web
counter
 

Jane Eyre by Charlotte Bronte

By ShinyKate | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (50)



jane_eyre_04_465x370.jpg

If nothing else, the Cannonball Read is teaching me that the more I care about a book, the harder it is for me to write about it. In the light of recent personal events, I was having a hard time delving into Jane Eyre’s love story without my own romantic baggage weighing my interpretation down. At the very least, I can still say that I bristle whenever someone compares the Twilight series to Charlotte Bronte’s best known novel. However, I didn’t want to spend the review going on and on about how one version of ideal love is better than another, mainly because I don’t think Meyers’ series deserves so much of my time and energy. There is one difference I can mark without hesitation, and something I don’t think is discussed enough when Jane Eyre is brought up. Unlike Twilight or most other romantic novels, Jane Eyre is much more than the author’s romantic fantasy transcribed onto paper. In fact, the title’s subheading reads, “An Autobiography,” not “A Love Story.” While it’s tempting to think mainly of the novel’s love story (admittedly, it is pretty swoon-worthy), to focus only on that is to give short shrift to a complex and broad-scoped tale. In many ways, Jane Eyre is Bronte’s autobiography. I wouldn’t call it strictly factual, but the heroine’s story touches on the variety of struggles, concerns, pet peeves, and wishes of an educated, imaginative, single woman without money in 19th Century England.

In the first few chapters, we focus on Jane’s childhood as an orphan living first as a dependent with unsympathetic relatives, then at a religiously affiliated boarding school. Through Jane’s relatives, the Reed family, Bronte makes her first attacks on an unfair social structure of her time, illustrating through her characters that money and a good family line do not necessarily make better individuals. This may seem pretty elementary to many 21st century readers, but linking money and status with personal worth was a surprisingly common mindset in Bronte’s time (even more so than today). When Jane enters Lowood School, run by the cruel and hypocritical Brocklehurst, Bronte takes the opportunity to condemn those whose faith inspires false piety and heartlessness (Pat Robertson would do well to read those chapters). On the other side of the coin, Jane learns through a close friend that though some Christians behave monstrously in the name of their faith, it is not worth condemning the faith itself altogether. A belief in a benevolent, loving, supreme being can inspire serenity, compassion, forgiveness, and courage. This is the faith that Jane adopts. Combined with an almost pantheistic belief in Nature, whom she deems a spiritual “Mother,” it guides her principles and actions throughout the story.

The narrative flashes forward several years, leading Jane to Mr. Rochester and their well-known love story. While it is undeniably moving, passionate, and charming (they really do make a wonderful couple), there are elements to their initial courtship that make even the heroine uneasy. He is secretive, domineering, possessive, and takes a disconcerting pride in being Jane’s only loved one in the world. Loving him as intensely as she does, Jane worries that he is becoming an idol to her, and that she may fall under a sort of passionate bewitchment where her will is no longer quite her own. When circumstances make it clear to Jane that she can not stay true to both Rochester and herself, she chooses herself. (You hear that, Ms. Meyers?) The choice to leave him is excruciating, but she goes. The heartbreak, combined with the physical hardships she encounters, quite literally almost kills her.

It is only much later, when Jane has developed a life, a will, and loved ones of her own, that she is ready to love romantically again. When she does marry, it is as an “independent” woman with money to care for herself, and a position that frees her from personal obligation to others. She has discovered and bonded with distant relatives, creating a loving family life of her own, plus an intimate circle of friends. (Seriously Ms. Meyers, I hope you’re taking notes.) When she finds love again, she is thus able to approach her partner on a more equal footing with him. In fact, circumstances make her husband dependent on her for a little while. This brief period evens the scales between them, making them lifelong equals and peers. As such, they become best friends “at once as free as in solitude, as gay as in company.” This bolsters their romantic relationship, making it richer and more fulfilling for both partners as the marriage progresses.

This last point may seem like common sense to many readers today. However, in the 19th century, taking such a stance on romantic love was quite unusual. Transcending the dichotomy of love and autonomy was a step very much ahead of the author’s time. Throughout the book, Bronte also manages to reconcile reason with passion, Christianity with Paganism, and scathing social critique with a forgiving idealism. Though it is often written off as a girly, romantic novel, it is actually a highly fictionalized autobiography, written by an insightful, though lonely, female Transcendentalist. Through the heroine’s life (especially through her romantic involvements) Bronte proposed ideas and confessed truths about individuality in regards to womanhood that had previously been ignored or unconsidered by her culture. With the widespread popularity of romances like Twilight and reality shows where individuals compete with one another for attention and affection, I’m concerned that such ideas are slipping out of our cultural mindset. I’m almost tempted to keep a stash of copies of Jane Eyre at the ready. Anytime a girl or young woman intimates that the Twilight romance is the ideal love story, or gives signs of wrapping up her self-worth in how much (particularly male) attention she gets, or lets her life revolve entirely around an individual or cultural mindset without taking the time to make up her mind for herself first, I’d really, really like to give them a copy of Bronte’s novel.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of ShinyKate’s reviews, check out her blog, The Aspiring Jedi.









Blog Trends from My Bunk 01/14/10 | Kathryn Bigelow Attached to "Held by the Taliban"













Comments

Splendid review. I've read this one several times (and was often derided for being a man who outspokenly enjoyed "feminist lit"), always loved the dignity and honesty of the novel. The fact that Charlotte merely gave a picture of the situations and said what her heart told her (not what was ultimately right or wrong) was always attractive to me.

Posted by: ThunderSacTriumph at January 15, 2010 8:29 AM

Ok,you reviewed the one book that could bring me out of hiding. This is my very favorite book and I read it at least once (if not twice) a year. I also love the picture, that is the best Jane Eyre movie EVER!!!! Whoa, ok gotta calm down...you guys are gonna start calling me a Eyrehard or a Janehead...or what ever you call those Twilight nuts. This might sound strange but, one of the things I love about Jane Eyre most is it always gives an extra boost to my faith in God and in Humanity and it makes me think of my life and if there are ways I need to improve. This book is about so many things and as mentioned above there is the theme of Christianity and Paganism. But for me the overarching theme for the book has always been triumph over adversity by making moral choices and keeping forgiveness in your heart. And for me is has made the book so powerful and meaningful because in my mind morality and purity are the essence of staying true to your self....throw in that forgiving heart and THEN you have a recipe for romance and one of the best books ever written.

Posted by: radiantjezzy at January 15, 2010 8:37 AM

Thank you for an insightful review. This is one of my favorite novels, and I think you've conveyed the tone and spirit of the work without succumbing to the urge to romanticize the story.

Posted by: becky at January 15, 2010 8:37 AM

With the widespread popularity of romances like Twilight and reality shows where individuals compete with one another for attention and affection, I’m concerned that such ideas are slipping out of our cultural mindset.

Amen. Also, although I dislike this book, I love your review for summarizing such complex material and explaining its importance to women and to history.

Posted by: caroline at January 15, 2010 9:03 AM

I'm loving the contrast between this review and one that was posted last year.

I have just realised I've never read any of the Bronte books. That's kind of terrible of me I think. I'll add Jane Eyre to my list. I have seen an adaptation so I know the basic gist of the story, but obviously it's not the same.

Posted by: Carrie (aka Teabelly) at January 15, 2010 9:03 AM

I love this book but I've never seen any film adaptations of it... so I think I'll get on that.

Posted by: bat at January 15, 2010 9:11 AM

Carrie beat me to it, the review that was up last year started a storm of comments, this one is very well thought out and I appreciate ShinyKate's effort. Long live smart independent women!

Posted by: Irina at January 15, 2010 9:16 AM

I've mostly heard Twilight being compared to Wuthering Heights, which makes sense, because what they two novels have in common are self-absorbed, unredeemable, melodramatic assholes. I kept waiting for someone to learn a lesson and become likable, and it never happened. Anyway, great review, and if anyone wants more Bronte, I highly suggest reading Villette, my favorite Bronte novel of them all.

Posted by: DawnDraper at January 15, 2010 9:19 AM

Well done, K.O.! Shiny!

Posted by: socalledonlycousins at January 15, 2010 9:39 AM

Where have all you Bronte lovers been? Usually whenever there's a hint of Yorkshire literature from a certain family on Pajiba, there's a hate storm in the comments. Glad to see there are some who appreciate the sisters.
Although ShinyKate, I have to take exception to this: "it is actually a highly fictionalized autobiography". It can't be both: a book of fiction can be loosely based on a life experience (which parts were) or it can be a factual autobiography. It can't be both. It's the blurring of those lines that have led to the so-called "memoirs" that we have been getting in recent years that allow writers to beef up the drama where it never happened.

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 15, 2010 9:41 AM

Oh come on DawnDraper, aren't you being a little unfair to Katherine Earnshaw to call her a "self-absorbed, unredeemable, melodramatic asshole"?

Posted by: PaddyDog at January 15, 2010 9:44 AM

OH, how lovely. This is one of my favorite books as well, though I've never been able to articulate why quite as well as this. Now I'm going to have to pull it out again, as it's been a few years since I read it last. Thank you!

Posted by: Anna von Beaverpuppet at January 15, 2010 10:00 AM

Whoa, whoa, PaddyDog. -Charlotte- Bronte. *not* Emily or the other one. From what I've read, Charlotte was crippled by not only being a woman in her time, but by having to acquiesce to her pact with her sisters in regards to how and when things were written. Jane Eyre deserves to be removed from the umbrella of "Yorkshire literature from a certain family". The family didn't write it, Charlotte did.

Emily Bronte was an idiot, if Wuthering Heights was any indication: a self-congratulatory idiot with a thesaurus.

Posted by: Kat at January 15, 2010 11:08 AM

Aaand, now I'm off to pick up a copy for my niece... I'm just ashamed I didn't think of it on my own. The poor girl suffers from a family who have been harping on her since KINDERGARTEN to get herself a boyfriend and always coo over how "sexy" she looks when trying to convince her to lose her athletic duds in favor of some tighter, skimpier look.

Posted by: theotherboo at January 15, 2010 11:58 AM

Well written, ShinyKate. A romance is always more interesting and powerful when it's written in a context--especially one that strengthens the individual characters.

Posted by: kelsy at January 15, 2010 11:59 AM

Great review, Kate!! I'm a terrible ex-English major, I've never read this!! But I'm trying to work backwards and catch up. I'm definitely adding this to the list, solely based on your review. Awesome job, lady.

Posted by: MyySharona (formerly Sharon) at January 15, 2010 12:00 PM

If you are looking for a (mostly) faithful rendition of Jane Eyre onto film, you should check out the 1983 version with Timothy Dalton (!) and Zelah Clarke. This is the only version that doesn't just skim over her childhood and the time she spends living with her long-lost relatives. Also Clarke is amazing as Jane. And Dalton does a decent job as Rochester.

Posted by: sandyk at January 15, 2010 12:28 PM

Nice review! The first time I read this book, Jane's decision to leave made me absolutely crazy. It's still a little perplexing to me, but I love your well-considered analysis of why she did it. Very cool.

Posted by: Sbrown at January 15, 2010 1:39 PM

PaddyDog: I stand by my description of all the horrible characters in Wuthering Heights. From where I stand, Catherine is elitist, selfish and petulant. And also a giant bitch. But I'm eager to hear why you disagree.

Posted by: DawnDraper at January 15, 2010 1:47 PM

Nicely done Kate!

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at January 15, 2010 1:54 PM

I have to take exception to this: "it is actually a highly fictionalized autobiography". It can't be both: a book of fiction can be loosely based on a life experience (which parts were) or it can be a factual autobiography. It can't be both. It's the blurring of those lines that have led to the so-called "memoirs" that we have been getting in recent years that allow writers to beef up the drama where it never happened.
Posted by: PaddyDog

It can be both if it wants to be. Did you know that writers can write whatever they want and call it whatever they want, that it's the publishers that force square pegs into round holes?

Posted by: Brenton at January 15, 2010 2:19 PM

I read Jane Eyre when I was WAY too young to appreciate it, and therefore hated it. I think I was maybe 8 or 9. The latest Masterpiece Theatre offering got me more interested in it, and so did this excellent review. I must give it another go.

Another reason I've never revisited the Jane Eyre was because I hated Wuthering Heights, even though it was written by a sister of the author and not the author herself. Now WH I read as a teenager in a class and had it explained to me, and I still hated it.

Also, when watching the Masterpiece Theatre version, I was always distracted by Jane's froglips. What is up with those things?

Posted by: BWeaves at January 15, 2010 2:41 PM

Great review. I've loved this book since I was a kid. Everyone should read it at least once.

Posted by: Mrs Smith at January 15, 2010 3:04 PM

It's so funny that this review went up today because I was just thinking yesterday about what I should read next, and I was considering re-reading Jane Eyre so that I could give Marcus the scathing review he wanted from me.

I'm with caroline on this one -- great review by ShinyKate. Even though I'm not a big fan of the book, I can appreciate that personal experience makes this book really resonate with you. That's how I felt about 500 Days of Summer. I know that some people didn't like it, but it really spoke to me.

Personally, though, I like Jane Austen so much better than any of the Brontë sisters. But kudos on the review. :)

Posted by: Jelinas at January 15, 2010 4:15 PM

The first time I read this book, Jane's decision to leave made me absolutely crazy. It's still a little perplexing to me...

Really? It's set in the 19th century. Jane chose not to be a woman of "ill repute," unacceptable to proper society, which was both a sensible choice and in keeping with her morals which were established from the first chapters.

By the way, neither Jane nor Mr. Rochester is supposed to be attractive, which I imagine sets up a problem for film adaptations. It always bugs me when the actors are attractive, but I do understand the dilemma of asking viewers to sympathize with and watch a pair of unattractive people for two hours. Such is our appearance-prejudiced world.

Posted by: Lilly at January 15, 2010 5:55 PM

I also read "Jane Eyre" when I was too young to appreciate it, and shortly after I first read (and developed my deep loathing and hate for "Wuthering Heights"). I was baffled by Jane's final choice, and could not understand it at all.

Luckily, I reread both books while studying English Lit at University. I discovered new and articulate reasons for why I hate "Wuthering Heights" and pretty much every single character in it, but I realized that I had been very wrong about "Jane Eyre" and that it's a truly wonderful book. I absolutely agree with you, ShinyKate, it should be read by all young women to give them a much better female ideal than the drippy Bella Swan.

Posted by: Malin at January 15, 2010 6:15 PM

Sorry, only have time for a quick blap.
All I can think of is "Jane Airhead" from SCTV.
But it's nice to see folks are still reading some classics, btw.

Posted by: Odnon at January 15, 2010 6:35 PM

This comment thread is entirely too civilized. Cannonball has been notorious recently! No pro/con religious rants? No one telling off the reviewer for no good reason? No psuedo-intellectual douchebag starting a flame war? No vagina jokes!? Whatever will become of the vagina jokes? I just don't know what to think about this.

Posted by: welldressed at January 15, 2010 8:50 PM

Yes, sandyk, the Timothy Dalton series is absolutely my favorite and best adaptation of the novel. It's thorough and engaging and I felt like the chemistry between the two actors represented the proper chemistry between Jane and Rochester. The latest Masterpiece Theater one to me started out fairly well and then sort of took a turn for the ridiculous and maudlin halfway through. I watched it with my parents, and we all decided to turn it off.

And DawnDraper, bonus points for Villette! Definitely Charlotte's most complex and interesting novel, though my lack of French made passages of it a bit frustrating. But I definitely second the recommendation, not so much for the romance but for Bronte's fascinating perspective on religion, power, and Englishness.

...Can you tell that I just wrote a term paper on that novel?

Posted by: kalexal at January 16, 2010 10:47 AM

Me too, kalexal!!

Posted by: DawnDraper at January 16, 2010 6:30 PM

Thank you so much for the lovely review! Jane Eyre is my favourite book, and I could never have articulated why as beautifully as you just did.

Posted by: Tierney at January 16, 2010 8:32 PM

is there a chance of becoming immortal with your friends and family in Jane Eyre. is there women who would literally die giving birth rather then try to abort and unborn child. in it.
if there is not i won't read it. i just don't like things that make immortality with your family and friends going through it with you look like a curse as it is portrayed in harry potter. God has immortality and he's not cursed. and twilight has been the answer to my prayers.

Posted by: Utah Dynamo at January 17, 2010 2:20 AM

Struggling in the early part of your career? http://AgelessMeet.com/ opens opportunities to meet attractive young girls and treat you like a king.

Posted by: Helen at January 17, 2010 5:41 AM

Though I prefer Austen over the Bronte sisters, I do love Jane Eyre quite passionately. Such a thoughtful review--great job, ShinyKate! It's nice to hear some love for 19th century lit on Pajiba, since it's decried as boring way too often.

Posted by: bonnie at January 17, 2010 6:36 PM

I must admit, I was in the group fo people who read it when too young to appreciate it (it's my mom's favourite book, so she recommended it to me, and I didn't enjoy it much). Austen I loved right from the get-go, but the Brontes never really seemed to do it for me.

That said, I've been meaning to give it another try for a while...ever since reading Jasper Fforde's "The Eyre Affair", actually (and watching a few different filmic versions that didn't seem to match up with my negative memories). This review definitely makes for an even stronger case. ^^

I think the representations in the 2006 BBC version of Rochester and Jane seemed to me to be the best balance between "normal-looking" and "pretty enough to be seen on TV"...striking/interesting without being conventionally handsome people. ^^

Posted by: DaftSteampunk at January 18, 2010 7:30 PM

Fabulous review.
There are passages of prose in Jane Eyre which are so well written they strike to the core (e.g., Jane's appraisal of the society, interactions and incidents during her evenings sitting in the window booth whilst the Ingrams visited).
As for film adaptation, although it did slice much of the book out, for pure information and passion exhibited in 90 minutes, the 1997 Hinds/Morton version is my favourite. I feel that these two embody CB's descriptions of the pair in the books. And the chemistry between the two actors, imo is unparalleled.

Posted by: KarenUK at February 1, 2010 2:24 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think...

Posted by: instantempo at November 19, 2010 10:33 AM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: lavoro da casa at December 7, 2010 10:08 AM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: Jonathon Pouch at January 6, 2011 1:54 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading signals at January 16, 2011 9:22 PM

Uhm... I don't really know what to think... but I have a question I'd like to ask you in private, ideally by email. How can I reach you?

Posted by: forex trading signals at January 17, 2011 11:44 AM

You sure do know what youre talking about. Man, this blog is just great! I cant wait to read more of what youve got to say. Im really happy that I came across this when I did because I was really starting to get bored with the whole blogging scene. Youve turned me around, man!

Posted by: discount Biaxin at January 19, 2011 2:55 AM

You have some honest ideas here. I done a research on the issue and discovered most peoples will agree with your blog. After that early period, the Beatles evolved considerably over the years.

Posted by: online pharmacy at January 20, 2011 12:22 AM

I admit, I have not been on this webpage in a long time... however it was another joy to see It is such an important topic and ignored by so many, even professionals. I thank you to help making people more aware of possible issues.Great stuff as usual.

Posted by: generic pills online at January 26, 2011 2:45 AM

I found your site from wikipedia and read a few of your other blog posts.They are cool. Pls continue this great work. Later on other fantastic American rock acts such as Lynrd Skynrd, The Eagles, America, the Allman Brothers, and the Doobie Brothers would come on the scene and shake up the world with their string of hit songs.

Posted by: Olaf at February 7, 2011 9:59 PM

I feel like you could probably teach a class on how to make a great blog. This is fantastic! I have to say, what really got me was your design. You certainly know how to make your blog more than just a rant about an issue. Youve made it possible for people to connect. Good for you, because not that many people know what theyre doing.

Posted by: Boss at February 10, 2011 11:43 PM

Thanks a lot for your time to have decided to put these things together on this blog site. Josh and that i very much liked your insight through your articles about certain things. I recognize that you have numerous demands in your schedule hence the fact that you actually took the maximum amount of time like you did to steer people really like us by means of this article is also highly appreciated.

Posted by: fare soldi at March 2, 2011 9:08 AM

I don't know if I see where you are comming from, but do indeed elaborate a little more. Thanks

Posted by: forex trading tips at March 11, 2011 1:33 PM

I was more than happy to seek out this web-site.I wished to thanks in your time for this excellent read!! I definitely having fun with each little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to take a look at new stuff you blog post.

Posted by: nice cardigans for men at March 16, 2011 5:34 PM

Kudos for the great article. I am glad I have taken the time to learn this.

Posted by: Cosmetic surgery at March 19, 2011 5:05 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time