free counter with statistics The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets by Eva Rice | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

lost_art_203x152.jpg
The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets by Eva Rice


Cannonball Read / Rusty

Book Reviews | October 12, 2009 | Comments (10)


I picked up this novel because the title is one indefinite article away from being a Queens of the Stone Age song that I quite like. It turns out that The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets, written by Eva Rice (daughter of Tim Rice for any other music geeks out there), is about a generation that often seems to get left out of literature and other entertainment; the generation who grew up during World War II. We hear a lot about the Boomers who came after, and ‘The Greatest Generation’ who saw through both World Wars, but little attention gets paid to the children who grew up knowing only a life where daddy was overseas and food was always rationed*. The main character in this book, Penelope, is an 18 year old British girl whose father died in the War and who now lives with her mother and younger brother in an ancient estate that’s crumbling around their ears due to lack of money. There was a time when Penelope’s life would have been defined and lived comfortably merely by the fact of her social status, family history, and land holdings, but the post-war 1950s were not that time.

The book starts with a chance meeting between Penelope and Charlotte, who drags Penelope into a cab with her so that Charlotte doesn’t have to go to tea with her Aunt Clare by herself. From there, Penelope begins a fast and deep friendship with the glamorous and impulsive Charlotte and Charlotte’s strange cousin, Harry. From the beginning, it’s clear that Aunt Clare knows a little more about Penelope than Penelope does about her, but it’s not revealed until the end what that knowledge is. The book mostly takes place over winter into spring of 1955.

It’s difficult to describe the plot because most of it boils down to interactions between characters. Conversations between Penelope and her family, parties she attends with Charlotte and Harry, a chance encounter with a handsome American man on the train, etc. There’s no overarching action to speak of. However, the book does deal in one literary cliché that I’ve never been a fan of, which is having a female character spend almost the entire book talking about how she’s not in love with a male character while those around her roll their eyes … only for that female character to realize at the end that she really and truly is in love. Aside from that, though, it’s an interesting book and enjoyable enough as something of a light fluffy escapist read.

*Anyone else who read the American Girl Doll books will know that the story of Molly concerns just this time period, but I genuinely can’t think of any others off the top of my head.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Genny (now just Rusty)’s review, check her blog, Rusty’s Ventures.


Pajiba Afer Dark 10/11/09 | Box Office Results October 11, 2009



Comments

I looooooooove this book. You're right about the lack of story, but the characters are all so sweet and engaging, it doesn't matter. I've read it twice and would happily do so again. There's just something really delicious about it.

Posted by: Katie at October 12, 2009 8:28 AM

I only realised I'd read this when I saw the cover. So, I guess it's not overly memorable. I think I liked it well enough, but it didn't rock my world.

Posted by: Carrie at October 12, 2009 8:58 AM

This sounds a lot like I Capture the Castle (only not as good perhaps). Anybody read both and can comment?

Posted by: AM at October 12, 2009 9:17 AM

I have read both. I can't remember thinking they were overly similar. I wasn't a fan of Castle though, must say. I didn't hate it, but my friends raved about it and I just didn't get the fuss. I think if I'd read it when I was younger I might have appreciated it more.

Posted by: Carrie at October 12, 2009 9:40 AM

what-ever you do-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o
don't tell anyone.

rusty, you KNOW i *totally effin heart* you, right?
i'll be singing that all day! (and i thought my double-shift monday was going to suck)

Posted by: gp at October 12, 2009 9:48 AM

oh oh but i love this book and this era!
and there are many many more you can read:
"a little love song" (during war), "back home" (1945), "cuckoo in the nest"/"a spoonful of jam" (1946-1948) and "just henry" (early 50s) are all by michelle magorian and are all YAish in tone, and gorgeous to read...and i would read in that order. she is most famous for "goodnight mr tom" which about an evacuee at the beginning of WWII, but is more a children's book (they made us read it when we were 10) but also great!

Posted by: majandrastar at October 12, 2009 12:56 PM

Oh, I LOVE this book. I'm in the middle of a reread now. I will have to ding you on one thing though; even if it is the "Oh, I hate [male character]! Oh wait, I'm in love with him!" cliche, I love the end because she doesn't just dramatically fall in his arms. You can decide for yourself if they decide to be friends or start a romantic relationship. I had been waiting for a book to end like that for years.

AM, it's like a less depressing version of I Capture the Castle, and thankfully without all of the boring Stephen machinations in the middle.

Posted by: claire at October 12, 2009 1:36 PM

It's fantasy, so everything war-related is allegorical, and his dad isn't overseas, but The Book of Lost Things is about a kid growing up during WWII.

Posted by: SaBrina at October 12, 2009 10:54 PM

It doesn't revolve around this time period, but an argument could be made for The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe... the whole reason for the kids' being in the new house is to get them away from the bombing.

Posted by: octothorp at October 13, 2009 10:30 AM

Wasn't Ian McEwan's Atonement about characters through that time period? The girl is 13 in the mid 1930s, 18 at the height of the war.

I can't think of any other, but the time period interests me. I think I have to check this one out.

Posted by: Annie UhOh at October 13, 2009 10:25 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment: