free counter with statistics Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

pride-and-prejudice-and-zombies.jpg
Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith


Cannonball Read / Genny (also Rusty)

Book Reviews | June 3, 2009 | Comments (11)


It is a truth universally acknowledged that a zombie in possession of brains must be in want of more brains.”

This is probably one of those times I’m going to be accused of being no fun or not having a sense of humor, so let me say that if you want to read Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, Seth Grahame-Smith’s undead update on Austen’s classic novel, you should totally read it. I can promise that you won’t regret doing so.

That out of the way, I have to say that I like the idea of literary updates or revisions more than I like the finished product. I wasn’t a fan of the novel Wicked, even though I liked the idea, and I have to say the same for Pride and Prejudice and Zombies. The concept works in a broad sense, but I’m not a huge fan of Grahame-Smith’s habit of taking the novel past humor and straight on into absurd. All five Bennet girls are apparently Shaolin-monk trained warriors who are sworn to protect their countryside until such time as they are married off. There are ninjas featured in at least two or three scenes*. Elizabeth responds to Darcy’s slights by roundhouse kicking him in the face, and reacts to the shame of her own prejudice by administering something referred to as “the seven cuts of shame” to herself. All of the houses have a dojo, one of Lizzie’s friends contracts the zombie virus (although a few places where the story is told from her rapidly zombifying perspective are pretty damn funny in their own right).

For those not familiar with the original Pride and Prejudice, it is principally the story of how a Ms.Elizabeth Bennet and a Mr.Darcy come to see past their individual prejudices and prideful natures and fall deeply in love with each other. It’s a lovely piece of writing, but I suspect that this book has launched more unhappy relationship and women pining away after men who aren’t that into them than any modern romantic comedy. I mean, the message of this is basically “when men act cold and indifferent to you, it’s because they’re really just trying to hide from their feelings of love” which is wonderful for Elizabeth and Darcy, but deadly when applied to real life romantic situations. Anyway, that part of the story remains unchanged in Grahame-Smith’s version, but there’s also much talk of dispatching “Unmentionables” and that Elizabeth’s warrior training (despite taking place with Chinese masters rather than the more respectable Japanese masters) is a factor in her suitability as a wife. All the characters are more violent in their reactions to one another, and several important conversations between characters (such as Darcy’s initial proposal) take place while characters are engaged in combat.

Overall, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies is fun, lighthearted, and feature some rather inspired illustrations. Also, since it’s the closest my brother will ever get to actually reading Pride and Prejudice I suppose it’s also a good way to inject a small amount of knowledge of classic literature into someone who would rather read about zombies.

*Were there even ninjas around in the 19th century? I guess this is a pointless question because of all the zombies crawling around, but it was a real sticking point for me, for some reason. I’m not on the ninja train the way I’m on the zombie train.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Genny (also Rusty)’s review, check her blog, Rusty’s Ventures.


Best Series-Long Performance of All Time | Grace Trailer



Comments

I am not a fan of Austen's work nor particularly crazy about the zombie genre so I doubt this book will ever find it's way to my "must-read stack".
Still, a nice review and much appreciated.
Oh. I don't wish to be excoriated by the zombie-lovin' Pajibans, so I'll add that I DID see the subtitled version of "Dead Snow" yesterday and found it to be just gut-bustingly funny and great fun to watch

Posted by: Spender at June 3, 2009 9:30 AM

Um...didn't someone already review this book for the "cannonball read?"

But while we're on the subject, I think this book is total crap. If they're going to starting printing books on the same level as they're kicking out movies ("reboot!" "retool!" "remake!" "update!"), then I'm checking out completely. There are too many talented writers out there not getting any press or coverage while hacks with a hook like this "author" get splashed all over the place. It's sad.

Posted by: B-Unit at June 3, 2009 10:03 AM

The wife wants to read this so I'm sure I'll hear if it's good or not. After her violent reaction to Twilight (and subsequent reading of certain passages to me) I know I don't ever want to go near that one so her opinions tend to be pretty sound guidance. She did hate "Calamity Physics" though so she's not infallible.

Nice review.

Posted by: TylerDFC at June 3, 2009 10:25 AM

There are so many books around. Why review the same book more than once? Although I have read Pride and Prejudice and even watched the film I'm not a big fan. This MIGHT make it a bit more fun but at the same time it sounds very much like an easy way to get noticed and make money. Rehash something which has already been done and add zombies to it. As B-Unit pointed out when someone does it with film we pounce upon them so why be more lenient with books?

Posted by: barf at June 3, 2009 11:36 AM

I always assumed that ninjas were one of those ancient Chinese secrets, you know, around for centuries before white people suddenly decided they were cool and starting mimicking them.

Posted by: Monica at June 3, 2009 12:49 PM

I was so disappointed with this. The funny, it was not so funny. At least the illustrations were cool.

Posted by: Banana at June 3, 2009 4:23 PM

Ninjas are Japanese, not Chinese, and they start showing up around the 14th century during the Kamakura period.

Posted by: osmate77 at June 3, 2009 5:32 PM

I haven't been able to read it all the way through yet. I imagine the Wayan's brothers using it as a basis for the script to "Not Another Literary Adaption" and the urge to drink becomes overwhelming.

I think the book fails because cutting and pasting zombie fights into the middle of a story about the restrictions of society and familial expectations removes all the intrinsic drama from the story. Instead of portraying the strict adherence to manners and breeding as the character's refuge from the very real horror happening outside their doors, he used Austin's writing as a placeholder between fights. It is like Buffy the movie vs. Buffy the series. No heart and some really stupid sight gags.

Posted by: Jennifer at June 3, 2009 5:39 PM

The zombie gags were hilarious for about 50 pages, but the plot wore thin. Also, I was incredibly disappointed by the character sabotage Grahame-Smith felt necessary to include. Elizabeth Bennet eating the still-beat heart of a ninja? That's moved beyond macabre into just bizarre.

Also, Genny, I agree with your statement that too many women take false hope from the Darcy-Bennet love story. It's sad, really, that such a clever and snide woman is relegated to the chick lit genre.

Posted by: bonnie at June 3, 2009 6:42 PM

talk about a book that should be made into a movie right away!

Posted by: martin at June 3, 2009 9:25 PM

What is an acceptable stage to be bored with zombies? Cuz I'm kinda getting there but feel like I'm going out early. Should I hold off until MTV start running zombie themed shows?

Posted by: RandyPanTheGoatboy at June 3, 2009 11:42 PM