web
counter
 

legend9.jpg
100 Books in One Year: I Am Legend by Richard Matheson

Cannonball Read / Sophia

Book Reviews | December 24, 2008 | Comments (21)


Publisher’s note: For those counting, with 28 books read, Sophia has actually pulled into 2nd place in the Cannonball Read, only 5 books behind Prisco.

I recently watched Will Smith’s version of I am Legend, which made me curious enough about the original story to consider expanding my reading to the horror genre. Whether movies or books, horror is probably my least favorite. The only horror movie I’ve seen in the last five years was Shaun of the Dead, and I’m not even sure if that one counts. But I’ve been reading so many books lately, it’s a good excuse to branch out and read some things I wouldn’t otherwise.

Like most of my reading material, I picked up I Am Legend at the library. Fortunately the copy I found had I Am Legend as well as ten other short stories written by Richard Matheson. This was fortunate because I Am Legend has only 170 pages, and even though I don’t mind flouting the reading contest rules when appropriate, I don’t want to do it for every book I read. So, the ten other short stories added another 150 pages to the book, making it more than adequate in length.

I’ll start with the title story and reason for reading this book in the first place, I Am Legend (1954). Robert Neville is alone in the world, having survived an epidemic that swept the Earth, killing people and turning them into vampire creatures. The creatures cannot stand the sun and go into a coma-like state during the day, but at night they come and attack his embattled house. Robert Neville’s life consists of the monotonous tasks of daily survival, constant loneliness and despair, killing as many vampires and diseased individuals as he can, as well as learning as much as possible about what’s happened to everyone.

Despite my general aversion to horror stories, I enjoyed reading I Am Legend. Neville’s daily survival is interesting, and Matheson slowly leaks out information about Neville, his past, his present, and the specifics about the vampires so that the book often reads like a mystery. I also liked comparing the book and the movie. The movie changed the location to NYC, changed the cause of the disease, and changed some of the aspects of the disease for story purposes. Most of these changes, I think, made for a better movie. Seeing Robert Neville tearing through a deserted and lonely Times Square is much more visually captivating—horrific C.G. deer notwithstanding—than seeing him wander around a nondescript suburb. The movie also captured Neville’s loneliness and solitude quite well, managing to have the same feeling of the book, without being tied down to all the particulars. The main difference between the two is the ending. The book’s ending fits the story perfectly and ironically, making the entire story meaningful and more memorable, but the movie strays too far from the book for its last chapter and suffers by comparison. And I say this after also having seen the alternate end on DVD. Of course, now that I’ve seen both, I’m having a hard time remembering which was the “original” movie ending, but I prefer to selectively remember only the first 2/3 of the movie anyway.

I was not as impressed by the ten other short stories included in this book. The problem might again have been the genre, but I did not find them nearly as absorbing or thoughtful as the main story. I guess they were all generally well-written and the characters were often interesting enough that they weren’t painful to read about, but I was glad when I finally finished. Merely throwing in the undead or talking about funerals doesn’t do anything for me. Only one story even kind of scared me, and I think that’s because it was about a young, single woman who was attacked in her apartment—even though she was attacked by a miniature doll, so even then I wasn’t that scared.

One other issue I had with Matheson’s writing was the way he wrote about women, which I’m sure was partly a product of the times when he wrote. The 1950s weren’t exactly a banner year for women’s issues. In the book I Am Legend, Robert Neville states when he finally meets another human—a woman—that he would have “violated” her if it had been a couple years earlier because, y’know, men have needs. I tried to imagine Will Smith raping the woman he meets up with in the movie because he’s horny, and it didn’t work. Perhaps this is just a sign that men have improved in the last 50 years, or at least the men I know.

Matheson’s most annoying take on women is in his short story entitled “From Shadowed Places,” where a rich, playboy has a curse put on him by a Zulu witch doctor while he is trophy hunting in Africa. Fortunately his fiance has an old friend from school who spent some time in Africa, learning under a witch doctor, and knows how to deal with these things. The playboy is wary because she is black and a woman but doesn’t have much of a choice. Fortunately she is a busty, black woman and she saves him by dancing around naked in front of him with his fiance and father-in-law watching, and then having sex with him and drawing the demon into herself. I sometimes felt as if I were reading the script to a really bad porno movie. Besides the fact that there didn’t seem to be anything more to this story than Matheson’s weird sex fantasy, I was also bothered by the fact that he persistently defined the women in the story as feeling shamed. The woman who saved his life felt “shamed” when she walked into the room topless. And then later in the story his fiance felt “shamed,” perhaps because she felt she shouldn’t have resisted when she watched her friend have sex with her husband-to-be. I didn’t appreciate the constant connection between women’s sexuality and shame, and I’m sure it didn’t help that I didn’t particularly like most of his short stories.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details are here and the growing number of participants and their blogs are here. And check here for more of Sophia’s reviews.









Do You Have a Life? | From Paris with Love Trailer













Comments

Magical Negro as dues ex machina? Did she teach them how to appreciate the true meaning of life and how to relax and have fun while she was at it? Feh.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at December 24, 2008 8:41 AM

Sophia, you're probably my favorite reader, just because your reviews are always thorough and insightful. Love it!

Posted by: Marra at December 24, 2008 9:03 AM

Ms. Sophia, I must thank you for reviewing this book. I read the story before seeing the movie, and I must say that while the movie was pretty good the last act was indeed subpar compared to the book.

The movie adequately adapts most of the plot points and gut punches the book had, but the book just hurts you more. The story about The Dog, and the whole "Other Survivor" angle are just better portrayed in the book. Plus, Neville wasn't this hotshot Army doctor, he was a regular schmoe who taught himself rudimentary biology to try and keep his enemy at bay. (Sorry if that's not as interesting as the "Token Shirtless Will Smith Scene" Hollywood! What makes you think you're any better?! You made Ashton Kutcher a star!) The book dropkicks your emotional puppy, where as the movie merely hits it really hard with a newspaper.

Posted by: Mike R. at December 24, 2008 9:36 AM

Magical Negro as dues ex machina? Did she teach them how to appreciate the true meaning of life and how to relax and have fun while she was at it? Feh.

I have to agree with Tracer. If you really need something to teach me the true meaning of life and how to relax, there's always that bottle of Scotch in the liquor cabinet. It's less racist, and it doesn't judge you...it just sits there like a friend who doesn't know how to control your inner most impulses, but laughs when you make an ass of yourself in front of your girlfriend by hitting on her si...ah, can we all just forget I said that?

Posted by: Mike R. at December 24, 2008 9:39 AM

Oh, yeah, big time WORD to all of this. I read a lot of short story collections, but is the one where there's a story about a guy who is arranging a funeral, and at the end the funeral director asks who it's for and the dude says, "My wife" and then makes it clear he's on his way home to kill her? Um, no thanks.

I did enjoy the differences in I Am Legend but I agree that the film was cooler set in NYC. It always bugged me that the Will Smith character insisted that the creatures were mindless despite the mounting evidence to the contrary and I appreciated in the book that they were still, in many ways, human. It made it more complex and interesting to read. And the ending was way more appropriate, I thought.

Posted by: Cara at December 24, 2008 9:41 AM

Since I have no intention of watching this movie, the Charlton Heston version, or reading the book, can someone please give me a SPOILER to the book's ending?

Posted by: BWeaves at December 24, 2008 10:22 AM

BWeaves, if you track down the original review to the film, it's in the comments there.

That said, the book is magnificent (as is much of Matheson's work). The film is enjoyable, but the botched ending is infuriating and completely defeats the purpose of the title itself. Basically it wastes 90 fantastic minutes of solid direction, action and great Smith acting.

But the book - everyone should read it. I also recommend the graphic novel.

Posted by: TK at December 24, 2008 10:28 AM

What TK said, only more so -- IMHO, the acting and direction was about as solid as its CGI. More importantly, however, the movie is a total perversion of the book's underlying premise.

Despite its flaws, the book is one of the earlier books to insert social commentary into a horror genre, and to portray vampires as anything other than your typical blood-sucking monster types (i.e., Scientologists). The movie is utter shite.

Posted by: A Bowl Of Stupid at December 24, 2008 11:10 AM

Nice review, Missus Ladyma'am. I kinda dug the suburbia aspect of the book vs. the movie - the NYC setting definitely nailed the scope of how alone he was, but the book seemed a helluva lot bleaker - especially given that the guy spend a large part of his in-home confinement getting loaded off his hoopty.

And yeah, the book ending curb-stomped the movie one...

I also agree with you on the other stories, save for the one about the creepy sumanamabitch at the carnival. For some reason, that spooked the hell outta me.

Posted by: Skitz at December 24, 2008 11:21 AM

And, I'm gonna go completely against everything I've ever said about remakes here...

The Will Smith movie was great (save for the last quarter of the film), but I wouldn't be opposed in any way or form to a remake of this one. One that sticks to the book like The Green Mile or Rita Hayworth & The Shawshank Redemption.

Posted by: Skitz at December 24, 2008 11:27 AM

Merry Christmas! I'm an open minded girl from US, I'm interested in exotic things, photography, dating and sports...
I have my photos on ---Tallhub.com---, I love tall guys!
Do you love traveling and have some experience? Just find me out^^

Posted by: kent at December 24, 2008 11:46 AM

The movie, while actually pretty damned good for most of its duration, Hollywoodized the hell out of the book's bleak ending. I didn't even like the book that much, but at least the final pages stay true to the overall grim tone.

I should have known what to expect: Will Smith + December studio tentpole=upbeat ending.

Posted by: stryker1121 at December 24, 2008 12:44 PM

Find me out! ;););)I am a tall single mind with an open gal who also hated the fact that the movie ruined the reason for the epic title of the work, and also I like traveliing?:p Also, poor puppy. Sexy photos!

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at December 24, 2008 12:45 PM

God, Kent, you're such a whore!!

Posted by: TK at December 24, 2008 12:53 PM

The short story of the woman being attacked by the doll was part of the Trilogy of Terror, with Karen Black.

Posted by: Heywood J. at December 24, 2008 2:54 PM

Agreed, the movie was pretty pointless without the original ending. Also, the first half or so of the book is MIGHTILY depressing. Way more so than "The Road" or any other postapoc fiction I've read.
And I thought "Shadowed Land" was the only other story in the book worth reading; the sheer mass of its racist, sexist and generally backward thinking constitutes a kind of historical monument, and much more food for thought than any of the others.
Plus, it was really well-written.

Posted by: Pen Dragon at December 24, 2008 4:19 PM

"The Road" is Godapus-awful boring. Good thing it's short.

Posted by: bucdaddy at December 24, 2008 5:31 PM

Agreed,Bucdaddy. As a matter of fact I think Cormac Mccarthy is pretentious and overrated as a writer. His insistence on not using quotation marks to attribute the dialogue to any particular character drives me nucking futs!

Posted by: B-rant at December 24, 2008 8:13 PM

I read the book before I ever saw the movie, but I had seen trailers of the movie, so I think that those colored my mental picture of the story somewhat.

I agree that I Am Legend outshines all of the other short stories in the film; in fact I can only vaguely recall even the ones mentioned here. They just didn't have the same impact on me that the main story did. And yes, the titular ending was completely mangled. I think that the ending in the book brought everything together so that it suddenly made sense, and I barely remember the ending to the movie. I've blocked it out.

*SPOILER*

I felt that one of the parts of the book that had the most impact was when Neville had to bring his daughter and wife to the burn zone. That had much more emotional impact for me than some dumb helicopter crash.

*END SPOILER*

I did very much enjoy that among the special features in the DVD were some animated shorts that I found to be rather more in keeping with the spirit of the original book. Those were awesome.

Wow, I haven't commented in weeks, and now I've written a novel. I haven't even scratched the surface of what I wanted to say, though. I smell blog post simmering...

Posted by: Alexandra at December 25, 2008 12:01 AM

MY favorite part of the book is where the wife comes back from her grave...and he has to kill her and bury her again!! AH! Also, the fact that he gets drunk half the time. Let's face it, that's what most of us would do.

Oooh and the creepy neighbor guy. It is MUCH creeper to have the vampires able to talk and remember at least some of their former selves. Much scarier than the "I Am Robot" fleshed out jumpy runny things in the film. Relentlessly shuffling undead are scarier than fast-moving ones any day.

Posted by: AM at December 25, 2008 6:07 PM

"Fortunately the copy I found had I Am Legend as well as ten other short stories written by Richard Matheson."

"I Am Legend" is a novella, and only meant to be included in the book of short stories that has that story as its title. I don't think you'd find it anywhere else, or alone.

At any rate, I actually disagree with the latter half of this review -- I thought the other stories, being shorter and tighter, were more interesting. I did enjoy much of "I Am Legend" the story and thought the movie version was pretty crappy (ie the zombie CGI non-vampires, the lack of interior monologue, the change from average-Joe to doctor, the freaking ending) but the shorter stories were more enjoyable, like the one about the doll who came to life (albeit a little sexist, as Sophia says, though it didn't really wreck that for this feminist reader).

Posted by: Ariel at December 27, 2008 12:50 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time