free counter with statistics On Chesil Beach by Ian McEwan | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

n217864.jpg

Still Enduring

On Chesil Beach by Ian McEwan / Phillip Stephens

Book Reviews | September 18, 2007 | Comments (16)


“Who’s your favorite author?” is probably the most incessant question to ever dog a bibliophile, and it’s one I find frustrating. I tend to focus on individual works themselves, as opposed to one author’s entire canon. Obviously, some writers are better than others, but I’m an ardent believer that the cult of personality which often arises in conjunction with an artist and his or her oeuvre is distracting. For example — Jonathan Franzen’s infamous bout with Oprah over The Corrections was a hugely obnoxious tit-for-tat wherein one party was overly concerned with who should read the book, while the other was overly concerned with the snobbery of the one who wrote it - both views can’t seem to recognize that a literary work should stand alone. No one who reads The Corrections (you’ll just have to accept my generous estimation) in 20 years will remember that Franzen was questionably elitist about it; no one will remember that James Frey was a liar and a tool (if they remember him at all), just that his book was lousy.

I only bring this up because liking one particular author’s canon feels reductive, but it usually doesn’t stop me from answering the question: Ian McEwan. Ever since picking up a dusty copy of Enduring Love in Oxford (which had the additional bonus of being the author’s hometown) a few years ago I’ve devoured anything with his name attached; the guy’s a genuine master at creating dread more palpable than any horror writer, all while working within the highest of literary traditions. It’s hard to pin down the themes of his entire body of work, but McEwan seems to relish the lurid undertones that dissolve middle-class England, whether it’s based in real violence or, more probably, the destructiveness of latent desires.

Fittingly, McEwan’s newest, On Chesil Beach, is the story of a couple undone by sexual incongruence. Beginning with “They were young, educated, and both virgins on this, their wedding night, and they lived in a time when a conversation about sexual difficulties was plainly impossible. But it is never easy,” McEwan begins to explore and unravel a time when sexual politics were on the cusp of transformation — the 1960s. The novella pores over one evening, with a few flashes backwards and forward, of the sexual culminations which will either make or break a marriage of two people who genuinely love each other.

Both of the main characters, Edward and Florence, approach their wedding night with stores of apprehension — Edward wants to fulfill his erotic desires, Florence doesn’t seem to have them - as they stumble towards discovery and dissolution. The pair are obvious representations of troubling dichotomies (masculine-feminine, subjective-objective), but are no less wrought because of it, and their movement towards sexual achievement or debacle is a highly momentous one. McEwan paces this event with deliberate tension, letting the evening unfold at the literary equivalent of real-time, something McEwan perfected in Saturday.

Despite its brevity, On Chesil Beach has the enormous metaphorical potential consistent with McEwan’s work. Though the exposition encompasses little, the book is short and intense, unfurling with an anxiety that underscores the psychological dynamics coming into play here. On Chesil Beach is a book that can be read in a sitting, but whose polarities can be pored over for a lifetime. It’s exciting to read the work of an author who has mastered his craft slowly and comfortably, and is now experimenting with how much he can do with so little.

Phillip Stephens is the lead critic for Pajiba. He lives in Fayetteville, AR.


Mischief. Mayhem. Pajiba. | What Perez Hilton Says about the VMAs



Comments

I upset myself on a semi-regular basis by never having read any Ian McEwan, I know that I should, and I know that as soon as I do I'll adore him it's just something that I've never gotten around to.

On Chesil Beach ordered and paid for along with Enduring Love... and all the DVDs I had sitting in my basket for next payday. Dammit. Oh well, I did need to own Conversations With Other Women I guess.

Lovely review, it told me everything I needed to know.

Posted by: Alex the Odd at September 18, 2007 12:33 PM

I thought On Chesil Beach was way, way better than Saturday, which was a little too "This is my post-9/11 novel" for my taste. The whole "Dover Beach" scene at the end was lame.

This book was awesome though; he's really good at this kind of micro-level writing, where the tiniest of human interactions mean everything. I would much rather read that kind of writing anyway.

Posted by: Brenda at September 18, 2007 1:01 PM

I really enjoyed The Child in Time, and mean to read more McEwan.

Posted by: Kermit at September 18, 2007 1:27 PM

I'm still reeling from The Cement Garden.

Posted by: Cindy at September 18, 2007 2:00 PM

Revoke my Pajiba membership if you will, but honestly on a daily basis I vacillate between considering McEwan an unequalled genius and thinking he's god-awful and everyone is afraid to say it out loud because of his lit-cred. This happened to me several times while reading "Saturday" with the effect that I really loved some parts of the book and re-visit them frequently and other parts have me wondering where his editor was when he needed him most. I do think I react better to his shorter works so hopefully this will fall into the genius category. By the way, I feel the same way about John Banville. Can anyone explain this?

Posted by: PaddyDog at September 18, 2007 2:11 PM

I've been circling this book ever since it went on shelves, always intending to buy it, but always remembering it when i already had a book or two in my hand. I'll try and make it a priority now. Great review, Phillip.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at September 18, 2007 2:27 PM

My wife loved Atonement. I can't get through it. It's probably me, but the story is just too darn uninteresting. His writing is fine, his structure if you will, but the story leaves me wanting ... to put to put the book down.

Posted by: me at September 18, 2007 3:06 PM

I suppose Ian McEwan is a decent writer but I hated Atonement. So did my mother and her friend. It's a book that has festered (I need a better verb) through several people b/c of its bestseller status. I've yet to meet someone who has read Atonement and gone on to another McEwan book.

I know that good writers provoke a reaction but I thought the characters were really awful and the fact that the little brat got away with ruining so many lives really pissed me off. It seemed a study of human behavior and family secrets that didn't have any sort of resolve or greater point to it. I don't mind tough literature but this was a disappointment in the end...

Posted by: Amanda47 at September 18, 2007 3:34 PM

Funny, I adored Atonement but disliked most of his other works, even though I think his writing style is beautiful and brilliant. The stalker theme got old for me.

Posted by: Lilly at September 18, 2007 7:42 PM

Unrelated(ish) comments. First, thank you thank you thank you for saying that Million Little Pieces sucked. It did. Everyone I know LOVES it, and it was awful. I could have written that book with my eyes closed. Describe vomiting, swear at people, refuse to look yourself in the fucking eyes, use the harshest language you can, unrelentingly and without any attempts at variation. Voila.

PaddyDog: I don't know why that is. I read 'Atonement' and liked it, but haven't read anything else by McEwan, so I can't compare. I read John Banville's The Sea, and thought 'someone gave this guy a word-of-the-day calender, and he's intent on using all of October before the book is out' but then I read a short passage by him in a book on writing, and it was lovely. Brilliant, even. What gives, people? Maybe it's what Phillip says, about each work standing alone.

Posted by: raych at September 18, 2007 8:16 PM

I loved Atonement and I loved On Chesil Beach. To me, McEwan is brilliant, but I can see why some people might not like him. The Corrections, though...if they're lucky, people won't be reading that in 20 years. Franzen needs to be forgotten.

Posted by: mike at September 18, 2007 10:49 PM

I don't know why but I couldn't finish Atonement, and like Amanda47' comment- I haven't bothered reading anything else by McEwen. This review is encouraging, I'll try again.

Posted by: demondoll at September 18, 2007 11:52 PM

If you liked McEwan, you ought to read "Out Stealing Horses" by Per Peterson. The tone is similar. They both have a sense of quiet elegance. Out Stealing Horses is a bit more haunting, set in the cold, empty countryside of Norway. Lovely, lovely books...both of them.

Posted by: Al at September 19, 2007 12:50 AM

Funny, I thought Atonement was the best thing that Ian McEwan has written thus far. Most of the people who can't finish Atonement get stuck in the first part of the book. In my honest opinion, if you can't finish the book, you shouldn't open your mouth to judge it.

Posted by: CC at September 19, 2007 12:32 PM

Reading "Atonement" made me want to read everything he ever wrote. That book is flat out amazing. I figured, if all his books are like this, holy crap! "Amsterdam" is excellent. "Saturday" is very good, but not as good as those two. "On Chesil Beach" is excellent. His books are so moody and full of tension. Next I will try "Cement Garden," thanks Cindy!

Posted by: shelleyh at September 20, 2007 1:46 PM

You're right, it can be read in a sitting, which is what I just did. I thought it was fantastic, and I can't get it out of my head (in the best, and saddest, way possible).

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at September 25, 2007 6:17 AM