web
counter
 

The Heretic's Daughter by Kathleen Kent

By Intern Rusty | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (17)



HereticsDaughter.jpg

The Heretic’s Daughter by Kathleen Kent is a loosely fictionalized account of the trial of Martha Carrier during the Salem witch trials in 1630. The story is told from the perspective of Martha’s young daughter, Sarah, who is only 11 when her mother was arrested. The story begins long before that, though, chronicling the events that will lead up to Martha being accused of witchcraft.

In fact, I’d say the story overall has more to do with the relationship between Sarah and her mother than the actual witch trials. The trials aren’t introduced until midway through the book, with Martha, Sarah and the arrest of all three of Sarah’s brothers coming after that point. Martha Carrier is portrayed as a strong, stubborn, and not particularly emotionally available woman. The last part is what stings Sarah the most, and causes the daughter to resent her mother openly on several occasions. Martha proves her concern for her children, though, when she takes Sarah aside the night before she’s arrested and warns her that if Sarah and her brothers are arrested as witches they must confess to whatever the court wants to hear to avoid being hung. Martha intends to proclaim her innocence until death, with the clear knowledge that to do so will be to practically sign her own death warrant.

The Heretic’s Daughter is an interesting look at home life in New England in the seventeenth century and particularly an interesting look at a side of the Salem witch trials that’s not often represented. Sarah not only watches the arrest and imprisonment of her mother, but she herself is arrested and tried along with her three brothers. Only her baby sister and her father escape accusations, and it’s hinted that her father might do so more out of the townspeople’s fear of him than anything else*. The court room scenes are terrifying and the descriptions of the jail are horrific, never mind the discussions of what people were put through to coerce confessions out of them. One of Sarah’s brothers nearly dies in prison, and when Sarah’s mother is taken away to be hung, her children only have a few minutes to say goodbye to her. It’s an extremely unflinching look at a very dark and disturbing chapter of American history, when the hysteria of young girls was taken as unarguable testimony to the presence of evil.

Having some foreknowledge about the Salem witch trials is helpful in reading The Heretic’s Daughter, but it’s far from necessary. The book is a fairly easy read, the language would probably be understandable to a bright middle schooler although the parts about the trials and executions may be upsetting. Overall though, Kent has written an interesting book that’s a good choice for anyone interested in life in Puritan America or the Salem witch trials.

*Sarah’s father, Thomas Carrier, was well clear over 7 feet tall (some sources say 7’4”) and served under Cromwell before coming to America. He also lived to at least 109, his family claimed 113, and was active and lucid until the day he died. Oh, and some say he’s the man who executed Charles I. Fun tidbits for you history dorks.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read review. For more of Rusty’s reviews, check out her blog, Rusty’s Ventures.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Blog Trends from My Bunk 01/07/10 | Leno Expected to Move Back to 11:30; Conan To Get a Half Hour Bump









Comments

Hmm, I might have to pick this one up.

Posted by: Carrie (aka Teabelly) at January 8, 2010 8:22 AM

This sounds quite interesting. Thanks.

Posted by: admin at January 8, 2010 8:59 AM

I'm reading a biography of Daniel Defoe, and there's a kookie Papist/Puritan/Anglican triangle going on, where two at any time gang up on the other.

Does the author fall into that historical novel trap of having overly sophisticated protagonists? Where the character seems to be a bit too preternaturally modern? That can close down an historical fiction novel for me in a heartbeat.

SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT SPOILER ALERT
How much of the stuff between the mother and the uncle is the uncle being douchey for the land? Or is it presented that it's possible the uncle truly believes that at least some witchery is going on?
/SPOILER ALERT /SPOILER ALERT /SPOILER ALERT

Posted by: Mike B. at January 8, 2010 9:05 AM

"Life in puritan america" as if that's in the past. Sounds interesting, but a little bit upsetting for my tastes, it'll just make me angry, then sad, then angry again.

Posted by: Chugga at January 8, 2010 9:17 AM

you had me at Salem witch trials.

i'll be checking this, for sure.

Posted by: gp at January 8, 2010 9:30 AM

I love some good historical fiction (most recently read "London" by Edward Rutherford and thoroughly enjoyed it) and love even more some historical fiction based on inexplicably crazy events.

*muffled words* What?! Of course I don't love books more than you! *muffled words* Oh come on, don't make me say it front of everyone! *muffled words* How many times do we have to go over this? *muffled words* Don't be like that. *muffled words* Oh, real mature! *muffled words* You cut me deep. Fine, I'll say it.

"I love you more than anything in the world, boobs."

Posted by: Kballs at January 8, 2010 9:31 AM

Excellent review! Seems like an interesting take on a story a lot of us think we know well.

My wife is obsessed with the the Salem area and the history (and she's not even a witch!), so I might have to recommend this to her. She lived there for a while and it's always been her goal to take me and the kids back someday to visit the region.

Posted by: Snath at January 8, 2010 9:58 AM

Probably to burn you, Snath. Watch your back on that family trip...

Posted by: Brenton at January 8, 2010 10:38 AM

Yeah, I guess I should stop causing all those plagues and famines.

Posted by: Snath at January 8, 2010 10:49 AM

Watch out for Kballs' boobs while your at it, Snath. Looks like Salem is still making peeps do the crazy.

Posted by: Stella at January 8, 2010 11:51 AM

Mike B., it's hard to say as the townspeople and the uncle aren't really dealt with as much as the family. It does, though, seem like the term "witch" is thrown around more as a taunt or an insult than an actual accusation by most. Some people seem to genuinely believe they've been bewitched, but some just seem happy to play that angle for the court. And it can't be denied that many people doing the accusing have personal vendettas or stand to gain from the accused being arrested and convicted.

As for the protagonist being preternaturally modern, I can't say I noticed anything overt there, but I'm not a huge consumer of historical fiction so I can't give you a definitive answer.

Posted by: Intern Rusty at January 8, 2010 12:01 PM

Wait... what?

Martha proves her concern for her children, though, when she takes Sarah aside the night before she’s arrested and warns her that if Sarah and her brothers are arrested as witches they must confess to whatever the court wants to hear to avoid being hung.

But... if they confess, they're killed as witches. Only church trials spared witches who confessed and repented, and generally hit them with penance (a year's fasting for harmful magic, I believe, and a month or so for magic with good intentions) and a promise to never do it again; secular courts had no mercy for the accused. How is that... um... how is that good motherly advice?

Your review's good, but that part just froze my brain in its tracks. HOW DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? "Confess to this crime punishable by death so that you don't die, sweetie!"

Posted by: Nat Kittyface at January 8, 2010 12:58 PM

Great review, Rusty -- sounds like a sad, but fascinating, read.

Posted by: Jelinas at January 8, 2010 3:38 PM

I imagine that custom (secular courts having no mercy) wasn't so strict, NK, though I'm just guessing. I just read a story about a witch trial in the latest issue of Geist magazine (will go online next month, I think) and I remember the trial was secular and the witch didn't die.

Posted by: Brenton at January 8, 2010 4:03 PM

Nice review. This sounds interesting. We just talked about Charles' beheading and Cromwell's Protectorate today in British lit. I'm a lit. teacher, but I'm a complete nerd for history, too. I wouldn't call myself a dork, but thanks!

Posted by: Goddess at January 8, 2010 5:14 PM

What I really liked about the book is that it's based on letters and diaries of Kathleen Kent's family. That added a cool, personal touch to history, in my opinion.

Posted by: Sharon at January 9, 2010 7:08 PM

I happen to be commenting to let you be aware of of the wonderful discovery my friend's girl had studying your web site. She mastered several pieces, not to mention what it is like to have an incredible teaching style to make other people clearly get specified complex issues. You actually did more than our own expected results. I appreciate you for offering such productive, trusted, informative and as well as easy tips on the matter to Mary.

Posted by: home remedies for acne and pimples at March 12, 2011 9:06 PM