l_19d90a5f0759769ce1fd427767474550.jpg

Saturday Night’s Alright for Fighting

Samedi the Deafness by Jesse Ball / Jennifer McKeown

Book Reviews | September 19, 2007 | Comments (8)


Is a book that appears immediately in paperback the literary equivalent of a movie sent straight-to-video? I pondered that question briefly before purchasing Jesse Ball’s Samedi the Deafness; ultimately, I chose an optimistic point of view, deciding instead to sneer at the hardcover as an archaic status symbol, a method by which publishing houses can squeeze a few extra dollars out of the earnest reader. It was not, I decided while heading toward the cash register, a reflection of the quality of this work, for the back cover proclaimed Samedi worthy of Kafka, Hitchcock, and Lynch. I chose to believe that such praise was well deserved, complimenting myself on finding a hidden gem, a masterpiece that had slipped through the cracks.

OK, so I was feeling optimistic that morning. In my natural, cynical state, I would have laughed at the obviously empty praise of the cover blurb, knowing full well that one never actually believes what is found there. For once, though, I’m thankful I enjoyed a brief moment of rosy vision, as Ball does deliver an adequate, thought-provoking tale full of surrealism, ambiguity, and absurdism. He doesn’t reach the heights attained by the greats to which he’s compared, but Samedi the Deafness is a quick, intelligent read that, while it probably won’t astound, will at least perplex and entertain.

Ball has created a world where truth is an illusion and nothing is as it seems. The narrator, James Sim, is a mnemonist, one who is capable of remembering large quantities of information.You’d think this makes him reliable as a narrator; however, when everyone lies, no information can truly be believed. The novel begins as Sim buys a newspaper and sits in a park to read. Soon, however, he hears a shout and, upon investigation, finds a man who has been stabbed several times. Sim questions him and learns that his death has been precipitated by a mysterious figure named Samedi (literally “Saturday,” in French), the ringleader behind a great conspiracy involving suicides carried out on the White House lawn. With his last breath, the dying man urges Sim to expose Samedi and his followers.

Although Sim’s first instinct is to run away and forget the whole affair, he soon finds himself further drawn into the mystery; when he does finally make an effort to investigate, he is drawn irrevocably into a world of shadows and lies. He soon ends up at a verisylum, built for the treatment of chronic liars, cases in which one’s lying compromises the identity of the individual. In Samedi, identity is insubstantial; it is the sum of both the actual truth (whatever that is) and one’s fictions about oneself. As one employee of the verisylum explains, “when many lies are told, unfettered by immediate comparison to fact, they end up comprising a kind of truth.”

Inmates of the verisylum spend their days playing Rovnin, a Russian game which involves the creation of “proxies,” or fictional players who aid, abet, or foil one’s schemes. Samedi the Deafness is Rovnin on a large scale, and Sim never knows whether any given “friend” is at any given time an ally or a foe. To be fair, Ball’s idea is hardly a new one. Better authors have made better use of this idea. Ball’s strength lies in his style, which is austere yet poetic.

The only drawback to Samedi the Deafness is its finale. The plot races toward Saturday, the culmination of Samedi’s efforts. Had he not attempted to explain Samedi’s motivation I might be more appeased, since a lack of explanation would seem in line with his absurdist streak. Unfortunately, that is not quite the case. That he does attempt a deeper explanation of Samedi’s plot is all the worse, since his explanation is weak and poorly explored. Ball excels at creating suspense and tension, and he’s created such a build up for the denouement that one can’t help but feel left down that he doesn’t explore the depths he was capable of reaching. Better luck next time.

Bibliolatrist possesses extraordinary powers that enable her to read tall books in a single bound. As Jennifer McKeown, she spends her days as a mild-mannered English teacher living outside Philadelphia. She blogs over at Bibliolatry.









Do you understand the words that are coming out of my Pajiba? | Look Who's Talking













Comments

Truth is an "allusion"? An allusion to what?

Otherwise, nice review.

My editing mistake -- noted and corrected. Thanks. -- DR

Posted by: be right back at September 19, 2007 2:30 PM

Never heard of this book or this author, but you have piqued my interest! I can not recall ever seeing this book reviewed in the mainstream press, so hooray for Pajiba!
Absurdism! That's the thing, although I will probably agree wiuth you if too much is revealed of motivations.
A few words about hard backs vs. paper backs. Both have advantages -- HBs are clearly more sturdy than most PBs, but PBs are more portable. A room filled with shelves of nice, fat, dust-jacketed hard backs (facing out) is a wonder to behold.
Well, welcome to Pajiba Jennifer, and I look forward to more reviews.
--Chiron, 9/19/07

Posted by: Chiron at September 19, 2007 2:31 PM

Great review, Jennifer. Samedi sounds somewhat interesting, but I don't think I'll be picking it up anytime soon. I'm also disappointed, without even reading the book, in the ending. I don't like when authors feel the need to over-explain.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at September 19, 2007 3:17 PM

"Is a book that appears immediately in paperback the literary equivalent of a movie sent straight-to-video?"


I think it depends whether it was a trade paperback or a mass-market pb.

Posted by: Rae at September 20, 2007 3:41 PM

i was under the impression that all books are published in paperback FIRST then go to hardback when/if there is a market for them. it depends on the sales, no?

Posted by: serlady at September 20, 2007 5:10 PM

i was under the impression that all books are published in paperback FIRST then go to hardback when/if there is a market for them. it depends on the sales, no?

Posted by: serlady at September 20, 2007 5:10 PM

Whether a book is published in hardback first or not depends upon the confidence the publisher has that it will recoup its unit costs, which are much higher for a hardback than a paperback. Fewer people buy hardbacks as they are dearer.

The choice of going for hardback then depends on how popular the author is and how heavily the title will be promoted. Although my book, Hybrids, was well promoted, it still went straight to paperback.

If there is a hardback edition, usually there's a wait of 6-9 months before a paperback edition comes out to give it a chance to sell through.

Posted by: David Thorpe at September 25, 2007 8:01 AM

sorry, your misunderstanding of the book is obvious and profound.

you complain about the lack of explanation as to why stark planned and did what he did. but this was explained in one paragraph, and wasn't (and shouldn't) be explained more than this.

this was the single point of the entire book and you missed it.

this paragraph alludes to nothing less than what is required of humanity if it hopes to one day stop destroying itself.

and you missed it.

how can someone review a book who misses the entire point of why it was written in the first place?

i am seriously distressed.

Posted by: richard at January 9, 2008 9:33 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time