![]()
100 Books in One Year: The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams
Cannonball Read / Courtney
Book Reviews | December 19, 2008 | Comments (27)
This book is delightful.
No really, that’s about it. What else can I say for a 30-year-old cult classic? I had never read this novel but, like you, I had heard about it for years from myriad Adams groupies. I did go to see the recent film version, starring Mos Def, among others, on a date with one of those groupies and I loved the film. He complained that the jokes were stale because he knew them all. I found it funny and refreshing, and Alan Rickman is the Voice of God, so what was the problem again?
After finishing the novel I claimed that it was a comedy novel masquerading as sci-fi, then realized that I said that only to excuse myself for liking the book. You see, I’ve always had an aversion to all things science fiction. Anything with stars in it, whether it is wars or trek, leaves me in a cold shudder. I find the story lines, acting, dialogue, and direction, everything appalling. George Lucas has no place here.
Then I realized that I was full of shit. It started when I thought, “I hate sci-fi. Except for ‘Futurama.’” But I excused that because, you know, “Futurama” is a brilliant comedy, just with space and robots and aliens. Not really sci-fi. The I caught myself thinking, “I hate sci-fi, except for ‘Futurama.’ Oh, and ‘Firefly.’” It didn’t take long for me to discover that my “I hate sci-fi, except…” list was a mile long. In addition to those wonderful shows, I love Flash Gordon, Blade Runner and Red Dwarf. I even have very fond memories of the Ken Barry/Sandy Duncan vehicle The Cat from Outer Space.
I’m even a fantasy nerd! I own all of “Buffy” and “Angel” on DVD, I collect the comics and Labyrinth is sitting on my DVD player right now! None of us are innocent. I may sneer at fans of Hans Solo, Captain Kirk, and Frodo, but I’d watch anything that Joss Whedon told me to.
It did not surprise me to learn that Adams wrote for Monty Python in the 1970s. I grew up watching “Flying Circus” and the related movies, which my parents supported. I think that Python, more than any other comedy show, is the glue that binds disparate groups of nerds together. Their kind of humor, topical and absurd, childish and mean-spirited, but always intelligent, is a proto-type for people like Whedon bringing humor to the genres of sci-fi and fantasy. I will never love “Star Trek,” because it isn’t thought provoking or funny to make up for the shoddy production and poor acting. But I will accept that, in some cases, I do like science fiction.
This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details about here and the growing number of participants and their blogs, from which these reviews are pulled, are here. And check here for more of Courtney’s reviews.
Follow @pajiba
← Favorite Discoveries Day 1 | Great Gatsby Movie →
Comments
Posted by: vic at December 19, 2008 8:19 AM
Hooray! One of my favorite book series, though the last three books are just nowhere as good as the first two, but have their moments of hilarity and sometimes, beauty.
I think the film was wretched in many ways, but it did a few things pretty well. The casting was awesome, for one, and the visuals were splendid. But the dialogue was stupid as hell in a lot of places (mostly the ones that didn't correspond to the book) and John Malkovich's character and his storyline made no sense at all. Otherwise, I didn't hate the film, I'm just so annoyed at how Hollywoodized it became. /fanboy rant over.
SO yeah, awesome book.