web
counter
 

newmoon2.jpg

I Need a Goddamn Drink

New Moon The 2nd Book in the Twilight Series by Stephenie Meyer / Sarah Larson

Book Reviews | September 18, 2008 | Comments (68)


Imagine Romeo & Juliet, only 563 pages long and severely retarded, with vampires and werewolves and idiots on wheels. That pretty well sums up New Moon, the sequel to Stephenie Meyer’s Twilight. Oh yes, there are werewolves now. They were, of course, hinted at in Bella’s talk on First Beach with Jacob in the last book, but when that never went anywhere I thought we were granted a reprieve and Meyer forgot all about them. I don’t know what I was thinking, giving Meyer even half an ounce of credit.

I’m getting a little ahead of myself. New Moon is part two in the series about Bella Swan, a teenager living in the tiny town of Forks, Washington, and her relationship with Edward Cullen, a vampire. I’m not going to get too much into the backstory here, because I don’t have the energy, quite frankly. This book did some funny shit to my brain. I’m at least twice as crazy and seven or eight times as stupid as I was before reading it, and somewhere along the way I ended up (against my will, I might add) getting invested in this godawful series, which kinda makes me want to kill myself.

The book opens with Bella dreaming about Edward, because all Bella ever thinks about is Edward. In the dream, Bella sees herself standing with Edward, who is eternally 17, and she’s all wrinkly and decrepit because she’s not immortal. She wakes from the dream, and it’s her birthday, and holy shit you guys, she is turning 18, which is like, SO OLD that she may as well start digging her own grave now because it is ALL OVER. So Bella is depressed about the lost bloom of her youth, and she doesn’t want a birthday party and doesn’t even want anyone to acknowledge her birthday. Naturally, Edward and his family throw her a big-ass party, because Edward never cares about what Bella wants and always does whatever Edward decides is “best” for her.

At the birthday party, Bella gets a papercut while opening a gift, because Bella is like the dumbest person in the history of ever and can’t do a single thing without somehow fucking it up, even opening a box. Anyway, so she gets this papercut, and it sends Jasper into a frenzy and he tries to attack Bella, but Edward stops him, and of course Bella falls the fuck over because she’s got some kind of neurological disorder wherein she is less likely to remain upright than a one-legged blind lady with an inner-ear infection and Parkinson’s. So Bella goes ass over tea kettle and tears up her arm with a bunch of glass and bleeds a lot, and suddenly none of Edward’s family (who are all vampires) can handle it aside from Carlisle, and the others all have to leave the room.

Now, you might be wondering why this spilling of Bella’s blood would make nearly everyone lose complete control of their faculties, when just a few months prior (at the end of the last book) they were in the ballet studio where Bella cracked the back of her skull open and was bleeding all over the place, and they didn’t try to eat her then, so what’s with the feeding frenzy this time? Listen, you can wonder about stuff like that, but just trust me when I tell you that it will only give you a migraine. There are no good answers to such questions. Continuity on that level is far and away beyond the realm of Meyer’s abilities as a storyteller, and we’re only in the opening of the book. We’ve got, like, 500 pages of bullshit to get through yet, so buckle your chin straps and hang the fuck on because I’m gonna cruise through it as quickly as possible or this will turn into a rant longer than the book itself. There are spoilers ahead, so if you don’t like that you can suck my dick and stop reading.

Edward decides that he is too dangerous for Bella to be around, even though he spent the entire last book stalking her every move because he had to protect her from the constant peril wrought by her own idiocy … but again, continuity is an ingredient not used in this recipe; it’s been substituted with equal parts stupidity and schmaltz. Edward and his entire family move away, because what better way to protect Bella than to leave her all alone in what is essentially the biggest North American hellmouth outside of Sunnydale?

Okay, I lied about getting through this quickly and without rants. The whole “hero runs away to protect heroine from his dangerous lifestyle” thing is so annoying. It even annoyed me when Harry Potter did it to Ginny, because if he could haul Ron’s dumb ass with him into the woods, then he could sure as hell take Ginny. I mean, I like Ron, but given the choice between him and his sister as backup in a dangerous situation, I’d pick Ginny in a heartbeat, every time, no hesitations. I understand that Harry was afraid that he would lose focus if he had the distraction of worrying about Ginny, but it would have been nice if he had just up and said that, as opposed to trying to make it sound like some noble sacrifice on his part to keep her safe. Draping weaknesses in a false mantle of chivalry is not endearing. In this case it’s even more annoying, because Bella can’t stand up, sit down, or walk in a straight line without somehow injuring herself, so precisely why Edward thinks she’ll be safer if he and his immortal super-power-having family up and abandon her is beyond me. Oh my God, I don’t even know why I care. Do you see what these books are doing to me? I get dumber with every page I read.

Where was I? Oh, yes. Edward leaves. Bella falls completely apart. Despondent doesn’t really even cover it, because Bella is the personification of codependent, and with Edward gone she barely knows how to function. Guess what begins to bring her out of her depression? I bet you’ll never guess. Unless you guessed “another guy,” in which case, hey — you are a good guesser of things! So Bella becomes BFF with Jacob Black (he of the Quileute tribe, who made the treaty with the Cullens which was mentioned in Twilight). Jacob is a werewolf, by the way, because Bella can’t have normal friends or she might theoretically stop being such a goddamn retard, and then what would the books be about? Bella also becomes an adrenaline junkie, because why not? It’s stupid, so it’s perfectly in character. She courts danger because it helps her hallucinate about Edward, and she thinks this will keep her from losing him or some shit. So she goes cliff jumping, and of course she almost dies, but Jacob rescues her. I would go off about how much it pisses me off that Bella never ever rescues her own damn self, but why waste the energy? I’m already exhausted.

Let’s just get this over with. Through a contrived series of miscommunications, Edward thinks Bella is dead, so he goes to see the Volturi (the biggest, baddest vampires of them all) to try and get himself killed. Bella and Edward’s sister Alice have to bumble their way to stopping him, and (unfortunately for me) they manage to succeed. The Volturi say that because Bella knows about vampires, she has to either become one or die, and (again, unfortunately for me) the Cullens vote against killing her ass and will turn her at some point in the future, because they’re all pathologically stupid.

New Moon is like what would happen if a coven of mentally delayed witches got high as hell and concocted a brew made up of Romeo & Juliet, “Roswell” the series, a random assortment of romance novel clichés, The Dive from Clausen’s Pier, and some disjointed vampire and werewolf stories told to them by a seven-year-old with ADHD. Then the witches feed the brew to a grizzled old dog with rabies, wait for the product of the resulting intestinal distress, smear it all over some paper, and have the unmitigated gall to call it a novel.

I hate everything about this book. I hate it even more than I hated Twilight. I hate stupid Bella, who is the limpest of all the world’s wet dishrags, and I hate stupid Edward, who is a whiny and controlling creepazoid, and I hate all their stupid star crossed angst, and I hate the stupid town of Forks and the whole stupid Cullen family and everything with the stupid werewolves and the stupid Volturi and oh holy hell it’s all so overwhelmingly stupid and I hate it so much.

I already Googled what happens in the other two books, and now that I know how stupid THEY are, I must read them. I don’t even understand it, but I am compelled against my own will to suffer every moment of this agonising stupidity. These books are insidious. There is some kind of evil woven into the fibre of the pages, I think, something that has broken me. I hate this series with the fiery intensity of a chemical weapon, and I can’t. stop. reading. it.

I need a goddamn drink.

Sarah Larson is not the scorpion-eating famewhore who once dated George Clooney. She lives in Minnesota, where she is usually up to no good. You can find her monitoring the imminent undead armageddon at Zombie Forecast, or hardly ever updating her woefully neglected blog at Unscheduled.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba Love 09/18/08 | WarGames: The Dead Code









Comments

Oh Jesus, you're still going.

It doesn't get any better. New Moon was the worst of the four, but...the other ones are longer.

Posted by: dsbs at September 18, 2008 1:11 PM

Did you lose a bet?

Posted by: Jay at September 18, 2008 1:11 PM

See, now I thought this one was at least better written than the first. A little, anyway.

POSSIBLE SPOILER
And for some reason, even though there was no hope because there are 4 books in the series and all the buzz, not to mention the writing, makes the end obvious, I was hoping she would wind up with Jacob, because I thought the parts with him (well, before he became as much of an asshole as her) were sweet.

Wait 'til you get to the third one...

Posted by: Knife Pile Palin (formerly Anna von Beaverplatz) at September 18, 2008 1:16 PM

For the reasons you listed, I will be staying away from this series like the plague. It's sorely disappointing that teenaged girls can't get their literary romance fix with something a little less moronic. Why couldn't the author just name Bella "Mary Sue?" Would've made much more sense.

Posted by: lilah012 at September 18, 2008 1:39 PM

I had the same reaction to the books. I especially like the way she bitch slaps you with every metaphor she can come up with. Just wait, she gets even subtler.

Posted by: Nimue at September 18, 2008 1:43 PM

Everyone in my office (including my roommate) have been passing these damn books around and harassing me about reading them. I've resisted so far with every excuse possible because of my assumption that these 2 things would be true...
1) They will be stupid as shit. and, 2)I will not be able to stop reading them.

Believe me, I know myself. I watch The Hills. And Gossip Girl. I'm sorry.

Posted by: jamiepants at September 18, 2008 2:01 PM

". . .and of course Bella falls the fuck over because she's got some kind of neurological disorder wherein she is less likely to remain upright than a one-legged blind lady with an inner-ear infection . . ."

Did anyone else suddenly visualize the goats from the video yesterday?

Posted by: BWeaves at September 18, 2008 2:06 PM

So, I'm in a quandry.

I read the books. I hated the books but I just couldn't. stop. reading.

I had long conversations with other well-into-adulthood, professional, more-feminist-than-not, women and we all agreed. We hate everything these books project. But damn, they just pull you in.

Now to the problem. I teach highschool. I teach teenagers who, for one reason or another, don't read so, they've been placed in an intensive reading program (my class).

Do I add these books to my current classroom library?

I know they'll love these books. But I don't want them reading the books because the books are evil.

But they'll look forward to reading them every day.

But they're evil.

But this might be the book that turns them on to reading.

E. Vil.

Posted by: JustM0 at September 18, 2008 2:15 PM

Sarina, the mere fact that you are continuing with this makes me worry for the small shred of sanity that you have left.

Put them down and walk away before you wind up watching bad MTV "reality" shows and using text lingo in everyday conversation.

Posted by: Melody at September 18, 2008 2:25 PM

So Bella must be in some way related to those fainting goats, right? These books would be much better if Edward and the rest of the Cullens just ran around going "AAAHHHH boogedy boogedy vampire" and laughing when her legs freeze up and she falls over.

Also if it had more in common with Romeo and Juliet and the star-crossed lovers actually DIED. Jesus, get it over with.

Posted by: Sabrina at September 18, 2008 2:29 PM

That was one of the best reviews I've ever read on this site. I need to somehow work "falls the fuck over because she's got some kind of neurological disorder wherein she is less likely to remain upright than a one-legged blind lady with an inner-ear infection and Parkinson's" into a conversation. I read the first book, but have successfully avoided the rest and kind of hate myself for even reading the one. I thought I liked vampire books, but not enough to make up for every single character being unbelievably, excessively annoying, as if it's a mission they must fulfill.

Posted by: PallasJay at September 18, 2008 2:35 PM

Oh, great, BWeaves got there first. This is what I get for starting a comment and then wandering off for an hour before finishing it.

JustMo, my roommate went home for a wedding and her younger sister was raving about Twilight. She said, and I quote, "This is the first book that I've, like, read, and finished." The way I see it, reading is better than not. I used to gorge myself on Sweet Valley High and the Baby-sitter's Club without realizing how poorly they were written, but they did get me reading. Hopefully some of them will graduate onto better-quality books.

Posted by: Sabrina at September 18, 2008 2:36 PM

Again, because of this drivel, these goddam kids nowadays have the wrong idea about me. There's no romance, no obsessing over each other, none of that. Jesus, the last girl I was "obsessed" with was a common street whore who drunkenly stumbled past Wismar city limits. And by "obsessed with" I mean I was friggin' starving. I swear, I set one foot in that town, everybody's out to be a hero - "Ooh, we must rid our town of this wicked Nosferatu, the creature of nightmares..." - give me a goddamed break... So instead, I'm drinking the blood of a VD-ridden floozie because I can't stomach the thought of eating another feces-covered rat, and some dippy broad decides to write a book on how romantic this life is? Christ...

Posted by: Count Orlock at September 18, 2008 2:39 PM

JustMo: I agree with Sabrina (and not just about goats). Anything that gets these kids reading will encourage them to read better stuff later. Practice makes perfect, eventually.

Posted by: BWeaves at September 18, 2008 2:41 PM

Even if it is stupid pablum, if it gets kids to read a fucking book, I am all for it. I mean Jebus, have you all seen the illiterate boobs that are graduating High School these days? They are fluent in text-speak and LOLCATS but can't write a sentence. The underpaid over worked teachers have trouble getting them interested because they can't use teen lit in the class room. If they need to use this kind of stupid crap as a gateway drug to better literature later on, go for it.

Godtopus Damned idjit kids these days, and their rock and roll music...

AND GET OFF MY LAWN!!

Posted by: Lindsey at September 18, 2008 2:45 PM

Jesus, I'm so glad I was into Kurt Vonnegut when I was a teenager.

Posted by: mark at September 18, 2008 3:19 PM

Having also fallen victim to this insidious series, I now very proudly tell anyone who will listen that I managed to put down the fourth book half-way through, and have not gone back.

I've regained some sanity and held onto my sobriety for five weeks now.

Posted by: Lexie at September 18, 2008 3:43 PM

"Even if it is stupid pablum, if it gets kids to read a fucking book, I am all for it."

I agree. I read some bullshit when I was a youngster, but when I became a woman, I put away childish things. You can read crap as a kid and grow up to have some taste.

My problem is with a friend of mine, who is 35-damn-years-old, who reads this shit and says it's great. You can tell me it's absorbing and entertaining, but don't ever, ever tell me it's "great."

Posted by: samantha t at September 18, 2008 3:44 PM

So, uhh... anybody wanna talk about Bella's staggering lack of independence? Or maybe about how she's super selfish and uses people for a quick fix the way addicts use drugs? Or maybe about why in the holy fucking hell nearly everything with a penis who isn't her dad is completely in love with her, despite the fact that she has no discernible personality? Or maybe the racist undertones in Meyer's portrayal of Jacob and the rest of the Quileute? Any of that? Huh? Anybody?

...please. I seriously need, like, an e-support group over here. Normally, I am nice to my books and I treat them very well, and I can usually read a paperback several times before it starts to look like anyone's even opened it. This book, however? Looks like it got caught in a thresher, because of how many times I pitched it across the room and it slammed violently into the wall in my apoplectic fits of rage.

Listen, if nobody wants to talk about the more seriously disturbing aspects of Meyer's asstastic writing, then can we at least talk about how poorly edited and unprofessional these books are? I stopped counting all the typos, punctuation problems, grammatical errors and missing words when I got into the forties. Or maybe we could talk about why, FOR THE LOVE OF LOGIC, WHY there was a gigantic pile of glass plates at Bella's birthday party when vampires don't fucking eat? Who were all the other plates for? Who else was supposed to be eating cake? Was it a blood cake? WAS IT???

Please, someone punch me in the face. Please.

Posted by: Sarina at September 18, 2008 3:54 PM

Oh god, I'm so glad I'm not the only one with this problem! I hate Bella. I hate these books. YET... I have to finish the series. Wikipedia won't help. It's a sickness.

"of course Bella falls the fuck over because she's got some kind of neurological disorder wherein she is less likely to remain upright than a one-legged blind lady with an inner-ear infection and Parkinson's."

Love this!

Posted by: Melissa at September 18, 2008 3:58 PM

I've managed to stay the hell away from these books, but I'm going to have to toss in another "as long as they're reading, it's worth it."

I know far too many people who have never finished an entire book, and plenty more who treat me like I'm a loser wasting time when I read a book. There's this weird kind of superiority that comes with a sniffed, "Oh, I don't have time to read." And everytime I hear it, I think it's a crying shame.

Starting on the crap that'll really suck you in all of the way through the end is what gets you started on a path towards reading things that are far more worthwhile.

And to be honest, I even respect the folks who read nothing but Harlequin romances more than I do the ones who've never finished a book because 'there are more important things to do in life.'

Posted by: Tyburn Blossom at September 18, 2008 4:05 PM

These books suck. And I've read all of them. And it is entirely possible to use them as a gateway drug to kids to get them to read better books. I know because I do it almost everyday. I get all the teens who are jonesing for another hit. They come in looking for something and I slowly and subtly feed them better and better books. It's my evil plan, and fortunately also my job.

Stephenie Meyer was planning on rewriting Twilight as told from Edward's point of view to be entitled Midnight Sun. Unfortunately (or fortunately depending on your point of view) it got leaked on the internet adn Meyer threw a full fledged hissy fit and refused to write any more. (Showing the exact same amount of maturity of any of her characters and clarifying many things.) She posted the draft on her website. Unbelievably Edward is even more of an asshole when it is told from his point of view, and I didn't think that was possible. If you feel the need to torture yourself as I do follow the link:

http://www.stepheniemeyer.com/midnightsun.html

Posted by: libraryliz at September 18, 2008 4:45 PM

I also got sucked into these books by my 30-year old friend, and also because I bought The Host for my boyfriend because I was so completely naive of the fluff that this woman is capable of.

Yet I read all four. Why? Who knows? I read Tom Robbins and Vonnegut, for Pete's sake!

it's shameful...when people ask me how I can read these, I tell them that I'm getting as much "casual reading" in as possible before I start veterinary school.

Posted by: jesskate at September 18, 2008 4:47 PM

"I know far too many people who have never finished an entire book, and plenty more who treat me like I'm a loser wasting time when I read a book. There's this weird kind of superiority that comes with a sniffed, "Oh, I don't have time to read.""

Oh, my GOD I hate when people say things like that as though they're reveling in their own illiteracy. I have never in my life - I'm talking during graduate school, qualifying exams, the LSAT, the bar exam, law school, my first year of practice in a large law firm, my child's first days of life - not had the time to read. Never.

Posted by: samantha t at September 18, 2008 4:57 PM

libraryliz, I already read the draft of Midnight Sun. No, I don't really know why. Yes, it's godawful. Yes, Edward is even creepier from his POV, and he and his entire family are even dumber when viewed from such intimate perspective, and Bella's appeal is even more of a mystery when described by the person supposedly unable to resist it.

If I ever happen to meet Stephenie Meyer, or if she or her publisher should ever be foolhardy enough to grant the interview I requested, I imagine that within five minutes of making her acquaintance I will have turned into a drooling, stuttering imbecile because the sheer effort of trying to get out six thousand questions at once, while screaming and frothing at the mouth, will break me.

Posted by: Sarina at September 18, 2008 5:03 PM

Sarina, the thing that bugs me is that each and everyone of Meyer's characters have exactly one character trait and sometimes one super power. Alice likes fashion (and sees the future), Esme is motherly, Carlisle is nice, Bella is clumsy, Rosalie is vain, Emmett likes sports and fighting, etc. I read somewhere that Meyer brags about never taking a writing course (or somesuch). Well clearly she didn't need any practice in creating complex, well-rounded, or flushed-out characters.

The entire time I was reading Midnight Sun, I was getting more and more angry. First at Meyer for posting it, and then at me for reading it, and then at the internet for existing and allowing me access to this dribble.

Posted by: libraryliz at September 18, 2008 5:16 PM

Oh, Sarina, I need to be in your e-support group! I thought I was the only one who HATED these books yet COULD NOT stop reading them. Ugh. I'm glad there are others afflicted with this problem, it makes me feel like I'm not so weak.

I hated the second one the most because it had exactly 5 pages of plot and the rest of it was Bella moping around and acting like an idiot. I think Bella Swan might possibly be the worst female character in any book ever.

Posted by: Emily at September 18, 2008 6:16 PM

Samantha T and Lindsey: I hear you, my sisters. And I too was mocked for reading.

I read this series with my 17 year old step-daughter. It gave us something to talk about, which was a nice change from the bored silence I usually get from her. Is it great literature? No, but it was entertaining mind candy.

Posted by: lori at September 18, 2008 6:19 PM

Ms. Larson,

I would really hate to exacerbate your dislike of these books, and had you not admitted that you were going to continue reading them, I wouldn't be trying to inflame you now (there's enuff of that crap going around here now to add to it).

But what is even worse than the sympathy I feel for you having to endure these storylines in the future is the possibility that we, your fans, would not have you to write about them, and that would be the true tragedy here.

Young lady, I'm old enough to be (*ahem*, tugs at collar)-- your very young, dashing uncle, & I have no other reason to write this than to say your vitriolic rant was a smiling, laughing riot of wordage that I had to get home from work and read parts of again out loud just so I could laugh at it in the private lunacy of my own home. I mean, it truly reaches 'Rowles-ian' heights of disgust, which is the best compliment I can think of now.

So anyways, just as a fellow admirer-- please assure us you'll provide the other reviews of this series. You OWN this now, chile, best accept it.

No WAY am I ever gonna touch one of these books, but reading your review makes me feel like I know the thing inside and out, and you turn all the boring parts into the best parts.

Good Writers, you people.

Posted by: TMax at September 18, 2008 7:40 PM

Breathe deeply and concentrate on this: September 19th is International Talk Like A Pirate Day: tacit permission to drink all the rum in the world and wash the evilness of Stephanie Meyer out of your cortex.

Posted by: YeahButNoBut at September 18, 2008 8:27 PM

Why is it always a human girl and a vampire guy? I'd fuck a vampire girl, and I used to be an attractive guy. Back when I was 14 and socially retarded.

Dammit.

Posted by: Lucas at September 18, 2008 10:32 PM

I was never a fan of the vampire novel/movie/cultural icon. The best and only vamp worth watching is Nosferatu.

Posted by: Devo at September 18, 2008 10:53 PM

I absolutely adore these reviews.

I think after this you need to review "The Da Vinci Code", which sounds like it might not be the stupidity of these books, but would come awfully close. I know it's the only book that's made me as angry as New Moon made you.

In fact, there needs to be a column reviewing best-selling books, because most of the ones at the top are complete shit, and someone as good at this as Sarah is needs to tear those hacks a new one.

Posted by: figgylicious at September 19, 2008 1:13 AM

New Moon is like what would happen if a coven of mentally delayed witches got high as hell and concocted a brew made up of Romeo & Juliet, "Roswell" the series, a random assortment of romance novel clichés, The Dive from Clausen's Pier, and some disjointed vampire and werewolf stories told to them by a seven-year-old with ADHD. Then the witches feed the brew to a grizzled old dog with rabies, wait for the product of the resulting intestinal distress, smear it all over some paper, and have the unmitigated gall to call it a novel.
Out of the entire review, which is a solid block of awesome, this! Is the win.

I have not read these books, and am now afraid of getting within twenty feet of a copy of one, lest I somehow be infected. Do they put something in the ink, d'ya think?

Also, I think figgylicious's idea about reviewing bestsellers should be investigated. I love to read the results of your suffering.

Posted by: Jerce at September 19, 2008 1:46 AM

STOP IT STOP IT STOP IT FOR THE LOVE OF GOD STOP IT.

How about a deal? You review "Let the Right One In", and I'll go over to Stephenie Meyer's house and break all off her fingers so she can't type, rip out her tongue so she can't dictate, and rip off her eyelids so she can't blink to the letters of the alphabet.

Deal?

Posted by: Cookie at September 19, 2008 5:03 AM

I second (third? fourth?) the idea of a column reviewing bestselling books, and along with Da Vinci Code, I'd love to see Eat, Pray, Love get the Pajiba treatment.

I have read the first book in this series, and like everyone else seems to be saying, I couldn't stop reading it. So much so that when I was about 3/4 of the way through, I went out and bought books 2, 3 and 4 so that I wouldn't have to wait a single minute to start reading the next books. Then I fininshed the first book and realized that whilst I couldn't stop reading it, I actually hated it and thought it was the biggest pile of steaming dogshit that had reached number-one-bestseller, oh-my-god-its-the-next-harry-potter, publishing-phenomenon status. So now, I have all four books sitting on my shelf, but I staunchly refuse to read the rest of them. So thankyou Ms Larson for your highly enjoyable review, and I can't wait to read your next one.

Also, as far as the whole "reading any book is better than none" discussion, I agree to a certain extent - I was obsessed with the Baby Sitters Club and Enid Blyton books when I was a kid, then Trebizon and random fantasies at highschool, and none of those were great brain food, but definitely were instrumental in making me a fast, efficient reader and I did eventually develop more Pajiban tastes. However, I have to point out that in none of the tripe I read as a kid, was the main character so horribly, disappointingly, disgustingly weak and co-dependant. Looking back, the Babysitters Club sucks, but ultimately, it was about a group of girls starting their own business, and whilst they definitely cared about clothes (especially Claudia, with her oft-described bohemian outfits, and Stacey with her "sophistication"!!) and boys (although, Maryanne totally survived without Logan, and none of the others had anything near co-dependant relationships at all), all of them could be seen as 'role-models' (I am using the term loosely) to some extent. And those books were still totally addictive! It is not necessary to write complete tripe in order to write delicious fiction. Stupid, stupid Stephanie Meyers.

It kind of makes me realize how awesome Harry Potter was: it appealed to every audience imaginable; was massively engaging and un-put-downable; had (almost always) watertight plots; was filled with fleshed-out, non-stereotypical, believable characters; and had at its centre heroes who were both wonderful and fallible... JK Rowling should beat Stephanie Meyers around the head with a quaffle bat.

Posted by: JJ McClay at September 19, 2008 5:43 AM

Dear God, Ms Larson, you are one brave woman to have subjected yourself to the travesty of 'literature' that is New Moon.

If I wasn't spending my time trying to think of ways to massacre Bella Swan in the most enduringly painful method possible (and Stephenie Meyer for creating such vitriolic, heinous and inexplicably published crap), then I would be saluting you for your bravery.

I only hope you have the strength (and adequate brain power) to review the last two before your brain decides to melt in an effort to preserve itself from any further Twilight torment.

Posted by: CamillaV at September 19, 2008 6:59 AM

I'm a hot white single girl, I feel lonely... What I really need is love, Feel free to chat with me on(([___"interracialchatting.com"___])) where i upload my photos and many black or white singles seeking love online.

Posted by: liin at September 19, 2008 11:43 AM

Behold, those in need of a place of solace! I bring a gift:

www.twilightsucks.com

I suck miserably at html, so I have also linked my name. See what I do for you people? I sacrifice my own blog link!

Posted by: Blonde Savant at September 19, 2008 12:15 PM

Ok so I'm chiming in late but: these books are like crack. I don't know what it is but I can't stop reading them. They're ok. I'm not in love with them, and I certainly don't have the hatred towards them as y'all do but I just can't put them down. I haven't read the last one yet but I'll get to it.

Oh and by the way, what the hell is with all the romance bashing. Seriously? All those haters obviously has never read a good romance novel. Get off your high horse. Jeez.

Posted by: Dee at September 19, 2008 12:35 PM

BWeaves -- you bet!

Posted by: Bev M. at September 19, 2008 2:14 PM

I feel like books are quite like movies. You have your entertaining ones that are mostly "OMG WHAT HAPPENS NEXT" but not really full of anything useful. You have your classics which can range from awesome (and transcend their period) to just dreadful, not because of personal preference but some are only good in the context of their time. Then you have great books that for whatever reason aren't classics, I guess because they're not old enough yet, but really teach you something.

Posted by: Devo at September 19, 2008 2:48 PM

Wow.

Okay. Well. Try reading the Sookie Stackhouse novels by Charlaine Harris. I've only read the first one (so please don't hurt me if they suck, too. Heh. Sorry.), but so far theses novels are shaping up to be what the Twilight series wanted to be. Vampires, mind-reading, and shapshifters! With southern accents!

Posted by: Nadha at September 19, 2008 3:08 PM

I bow down before this awesome review, which was better in its entirety than even a sliver of that dreadful series. I read the first three, at the behest of a confused English teacher who wanted to know if she was alone in finding them deeply disturbing. I assured her she was not and told her she owed me a bottle of very old scotch for making me endure such a travesty of "literature." I die a little every time I think that someone PUBLISHED this drivel. And no, I did not read the fourth book, nor will I.

One question: Has Meyer ever spent time with high school girls? If you mope around for more than a couple of weeks over some guy, at least one of your girlfriends (or you best enemy) is going to smack the ever loving crap out of you. Repeatedly. The fact that no one did tells you all you need to know about Bella.

Posted by: Reba at September 19, 2008 3:14 PM

I love that I'm not the only one up for this idea.

We're all just a pack of sadists.

Posted by: figgylicious at September 19, 2008 3:55 PM

READ THE REST. Do NOT listen to the people suggesting you stop.

Jesus people. If glass plates inspire that kind of freakout, imagine what poor Sarah will do when she has to talk about undead sperm and Reneesme.

Weird thing happened when I tried to read this series: in all fucking honesty? My chest started to burn. Like heartburn only WORSE. I actually thought I might be having a heart problem. I took these away from my 14 yr old impressionable (omg did I get to her in time?!) sister and gave her a hundred to spend on books at Hastings under the condition that she couldn't get a book from the YA section. So I can't suggest that you let your students read these books JustMO.

Posted by: Jon at September 19, 2008 4:12 PM

Wow, I love you. This may just be one of- oh, okay, I'll go there- THEE best review on this site. I just loved it.
If I allow my ego a say in the matter, I might just add that it sounds like something I would write if I ever forced myself to read these horrible books. (Yes, I am equating myself with your greatness, HA! You can't stop me!)

Thanks for such a funny review, it really hit the spot.

Posted by: staylor at September 19, 2008 5:30 PM

Doesn't Edward try to commit suicide by public sparkling? That's what I read on the synopsi (or whatevs the plural of that is) on the sparkle motion blog. Which is my definitive source of this series. Comedy gold.

Posted by: Pheagan at September 21, 2008 2:02 AM

"Doesn't Edward try to commit suicide by public sparkling?"

In a roundabout sort of way, that's exactly what he does. Now what the holy hell is the sparkle motion blog? I could look it up, but I'm more than a little afraid of what I'll find. The Twilight fandom seems to be built entirely out of shit from my nightmares.

Posted by: Sarina at September 21, 2008 3:19 AM

I laughed through this entire review. It's essentially everything I thought about the book abbreviated (I rant) and enhanced with the most creative profanity I've yet read. Bravo.

Posted by: Kat at September 21, 2008 5:36 AM

I want to wipe my ass with this book.

[And for the curious who want to be spared the full brunt of idiocy, I suggest checking out Cleolinda's LJ for recaps, brief excerpts, and incredulous commentary of the whole series.]

Posted by: BlueBombardier at September 21, 2008 1:28 PM

I'm telling you, Meyers diddles the brain, and diddles it well.

Posted by: Jessica at September 21, 2008 8:42 PM

I would like to personally apologize on behalf of my generation for making this series popular. This obviously means a social handicap for the majority of teenage girls who probably now purposely fall over and try to hurt themselves because that means Cedric Diggory... I mean a gorgeous vampire will fall in love with you.
The only one I think worth reading about is Jasper. And Alice... but that's mainly because she stole a porsche.

Posted by: Lauralyn at September 22, 2008 4:50 PM

For all of you out there who think New Moon was stupid and worthless.... SCREW YOU! New Moon was amazing and full of curiousity of what is going to happen to Edward and Bella's relationship which is what kept me reading.

Posted by: hannah at November 9, 2008 11:00 AM

For all of you out there that think New Moon was worthless....SCREW YOU! I think New Moon was full of excitement and curiousity of what was going to happen to Edward and Bella's relationship, which is what kept me reading. Stephenie Meyer is an AMAZING author and shouldn't think other wise for those of you who are on crack and didn't like New Moon.

Posted by: hannah at November 9, 2008 11:06 AM

i love all of the books.... there like my heart and everything... im in love with edward hes sooooo goood looking. omg im in love with him

Posted by: shanice johnson at November 12, 2008 10:59 AM

Sarina...

YOU brought this evil into our swamp.

YOU brought the birds here.

And the birthday-ruining movie's not even out yet.

Posted by: Jay at November 12, 2008 11:05 AM

well i only read twilight and the first chapter of new moon and im very anxoius to read new moon. i don't care what anyone thinks about the book...i like it i find it pretty interesting. it really pulls you in and makes you wanna keep reading it and now i cant wait to see the movie and i cant wait to read the rest of the saga!!!!

Posted by: Indya at November 24, 2008 12:42 PM

ANGRY MUCH? WHY READ ALL FOUR IF IT WAS AGONY EVERY STEP OF THE WAY? anyway, im a little too old to be reading the teenage saga... but i think half the fun is because its almost impossible...step outside reality, find pleasure in simple things, stop being angry at people for writing books that many enjoy when you are the jackass who didnt stop at one...

Posted by: CupCake at November 26, 2008 1:18 PM

hihi it's hihi. i think they books were good. they had an interesting plot and pulled you in. and for heaven's sake, please leave edward alone. talk about bella all you want, but DO NOT talk about edward. he can TAKE YOUR HEAD OFF.

Posted by: HIHI at December 29, 2008 2:54 PM

hey,i love your books but sometimes we all just get bored of reading so i think on your web page you should have something for us to sign up at and then we pick a chapter that were on and it will read us that chapter then well have to read a few more chapters then we could go back and it will read it to us


thank you!
katie

P.S. please think about this cool idea.

Posted by: katie at December 30, 2008 12:27 PM

I dont understand why you have bothered writing the review if you hate the series so much?
Why waste youre time on something that you don't seem to give a shit about.
If you're going to be critical lets see you make the perfect story with an amazing storyline and get it made into a movie.

Posted by: Chloex at January 8, 2009 3:24 PM

I've read all four, rapidly. I'm 42, reasonably bright and was compelled to just keep reading them. I can't help but think that if Edward had followed Emmett's advice to not worry about one slip in Twilight, the rest of them (vampires, werewolves and readers) would have been better off.

The books have done one profound thing to me - awakened my dormant women's libber. I did enjoy reading them but the messages horrified me. (Anyone else worry that she's making REALLY rough sex sound just wonderful - and what that could do to the young girls who seem to worship this book? Or how about the idea that getting married and having a baby as a teenager will deliver all of your dreams and more? Aaarrrrgh!) The expression and loose plots were also hard to stomach.

Also, as Harry Potter copped a bashing from the Christian fundamentalists in the US, who on Earth are they praising this one with it's embedded horrific themes? Victim as heroine anyone?

I'm now in self prescribed reading therapy, reading well written adult books to recover. I'll be fine again soon.

Posted by: Sal at January 21, 2009 5:08 AM

I've read all four, rapidly. I'm 42, reasonably bright and was compelled to just keep reading them. I can't help but think that if Edward had followed Emmett's advice to not worry about one slip in Twilight, the rest of them (vampires, werewolves and readers) would have been better off.

The books have done one profound thing to me - awakened my dormant women's libber. I did enjoy reading them but the messages horrified me. (Anyone else worry that she's making REALLY rough sex sound just wonderful - and what that could do to the young girls who seem to worship this book? Or how about the idea that getting married and having a baby as a teenager will deliver all of your dreams and more? Aaarrrrgh!) The expression and loose plots were also hard to stomach.

Also, as Harry Potter copped a bashing from the Christian fundamentalists in the US, who on Earth are they praising this one with it's embedded horrific themes? Victim as heroine anyone?

I'm now in self prescribed reading therapy, reading well written adult books to recover. I'll be fine again soon.

Posted by: Sal at January 21, 2009 5:15 AM

From: http://community.livejournal.com/i_hate_twilight/99890.html

"Is he drunk? Is he so over trying to sell this crap? Is he just an idiot?

Anyway, what I'm referring to is Rob Pattinson's rambling, offensive, mostly incoherent and absolutely wonderful response to E! channel movie reviewer Ben Lyons' question: What do you think it is that has people so enamored with the world of Twilight?

Pattinson: Well, I mean, I think people -- there's a thing about the books where, uh, when I was reading them, I, ugh, I didn't know how to read it from, you know, teenage g-- or any woman's perspective, I guess. I don't really know why they like it. But what I thought was weird about it, the, what, the reaction I had with it was ... umm.... When I read it, it seemed like (grimaces) I was convinced that ... Stephenie was ... convinced that she was Bella, and uh, and you, it wasn't, it was like it was a book that wasn't supposed to be published, like reading her ... her sort of sexual fantasy about some -- especially when she says that it was based on a dream, and it's like, "Oh, then I had a dream about this really sexy guy" and she just writes this book about it, and there's some things about Edward that are just so specific that it's like, I was just convinced that, that this woman is mad, she's completely mad, and she's in love with her own fictional creation and I -- sometimes you, like, feel uncomfortable reading this thing, and I think a lot of people feel the same way, that it's kind of voyeuristic, ah, and it creates this sick pleasure in a lot of ways. But then it kind of introduces a lot of the, the action elements and it's very honest and really really honest and that's kind of what's weird about it.

***

Um ... what?

And the best part is Ben Lyons is just kind of sitting there, watching, with this blank non-committal look on his face, like he's afraid to agree or disagree or even register that this guy is speaking at all. It's freaking fantastic.


Hear, hear! Even the heart throb star of the movie feels creepy reading it.

Posted by: Sal at January 21, 2009 5:25 AM

Link to video of the above referenced interview: http://au.eonline.com/uberblog/lyons_den/b68239_rob_pattinson_on_whats_weird_about.html

Robert Pattinson doesn't seem incoherant to me, just wonderfully honest. :)

Posted by: Sal at January 22, 2009 7:14 AM

i love these books even if only read first one

Posted by: taylor at January 22, 2009 6:20 PM

i love this book and i can't wait for the movie!!!!!!

Posted by: des at January 27, 2009 11:22 AM