web
counter
 

sawtelle.jpg

Coming of Age in Wisconsin

The Story of Edgar Sawtelle by David Wroblewski / Jennifer McKeown

Book Reviews | October 8, 2008 | Comments (15)


When I first finished The Story of Edgar Sawtelle (Oprah’s newest book du jour), my first impulse was to weep (again). My second was to go immediately to sleep. Sawtelle was too overwhelming, too powerful - just too much. I needed to escape it in order to fully embrace it. The Story of Edgar Sawtelle is a demanding read: it demands your time, your emotions, your intellect. And, as much as I hate to agree with the Big O, I can’t deny that she’s picked a winner this time, although I know many people will disagree.

Before you confuse me with an Oprahead, let me state for the record that I’m no big fan of the Win, but neither am I her biggest detractor. I could take her or leave her (even though I can’t slight anyone who gets people to read, regardless of the effects of her sponsorship or of the quality of some of her choices). But when I heard Oprah had recently endorsed The Story of Edgar Sawtelle, I altruistically thought of the Pajibaverse, who, I thought, might benefit by my taking one for the team. When Oprah added that The Story of Edgar Sawtelle is a must for anyone who loves dogs, I knew I was destined to read it. (Yes, I’m one of those annoying people who has dogs instead of children. Don’t judge me.)

I began the novel optimistically, but soon ground nearly to a halt. Difficult at first to get into, The Story of Edgar Sawtelle begins shrouded in mystery before plunging headlong into exposition. I persevered, and my efforts quickly paid off. It wasn’t long before I became entranced by the story, and I now consider The Story of Edgar Sawtelle to be one of the best novels I’ve had the pleasure of reading for Pajiba. I’m glad I purchased it (instead of borrowing it from the library), because I’d have a hell of a time letting it go.

Now it’s time for the part of the review that concerns the novel’s plot, but before I get to it, I’ll be upfront and say that I heeded Oprah’s advice and did not read the book jacket (which, she said, gave too much away). Although I hate to agree with her again (I know, I know), I must admit this was good advice. I naively thought I knew all that the novel entailed (a mute boy and his dogs), but I was wrong. Those who choose to keep the rest of the plot a mystery will have, as I did, the pleasure of watching a jewel unfold before their eyes.

I won’t give any spoilers here, but I will say that early in the novel it becomes clear that Wroblewski is retelling Shakespeare. To say which play gives too much away (once you recognize the source, you’ll know where the rest of it is headed), but I will say it’s brilliantly done. Wroblewski does more than just take an old play and plunk it into the twentieth century; he makes it come alive, adding depth and focus and greater understanding.

Like Shakespeare’s plays, The Story of Edgar Sawtelle is divided into five parts. These “acts” behave much the way they do in drama. The first section sets the stage, as it were, by outlining the history of Edgar Sawtelle, whose grandfather once turned an old farm into a kennel to make his dream - dog breeding - a reality. Although untrained, Sawtelle aims (through trial and error) to breed a new kind of dog.

Years pass, and Edgar Sawtelle, is born. Generations of dogs have been bred since those first days, and their lineage is varied and complex. Like many of the dogs that have developed under Sawtelle care, Edgar himself is also quite unique. Although physically okay, Edgar Sawtelle is totally mute. He begins to develop a unique relationship with the dogs, especially with one named Almondine, and communicates with them through his own form of sign language.

Edgar grows, learning the ways of dog breeding and training, until he approaches adulthood. At this point in the story, obstacles must always be overcome; such is the nature of life. I won’t say anymore about the plot (those who want a spoiler can easily find it at Amazon), but needless to say that Edgar’s path to adulthood will not be an easy one. In the meantime, readers are provided with a unique, powerful look at a young man struggling with the world around him, and his work with the Sawtelle dogs allows us to see the humanity possible in man’s best friend.

Wroblewski’s prose is simple, almost McCarthy-like in its rhythm (but with more punctuation). Simple though it may be, Wroblewski’s prose beautifully renders Edgar’s world:

October. Dry leaves chattered beneath the apple trees. For three nights running, pearl flakes of snow materialized around Edgar and Almondine as they walked from the kennel to the house. Almondine poked her nose into the apparition of her own breath while Edgar watched a snowflake dissolve in midair, one and then another. Those that made it to the ground quivered atop blades of grass, then wilted into ink drops. At the porch, they turned to look at their footsteps, a pair of dark trails through the lawn.

After gushing about the plot and about the prose, I had to wonder: Is it really as perfect as I’m making it sound? Is my love of dogs clouding my judgment? No, on both counts. Even my love of dogs, which admittedly adds greatly to my love of Edgar Sawtelle, can only take this book so far. That said, of course Sawtelle isn’t perfect; there’s no such thing as a perfect novel, although that might make an interesting comment diversion. (I have a few titles I could throw into the ring, although it’s possible, I’m sure, to find flaws even in those.) I could quibble about the length, which borders on just a wee bit long (perhaps more than a wee), but if I’m being truthful, I barely noticed the length once the story of Edgar grabbed me. Some details regarding dog breeding and training were probably not necessary, but these tidbits were generally cleanly interspersed throughout the text and did not feel burdensome to this reader.

Other flaws are easily diminished once one remembers that Wroblewski is invoking Shakespeare. For example, a few scenes seemed at first quite unrealistic, but these scenes become more understandable when one remembers the source material. Many readers also hated the ending, but those who recognize the Shakespearean parallel shouldn’t be surprised by how it all ends.

Ultimately, you don’t have to be a dog lover to enjoy Wroblewski’s novel; The Story of Edgar Sawtelle is intelligent, moving, and profound. If you decide to tackle it, chances are good you won’t be disappointed.

Jennifer McKeown reads way too much and blogs about her experiences over at Bibliolatry.









Trailer for The Matador | Rachel Getting Married













Comments

Huh, now that's one glowing review! I may just have to check this one out. By the way, no judgment from me--I have cats instead of kids, which is arguably worse than canine children.

I'm a little hit-and-miss with the Oprah books I've read (which are very few; I'm not a follower, just happened to pick up a couple of books with her seal of approval). Kind of liked She's Come Undone; however, Anne-Marie MacDonald's book Fall On Your Knees depressed the bejeebus out of me. It was set in my home town, so many local folks have read it, and most list it among their favourite books...but I found it so freakin' bleak.

Posted by: meaux at October 8, 2008 11:13 AM

Children are far more annoying than animals. Fact.

Posted by: Todd at October 8, 2008 11:35 AM

I'm kind of hit-or-miss on reading Oprah's recommendations. I've read a few, but they were usually books that interested me on their own merits, and not because O said so. My book club (yeah, I'm in one, so what) read "The Good Earth" recently, and two of us carefully peeled the Oprah's Book Club sticker off our copies of the book.

I had heard about this book, and it sounds interesting. I'll probably read it, but I already have a huge pile of unread books at hand. I'd like to get some of those read before adding to the stack.

Posted by: rlr260 at October 8, 2008 12:20 PM

Sorry, meaux, on co-opting the term "hit-or-miss." I was not deliberately echoing your words. I checked the review to see if the term was used, but I failed to re-read your comment.

Posted by: rlr260 at October 8, 2008 12:25 PM

Ha! I'll take that as "the sincerest form of flattery," rlr260--even if it was completely subconscious. I won't even charge you royalties.

Yeah, I'd be among the sticker-peelers of your group; like Jennifer, I have nothing against Oprah, but frankly I don't want people to think I'm reading something because (rather than in spite) of the label!

Posted by: meaux at October 8, 2008 12:30 PM

Well, I've gotta say I'm kinda relieved it doesn't look like Titus. That's some disturbing shit, yo. And what is it with Anthony Hopkins not being able to get away from cannibalistic roles??

Posted by: lordhelmet at October 8, 2008 1:23 PM

Not to be an Oprahead or what have you, but seriously I think it is insanely amusing that people get overly involved in judging others as to whether you read something because of or in spite of Oprah's stamp of approval. It is another level of pretension, like you are better than Oprah's book club picks, that you are a true literature consumer or that your intellect knows not the confines of Oprah's commercialised push for people to read. Instead of spending your time apologising as to why Edgar Sawtelle is a good read and has nothing to do with Oprah's choice - just read it, love it, lick it (if you have to) and quit the whole "I would have totally found out about this book and held it close to my heaving chest, even if Oprah had not pointed it out." AS IF ! In other news, Edgar Sawtelle is a wholly poignant novel on its own merit. It is filled with rich descriptions of the setting and paired with Edgar's trajectory in his life, it makes for a good read - just like Oprah says !!

Posted by: Nelly at October 8, 2008 1:28 PM

Oooh this sounds like something I've gotta pick up. I'll read anything people (well, most people) recommend with this much enthusiasm.

Posted by: figgy at October 8, 2008 1:34 PM

holy crap, I am now heading to lunch and will be purchasing this book.
We too have canine children who mean the world to us. You can't imagine how ridiculously happy I was this morning when a complete stranger complimented on how well behaved they are on the leash. I was giddy with parental pride. Sad, I know.

But both Bear and Lillifus Maximus got extra treats in their bowls, just the same.

Posted by: Stella at October 8, 2008 1:57 PM

I read a number of good reviews for Edgar Sawtelle earlier this summer and put it on the month's long wait list at the library. I read about one-third of the book in the two weeks I had it checked out and was so engrossed with it I decided to purchase a copy rather than wait list it again. Combining sale price, my boss' store membership, and a coupon, I picked it for about half price. I was raving about it to everyone I knew for a couple of weeks until Oprah picked it and I decided to shut up about it. I was happy to put in my two cents before Oprah's endorsement, and still think it is a real accomplishment in American literature, but I think it's going to get enough hype without my added efforts.

Posted by: BRad at October 8, 2008 2:22 PM

Thanks for the review - I lurve books that are a re-telling of Shakespeare. Check out A Thousand Acres by Jane Smiley, too.

Posted by: phquaryn at October 8, 2008 7:06 PM

Goddammit! I just went to put this on hold at my library's online catalog, and right there in huge letters in the summary, they wrote, "based on Shakespeare's [redacted]." I am so pissed. Beware your library's online catalog if you don't want to find out too much!

Posted by: jax at October 9, 2008 12:44 PM

Some of Oprah's books are treacly, others are masterful. For example, "Sula" and "Fall on Your Knees" are on the list the same year: the first is incredible, the second is schlock. I don't think anybody walks around embarrassed to be reading "Middlesex" because it was on Oprah's list.

I must admit that I loved when J. Franzen balked at being on the show and then won the National Book Award. Bwah-ha-ha. He was also very gracious in following up with and apologizing to Oprah for making his comments in public, but never quite backed down from his comments. I truly respected him for that.

Posted by: samantha t at October 10, 2008 2:24 PM

I used to hate when kids at school would love a song that was played on the local alternative radio station, but as soon as it was picked up by a mainstream, commercial station, they would profess their hate for it. Thats what the Oprah-hating reminds me of, and such reasons are so silly.

Also, I like the majority of the books she selects. No one is ever going to completely agree with someone else's choices, but I think she does a great job of trying to expose people to some great stories that they otherwise would likely not be exposed to.

In case you can't tell, I like Oprah. Not her actual show/other stuff: I never watch her show, I don't read her magazine, I don't parrot her beliefs or anything like that, I just think that as far as major celebrities go with masses of influenetial power, I think she tries to use her power for good. Which is a fuckload more than you can say about most of them.

Posted by: JJ McClay at October 11, 2008 7:58 PM

A bit blathery in the middle, some of the dog stuff could have been left, but OH MAN, I cried at the end.... This is the book you will think of for days, and weeks to come.

Posted by: Janey at October 28, 2008 8:42 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time