web
counter
 

When He Traveled Time, for the Future of Mankind

By kingsmartarse | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (42)



Kurt_Vonnegut_S_SlaughterhouseBFive.jpg

I always find it a difficult situation when a friend suggests something for me to enjoy because they so thoroughly enjoyed it themselves. It pressures me want to like it in exactly the same way they do, though that is highly improbable. That is the case I find myself in with Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse-Five. It was on my to-read list due to Vonnegut’s acclaim alone, but my good buddy sent it to me as a care package. In the book, he wrote, “Enjoy this masterpiece.” Masterpiece. That is a lot of pressure.

The meat of Slaughterhouse-Five follows the eventful life of an American soldier named Billy Pilgrim. Billy Pilgrim is captured during World War II and ends up surviving the Dresden bombings and later goes on to become an optometrist, marry a fat woman named Valencia, survives a plane crash, and is kidnapped by aliens called Tralfamadorians. And somewhere in all of this, he has become unstuck in time. As such, he unexpectedly moves through each of these events in his life at random, giving the story a non-linear chronology.

While it may seem that this would make the story confusing and convoluted, it actually worked really well. Every scene feels like a small window of Billy’s life. You are not listening to a biography of man, but rather listening to the man tell you his stories (but it’s a third-person narrative). He tells you what parts he wants whenever he feels like they need to be said, with no regard for a consistent time line. It’s an ironic twist because Vonnegut actually has characters in the story who live on that idea: the alien Tralfamadorians. As it’s explained, the Tralfamadorians are aliens who can see in the fourth dimension. This ability causes some misunderstandings between Billy and his captors, but the Tralfamadorians explain their view to Billy. As humans, our lives seem to be a series of choices, a cause and the following effect, and at the end of life, a person ceases to exist. For Tralfamadorians, because they can see in the fourth dimension and therefore see all moments at exactly the same time, there is essentially no choice in life; everything is predestined. Everything has already happened, has always happened that way, and will always happen that way. Therefore beings do not cease to exist to the Tralfamadorians; they are still alive because they continue to exist in other moments, the moments we consider the past. As we follow Billy through his jumps to different points of his life, we see that the narrator references this logic more and more since Billy has already seen what comes next (i.e. Edgar Derby’s death, Billy’s own death). This logic also seems to be the backbone of Vonnegut’s most famous phrase, “So it goes.”

“So it goes” is a phrase used heavily throughout the book, always following any discussion or any sort of mentioning of death (or rather, the end of life). It’s a bit like “That’s what she said” (I realize Slaughterhouse-Five pre-dates “The Office (US)” by something like 40 years) in that the statement provides a bit of humor to the text. However, while “TWSS” offers an obvious, semi-toilet humor to “The Office,” “So it goes” adds a more subtle and dark humor to Slaughterhouse. Death is heavily mentioned in the novel, but instead of being the typically morbid, solemn, melancholy affair it is in real life, Vonnegut gives it a tongue-in-cheek quality by following every mention of death with “So it goes.” It’s difficult to explain, but it’s like someone shrugging both shoulders with a smirk and saying, “Oh well! That’s that!” It’s a tone used throughout the novel, even without mention of death or Vonnegut’s phrase.

I’m wary to apply the “masterpiece” designation of the book, but it is incredibly well-written (call that an understatement if you like). Though I have trouble explaining the dark yet humorous tone of the book, it’s what I enjoyed most. It smacks of a small hint of Shakespeare; tragedies laced with ironic humor. It’s a different kind of subtle humor that I don’t think I see much of anymore. But alas.

…So it goes. (I had to say it.).

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of kingsmartarse’s reviews, check out his blog, Feeling Red









Dave Addresses Leno's State of the State of Things | The Eclipse Trailer













Comments

Listen:

Thank you, found this back in college...i have read it every year since!

Posted by: Nunzio Badalamenti at January 21, 2010 8:20 AM

Every. single. obituary of the man in 2007 ended with "so it goes." Although I'd have to disagree with your reading; I saw it as a solemn acceptance of the inevitability of death as an event in life instead of a smirk. But that's just me!

Posted by: Mr. Tusks at January 21, 2010 8:30 AM

Next, read "Timequake."

Posted by: superasente at January 21, 2010 8:42 AM

I did love this book, as I love almost all of Vonnegut's stuff, but Cat's Cradle is pretty much my favourite book of all time. Read that one. No pressure.

Posted by: dsbs at January 21, 2010 8:51 AM

When considering what qualifies for a masterpiece, it's important to remember that there have been thousands of books, good and bad, since Slaughterhouse Five that have tried to emulate the style, the time-hopping concept, the darkness and humour intermingled so that one never knows whether to laugh or cry, BUT Vonnegut pioneered this style. When S5, Breakfast of Champions, Mother Night, etc. came out Vonnegut had created a very new way of writing about war and death and life. That's what makes it a masterpiece.

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 21, 2010 9:44 AM

It has been added to the pile, thanks.

Posted by: admin at January 21, 2010 9:49 AM

I'm afraid this was yet another beloved classic that I didn't like. The repetition of 'so it goes' drove me mental. I can't really remember what else I thought about it and it hasn't been that long since I read it. That probably says it all.

Posted by: Carrie (aka Teabelly) at January 21, 2010 10:04 AM

Having characters that embody the theme is an "ironic twist"? Referencing a character's death (Edgar Derby) without any sort of context to who that is? "So it goes" is kind of like "That's what she said"?

I don't want to discourage a burgeoning writer. Writing your stuff and putting it out there for the whole Internet takes some stones. But it's this flood of 10th-grade-book-report level content in the past year that's causing me to phase Pajiba out of my blog rotation.

Posted by: hmm at January 21, 2010 10:09 AM

I discovered Vonnegut in middle school -- Slaughterhouse Five is a favorite, but Deadeye Dick gets top billing for me. And I agree with dsbs, Cat's Cradle is pretty damn good, too.

Posted by: linny at January 21, 2010 10:13 AM

I have no problem with saying it: Slaughterhouse-Five is a masterpiece.

Posted by: ChristianH at January 21, 2010 10:16 AM

dsbs - check out Time's Arrow by Martin Amis - his references to Cat's Cradle tickled me in a very special way.

And I agree with Mr Tusks on the reading of 'so it goes' - it is a phrase which I have always felt was incredibly sad whenver I read it.

Posted by: The Chief at January 21, 2010 10:20 AM

You know I wasn't going to comment on "so it goes" since I've had my knuckles rapped for being too hard on book reviewers in the past, but since we're going there....
"So it goes" is absolutely nothing like "that's what she said".
"That's what she said" is written as a catch phrase for comic relief and intentionally exploited for pop culture purposes in episodes.

"So it goes" was written almost as a poetic device. It's similar to "in the room the women come and go talking of Michaelangelo". It adds a rhythym and a tragicomic punctuation to key events and thoughts througout the book. It really does it a disservice to lower it to the level of "that's what she said".

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 21, 2010 10:26 AM

I don't want to discourage a burgeoning writer. Writing your stuff and putting it out there for the whole Internet takes some stones. But it's this flood of 10th-grade-book-report level content in the past year that's causing me to phase Pajiba out of my blog rotation.

And it's this flood of people who don't seem to get what the Cannonball Read is all about that drive me bonkers.

Posted by: Carrie (aka Teabelly) at January 21, 2010 10:27 AM

16-year-old me hated this book. I wonder if I would still hate it now.

Posted by: kelsy at January 21, 2010 10:29 AM

And it's this flood of people who don't seem to get what the Cannonball Read is all about that drive me bonkers.

One might forgive someone for not understanding that, because the only explanation the site gives to those not intimately familiar with the history and culture of the comments section is that it's a "race among Pajiba readers to read 100 books in under a year."

When I found Pajiba it was a great site that had some quality movie and TV reviews and a few other interesting pieces. Now the homepage is a swamp of recycled trade news, comment diversions, trailers, lists, DVD releases, tedious recaps and subpar reviews by non-staffers. It's work to wade through the noise to find the good stuff.

I know Pajiba's not my site, and if I want to complain so much then why don't I see how hard it is to make a site myself blah blah blah. And if this quantity-over-quality shift has driven up ad revenue or helped foster a tight community, good for Pajiba. But it's alienated me, and I'm sure a lot of other casual readers as well.

Posted by: hmm at January 21, 2010 10:52 AM

Every. single. obituary of the man in 2007 ended with "so it goes."

Posted by: Mr. Tusks at January 21, 2010 8:30 AM
---
And every obit of Mel Blanc was headlined "That's all, folks!"

Sometimes these things just write themselves.

Posted by: , at January 21, 2010 10:55 AM

16-year-old me loved this book. I found Vonnegut at that perfect adolescent time where his writing really connects with a growing curiosity and awareness of the complexities of the outside world still tempered by idealism and naiveté. He was like the crazy old wise man who talks to kids without talking down to kids, and I remember fondly that feeling of him telling it like it is, not hiding the horror and evil but mixing it with absurdity and humor and that unique Vonnegut brand of humanism.

I read Breakfast of Champions first, admittedly not the best novel to start with considering all the inside jokes and call-backs to previous novels and characters, but it worked for me. I found it on my Dad's bookshelf and was intrigued by the crude line drawings and the way it was unlike any book I'd ever encountered before.

I still think Vonnegut is best read by kids- he almost seems to be aiming his stories at them- but he shouldn't be forgotten by adults. We all need a little bit of that Vonnegut humanism, too. Starting with my favorite quote from God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater:

"Hello babies. Welcome to Earth. It's hot in the summer and cold in the winter. It's round and wet and crowded. On the outside, babies, you've got a hundred years here. There's only one rule that I know of, babies-"God damn it, you've got to be kind."
— Kurt Vonnegut

Posted by: Yossarian at January 21, 2010 11:10 AM

Actually, looking around you're right. An explanation of CR probably wouldn't be a bad thing.

The other stuf, I can't really comment on, since I'm happy with the place.

Posted by: Carrie (aka Teabelly) at January 21, 2010 11:12 AM

I saw it as a solemn acceptance of the inevitability of death as an event in life instead of a smirk. But that's just me!

Posted by: Mr. Tusks at January 21, 2010 8:30 AM
It's both.

Paddy used the word "tragicomic." It's appropriate.

The ability to both laugh and cry at the same time is something Vonnegut raised to an art form. I owe no small part of my (slanted) worldview to reading his books as a whelp. The percolation of his words through my brain is probably responsible for some of the best conversations I ever had.

Yossarian, I would suggest that young people do read his books, if only for exposure to a different way of thinking about things. It certainly affected me. But then they should save them on a shelf for 10 years and try again. After all, the frontal cortex isn't finished developing until you're 24 or so, so the kids can't be blamed for missing half of it the first time.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at January 21, 2010 12:18 PM

Reading Vonnegut for the first time is pretty magical, I think. No other author has/had the ability Vonnegut had to hold us all in front of a funhouse mirror. He expected a lot from his readers - the biggest chunks of his message are between the lines of text.

Slaughterhouse is a great starting point, it's Vonnegut's most famous and most discussed book. Themes he carries in other books are started in SH5, and it's the most autobiographical of his novels. My personal recommendations are Galapagos and the short story collection Welcome to the Monkey House. Galapagos will twist your brains up in your head until your thoughts itch and WthMH has some of the most beautiful prose hidden away inside. You won't believe "Ready to Wear" and "Long Walk to Forever" are written by the same man, and you'll never forget either story.

Vonnegut is from my hometown, which he claimed to hate in nearly every interview he did. Yet it appears in almost every piece he wrote, and he writes about it almost lovingly. I think that's what strikes me the most about his writing - everywhere Vonnegut looked, he saw ugliness; but at the same time he always saw the potential for beauty underneath. I don't think he lost hope for the rest of us until the very end of his life.

I think this is a great review of your first trip into Vonnegut world. I think you'll find more and more to love about this story if you read it again, or read other pieces by KV.

*retreats to shadows*

Posted by: chamalla at January 21, 2010 12:23 PM

I miss you, Kurt Vonnegut.

When he died, everyone on the internet said, 'His tombstone better read: Everything was beautiful and nothing hurt.' I think that would have been a better choice than "so it goes" in his obituary.

Posted by: faye at January 21, 2010 1:10 PM

You should have at least done some background research on this author before "winging it", which is the predominant tone of this review. For a throwaway author from the grocery store aisles, I can understand, but not a work from such an esteemed author.

You might as well be asking an elementary school student to comment on the use of chiaroscuro in Late-Renaissance artwork.

The readership demands quality; quality, this ain't.

Posted by: Recondite at January 21, 2010 2:03 PM

What background research would you like to see? I'm just a few volumes away from completing Vonnegut's career and I thought this review got it more right than wrong (in fact almost completely right aside from my disagreement with "so it goes"). And shouldn't a book review be a reaction to one book, and not a dissertation on an author's entire career?

You seem pretty eager to dismiss someone who's giving an honest try. Vonnegut would not approve.

Posted by: Mr. Tusks at January 21, 2010 2:07 PM

Bunch, meet panties...

Posted by: Recondite at January 21, 2010 2:13 PM

Love love love Vonnegut. My personal favorite is The Sirens of Titan. It always gets me choked me up in the end.

Posted by: krolowonder at January 21, 2010 2:57 PM

You should have at least done some background research on this author before "winging it"

Is it "I don't understand Cannonball Read" Day? You try reading and reviewing 100 books in a year (or whatever the deal is) and take the time to research the authors and situate the books in history and in the right literary movement and then get back to me with your results. These are generally quick-hit reviews that give us a feel for the book, not well-researched reviews that cover the gamut of issues typical in a newspaper books section. Sometimes they work, and sometimes they fail; if I want professional reviews I'll read my RSS feed for the London Review of Books (which I rarely do because the reviews are too damn long).

Posted by: Brenton at January 21, 2010 3:06 PM

Recondite, I respectfully request that you chill. I know from pedantic criticism. I make a habit of it. But there are critiques born out of a love of knowledge and literature, and then there's the dick-ish kind of criticism that makes people actually avoid the topic.

You're veering dangerously close to the latter.

This isn't a dissertation. It's not even a book report. It's a candid reaction to the book.

As the writer touched on, Vonnegut has a reputation for being "Literature" that is intimidating and even off-putting. We don't need to make that situation worse by being thuggish in our responses. Dude just got his feet wet in both Vonnegut and writing about Vonnegut and you're ready to pull him out of the lake and shove his feet directly into the fire.

Not cool, man.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at January 21, 2010 3:11 PM

I've never read Vonnegut, but now I really, really, really want to. Thanks for the review, kingsmartarse!

Posted by: Jelinas at January 21, 2010 3:32 PM

I'll go out on a limb and try to place the "so it goes" phrase with a more familiar, to me at least, phrase of shikata ga nai or sho ga nai in Japanese. The idea of "it can't be helped" or "so it goes" in this case. Phrases used predominately in the face of calamity and despair. Something horrible had/has/will happen...and it can't be helped. The world moves forward and unpleasant things will happen. A bombing of Dresden will occur. A good man will get killed for picking up a teapot.

Shikata ga nai. So it goes.

Posted by: Ren at January 21, 2010 3:40 PM

Thinking now, of the journalist, Linda Ellerbee. She incorporated "and so it goes" into her broadcasts (and life) and I always thought she got it just right.

Posted by: Fish at January 21, 2010 4:47 PM

Very well put ZombieScientist, Recondite don't be a dick this isn't grad school its a site for folks who are mostly drunk but love good media...also Dustin is an ass clown!

Posted by: Nunzio Badalamenti at January 21, 2010 5:56 PM

You know, I will always remember my first Vonnegut (only read two so far... sorry, not a prolific reader AT ALL). It was the Sirens of Titans (Yay !) and I don't really remember the plot details or the ending or anything... But I do remember just GETTING it, and completely loving it. I bought a copy for my boyfriend almost a year ago, and he has yet to read it (insert sad face.)

I will check this book out... Good review!

Btw, to people who read Vonnegut, Do the Tralfamadorians make regular appearances in his books? Because they were in the Sirens of Titans too.

Speaking of pressure to friends to like the same books, I recently gave my roommate a book for Christmas and I said to her, "If you don't like this book, I question your taste." Probably should not have laid it on so thick hah.

Posted by: dene at January 21, 2010 5:56 PM

Sweet Christ on a unicycle, I hate doing this.

As some of the more astute commenters have pointed out, THIS IS NOT A SERIES OF "PROFESSIONAL" REVIEWS. It's a friendly competition among people who wish to broaden their reading horizons, share their opinions with others, and most importantly, raise money for Amanda's son's scholarship fund. I will not tolerate personal attacks on the participants. Constructive criticism and well-thought out comments, yes. Dissenting opinions, sure. But unless you're a fucking participant, do not judge those who are.

*removes bitchface, for now*

Posted by: Nicole at January 21, 2010 8:45 PM

Also, if you need more info about the CBR, feel free to check here:

http://www.pajiba.com/book_reviews/cannonball-read-season-two.php

Posted by: Nicole at January 21, 2010 8:48 PM

Dene, unfortunately, the Tralfamadorians only make one appearance. In fact, the only character I can remember appearing more than once is Kilgore Trout, and in every book other than his own it's in name only. But once could say that the most common character is the estimable Narrator himself: one could say that at least one character in every book represents Vonnegut in some way. I haven't read all of the books, but none that I have experienced have failed to come from a very personal area.

Posted by: Mr. Tusks at January 21, 2010 9:14 PM

Yea.. sometimes it's awkward in a conversation when someone says "this is my absolute favorite book!" and you.. want to agree.. but "mehh" no you don't. lol

great review!

I hope to write a fab review and get posted too :P
maybe we can make a mini competition within a competition.

Posted by: Anhelo at January 21, 2010 9:26 PM

Great link here to a letter Vonnegut wrote to his family from a repatriation camp shortly after his experience as a POW (the inspiration of Slaughterhouse 5)
http://www.lettersofnote.com/2009/11/slaughterhouse-five.html

Posted by: masonwasp at January 22, 2010 10:01 AM

"After all, the frontal cortex isn't finished developing until you're 24 or so..."

Wow I hope that's just some sort of weird biological fact - and that "developing" or growth is a mathematical measurement of mass and tissue.

If anyone thinks they stop learning at the age of 24 they are in for a big surprise.

That's just probably an unnecessary word of caution that I'm sure all of you know or expect.

Perhaps I've misinterpreted the remark. I have been wrong before. Time changes not only you, your surroundings but your point of view in a dizzying cycle of reality and experiences. Issues you never thought of will cross your path and well the choices just keep on coming.

Love Kurt and all the great comments - keep on reading!

Paul Burke
Author-Journey Home

Posted by: JourneyHome at January 22, 2010 10:46 AM

In this context, it was kind of a bad joke.

Actually, it means that you don't reach an "adult" physiology or capacity for planning and impulse control until approximately that age.

Obviously, you can keep learning after that age. What you can't reliably do until then is make good long term decisions or inhibit impulses well.

Posted by: ZombieScientist at January 22, 2010 11:15 AM

Slaughterhouse Five is definitely a book that sticks with you. I read it years ago, and still, today, I find myself thinking about passages and moments in this book. I'm glad I read it. It makes me really appreciate Vonnegut's intelligence, humor, and sorrowful demeanor. It's a real work of art and one of the my favorite science fiction books.

You know that this is Jon Stewart's favorite book. Le sigh, Jon Stewart interviewing Kurt Vonnegut is must watch Daily Show.

Thanks for reminding people this book and it's author are stellar.

Posted by: Mebe at January 23, 2010 4:28 AM

Interested in a discrete and mutually beneficial relationship? http://AgelessOnly.com gives you a chance to make your life better.

Posted by: Brad at January 23, 2010 6:32 AM

The following time I learn a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I imply, I do know it was my choice to read, however I really thought youd have something fascinating to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about one thing that you can repair if you happen to werent too busy looking for attention.

Posted by: home remedies for acne at March 11, 2011 3:41 AM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time