web
counter
 

The Reader by Bernhard Schlink

By Brian Prisco | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (7)



kate-winslet-the-reader-2.jpg

I was interested in reading this recommendation by the Kamikaze Feminist, because it was literally the only book he read for the Cannonball Read. A book so good, it actually made him give up all other books. I would have liked to find out that he only read The Reader, 100 times, in the course of a year. That he got the entire text tattooed over his body, that he had started reading to prisoners in his spare time, that he started scoping out Neo-Facist rallies in the hope of inspiring a coming-of-age love story with a Nazi. Well, maybe that’d be a little too far. So I cracked the slim novel with some eager hope.

Meh.

It’s a very sparse novel, and I don’t mean in that tight Hemingway prose, but rather that Schlink writes in tiny chapters, reminiscent of James Patterson, where he focuses on one single event, one single memory and juices all he can out of it. I think I was sort of swept up by anti-hype, that it had been lauded as a film, and so I was unable to appreciate it for the literature. It’s exactly the kind of romance that I typically run screaming from, so I was not really expecting much from the novel.

That’s not to say it was bad or unpleasant. It’s just that it was breezier than I expected, especially considering the topics it deals with. A young boy comes of age in the arms of a mysterious older women, who turns out to be a concentration camp guard brought to trial. It felt like someone paging through a journal kept, and presenting it in the same style as it was on the page. The teen sexual awakening felt almost juvenile, as if he were unable to put into words all the emotions and feelings that were suddenly borne in him. Later, during the trial, it’s full of all the blustering and postulating of college years. That sort of ponderous know-it-all self-righteousness.

All in all, the novel didn’t capture me as hard as I thought it might. The closest comparison I can make is to my earlier foray into Ian McEwen. While I liked the book, it didn’t change my life, but it didn’t feel like a wasted effort either.









NBC Renews "Chuck" for a Third Season | He Needs a Kidney - Video Clip













Comments

Wow, finally a book that I have in my home. Most of Schlink’s works are just like this one, he has a theme and he runs with it until it is bone dry.

Posted by: Guess Who! at May 18, 2009 10:09 AM

This is definitely a book that has to be read before seeing the movie. I read it years ago with no inkling of the subject apart from the jacket blurb, and I was blown away. Looking back, I suspect that the fact that I was totally ignaorant of the story added to its impact on me, so I understand where Mr. Prisco's coming from. I have no interest in seeing the movie and spoiling my memories of the book.

(Hey, I de-lurked!)

Posted by: theymightbeslacking at May 18, 2009 3:17 PM

Hi theymightbeslacking! Keep up the delurking, won't ya? You jumped in with an, 'inkling', 'impact' and 'interest' and added absolutely no 'idiocy'. Welcome to the pages!

Posted by: replica at May 18, 2009 3:22 PM

Incidentally, my incessant alliteration indeed distracted us from my unintentional misspelling of "ignorant." I guess I do need more practice.

Posted by: theymightbeslacking at May 18, 2009 6:51 PM

I have to agree... I read this many years before Winslett got nude, and I remember the story's revelation as a wonderful turn and have very fond memories of the novel as a whole. It's a shame when one's enjoyment of a book is marred by having seen the film previously...

Though I'd happily wager my grandmother that David Fincher did more with Fight Club than Palahniuk was able to on the page, I can't help but think that it would have been an amazing read if I hadn't seen the film a dozen times before reaching for the book shelf.

That said, I also greatly enjoyed The Reader on the screen, and wondered at the time if it would be fair to add The Reader to the slim list of films, Fight Club most assuredly included, that surpassed their literary precursors? (The Godfather, The Shawshank Redemption, ...)

Posted by: JQ at May 19, 2009 12:59 AM

I agree more with Prisco - I read this long before the film came out and my reaction was kind of more "eh." Considering that it was marketed as a modern classic, I just felt like it didn't quite go deep enough and maybe I'd missed something. Since the movie's come out, I have also found a few interesting articles that discuss The Reader and a certain type of Holocaust denial. While I don't completely agree with everything the authors say, I thought it was a nice and different way to look at it. While Winslet's character is obviously treated unfairly, she still gets what she deserves - the problem is that the other women didn't. Anyway, here's a link to one of the posts: http://www.slate.com/id/2210804/

Posted by: Jen at May 19, 2009 4:47 AM

I loved this book. I went on to read more of Schlink. I think he's great.

His characters are intriguing, yet relatable. He's poetic, interesting, and easy to read.

I do think, no matter the book, that it's really hard to have an open mind on it after you've been pitched it as a "modern classic." Expectations fuck us in the ass every time.

Posted by: fartygirl at May 19, 2009 6:59 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time