blogspot
visitor
Tale of the Body Thief by Anne Rice | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

tom-cruise-lestat.jpg
Tale of the Body Thief by Anne Rice


Cannonball Read / (Genny now just) Rusty

Book Reviews | September 3, 2009 | Comments (31)


This is the first Anne Rice novel that I’ve read, and I was annoyed because our library was out of Interview With The Vampire, which I wanted to start with. However, after reading The Tale of the Body Thief I think I would have come to the same conclusion either way, which is that I simply don’t care for this kind of novel. I found it to be overly introspective and the characters excessively self pitying. It was like listening to a bunch of egomaniacs whine about how wonderful their life was and how handsome they are and wasn’t that simply tragic? Luckily, there was some amount of action in this book, but it was always between bouts of withering reflections on the self.

Perhaps I should say that rather than not liking the novel, I just don’t like Lestat. He spends the first half of the novel extolling all the reasons that his life as a basically immortal vampire who has access to unimaginable wealth is so terribly boring and mundane. Then he meets up with the titular Body Thief, a mortal who has perfected the art of transferring his spirit from one body to another with one catch, that body’s spirit must necessarily leave it’s own body first. Lestat eagerly agrees to trade bodies with this person, despite the well reasoned warnings from his friends. It takes Lestat about five minutes in a human body to realize several things; 1. Maybe it’s not a great idea to trade bodies with someone who all evidence suggests is nothing more than a career criminal with a nifty trick 2. Being human kind of sucks, what with the pain and the sub-par senses and hunger and whatnot and 3. I’m a whiny asshole who’s going to whine about numbers 1 and 2 despite the fact that I’m allegedly soooooo smart and could’ve figured this shit out by myself in like a nanosecond.

Then we get into the part of the novel that actually involves some action, where Lestat and his mortal friend David track down the Body Thief to force a switch back. The action is, inevitably, interrupted several times for Lestat to talk about feelings a lot, some more, again, but finally Lestat gets his own god-like (his words, not mine) body back. And then the book ends, right? WRONG. More whining, more reflection, more “oh the days gone by were so much better,” more spending of vast sums of money without a second thought. At the very end Lestat commits what I would have thought was an unforgivable act, Rice’s attempt to prove that all his wallowing about being a ‘demon’ or an ‘evil creature’ was actually true. But no, the other characters forgive him, because he’s Lestat and you just have to love him, right?

The Tale of the Body Thief is the fourth book in the Vampire Chronicles by Anne Rice. I found it to be whiny and frustrating but perhaps habitual readers of Anne Rice can tell me how I’m looking at it the wrong way. So far the only vampires I like are the Dead Before Dark vampires and even then Bill Compton is a little emo for my tastes.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Genny (now just Rusty)’s review, check her blog, Rusty’s Ventures.


Your Favorite Summer Movie | Human Centipede: First Sequence Images





Comments

Oh Lestat, you crazy bastard. "Raping" everyone all the time with your vampire ways.

Posted by: Snath at September 3, 2009 8:18 AM

I read these as a teenager. It didn't bother me so much, which seems appropriate considering the general state of emotional turmoil of those years. Your description sounds pretty accurate.

Posted by: lizella at September 3, 2009 8:35 AM

I tried Interview, once, back in the mid-nineties after I had seen the movie, and I couldn't get three pages into it.
And although I made it [a little] further, the same thing happened a couple of years later when I tried The Witching Hour.
I decided at that point that the Anne Rice Craze just didn't jive with me.

Posted by: Rykker at September 3, 2009 8:56 AM

What with it being Rice, I expected the titular "Body Thief" to engage in a little corpse-fucking. Y'know, because necrophelia is so damned erotic. I have to wonder what Rice, with all her gajillions and her obsession with whole-chicken sex, does in her mansions most evenings.

On second thought, actually, I don't wonder. Not a bit.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at September 3, 2009 9:19 AM

I never liked Lestat. Louis was much more interesting and sympathetic.

Posted by: Todd at September 3, 2009 9:34 AM

Neodiognes: Rice is all about the Jesus now. She has become born again and claims the Vampire Chronicles were the devil speaking through her or something. Before that she had claimed MANY TIMES that the Chronicles were recounted to her by Lestat, because he spoke to her. So cracy then, crazy now.

I liked "Interview" but couldn't get more than 100 pages into "Lestat" before giving up entirely on her.

Posted by: TylerDFC at September 3, 2009 9:37 AM

i'm going to be honest and admit i only read this post because i like Genny and despite the fact that i sort of loathe reading anne rice (who knew books were supposed to be so...wordy?)

Posted by: gp at September 3, 2009 9:40 AM

I read a lot of Anne Rice in high school, but I reached a point where her stuff just started getting obnoxious (Merrick, Vittorio and Blackwood Farms) - I stayed loyal for a while but after Blackwood Farms, I just couldn't deal with her anymore.
The Anne Rice novels I liked the most were The Vampire Lestat, Pandora and Armand - since these were pretty much straight up life stories, they didn't spend as much time whining and reflecting (sounds rather counterintuitive). I was apathetic towards Body Thief, and hated Memnoch.
I think if I'd started with this, I definitely would have hated Rice. Even liking her in high school, I disliked half of her books. I think you pretty much summed up the major problem with them.

Posted by: Jen at September 3, 2009 9:49 AM

I used to be really into Anne Rice, and read all of the vampire chronicles, in order. But after Interview With The Vampire and The Vampire Lestat, Lestat really began to grate on my nerves. Existential whining can only take you so far.

And, Tyler, be kind to Anne. She's been through a lot with the death of her daughter and husband.

Posted by: Carolina Girl at September 3, 2009 9:59 AM

Jen, Blackwood Farm is actually one of my favorites. Merrick, however, is not. Blarg.

Posted by: Snath at September 3, 2009 10:01 AM

I began to loathe whiny introspection with Rice's novels in high school. When J.K. Fucking Rowling used it in Harry Potter, I almost had a book burning.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at September 3, 2009 10:01 AM

Story of my life, Jen, story of my life.

Posted by: dia at September 3, 2009 10:16 AM

I didn't read as far as Body Thief myself. I enjoyed Interview with the Vampire because it was among the first modern vampire novels I'd ever read as a kid (previously, I lived in a bubble of Dracula and Hammer horror), and I also enjoyed the movie, though some of their changes made me a little sad once I knew what the difference between book/novel was.

The Vampire Lestat was also enjoyable, though I probably couldn't tell you anything about it nowadays save a few random plot points. But I do remember it being my absolute favorite, because Lestat was a little more fun-loving and easy-going than Louis, and it was before Lestat hit on his own whiny phase. It was also pretty cool, after Interview, to see certain events previously described by Louis from Lestat's perspective.

But then I hit Queen of the Damned and I got maybe 50 pages in before I just gave up. So I'd say Interview or Vampire Lestat have enough enjoyable stuff in them that you don't much mind the angst, but QotD and onwards the angst just creeps in and takes over the action.

Then again, I haven't read these books in years, so it's possible if I re-read them now, I'd be equally disdainful. Who knows?

Posted by: Nat at September 3, 2009 11:32 AM

I remember really enjoying Queen of the Damned, simply because it had a plot that moved, was "epic," and had much less time was spent on "We're beautiful and rich, and TRAGICALLY AWESOME!!! You want to be one of us? Well, you CAN'T, because you're just a boring, normal person!!! HAHAHAHA. Being got. . . I mean a vampire TOTALLY rocks the Casbah! I'm gonna go read some Byron while I smoke a clove." Well, except for that Baby Jerk (or Winks, or Jinks, or whatever) character, and the TOTALLY AWESOME COUNCIL OF AWESOMENESS. Ok, ok. It had a whole lot less self indulgant wangst. To me. At age 14.

I have a feeling that rereading it now would be like rereading Merecedes Lackey or Piers Anthony. I liked her books at the time, and there were a few good things, but I feel I've grown out of them.

Posted by: Rowen at September 3, 2009 11:46 AM

I wanted to like Anne Rice. I really, truly did. I wanted to be one of those people. I've only ever successfully completed one book*, The Witching Hour. Which I did like, though when I tried to read Lasher... I think I never got farther than halfway on that one. So dense! And kind of annoying.

*Actually, not entirely true. I ripped right through the Sleeping Beauty series (written as A. N. Roquelaure). 'Cause I'm sick like that. Sadly, I loaned volume 1 to a friend and never saw it again. 'Cause he's sick like that.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at September 3, 2009 12:54 PM

i read 'interview with the vampire' when it was released, and loved it. i was 13 or so at the time, and it totally satisfied my vampire lust.
because i loved it so much, it was only natural to read all the other stories as they came out and i read them all....but none of them ever were as good as interview. interview is more about loss and louis is such a gorgeous character. unfortunately the movie and everything that has come since it, probably has ruined it for anyone to be able to take it new.

Posted by: maxpurr9 at September 3, 2009 1:18 PM

I tried to read Interview with the Vampire but couldn't make it more than 50 pages in. The characters were too self loathing and Lestat was way too full of himself.

I'd much rather watch the yumminess that is Brad Pitt.

Posted by: greenblue at September 3, 2009 2:01 PM

I was working as a tour guide at Oak Alley when they filmed Interview.... It totally sealed forever my hatred of Tom Cruise (whiney douche who had to be helicoptered in each night so no one would see his make-up) and my love of Brad Pitt (totally down-to-earth and approachable guy who stayed at a tiny b&b next to the plantation and hung out on the porch with the old lady who owned it every night after filming.) Trivia: Anne Rice said she wanted Sting to play Lestat as that was how she saw him. She was pissed about Tom Cruise being cast.

Posted by: ShannonAnn at September 3, 2009 2:03 PM

I can't tell you happy I am to come back to mostly supportive comments rather than a slew of "Anne Rice is awesome and you're functionally illiterate" comments, which I feared when I saw the count was over 10 for a book review. I had been considering looking for Interview just to give the series a second chance but y'all have mostly talked me out of it. I'll just rent the movie again, because Brad Pitt is indeed delicious.

Posted by: Rusty (formerly Genny) at September 3, 2009 4:48 PM

I've only read Interview and wasn't very impressed with it. My initial thought upon reading it was, "My god, has Anne Rice ever heard of chapters?!?!" Louis drones on and on and on and on and on for some 300+ pages, and never once gives you a good stopping point. And just isn't that interesting, on top of it.

Posted by: Bistro at September 3, 2009 5:07 PM

Actually, this is probably my favorite book of Rice's, and the one I think would have made the best movie. But I agree that it can be tedious, I have to be in a particular mood to read it.

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at September 3, 2009 5:34 PM

I have read zero words of any kind of Anne Rice writing, and yet I know without a doubt that I would be alternately bored to tears and incited to extreme irritation by her novels. How do I know this? Because I have read reviews like this.

The psychic powers don't hurt either.

Posted by: SaBrina at September 3, 2009 7:56 PM

I read Interview and loved it. I didn't even mind Louis' soul-searching, as I felt that was to be expected, given his circumstances. Having read several of the other books in the Vampire Chronicles that followed, and getting more and more bored/disgusted, I have to say Rice should have stopped right there. Lestat was much more appeaking as a villain, when we didn't understand him so well. The subsequent books are dull because it's pretty clear that Rice fell in love with Lestat. I also find the weird sex a little distracting: vampires never consummate, the Lasher books feature incest and paedophilia and Rice is just generally self-indulgent. I'm bored with her literary wanking.

And now she's got the Jebus? Well, I suppose it makes sense, given that Jesus is the ultimate vampire. Nevertheless, I'll pass, thanks.

Posted by: Anne T. Christ at September 3, 2009 7:57 PM

I believe that Rice is a Catholic which is an entirely different kind of crazy than your usual born-again.

On a side note, I read that honest, hardworking, and decent Christians -- and yes, there are many many -- are becoming increasingly reluctant to admit their faith, because of the association with the right-wing nut-fucks who pollute the airwaves these days.

Anyway if Rice was a true convert she would have donated to the Church her entire haul from the vampire stuff and the S&M erotica stuff, or at least tithed a huge portion. Who knows, perhaps she did.

Personally I think she's engaging in the time-tested Catholic tradition of imbibing wine mixed with virgin blood while participating in mass orgies of pubescent altar boys repeatedly deflowered by gold-clad bishopric fondlers.

Posted by: Neodiogenes at September 3, 2009 8:14 PM


Pick a name asshole- rusty, genny who the fuck ever, and next time read the first one. and fuck you to the rest of you ididots who have nothing to do but day " gee what a great review, i used to like this book but you have shown me the error of my ways"

Posted by: Jack Random at September 4, 2009 6:58 AM

Wow Jack. Panties twisted up much?

I read em all and I gotta say, Body Thief is the worst.

And not just for the maxi-pad licking scene. Ugh.

My favorite, after Interview, was Queen of the Damned, if only for the un-fucking-believeably, cinematicly epic scene of the castle in the mountains with the unending line of worshippers trudging upwards to have their throats, nay, entire chest cavities ripped open by a power and blood-mad vampire. Friggin awesome.

Posted by: protoguy at September 4, 2009 7:59 AM

protoguy you're getting your chronocles mixed up... so step off your soap box and chillax...

the maxi-pad licking scene (def gross) is from Memnoch... and I believe the scene with the villagers all lined up along the mountain in the snow is from Queen of the Damned...

Tale of the Body-Thief is indeed the worst of the books... (well... maybe a tie with Vittoro)

I have fond memories of all of Anne Rice's Vampire books... but I read most of them in HS or College... there's a time and a place for everything people...

Posted by: Tammers at September 4, 2009 12:08 PM

I have never liked Anne Rice. I don't even like her smut, and I am a HUGE fan of smut.

Posted by: Cletus at September 4, 2009 5:45 PM

I stopped reading Anne Rice long ago but recently listened to "Cry to Heaven" read by Tim Curry ~ that was delicious!

Posted by: pegling at September 5, 2009 3:00 AM

I don't think most modern readers have the patience for a Rice-style writer; it's something written for a slower time.

Posted by: Chalmers at September 5, 2009 10:03 PM

Soapbox? Think you misinterpreted my intent there, but no matter. It scarred me no matter which chronicle it came from.

Posted by: protoguy at September 6, 2009 5:30 AM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.