web
counter
 

063008-despereaux.jpg
100 Books in One Year: Tale of Despereaux by Kate DiCamillo

Cannonball Read / Ironypants

Book Reviews | March 6, 2009 | Comments (19)


There’s a lot lot LOT of childrens’ literature out there, and a lot lot LOT of it is very, very bad. My love for books began when I was just a wee little reader, and I plowed through as much crap (Christopher Pike, Sweet Valley Twins) as I did quality (Madeline L’engle, Bunnicula (yes? anyone??), E.B. White). In the subsequent generations of kids books there have been an equal share of substance and fluff, and though I don’t have kids or really know very many kids I’ve still retained a love for and a curiosity about what’s going on in the world of youth literature. And, man, I can still really get sucked in. All six Harry Potters had me up late, feverish, red-eyed, metaphorical flashlight under metaphorical covers, too tired to stay awake at work.

This brings us to The Tale of Despereaux, a story of a smaller than average mouse with larger than average ears and exceedingly big, un-mousey dreams. It’s not a lightweight story. Our hero exists in an unsympathetic, vaguely British medieval land where soup has been outlawed and only outlaws carry soup spoons. He is the only survivor of his litter of baby mice, which inspires his melodramatic (and apparently, French) mother to name him Despereaux “for all the sadness, for the many despairs of this place.” His older siblings are called Furlough and Merlot. Har har. Another of our protagonists is a witless servant girl, sold by her father in exchange for a tablecloth, cauliflower-eared and half-deaf from frequent blows to the head. The whole tale is shot through with veins of humorous darkness like this, which helps the story transcend its cutesy premise and simple plotting and climb into some greater truths. DiCamillo even says it herself: “Stories that are not pretty have a certain value too, I suppose. Everything, as you well know (having lived in this world long enough to have figured out a thing or two for yourself) cannot always be sweetness and light.”

The balance between light and dark is the major theme that drives this story. Another of our characters is a castle dungeon-inhabiting rat named Chiaroscuro (an Italian word meaning light mixed with darkness, “look it up,” prompts the author) who is fascinated by the idea of light, having only seen it once in his short ratty life. His striving for the world above leads him down an even darker path than that on which he started, bringing us to another strength of DiCamillo’s storytelling: her characterizations. All are fleshed with an even hand: our wise narrator assures us of their failings as well as their triumphs, of the dark pockets in their hearts as well as the lights of hope burning in their souls. No hero is without his foibles, no villain without her potential for redemption.

As young adult books go, this one wins. It’s a stock fairytale, but one grounded in realism. That, coupled with large swaths of black humor and the occasional educational tidbit make this one more than worthy of its gold Newberry Medal.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details are here and the growing number of participants and their blogs are here. And check here for more of Ironypants’ reviews.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



NCIS Review | Pandorum Trailer









Comments

*Shocked gasp*

Did you just refer to Christopher Pike as crap?! My god, he was the hero of my teenage years. Granted I haven't read any in over a decade, but this wounds my heart deeply. Shari Cooper haunts you from beyond the grave.

Posted by: Carrie at March 6, 2009 9:24 AM

No, R.L. Stine was crap; particularly the Fear Street series. It was enjoyable crap, very cliffhanging/dark twist endings crap, but crap nonetheless.

Posted by: Mike R. at March 6, 2009 9:28 AM

A: That mouse is ridiculously cute. It bothers me how cute I find him to be.

B: re: Madeline L'Engle -- WORD.

Posted by: TK at March 6, 2009 9:37 AM

Bunnicula!

Dude, I read every Bunnicula book I could get my little preadolescent hands on. But I also read a LOT of Babysitter's Club. There must always be a balance between quality and crap...

Posted by: PaleoLithchick at March 6, 2009 10:00 AM

Yes! Bunnicula was quality literature. I think what really made the difference was the animals were not cutesy-poo. Yes, they were anthropomorphized, but in a genuine way - they had personalities, they got on each other's nerves. Love Bunnicula.

Posted by: marya at March 6, 2009 10:07 AM

I recently started rereading the Bunnicula books and they are still awesome. There are even some newer ones out.
Although I was a little disturbed at how far the cat goes to try to get rid of poor Bunbicula.

Posted by: KMC at March 6, 2009 10:14 AM

One would be hard pressed to find a children's literature offering that doesn't deal with death. The result is cloying emotions and deep meaningful prose that bores one to tears. However, there are exceptions and this book is one of them. From the story to the art to the packaging this book is thoroughly satisfying. Even the books on tape version is awesome. The only failing was that pathetic re-imagining that was the movie.

I'm not a huge fan of DiCamillo (not DiCamillio - change the heading, please.) Winn-Dixie was pedestrian. There was another story about a kid and a tiger that was weird. Her pig stories are pointless. The Edward Tulane book (or whatever it's called about a stuffed animal - Yawn!) is rather meandering. But she knocked it out of the park with Despereaux.

It is certainly one of the better books in a long while and worthy of a longer review, Ironypants. I'd give this a C- review. You're welcome.

Posted by: Duane at March 6, 2009 10:31 AM

My entire family loved this book. From my 14 year old son (who thinks he's too cool to read on most days) to my 10 year old daughter (who just hates to read, period.) Even my husband loved it.

I haven't read it. Guess I'll have to add it to my list.

Posted by: wsapnin at March 6, 2009 10:33 AM

Nice review IronyPants. I loved this book when I discovered it in my God-daughter's pile, and she loves it too. Children really respond to stories that inject darkness in the right way. They see it all around them (parents having an argument, hushed tomes when adults speak about sad events) and they're looking for a way to relate.
Anyone know if the film version was true to this?

Posted by: PaddyDog at March 6, 2009 10:33 AM

Come and join hot tall dating club ___Tallmingle.com___ has lots of sports fans there! besides, it's hot modelss, milfs, sexy chick s and handsome young men and chicks dating club!!LOL Don't miss out!! :-)

Posted by: owen at March 6, 2009 10:43 AM

imagine my surprise when i checked on pajiba today and saw my own name! thanks guys!

carrie: you have shamed me. i did LOVE christopher pike once upon a time. it just doesn't, um, hold up over the years.

duane: grading my review? really? i don't write for the website, you know.

Posted by: ironypants at March 6, 2009 11:22 AM

oh also, prisco ...
the link to my CR blog is wrong.
it's http://ironypants.wordpress.com


Sorry, Ironypants. That was my bad. The link (and the author's name) have been corrected. Also, Duane -- don't be a dick. -- DR

Posted by: ironypants at March 6, 2009 11:27 AM

I remember thinking Pike was the thinking man's RL Stine. hahahahahha. Funny but true.

Posted by: s at March 6, 2009 11:29 AM

That's all right ironypants, I forgive you. I'm scared to revisit Pike in case it is horrendous and my heart won't take it. But you made me want to read this book.

Posted by: Carrie at March 6, 2009 11:42 AM

Despised this book- love YA Lit though. I dunno- I guess the voice of the narrator was a bit grating to me. I loved Nancy Drew as a kid,although I would break-up with a guy the MOMENT he told he he wasn't kidding, his name was actually Ned. Nickerson.

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at March 6, 2009 11:57 AM

I loved this book when I discovered it in my God-daughter's pile, and she loves it too.

Your daughter is God?! AND she loves this book? That does it, I need to pick it up, and the publishers need to update their blurbs.

Posted by: Sabrina at March 6, 2009 1:28 PM

There are seven Harry Potter books last time I checked. Nice article though; brief and well-written.

Posted by: Rorny at March 6, 2009 1:54 PM

Duane, I give your comment a D+ for rampant asshattery.

Posted by: I Love Beets at March 6, 2009 2:04 PM

Man, I loved Bunnicula as a kid. Just thinking about him makes me want to go back and re-read The Celery Stalks at Midnight.

I need to read a good book after the crap I've been wading through lately, and this will definitely go on the list.

Posted by: Tyburn Blossom at March 6, 2009 2:36 PM