blogspot
visitor
Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters by Jane Austen and Ben H. Winters | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

ss-and-s.jpg
Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters by Jane Austen and Ben H. Winters


Cannonball Read / Brian Prisco

Book Reviews | January 20, 2010 | Comments (14)


So, if you do a quickie scan of the ol’ Amazon these days, you’re going to notice an entire trend of classics being B-movied for our appreciation. The Wizard of Oz — with zombies. Huckleberry Finn — with zombies. I like zombies, but c’mon. “So You Think You Can America’s Got Zombies.” Let the trend end. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies wasn’t even that fucking great. What I can best say about Sense and Sensibility and Sea Monsters is that at least it’s not more fucking zombies. Aside from that … yeah, bring on Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter. At least that seems a little original.

I like what Winters did with the overall mythology. Essentially, the world’s been flooded and all the aquatic creatures have become bloodthirsty and violent. Not just squids and giant sharks, but actually guppies and catfish and such. So all of Britain has actually become a series of islands, menaced by carnivorous sealife. I don’t know if it’s extended outside Britain or if it’s just a curse layered against them for colonization. It’s actually a great premise, but it’s a punchline that wears thin, just like with P&P&Z. Like Austen but let’s cram in as many fish references as we can.

Instead of being too old to be a worthy mate as in the original, in this one, they’ve made Colonel Brandon into some sort of squid-faced monstrosity. It’s really weak, the weakest change of the novel, particularly since they’ve modified it so that during all the many conversations, they’re constantly peppering the novel with references to how people can barely stand to look at him and he makes them sick. And Brandon’s in the novel quite a bit, so it just gets to be too much. Willoughby fares better, being represented as some sort of treasure hunter.

Not all of the changes are bad. Sir John and his wife and crazy mother and law undergo wonderful modifications which are great additions to the story. Sir John’s been turned into some sort of bizarre adventurer, and his wife and mother-in-law are actually captured savages from a village they ransacked. They were stuffed into burlap sacks and forced to marry. Charlotte Palmer also becomes a savage, and it works so well in the story. Even funnier is what he chooses to do with Margaret, the third sister. I kept forgetting she was in the story, since most of the focus is on Elinor and Marianne. Margaret becomes obsessed with a tribe of Cthlulu worshipers who are insisting that the protectors will rise up from the sea and save everyone. It’s hilarious, and actually does a great job explaining Margaret’s absence throughout the story. Lucy Steele and her sister get foisted off on another modification that is decidedly less wonderful.

Overall, the changes Winters makes are pretty good, but much like the Pride and Prejudice and Zombies inspiration, the joke just can’t hold out for the entire novel. It’s like, HA! Sea Monsters! Cool! Violence and bloodshed in classic Austen! Then it just gets less funny. And then you’re wondering when the story will be over. And in an Austen novel I already felt was overlong in the original, it seems to be interminable. I was mildly curious about the Oz and Finn mashups, but now I just want them to stop. I don’t want to see an entire generation of authors who make their bucks taking summer reading projects and peppering them with zombies or mummies or whatever the hell else they think of.

But I am still curious about Seth Grahame-Smith’s Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter, if only because it seems like he actually did some clever crafting. He started the joke, so it’s his fault that this is happening, but maybe he can shift it in a better direction.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. To read more of Brian’s reviews, check out his blog, The Gospel According to Prisco.


Blog Trends from My Bunk 01/19/10 | Hesher, I Love Sarah Jane





Comments

Hrm...does this mean it's too late for me to pitch my mash-up idea? I'm going with "On The Road with Frankenstein and The Wolfman." An homage to The Beats but also Abbot & Costello...whaddya think? Eh? Eh?

Posted by: JenVeas at January 20, 2010 9:00 AM

I just don't get this trend. A friend bought me P&P & Zombies for Christmas and it just bored me. It read like a student project that was trying too hard. I really wanted to like it but I couldn't do it.

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 20, 2010 9:52 AM

Lots of things sound better in theory than in practice. Universal health care, for instance.

Posted by: , at January 20, 2010 10:22 AM

Read it, got REALLY bored and had to fight thru to the end. Just made me dislike mashups and vow to never read Austen.

Posted by: blurm at January 20, 2010 10:23 AM

I've come up with the ultimate twist on this format. I'm going to rewrite Jane Austen's Northanger Abbey, only I'm going to remove all references to paranomal occurences and make it a straight up comedy of manners and class. Brilliant. For clearly, Austen's original intention was to write another book in the same style, only the publisher refused to print the manuscript until she peppered it with Gothic style. When the publisher realized she did it in a smart and subtle way rather than shocking and easy to sell quickly, publication was postponed until her death as punishment.

Wow. I've even figured out the fake dark orgins of the new book. Now to get to hacking and slashing.

Posted by: Robert at January 20, 2010 10:34 AM

Lots of things sound better in theory than in practice. Universal health care, for instance.
Or public education. Or public transit. Or the mail system. Or the social safety net. Americans are fucking stupid.

Posted by: Brenton at January 20, 2010 12:16 PM

I feel like if you were going to make any changes to Sense and Sensibility, you would just make Elinor and Colonel Brandon run off together midway through the book and end it. They were the only two normal people in the whole thing.

Posted by: kelsy at January 20, 2010 12:28 PM

Here's why it never pays to lie: My friend, Sherry, knows of my passion for all things Austen so she bought me a copy of P&P&Z for Christmas. I trudged thru a third of it, got bored and put it down. When she asked me how I liked it, I didn't want to hurt her feelings so I lied and said I liked it.
Last weekend, we were out having a few drinks, and talking about books that we had read. She then said "I thought P&P&Z was absolute shit, but when you liked it I figured there's no accounting for taste".
That book sucked and this one sounds like it's just as bad.

Posted by: Carolina Girl at January 20, 2010 1:41 PM

Darn it, I so wanted to write Emma the Vampire Slayer, but it looks like she's already being redone with werewolves. :(

DIE, YOU SPARKLY FOOLS!!!

Posted by: Jelinas at January 20, 2010 1:52 PM

Brenton,

Have you SEEN what comes out of the public education system? Serfdom is underrated.

Posted by: , at January 20, 2010 2:40 PM

If I want to read Jane Austin, I'll read Jane Austin. If I want to read poorly written genre/fantasy fiction I'll go to one of those shady self publishing websites and by something cheap.

These cute mash-up ideas are capable of sustaining my interest for approximately the length of a blog post. I have no idea why they exist as full length novels nor why so many people seem to be reading them (or at least buying them).

If anyone here would like book recommendations I keep regular office hours and am happy to assist however I can.

Posted by: Yossarian at January 20, 2010 2:46 PM

I tried reading P&P&Z, but I like it better as a joke sitting on my shelf than as a book to read.

The only zombie crossover I'm really enjoying is the TV series Dead Set, a mashup of Big Brother UK and a zombie apocalypse. Who doesn't enjoy watching BB-esque famewhores being shredded by zombies? A person with no soul, that's who.

Posted by: YeahButNoBut at January 20, 2010 4:22 PM

Ever feel that you would easily see yourself fitting into his / her life despite the age difference? http://AgelessOnly.com is a good place.

Posted by: Rose at January 21, 2010 1:23 AM

Where you high when you wrote this, because I can't understand a thing you are trying to say. Short sweet and to the point is a good rule to follow.

Posted by: V eyepete at January 21, 2010 4:53 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment:



Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.