM

This is one of my favorite books. It was the first book to make me cry in years and years. I'm very concerned for the movie and how they will ruin the book.

Thanks for making more people aware of this amazing book!

Posted by: Darlene at November 19, 2008 10:18 AM

Loved, loved, loved this book. I think I've read it at least 3 times. The time travel really blew my mind, and I think it was summarized very well in the review.

I'm also scared for the movie....Rachel McAdams as Clare I can see, but Eric Bana as Henry? Colour me nervous.

Posted by: zygomatique at November 19, 2008 10:20 AM

I was afraid to read this review because I was afraid it would tear the story apart. I loved this book when I first read and while I thought it was a genuinely good book on it's own merits, I have been known to love things that are objectively terrible. So it's nice to know I don't have terrible taste. That being said, I am nervous about the film - it could really go either way. They'll either nail it and it will be a beautiful film, or they'll totally screw it up and it will barely resemble the complexity of the original story. I don't think there'll be an in between with this one.

Posted by: Manna at November 19, 2008 10:20 AM

I really liked this book a lot when I read it a few years ago and I'm always trying to push others to read it as well. It's just such an interesting and unique take on the idea of time travel...I especially loved that Clare had known Henry for so long and yet when they meet for the first time, he doesn't know her yet.
I don't think their lack of close friends is implausible: Henry has a hard time making friends because his affliction is very isolating and Clare essentially grew up knowing him and being close to him, knowing they would meet. I would imagine that would make her less inclined to make close friends who might not understand her unique situation.

Posted by: peachfish at November 19, 2008 10:22 AM

I haven't read this, but I bought it for my girlfriend for christmas last year, and she loved it. I keep trying to get her to watch the Doctor Who episode, "The Girl In The Fireplace", by telling her that it's similar to this. No luck as of yet, but I'll keep trying.

Posted by: Mike R. at November 19, 2008 10:46 AM

This book nearly killed me, I cried so much. Nice review Figgy!

Posted by: Julie at November 19, 2008 10:58 AM

I also loved how intimately Niffenegger described Chicago. As a former semi-native now stuck in Texas, it was a wonderful added bonus.

Posted by: Stella at November 19, 2008 11:04 AM

"The Girl In The Fireplace"

Oh, of course, that one too! I was thinking of "Silence"/"Forest" due to the whole "when did you meet me?"-"when did you meet me?".....and all written by Steven Moffat (reportedly he acknowledged the connection with the book and "Fireplace). The man loves to make you well up (I've told you not to get me started on "The Doctor Dances") but he usually doesn't hurt you too bad in the end.

Hey, at least it's a book about time travel this time, I'm almost on topic!

If he goes by Russell's MO he should be writing at least three for 2010. But what's his heartstring scraping arc going to be for the season? I'm verrklempt already!

Posted by: Jay at November 19, 2008 11:19 AM

I, too, was nervous about reading a Pajiba review of The Time Traveler's Wife, but was so pleasantly surprised at the eloquent case you made for one of my favorites. Is it unabashedly romantic? Yes. Is it moving? Absolutely. Every time I read it do I wonder how Niffenegger manages to sneak into my house with her giant invisible ice cream scoop to hollow out my innards and leave me a quivering, sobbing mess? You betcha.

I haven't had much success recommending it to friends (perhaps something to do with touting "emotional catharsis like an anvil to the chest" as one of its major plus points), but every single person whose taste I respect who HAS read the book agrees: it's a damn fine story, well told.

Posted by: cerain at November 19, 2008 11:40 AM

Horray! I'm so glad that you (and others) loved this book as much as I did. I'm generally reticent in my praise of so-called "literary" fiction, saving my gushing for genuine masterpieces or ridiculously addictive genre fair (see Harry Potter); what I loved about the Time Traveler's Wife was that it combined solid writing, incredible story-telling, and a twist of science fiction. The compexities of Henry's time traveling are daunting, but A.N. handles them so flawlessly that I was applauding her prowess by the end of the novel.

It's one of those great books that made me forget - for 24 hours - what was real and what was fiction, so much so that when I was riding in the car with my own partner, I had a momentary fear that he might disappear before my eyes. And then I remembered that doesn't happen in my life, only in the book's life.

Oh, and I cried like a fucking baby.

I read it again, a year later, and cried then, too.

Posted by: pseudoliterati at November 19, 2008 11:57 AM

Fig, you did true justice to an amazing book. I didn't cry at it - I can count on one hand the books that have ever made me cry - but it is, in short, an awesome feat to take a concept so daunting and turn it into a beautiful, harmonious love story.

To me, reading this as a Who fan (and I'm going to fistfight Jay in a second), it was easier to follow because Clare was the fixed point; she is what keeps Henry grounded, even when he doesn't know her. Henry is always going to find Clare, and Clare waits patiently for that day to arrive. (I will not go into the Captain Jack Harkness-ness of this.) That said, I've read this book four times and still find something new each time.

Ok, Jay, you brought the Whoniverse into this biatch, so now we're gonna throw down. Firstly, I don't dislike River - she's brilliant and brave and strong and funny - I will merely ship RoseTen (not RoseAltTen) forever and ever amen, and it hurt my heart to see that in some other time and some other place he fell in love with Professor Song. It hurts even more now because we'll be getting Eleven sooner rather than later, which means that Ten will move on sooner rather than later, and that makes my heart hurt. And now Who fans have totally 'jacked this rad thread about Figgy's stellar book review.

(P.S. - I would compare this to GitF more than Silence/Forest because of the complete randomness of the fireplaces/mirror, as opposed to the labrynthine nature of the library.)

Brava, Ms. Fig.

Posted by: Nicole at November 19, 2008 1:12 PM

I'm so glad you reviewed this book! I LOVE this story and it's wonderful to see that others have an appreciation for it as well. I've tried recommending it to others, but I haven't received any positive feedback. I thought that perhaps I was the only one who likes it so much. While I'm nervous about the movie adaptation, I love Eric Bana. I'm trying to keep an open mind and see the movie and book as two very separate entities. While reading the book, I had a picture of a younger Harrison Ford as Henry. Clare was, of course...ME! I think it's time for a re-read.

Posted by: MissNev at November 19, 2008 1:18 PM

Eeek! I got linked!

Aw, shucks. Thanks, guys. I was worried I wouldn't do this book justice, so I'm glad you all like the review.

And woops...Clare, not Claire. I didn't even notice that.

I really can't wait to see a trailer for the movie. Eric Bana is #1 on my Freebies list, for crying out loud. Rachel McAdams is adorable. Liev Schrieber rocks my world. Of course, I'm keeping my fingers crossed that this won't suck, and that it won't make me horribly angry.

Maybe...just MAYBE it'll be awesome. Maybe.

Posted by: figgy at November 19, 2008 1:47 PM

I will join the love chorus surrounding this book. I read this in college when I was studying abroad and really missing the boyfriend, so I probably wept a little more than I might have otherwise. Seriously, this book made me its bitch, and I loved every minute of it.

I own it now (borrowed it before because I couldn't find many English books in Italy), but have yet to read it again. Does anyone know when the movie comes out? I'm too lazy to look it up myself.

Thanks figgy for the awesome review!

Posted by: luckycat at November 19, 2008 2:17 PM

I loved this book. I cried, especially when Henry and Clare were trying to conceive their child. Thanks for the great review. I need to read this again.

Posted by: rlr260 at November 19, 2008 2:20 PM

As good as Billie looked in "New New Earth" (and looking like a college flashback to boot--those pants! All Hottie '97 up in there) it's probably Alex's hair that seals the deal, and Alex and I already had a history. That doesn't negate Rose, since "Doomsday" will always be about the saddest thing ever, but I can welcome River, especially since she seemed to be sitting on a REALLY BIG story, and I'm relating to the Doctor, and he's kinda like Clare to River's Henry. "I'm your future, and it's great!" That throws the know-it-all, surely, but it's such a big, exciting thought. When I read this I thought that'd be such a comfort. "Don't worry, you're going to get here and find me, and you'll be amazing too."

There's some appeal to that!

Posted by: Jay at November 19, 2008 2:47 PM

I absolutely love this book, and I weirdly associate it with Pajiba because the first place I heard about it was here on, as part of the best recent fiction piece from a year or two ago. Niffenegger writes her characters beautifully, and I loved that Chicago was featured so well (being from there I am totally biased). I also absolutely love Rilke and all the references to his writing.

Posted by: eat my shorts at November 19, 2008 2:52 PM

Haha eat my shorts, I totally went and bought this after that Pajiba post. It's weird how it all comes back around.....to Pajiba. It is the center of the world.

Posted by: figgy at November 19, 2008 3:19 PM

One of my favorite things about the book is that for a while Henry's the one with all the answers, then Clare, then Henry again. That shift is so well interwoven with the other threads of the story.

Jay, I agree that the beginning is fun, because you get to see the Doctor adrift at the idea of this woman who has his number, but the end is just hard, because he knows now. It's the biggest spoiler of all. With Rose, as fucking heartwrenching as "Doomsday" is (and always will be; I swear I still cry like a bitch and I've watched it twenty times), at least he didn't have to live with the foreknowledge. Now give me peace.

Posted by: Nicole at November 19, 2008 3:21 PM

This book is what got me into "reading for fun" again.
The first I ever heard of this book was actually in Pajiba's list of the Generation's Best Books. So great! Unfortunately, I'm very worried about the movie situation.

Posted by: jmurae at November 19, 2008 3:32 PM

Y'all should check out Niffenegger's The Three Incestuous Sisters. (Sorry, can't do caps or italics.)

Posted by: PPJ at November 19, 2008 7:43 PM

For a brief period of my life, I was a frequent book thief. The problem being, I was nervous about stealing from anywhere other than large supermarket/department store places, like Walmart or Meijer or whathaveyou. These places sell books, but usually not things I'd be interested in. Nevertheless, I'd spend hours there, sifting through all the garbage in order to find something good. On one such occasion, I stumbled across this book. It seemed a little too sentimental for me, and I definitely thought it was "chick-lit" but the whole time travel aspect, and the fact that it WASN'T a period piece, made me want to give it a try. So I nabbed it from the Meijer, started reading it that night, and then proceeded to cry for a week and a half.

I wasn't necessarily very impressed by things like her word choice or sentence structure, but nevertheless she is able to create a complex world, peopled with very real characters that you can't help but feel affection towards, and I am definitely looking forward to the film, but also feeling reserved about it at the same time, since there is a good chance that the magic of the book simply won't be able to be captured on screen.

Whatever. It's a pretty good book, especially for what it's worth.

Posted by: Ana at November 20, 2008 2:08 AM

I reserved this at my local library because of this review, and I just finished the book about twenty minutes ago.

Wow.

It was really, really good. Thanks, figgy.

Posted by: Snath at November 28, 2008 2:48 PM