web
counter
 

nakedeconomics.jpg
100 Books in One Year: Naked Economics by Charles Wheelan

Cannonball Read / Sean K.

Book Reviews | January 29, 2009 | Comments (8)


I consider myself to be fairly knowledgeable and well-read. Enough so, anyway, to make informed political decisions and discuss them with a degree of expertise. Before the election, in a discussion with my sister-in-law (who works for the government and is smarter than I) regarding the economic policies being proposed, it became clear that I was in over my head. I don’t like that feeling. Naked Economics is the book she recommended to remedy my ignorance.

In Naked Economics, Charles Wheelan has accomplished the impossible: he’s written a book on economics (“the dismal science”) that is an entertaining read. As the title would imply, he’s stripped down the basic concepts of economics — shunning mathematics, formulas, graphs, and cryptic terms — and explained things using common-sense terms, real-world examples and simple logic. Concepts from basic economic policy theory through government finance, from financial markets to the Federal Reserve are explained in layman’s terms. Wheelan explains, in a clear and non-biased manner, things like how recessions occur, can be prevented and can be reversed, the perils of inflation and control of the money supply, why Mc-fucking-Donald’s is successful enough to be the worldwide bane of my existence, and why Bill Gates is rich enough to abscond with me in the darkness and sell me into slavery at will.

Despite this “idiot’s guide” approach to the topic, the book never comes off as condescending, and never treats its reader like an idiot. It’s a thorough, entertaining and humorous discussion of Econ 101 that trades GDP equations for plain-English explanations and the kind of real-life anecdotes that made me think: “Oh, I get it!” Having read Naked Economics, I certainly feel more qualified to discuss economic policy with people at or above my intelligence level, at least in as much as I can state that “[proposed economic action/policy] is or is not a good idea because it could cause [result] and may incite [result] to happen” with a fair amount of confidence. Even a normal grasp of economics such as this will allow me to do one of my very favorite things: feel smarter than other people.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details are here and the growing number of participants and their blogs are here. And check here for more of Sean K’s reviews.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Tomb Raider Reboot | The Damned United Trailer









Comments

I too, consider myself to be rather well informed, but have no idea what to make of the clusterfuck that is the current economic situation. I'll definitely be picking this up; great review!

Posted by: Marra at January 29, 2009 9:41 AM

Thanks for the tip Sean K., I think this is going to have to go on the list of books I borrow/check out/buy in another book binge.

Posted by: Mike R. at January 29, 2009 9:50 AM

I never ever thought I'd consider reading a book about economics, but I may have to give this a shot.

Posted by: Julie at January 29, 2009 11:51 AM

wait, you mean there's no guns vs butter diagram?

Thanks for bringing this book to my attention. I have an econ degree, and although I primarily studied emerging economies, I can't pretend to understand how we got into the mess we're in.

It sounds like a great read.

Posted by: Stella at January 29, 2009 1:01 PM

How can you explain in a non-biased manner a topic whose nature is still up for discussion?

I may check this out. I personally recommend Peter Schiff's Crash Proof.

Posted by: Eep at January 29, 2009 1:14 PM

If you like this book I would recommend both Predictably Irrational and Thomas Sowell's Basic Economics. Both will make you feel superior to others. Excellent.

Posted by: c at January 29, 2009 2:14 PM

I loved that book, although I wouldn't buy into economic theories too far. You'd think that if the theories were that valuable we'd be better at predicting recessions and depressions, but usually economists are far better at explaining something after the fact.

Thomas Sowell is really good too...

Posted by: j at January 29, 2009 4:52 PM

I read that book in college after taking Intro to Economics. It made me decide to stay and be an Econ major.

Posted by: Daniel Shi at February 1, 2009 3:02 AM