web
counter
 

The ABC Murders by Agatha Christie

By ScienceGeek | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (18)



cover_large.jpg

In recommending this story to your friends, please do not hint at anything that might spoil their pleasure in reading it.

This is the request printed inside the book jacket of The ABC Murders, and it tickles me. I picture Ms. Christie herself penning it, worried about the Spoilering of all her carefully crafted plot twists.

I just can’t refuse such a polite request. So, I will limit my descriptions to only what is found above that little message on the book jacket. A maniac is working their murderous way through the alphabet, starting with Mrs. Ascher of Andover, followed by Betty Barnard at Bexhill, then Sir Carmichael Clarke of Churston. And, from the very beginning, Hercule Poirot is involved.

I seem to have developed a bit of a gift for choosing books by Christie with plots that have been rehashed in a dozen different ways. This time, it’s the ‘hunt for the mad serial killer’ done do death (pardon the pun) by everyone from Dean Koontz to “CSI.”

This time, however, it didn’t spoil my enjoyment of the book. The ending delighted me, which is about as much I am willing to say. I’ve read less than half a dozen of Christie’s books, mostly Poirots, and I’ve come to the conclusion that she’s very clever in separating the styles of her two most famous creations, despite the fact that both examine the psychology of the killer rather than collecting physical evidence. Miss Marple is an old woman full of stories; she operates on the idea that all humans behave the same way when influenced by the same motivations. There’s no unique little snowflakes in Miss Marples’ world. Poirot is sneakier; he’s echoed, in many ways, in shows like “The Mentalist” or “Criminal Minds.”

If I have a complaint about her work it’s that sometimes it’s a bit too ‘stiff-upper-lip’. The characters are believable, but they can be a bit dry. The secondary characters can blend into the background, or one another, and you end up wondering if the Determined, Honest Brunette is the sister of the second murder victim, or is she the niece of the first? Then again, that may have been my own fault — I read this book to fill in time while my car was being serviced, in a room with a TV blaring some inane morning television show clearly designed for retirees with low standards and stay-at-home mums or dads too broken by sleep deprivation to demand better viewing material.

Christie deserved her crown as High Queen of Mysteries. If you haven’t read this book, please do. I recommend it highly, and I hope I haven’t hinted at anything that might spoil your pleasure in reading it.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of ScienceGeek’s reviews, check out the blog, Suburban Scientist









Sarah Chalke Set to Star in "Freshman" | Danny Glover in Dragon Fire













Comments

I just wanted to say that this is a lovely review. Christie is one of my favorite authors of all time. There's nothing more comforting, for me, than curling up with one of her books (several of which I have read again and again and again). I own more of her books than I do of any other author and while she might be responsible for me rampant anglophilia and my proclivity for country tweeds and little Belgian men, I think she has brought more joy to my life than harm. I heart the Cannonball Read!

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 4, 2010 1:03 AM

I don't know why that or this is in italics!!

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 4, 2010 1:04 AM

awesome review, LD!

Posted by: gp at February 4, 2010 9:27 AM

I think I'll pick this one up at the library today. The only Christie novel I've read was "And Then There Were None", and I zoomed through that in a couple of hours. Thanks for the recommendation!

Posted by: Commander Strikeher at February 4, 2010 11:30 AM

While I liked Hercule Poirot and Ms Marple, but I will always have a soft spot for Tommy and Tuppence. And much like coveredinbees, those books fueled my anglophilia to no end.

Posted by: Stella at February 4, 2010 11:34 AM

I've somehow skipped over Agatha Christie for all these years, but I've been wanting to read her for awhile. This looks like a good one to start.
Any recommendations for others?

Posted by: Sophia at February 4, 2010 2:15 PM

I can't remember NOT liking any of her books. And Then There Were None is always a good start - I remember reading it in school and so it may have been the one that got me started on the rest of her ouevre.

Posted by: Stella at February 4, 2010 2:23 PM

Uh-oh, the Italics Gnomes are at it again!

I've never read any Christie, but I totally want to now. Thanks for the review, ScienceGeek!

Posted by: Jelinas at February 4, 2010 2:31 PM

I LOVE Christie's book. My low-brow goal in life is to read all of her mysteries (which means that hopefully by the time I've gotten to some of the ones I've seen movie versions of, it'll have been long enough that I'll have forgotten who did it). I remember being surprised by the end of ABC Murders--it was no Murder of Roger Ackroyd, but it was still a shock.

(Should I assume that all the Christie fans here have seen her episode of Doctor Who?)

Posted by: Claire at February 4, 2010 2:46 PM

Oh, like Stella, Tommy and Tuppence are my fav because they are so intrepid (I would italicize that if the whole thing weren't going to be italicized anyway). I always start people off on The Secret Adversary because there's ESPIONAGE. And PRUSSIC ACID!

Posted by: coveredinbees at February 4, 2010 3:13 PM

I've loved Christie since I was a kid, and I've read almost everything of hers. At one point, I had a little score going with myself over whether or not I could guess the killer (I was slightly below 50% when I stopped keeping track).

If I remember correctly, I found this one very enjoyable, if not the most stand-out of her novels. One thing I've always appreciated about Christie over Doyle (who I also love, and actually have read the complete works) is that she usually plays fair with the reader - usually, the killer is someone we have met, and the evidence that Poirot or Marple or T&T are working with is usually presented to the reader as well, as opposed to the Holmes mysteries, where the answer usually lay with a piece of information only Holmes, or someone in his universe, could know. I can't remember exactly, but I think in this one we are introduced to the murderer, no?

Did anyone ever read the Crooked House? That one surprised me. The killer crossed my mind, but I thought for sure Christie wouldn't go there.

Stella, I also loved T&T best. I thought Secret Adversaries was so adorably romantic (that was the title of the first one, right?)

Claire, I was SO excited about that episode, and in a season with a companion who shared MY name - why, they were clearly writing the show for me! I thought the episode kind of sucked, though. The sci-fi aspect was sketchy (which is pretty par for the course with RTD, but still), the wasp thing was badly shoehorned in there, and it wasn't very fun. Plus it was stupid. Blech. What did you think?

Posted by: dsbs at February 4, 2010 3:42 PM

I don't remember which book featured T&T first, I just know that my pre-adolescent heart simply SWELLED with love for those two. They, along with Anne Shirley and Gilbert Blythe were my 'shoot for the stars' ideals of what coupledom should be like. I can think of few other 'couple' characters that were that endeared to me.

Posted by: Stella at February 4, 2010 5:01 PM

Tommy and Tuppence are the best. She was not afraid to age them, and her books follow them from their twenties to senior citizens.

I just love em.

Posted by: Maya Kane at February 4, 2010 5:19 PM

I'm so glad people liked the review!
I read 'Then there were none' as a practice for the CBR, and I'll second (third?) the recommendations. But honestly, all the ones I've read have been fantastic. I'm seriously in awe of Christie's skill, style... well, everything. I'm beginning to think I could do the entire CBR on her novels and still find each one interesting, which is about the highest praise you could give an author, really.

Mental note: check out some Tommy and Tuppence books, ASAP. These two sound like fun.

Posted by: ScienceGeek at February 4, 2010 8:12 PM

I had read most of Agatha Christie's books by the time I graduated from college. During middle school and high school, my father limited how many of her books I could check out of the library at once or I wouldn't have read anything else.

After reading this review, I feel like I need to take some time and read them all again. I did read Crooked House but I don't remember many details after 25 years so perhaps I will read that one second (after The ABC Murders).

Posted by: Dominique at February 4, 2010 9:19 PM

This is the first positive review of Christie I've read in a while. Heaven knows I'm an Elephant that Can Remember.

In our time, and long before, she is patronized for being "only" a puzzle writer (looking at you, Ruth Rendell, Ngaio Marsh, P.D. James.) This is usually not true, anyway, but her writing can be subtle.

At least she doesn't bang us on the head, over and over again, with artistic pretension and social relevance (again, looking at you, Ruth Rendell, Ngaio Marsh, P.D. James.)

Posted by: Janis at February 4, 2010 10:10 PM

I think I'll have to check this out. I've been reading Raymond Chandler and Arthur Conan Doyle, and this fits right in.

Posted by: Brenton at February 6, 2010 6:36 PM

It’s onerous to find knowledgeable folks on this matter, however you sound like you already know what you’re talking about! Thanks

Posted by: Cardigans for Men at March 16, 2011 2:20 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time