web
counter
 

The Amber Spyglass by Phillip Pullman

By Figgy | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (29)



golden-compass.jpg

So it ends. Pullman’s monumental trilogy comes to a breathless, exhausting, and sometimes underwhelming conclusion with The Amber Spyglass. I’m still a little bit shaken, to be honest.

The first book, The Golden Compass, set up players and locations. Lyra Belacqua sets out to rescue her friend Roger from the evil plans of the Oblation Board—aka The Church. At the end, Lyra discovers that hers is just one of many worlds, and the next book starts up with Lyra entering one of them. In The Subtle Knife, Lyra meets Will Parry, a young boy from our world who wants to find his missing father. With the help of the titular object, they travel through different worlds trying to fulfill the missions they have set for themselves. The Amber Spyglass deals, in essence, with the conclusion to the children’s quests. On top of that, the children have to escape capture by one of two opposing forces that are trying to find them, as it is prophesied that the children have vital roles to play in deciding the fate of the worlds. And so, the forces of “good,” led by Lord Asriel (Lyra’s father and his armies) and their enemies (the Church, and over them the forces of God, or “The Authority”) engage in an epic battle for control of the universe while they try to find the children.

Lyra and Will, of course, have their own plans. Lyra, finally growing up and maturing (Pullman skillfully changes Lyra’s way of speaking) still needs to fulfill her promise to Roger, and Will still needs to speak to his father. With these simple goals in mind, and while doing everything they can to resolve them, Lyra and Will find themselves in the middle of the great battle, fighting in it without quite knowing they’re doing it. All they know is that they must keep their promises and do the right thing.

It’s hard (and very unfair) to condense the plot so much, but anything else would take away the surprise and awe that come with that Pullman does in this book. The final book is massive, packed with exciting plot twists and fantastic battles, escapes, near-misses, everything you could ask for in an epic. And then some.

There are some weaknesses, though. I found this to be the most uneven of the three books, and sometimes things get a little too confusing to be completely enjoyable. It takes some work to untangle everything that’s happening and being said. And Pullman has been working on so many plots and characters that it’s perhaps inevitable that some of them come to rather lackluster conclusions. I felt that some of the big themes that he had been expanding on weren’t satisfactorily concluded, and I was left feeling a little bit shortchanged with regards to some of the big mysteries. The introduction of the mulefa, for example, seems completely unnecessary, and I found myself bored to distraction by the scenes dealing with them. There are a few other speed bumps like this, and it’s sometimes just irritating to have an exciting battle scene interrupted by a long, misplaced stretch of non-action.

To top it all off, Pullman goes all out with his criticism of religion in this book. It didn’t really bother me at all (and I’m not pro or anti religion), but it can get a little heavy-handed at times, with Pullman pushing his point again and again. I found it interesting, but it might turn some people off the trilogy entirely. But as I said in my other reviews, Pullman isn’t just screaming anti-religion nonsense; everything he writes fits into the story and has a purpose beyond scandalizing people. He’s criticizing dogmatism and fanatics, not just poking at the religious with no larger point in sight.

But these are minor complaints, really. The book is a fitting end to the trilogy, making the whole thing the best fantasy series I’ve read since Lord of the Rings. Don’t dismiss it because it’s labeled a ‘children’s book’, as it’s the furthest thing from a simple kiddie book imaginable — I actually think adults would enjoy the subtlety of Pullman’s prose and themes more than younger readers would. It has everything you could possibly want out of a series, and it’s the kind of thing that is appealing to just about every audience (except the freakishly religious, I guess). If you loved Lord of the Rings, if you loved Harry Potter (which really is kiddie literature), this is the perfect combination of both. It’s a sophisticated, intelligent series and just ridiculously fun to read. I am in awe at what Pullman has done, and I know I’ll definitely be reading this again sometime soon.


For more of Figgy’s book reviews, check out her blog. And, for her shirtless retrospective of Wolverine, you can check out this post









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Vacation Movies | HBO Picks Up Simon's "Treme"









Comments

I tried reading the first one and I'm afraid it bored me to tears. I hated the ending, which wasn't an ending at all, but a cliffhanger. I wasn't raised in any Christian religion, so I don't get the satire or jabs that everyone keeps talking about. I've already been raked over the coals by Pajibans who don't understand how I could know nothing about Christianity, but I bet you don't know anything about my religion either, and if you read a book that satirized it you wouldn't get the jabs either.

Posted by: BWeaves at May 7, 2009 9:32 AM

Harry Potter is not kiddie literature! Mean figgy!

Sigh. Great review!

Posted by: Kolby at May 7, 2009 9:37 AM

I couldn't stand the second two books. Pullman sets up this really cool alternate universe in book one, and then he weighed it down with so much crap in the later books, that I barely finished either of them. Especially this one.

Posted by: Wednesday at May 7, 2009 9:49 AM

The first book was fun, but it derailed quickly. Enough already Pullmam, we get it, you hate the Catholic church; did a bishop rape your grandmother or something? Sheesh! When you make C.S Lewis seem subtle, you should know you're something wrong.

Posted by: cockroach at May 7, 2009 9:50 AM

^*You're doing something wrong.

Posted by: cockroach at May 7, 2009 9:52 AM

I picked up and read this book after it was so highly recommended in a Pajiba What's Good For You Guide. I was disappointed to say the least as I found it, like BWeaves, boring and unsatisfying. I grew up Christian but have since pretty much abandoned religion, so the potshots neither went over my head nor bothered me. Still I finished the book out of expectation that it would improve, though it never did. Most of the other Pajiba recommendations were in fact good books.

Posted by: ed newman at May 7, 2009 10:04 AM

Some of the best books I've ever read - no qualifiers like "children's" or "fantasy" needed.

Yes, the shredding of religious hypocrisy is an important part of Pullman's message, but it's hardly the only thing of worth in the book.

Bweaves, I actually don't think it's a religious satire. It's a book about power - who controls it, and how they use it. I think we have all experienced that, regardless of our religious background.

To take just one example - the concept of cutting was heartbreaking - and eerily familiar to real world hot-button issues. It's taking away a person's agency, in order to "save" them from themselves. Abortion, sterilizing crack mothers, think about the ways in which do-gooders on all sides of the political spectrum want to take control of our bodies because they know better than we do.

And the loveable, complicated characters, the heart-thumping action sequences, the creepy, creepy antagonist - setting aside any larger messages, it's just a fucking good story.

Posted by: marya at May 7, 2009 10:04 AM

*I refer above to The Golden Compass, not the later book figgy reviews here (which I did not read).*

Posted by: ed newman at May 7, 2009 10:07 AM

I only read the first two books of the series (sadly didn't finish the last one), but automatically loved them. It made the eventual adaptation of the first film all the more heartbreakingly bad. I would have to agree though, it's very thought provoking work.

Posted by: Doctor Controversy at May 7, 2009 10:09 AM

I read The Golden Compass and The Subtle Knife and hated both books. I found them unbelievable, immature and incredibly heavy-handed with the anti-religion message (and my views are VERY anti-religious).

"the best fantasy series I’ve read since Lord of the Rings" You are clearly missing out on a lot of amazing fantasy series. I was a huge Tolkien fan until I read Anne McCaffrey's Dragonriders of Pern series and especially Martin's A Song of Ice and Fire series. While I appreciate the elaborate world Tolkien created, Martin tells a far superior story.

A worthy mention goes to Patrick Rothfuss' "The Name of the Wind" which is shaping up to be a wonderful trilogy.

Posted by: Agent Scully at May 7, 2009 10:25 AM

I don't read fantasy, I just want to say if figgy says it's good, you naysayers keep your damn mouths shut.

There, figs, I tole 'em fer ya.

Posted by: , (the commenter formerly known as bucdaddy) at May 7, 2009 10:39 AM

Most heartbraking end to a book ever. I have to say that the end of this series was the only time I've ever cried while reading a book/watching a movie/playing a videogame ever. (Well there was one reading a Dawkins book, but that was kind of different). I absolutely loved the series and swore never to read it again.

Posted by: Chugga at May 7, 2009 11:22 AM

I read all three and yes, the series as a whole is very enjoyable and the writing style kept my interest up.

My main complaint of the series is having a main character that I LOVED (Lyra) and then ignoring her and giving us another one(Will). I loved Lyra but Will was less interesting to me so at times when the later books focused on him I had a hard time enjoying it fully.

The story was great though. I love how, like Harry Potter(yes I liek those books, sue me) the kids grew up more with each book as did the situations and writing style.

All in all if you like fantasy novels pick them up because they are worth it!

Posted by: Angelmonster at May 7, 2009 11:53 AM

I can't express my love for this series any better than has already been done, so I'll move on. Did anyone else think that Iorek was pronounced 'Eye-or-eck'? In the movie they all called him 'Yorick' which, I suppose, is probably what it was supposed to be all along, but it never occurred to me while I was reading the books. I'm so used to Eye-or-eck now that I couldn't stop saying it if I tried, and it just sounds so much cooler.

I can't think of 'Achilles' as anything but 'Ah-sheel' after reading Orson Scott Card's Shadow series, either.

Posted by: James at May 7, 2009 12:23 PM

Chugga -- I hear you there!

I ended up reading the last two of the series while on a long train ride, and ended up weeping copiously at several points during the final book. Maybe it was because I read it all in one go, but it really hit me quite powerfully.

Posted by: linny at May 7, 2009 12:37 PM

No worries, buc! I can see why this is a very polarizing series. I found the whole thing very thoughtful and exciting, but I can definitely see how people wouldn't like it and give up before finishing--which is a big problem the last two books have. The momentum sometimes gets badly broken up and the preachiness can be a bit too much.

BUT I thought it was just so damn original and imaginative--the scenes in the land of the dead are just fucking HEARTBREAKING and the ending just had me bawling in the middle of the night. So I really loved the whole thing. But maybe it's not for everybody.

By the way, here are my reviews for the other two books, in case you want to read them:

Golden Compass: http://figgylicious.blogspot.com/2009/04/book-28-5k-5-golden-compass-by-phillip.html

Subtle Knife: http://figgylicious.blogspot.com/2009/05/book-29-subtle-knife-by-phillip-pullman.html

PS: As someone asked me when I finished this: what would YOUR daemon look like? I think mine would be a monkey of some sort.

PPS: Thanks for posting the review, DR!

Posted by: figgy at May 7, 2009 1:26 PM

The introduction of the mulefa, for example, seems completely unnecessary, and I found myself bored to distraction by the scenes dealing with them.

I completely agree, figgy. Even though I knew it was the final book, and I didn't really want the series to end, I also didn't give a crap about most of Mary Malone's adventures.

I was totally gutted when Lyra and Will figured out what they had to do to save the Dust. I'm talking full-on sobbing. I have to reread this series soon!

Posted by: Melissa at May 7, 2009 1:44 PM

i had to stop reading this book after i read a sentence that was something along the lines of "lord asriel stood in his adamant tower".

adamant tower? really?

so. fucking. bad.

Posted by: bree at May 7, 2009 3:04 PM

I thought The Golden Compass was by far the strongest book of the trilogy and the second and third books were pretty dissapointing. All in all, this was a pretty underwhelming effort and pales in comparison to series such as the Fire and Ice series by George Martin and The Warlord Chronicles by Bernard Cornwell.

Posted by: sosumi at May 7, 2009 3:21 PM

What's wrong with "adamant tower"? I mean...out of all the things to pick on...

Posted by: figgy at May 7, 2009 4:01 PM

I thought the series was interesting enough, especially the interpretation of religion. I didn't like the heavy-handed criticism, but the roles of Angels and the concept of Daemons kept my attention enough to read the books.

That being said, I think all three are crap. The problem for me was the Phillip Pullman tried to write a sweeping epic, crossing multiple realities and dealing with the fate of them all, and yet he made his focus two children. What I assumed was supposed to be the emotional climax of the book, where Lyra and Will realize they love each other and share a kiss, was RIDICULOUS. They're thirteen at most, and yet we're supposed to believe that these two realize completely what love is, and that they have somehow lost their innocence in doing so? Worse still, Mary was supposed be some sort of "temptress," bringing this about. I understand that Daemons settling into one form was something introduced in the first book, and is meant to be the same thing, a loss of innocence. But I don't understand WHY Mary is needed at all.

Mary's story, and the introduction of the Mulefa, confusing elephant beings on wheels, didn't need to be there. That subplot was mildly interesting...until I realized that the entire purpose was to bring the titular Amber Spyglass into the book. It and the Mulefa existed for no purpose other than to flesh out Pullman's concepts, having nothing to do with the main plot of the book and no effect on it until the very end. Of course, there was the assassin sent to do away with Mary, which some might say was the connection to the main plot. Only it wasn't, really. It was a connection, yes, but it was unnecessary and only existed to reinforce the threat of Mary as a "temptress." My point being, Mary and the Mulefa were completely unnecessary, or at least the Mulefa were. Everything discovered through them could easily have been expanded on through Asriel, and would have made a lot more sense.

Posted by: TK at May 7, 2009 5:20 PM

I both agree and disagree, TK. I'm with you on Mary and Mulefa, because they were just completely unnecessary. The whole plot involving Dust was one of the things I found wasn't satisfactorily concluded. I mean...they made such a huge deal of it and in the end it didn't even seem that important--or interesting. It was a weak hook. And Mary's role as a temptress was really pretty lame. They would've fallen in love ANYWAY.

I also didn't get how he never explained who the original Eve was, or if she had ever existed. If the whole concept of Genesis was a lie, and there was no temptation, did Eve even exist? And so, how was Lyra "Eve"? I get that Lyra was the "mother" to a new order, but I felt that the whole idea of "the fall" just fell apart, as if Pullman didn't quite know how he wanted it to end.

But I liked the love between Lyra and Will. I think the whole point was that they really were very ignorant and young at the start, but what they went through made them mature and grow up very quickly. Don't know, I think it worked and I bought it.

I couldn't help but love it even through all that. The trip into the land of the dead, the celestial battle, Metatron, the different worlds...that was pretty kickass.

Posted by: figgy at May 7, 2009 7:16 PM

Hee. I just noticed that DR linked to my Wolverine review. I love you, man.

(I bet you looked at RyRey for a long time, hmmm?)

Posted by: figgy at May 7, 2009 8:42 PM

I found it really hard to get into the first book; Lyra was so bratty that I couldn't connect to her as a character. I enjoyed the 2nd book & Will's perspective a little more. I LOATHED Lord Asriel throughout the series, and his sacrifice at the end did not redeem him for being fine with killing a kid to achieve his goals, so long as it wasn't his kid. I agree that the mulfa/Mary stuff was tedious and unnecessary, and that the religious smack-down was overdone. There were some great ideas and a few good moments, but otherwise I found the series quite disappointing.

Posted by: Lauren at May 7, 2009 9:18 PM

Not really a fantasy fan, I had read some of Pullman's other historical YA lit as a youngster, and only returned to the His Dark Materials series as an adult a few years ago. I found them incredibly well-written, very mature and relatable despite (or perhaps because of?) the young protagonists, and though it's meant to be this big anti-religious allegory, it is a great commentary on power and institution versus individual agency. I'm with you, figgy, these books are great.

Posted by: Ariel at May 7, 2009 9:50 PM

I haven't read this review yet, but YES YES YES YES YES YES!

Posted by: dene at May 7, 2009 11:12 PM

I love everything about this series.

@ James- Yea, I thought Iorek was Eye-O-Reck too, but once I realized that he was Yorick, it just made so much more sense, because of the Panserbjorn part. But you know what got me and still gets me? Daemon. I know in the beginning of the first book, they said that it's pronounced demons, but in my head, I just kept reading day-mons.

I can see why there are objection to the Mary and mulefa story line, but I actually really enjoyed it. What i thought was important to keep in mind is that Mary used to be nun (which Lyra reveals in the second book) and she had put her religious faith into something else- science. And then she was disenchanted by that because it turns out, science cannot answer all her problems and questions. So she goes into a new world, and I just saw it as a relearning process of how to view the world in a different way. She didn't have to see it in black-and-white way that seculars do, and also not in the God-or-die way. I thought that was really helpful to Pullman's message of resisting dogmatism, and yet also being able to retain a spiritual point of view. plus i like the mulefa! I thought they were fun... but I guess I was the only one.

Also, everyone keeps saying how the book is anti-religion. For me, when I first read it when I was 12 (yep, target age group- even though I think, like Figgy, that adults would enjoy it quite a bit) I saw it as anti-establishment. Anti-too-much-power-for-those-who-are-in-the-majority. That's what I saw it as. Because Coulter's gang had so much clout, but let's be honest- so did Lord Asriel's side. And then there's Lyra and Will, and those other people on the sidelines whom all the big politicians forget about when they are making their grand decisions - oh wait, wrong book/history/story. But you get what i mean.

and Figgy, I've had this discussion sooo many times with my friends, and I think I have settled on panther. rawr.

I LOVE THIS BOOK.

Posted by: dene at May 7, 2009 11:39 PM

I loved this series when I read them a few years back, and I'm just about to revisit them via audiobook. The last book had me bawling - I thought the love story was beautiful and incredible and heartbreaking. A really great series, and I listed it in my top five in our Pajiba guide thing and was so happy when it made the final list. [Speaking of, that book guide thing was one of my favourite posts ever, we should totally do it more often. Pretty please? Maybe they could be themed lists (Favourite books that make you cry/laugh/want to change the world etc?? Please?]

Also, I plan to name one of my future daughters 'Willyra', because I think that is an awesome name and this is such a beautiful work.

Also, pooh on you Figgy for your 'kiddie' jab at Harry Potter! But a great review nontheless.

Posted by: JJ McClay at May 8, 2009 7:30 AM

JJ McClay, the audiobooks from Audible are great. Get the ones with Phillip Pullman doing the narrating. It seemed a little strange to have other voices doing the spoken parts, but I got used to it really quickly. The scenes in the land of the dead are really, really good, much better than reading the written version.

Posted by: Ponytail at May 8, 2009 8:09 AM