web
counter
 

And Your 2009 - 2010 Cannonball Read Winner is ...

By Jen K. | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (35)



a_winner_is_you_1024.jpg

Jen K., who came in second in last year’s Cannonball Read (after starting late), has casually blown away the reading competition this year, completing 52 books in about four months, all while admirably serving our country. Congratulations, Jen K., and thank you so much for your continued participation.

In the Woods by Tana French.

I really, really liked this book. I actually only picked it up because I recently heard about the sequel, The Likeness, and figured I should read this one before I read the second one (which I will picking up very soon — not sure if it’s a good thing or a bad thing that I’m currently taking advantage of the free trial of Amazon Prime — I already have a huge “to read” pile due to my past month of Barnes and Noble visits).

The initial set up and description reminded me of Mystic River. One summer day over twenty years ago, a trio of young friends from the neighborhood go play in the woods. After the search parties start looking only one of them is found, clinging to a tree, scratches in his t-shirt, and blood in his shoes. The other two, Peter and Jamie, are never found. Obviously the parallels aren’t perfect but it is still that idea of one summer day changing things forever for a trio of friends, though in this case it is unclear what happened to two of them.

In the novel’s present day, Rob Ryan, the narrator, and his partner Cassie Maddox are sent to Knockaree to investigate the murder of a twelve-year-old girl, the same neighborhood and woods where Rob Ryan was found as a twelve-year-old when his two best friends disappeared. He is very conflicted about this case, afraid that it might be connected to his case, but also hoping it will help him find answers. Since twenty years ago everyone knew him as Adam Ryan, the connection isn’t obvious, and Rob is able to keep the investigation despite the possible conflict of interest. Cassie is the only one who knows of this, and she helps him hide the connection from their supervisor.

For the first half or two thirds of the novel, there is no clear answer. There are various possibilities as to the identity of the murderer but motive and evidence point to no one. Cassie took courses in psychology and is the closest the department has to a profiler, and something about the murder seems odd, forced. Katie, the victim, was a twelve-year-old ballet student about to leave the neighborhood for a prestigious dance school — was it a random pedophile or a jealous neighbor? Something seems off about the family — perhaps abuse? Her body was found at an archeological dig in the area, and the site was about to be destroyed by a new motorway — was it retribution or a warning to her father the leader of the local “Move the Motorway” movement? Or is it a serial killer returned? Nothing makes sense despite Cassie, Rob, and Sam’s best efforts (Sam was the third detective on the case to help the two partners — a new trio of sorts which parallels rather nicely with Rob’s original friends).

At first I suspected everyone, even Rob (actually, especially Rob) — after all, I believe there is an Agatha Christie novel (or possibly just a short story) that uses that exact set up — having the murderer be the narrator that seems just as baffled about the crime as the readers and the rest of the characters. Also, given this opening paragraph to Chapter 1, it sort of makes sense to doubt him:

What I warn you to remember is that I am a detective. Our relationship with truth is fundamental but cracked, refracting confusingly like fragmented glass. It is the core of our careers, the endgame of every move we make, and we pursue it with strategies painstakingly constructed of lies and concealment and every variation on deception. The truth is the most desirable woman in the world and we are the most jealous lovers, reflexively denying anyone else the slightest glimpse of her. We betray her routinely, spending hours and days stupor-deep in lies, and then turn back to her holding out the lover’s ultimate Mobius strip: But I only did it because I love you so much … What I am telling you, before you begin my story, is this - two things: I crave the truth. And I lie. (3-4)

I generally don’t go on about descriptions or language, but I actually really enjoyed the writing style. As the novel progresses, the case clearly affects Rob more and more. It affects all of them but given Rob’s emotional involvement, it is not always clear if he is thinking straight. I leave it to everyone else to decide how they feel about Rob as a reliable narrator but I actually felt like he was rather honest. It was easy to see when he did things I disagreed with and despite the fact that he was the narrator, I occasionally thought he was wrong — he did not shy away from portraying himself in an unflattering light as the case went on.

Cassie and Rob have been partners for two years when they get the case, and they have been the perfect pair — she was the only woman in the murder squad, and she and Rob just clicked. They are not dating despite the vibe they appear to give off and they have an incredibly a strong bond and trust between them but there are early hints that something has changed by the time Rob begins writing his story. Rob mentions early on that they spent about a month on the case, but it was a crucial and defining month in their lives that would change things.

While the case is of course important and there are small clues throughout (I caught one early on though it concerned a weapon rather than a suspect), the relationships within the novel are just as interesting and important if not more so than the case. Additionally, Rob struggles with his past — he has forgotten almost everything from before he was 12, and spends the novel trying to face and recapture his old memories. I’m not sure if I am really doing this novel any justice at all but it was much more than a simple murder mystery novel, and the characters (at least Rob and Cassie) were well-developed and I will definitely be reading the sequel soon.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read. For more of Jen K’s reviews, check out her blog, Notes from the Officer’s Club.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Gone with the Pope Trailer | The Joneses Trailer









Comments

What is the name of the book she's reviewing here? Isn't It Obvious? A Winner is You? Am I missing it somewhere?

Great review anyway! And way to go Jen K! That is just CRAZY impressive!!!

Posted by: Snuggiepants the Deathbringer at March 2, 2010 8:17 AM

GAAAAAAAAAH! I just finished 32. I FEEL LIKE A FAILURE!

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at March 2, 2010 8:20 AM

Snuggiepants,
It was In the Woods by Tana French.
Thanks.

Posted by: Jen K. at March 2, 2010 8:24 AM

Well done Jen!! I am only at 20 something. I too feel like a yokel in comparison. :)

Posted by: Carrie at March 2, 2010 8:39 AM

Congrats, Jen K. I'm just hoping I'll finish.

Posted by: admin at March 2, 2010 9:11 AM

Crap, I'm only on book 10 - STILL stuck on Lolita, but I'm going to finish it dammit! Time to find a bunch of easy reads - I think I'll tear into The Dresden Files and Sookie Stackhouse.

Posted by: Commander Strikeher at March 2, 2010 9:17 AM

Congratulations Jen! I'm embarrassed to say I'm on book six. Nice review as well.

Posted by: Cindy at March 2, 2010 9:22 AM

GET AWAY FROM JEN K! SHE BELONGS TO GEEP! (it's written in the back of her underwear...when she decides to wear such things)

Posted by: gp at March 2, 2010 9:28 AM

Congratulations! You deserve a cake or some sort of delicious baked good for this.

Posted by: Caitlin at March 2, 2010 9:34 AM

Jen - YES. This was a great book. I'm wondering, though... What were your feelings on the ending? Did you feel a lack of closure with the, um, other storyline or do you just chalk it up to good literature?

Posted by: HeathPie at March 2, 2010 9:36 AM

Congratulation, Jen! That is just hugely impressive. I just finished, I think, #14 or so and I'm pretty burned out. I should have taken a year off between this year and last. But I'll soldier on, I'm a reader after all.

Very good review. I put this book on my list last time I was at Borders and it sounds good enough to pick up. After the next 10 or so in the front of the line that is.

Posted by: TylerDFC at March 2, 2010 9:47 AM

Geesh, I thought 28 was good. If I didn't have two kids, a full time job, and freelance gigs on the side, I might have given you a run for your money.

Posted by: mswas at March 2, 2010 10:00 AM

Jen! Congratulations!

Not only did you absolutely kick the butt of this challenge, your reviews are always substantial and thoughtful.

Posted by: caroline at March 2, 2010 10:03 AM

This book sounds really interesting (I don't know Mystic River so I'm just going off your description.)... and kinda freaky. While reading it, I kinda thought of Rob as Sandra Bullock from Murder by Numbers. I'll definitely check this out.

Posted by: dene at March 2, 2010 10:23 AM

also, i already mentioned this on facebook (YAY FACEBOOK) but congratulations! I knew you were gonna win since I started following you ages ago haha.

Posted by: dene at March 2, 2010 10:24 AM

And also congrats, Jen K. YOU HAVE BLOWN MY MIND.

Posted by: Pinky McLadybits at March 2, 2010 10:31 AM

Well done Jen! I'm between 4 and 5. (We should be on 17/18 by now.) In my defense, I talk to my family occasionally, I read magazines, watch the Olympics and have 2 1/2 jobs...

Stay safe and keep on reading!

Posted by: Amanda47 at March 2, 2010 10:40 AM

This book sounds really good. Will definitely look for it at the library!! Congrats Jen K!!

Posted by: grace b at March 2, 2010 10:52 AM

Just know a great celeb site ___Tallconnect CO M___ where you can me et many big beautiful wo man and hand some guys.

Posted by: garyll at March 2, 2010 10:57 AM

Nice work, Jen K.! As to In the Woods, I can't wholly agree with you. I do think Tana French is very skilled in terms of style. Truly, this book (and The Likeness) were really pleasurable reads in terms of prose, but I think the mysteries in both are a little simple. It's just dressed-up Mary Higgins Clark, not that there's anything wrong with that.

Posted by: The Wandering Parakeet at March 2, 2010 11:27 AM

Congratulations again!!!!

Posted by: Alli at March 2, 2010 12:02 PM

I've only blogged 30 books in the Cannonball Read so far, because I decided I read too many books that are very samey, and there is no way I can blog 2-3 paragraphs about each of them.

But even if I had blogged all the books I've read, I would not have reached 52 yet.

Congratulations, Jen K, it's an honor to be beaten by you.

Posted by: Malin at March 2, 2010 12:34 PM

Congratulations Jen K.! And thanks for the book recommendation. I've added it to my list of books to remember.

Posted by: tamatha at March 2, 2010 12:54 PM

Congrats. Obviously the best reader has won.

I just finished book 10 but I took the whole month of December off, so I don't feel so bad. Onward!

Posted by: FyreHaar at March 2, 2010 2:42 PM

I feel the same way that you do HeathPie. I was so into it, and the main plot I loved, but the end ending left me really cold. I will say she is an excellent writer and I thought she did a great job with character and mood. Maybe that's why I was so disappointed, she handled the rest of it so well even a minor fumble at the end stands out.

Posted by: lumenatrix at March 2, 2010 2:52 PM

Congratulations, Jen K!

Nice review, too.

Now 'suze me, I've got to go catch up on my reading and reviewing...

Posted by: ScienceGeek at March 2, 2010 4:34 PM

I agreed with you for the most part. I LOVED the first 80% of this book. But man-oh-man did I hate hate hate the ending. To the point where I don't really feel that I can recommend this book to friends, which is unfortunate.

The second book is excellent, though, and I definitely recommend it. It's told from Cassie's point of view, and I think she's a much more engaging narrator.

Posted by: the essence of fanciness and class at March 2, 2010 4:42 PM

Well done, Jen K! That was amazing. You are a super-reader and that's fo sho.

Pajiba is lucky to have you. :)

Posted by: Jelinas at March 2, 2010 4:44 PM

The Wandering Parakeet and lumenatrix,
I can see your point about the solution to the mystery being a bit weak but I enjoyed the rest of the novel so much it didn't bother me. As I said, I just loved how she handled the characters, even if I hated where they ended up (but that's actually a good thing since French made me care about them). So as far as the mystery, I can see Mary Higgins Clark, but I felt like the characterization was much deeper. I can definitely relate to you, though - I feel like the Asimov detective novels are interesting because of the sci-fi but the actual mysteries are kind of weak, and I think a few people disagree with me there.
With that, it may have been weak, but it seems like murder mysteries nowadays are much weaker - maybe it's just a matter of adjusted expectations. I feel like when I was a kid and read Agatha Christie, I really had to try and puzzle through the novel to determine who did it. Obviously that also could have been my age. So many of the more modern ones tend to distract the reader with random action sequences that lead to discoveries, but there is less of a puzzle and it seems more like pure luck. I don't know, that could just be me or I might be reading the wrong authors.

Thank you to everyone for all the comments! I've also enjoyed reading everyone's reviews and recommendations for the last few months. I just keep getting more and more books that I want to read thanks to CBR. Many of you are incredibly good writers. By the way, if you haven't been on the facebook page recently, I'm leading the April Book Club discussion, and I need help deciding between three novels . . .

Posted by: Jen K. at March 2, 2010 4:45 PM

I've said it before, but I am in awe of Jen K. I was just thinking the other day when you were going to finish.

As for me? Book 26 ahoy!

Posted by: vikky at March 2, 2010 6:00 PM

Hot DAMN. That was ridiculously fast. I'm on books 16-18, and I've only reviewed half that. Congrats!

Posted by: SaBrina at March 2, 2010 8:24 PM

Congrats, Jen!

So... I guess I should get on writing my review #16.

Posted by: Sara at March 2, 2010 9:47 PM

Yea Jen K! Way to go!

Posted by: Lindsey with an 'e' at March 3, 2010 5:45 PM

Exciting news!

You left me in the dust lol

Posted by: Anhelo at March 3, 2010 11:00 PM

I’m impressed, I must say. Really rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, you have hit the nail on the head. Your idea is outstanding; the issue is something that not enough people are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this.

Posted by: Sterling Silver Bead bracelet at March 7, 2011 2:35 PM