blogspot
visitor
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

deathly hallows1.jpg
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows by JK Rowling


Cannonball Read / (Genny now just) Rusty

Book Reviews | August 21, 2009 | Comments (36)


In Deathly Hallows the war that’s been brewing for the previous six novels breaks through. The Ministry of Magic falls to Voldemort’s forces, and the wizarding media are being controlled as well. Those who oppose the new regime are under attack from all sides and frequently have to go into hiding to escape from the interrogations and baseless convictions that run rampant across the country. When dissenters are unable to be caught, their family members are taken hostage by Voldemort’s followers to blackmail the into submission. Harry, having been entrusted with the secret of defeating Voldemort by Dumbledore, takes Ron and Hermione with him to track down objects called “Horcuxes.” These objects are things which Voldemort has magically enchanted to contain part of his soul. As long as they exist, Voldemort cannot die because part of him will always live. The problem is that Dumbledore died before he could figure out exactly where all these Horcruxes are, so the three teenagers are left mostly up to their own devices to find them. Also, they can’t share their mission with anyone else to ask for help since doing so would exponentially increase the possibility of them being found out. These leads to a lot of frustration and fighting, and in one case a complete diversion from the mission when Harry begins to think that Dumbledore meant to point them in a completely different direction. Meanwhile, the wizarding world is being terrorized with no end in sight.

In the end, however improbable it might be, Harry and his friends succeed. Good triumphs over evil, and the battle of Hogwarts is won. Of course, the victory happens in such a way as to make it clear that no one really wins in war. Children are orphaned, beloved characters are killed, and Hogwarts castle itself suffers permanent damage. This is not a fairytale ending, but it’s the ending that the story dictates.

The story is somewhat more complex than the previous installments, and the answers are as fuzzy for the reader as they are for the characters. We don’t have any special insight into what Dumbledore wanted the children to do, and through the middle when there’s little to no action it’s almost as frustrating for the reader as it seems for Harry, Hermione, and Ron. This book is also darker than all the previous ones, with torture, kidnapping, and death being a main plot point. The book makes more demands on the reader than the previous ones; it’s tempting to skip ahead to where the action is rather than listen to another retelling of another round about conversation between Harry and Hermione. But the battle scenes are well written, and a lot of the introspection is necessary to understand some of the events that happen at the end of the novel. There’s also a passage that’s pure character redemption that may be a little complicated for smaller children, but which does shed new light on the actions of that character through the series.

Of course, then there’s the epilogue, which does seem to reinforce the idea that people do live happily ever after, you will marry your high school sweet heart and have loads of beautiful intelligent children with them. I know this was galling to some people, but if I were a parent reading this to my middle school age (or younger) child, I can see why Rowling would want to give some kind of hope at the end. The idea that there is life after the kind of loss all the characters experienced is valuable, even if the way it’s presented seems a little “happily ever after” for some.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Genny (now just Rusty)’s review, check her blog, Rusty’s Ventures.


The 5 Best Trailers for So Far Unreleased Movies | Capitalism: A Love Story Trailer





Comments

Just noticed that you probably meant "Epilogue" rather than "Prologue" in your last paragraph. :-)

Good review though in any case!

Posted by: Zerokool at August 21, 2009 8:17 AM

Just noticed that you probably meant "Epilogue" rather than "Prologue" in your last paragraph. :-)

Good review though in any case!

Posted by: Zerokool at August 21, 2009 8:18 AM

Nice review. I loved "Deathly Hallows". So often the finale to a series is just WEAK (see; "The Dark Tower") but I thought "Deathly Hallows" was stunning. It did get meandering and frustrating in the middle but I really think that was intentional to try and put the reader in the same state of mind as the heroes. The kids are scared, tired, frustrated, and falling apart and it's not until Harry gets the sword that things start to turn around. I have a feeling that is where part 1 of the movie is going to end, too.

I liked the epilogue for the same reason as you. After the total carnage and emotional wallop of the ending it needed some light to end the story.

Posted by: TylerDFC at August 21, 2009 8:23 AM

I have to mention one thing about this book that I rarely experience while reading. I have read most of these books twice, once upon release and once more before the next one was released. !!!!!!!!!!SPOILER!!!!!!!!!! When I came to the chapter titled "The Battle of Hogwarts," I got all-over-body chills and started giggling like a maniacal pickpocket. It is the perfect chapter title and prepares you for the climax of the entire series. Part of me hopes J.K. doesn't write anything else because she will forever be left wanting in comparison.

Posted by: Kballs at August 21, 2009 8:25 AM

Genny, you've revived wonderful memories with your review.

One of my fondest remeberances(despite my ex and my friend's ex-wife being present) was when 12:01 hit at the Barnes and Noble I was at when Deathly Hallows was released. You have to understand, this was a two level B&N, packed to the brim with fans waiting for their copy. Once the countdown hit zero, you should have heard the ruckus caused. It was the last time I ever wore a lightening bolt scar (drawn in borrowed eyeliner).

It's books like this (and the fans that love them) that really encourage a sense of community. Better yet, this was before the era of the Sparkletard, so I could associate with the screaming fans instead of wielding crucifixes to ward them off. Funny thing is, this was the night before the four of us left for our big summer camping trip, and there my friend and I were...trying to see who could get to the end quicker. (For the record, he won.) I miss the summer of 07. I miss having a new Harry Potter book to read. Most of all, I miss the days before the world went full Sparkletard.

Posted by: DoctorControversy at August 21, 2009 8:56 AM

lame... you might just get a B+ in 6th grade for this one. You hit on 3 of the 238 plot points in this book, good for you. Next time, why don't you review War and Peace in less than 500 words.

Posted by: Ted at August 21, 2009 9:14 AM

I seem to have an opposite view with all other Harry Potter fans. The battle scene and epilogue was where it really fell down for me, and I know exactly why: JK Rowling had written either most or all of it years before the rest of the novel. Her writing in these chapters has the flavour of her simplistic, child-friendly first novel.

The bulk of it, however, was solid gold, at least for me, and I know exactly why. It was a very personal experience, reading the novel. I was the same age as the trio when it came out, almost exactly, and they were functioning in the real world instead of the glitzy fortress of Hogwarts. There's a scene where they go to a 24 hour diner in the wee hours, and it struck me like a frying pan on the head, because I've been to a 24 hour diner in the wee hours. Also, Rowling's writing was immensly rich and honest. I don't remember reading Deathly Hallows so much as I remember seeing it.

The Snape thing was awesome validation for me, because I was RIGHT about him and could brag to all my stupid friends who weren't. And I particularly enjoyed the reveal of the flawed, anxious, self-doubting Dumbledore underneath all that quirky competence; I'd had a hard time liking Dumbledore before that specifically because of his lack of character flaws. The only thing I like better about the movies than the books is Michael Gambon's very Hallows-y portrayal of Dumbledore. (Richard Harris, god rest him, was a disaster: if leaning on Maggie Smith is the only way you can accomplish crossing the room, you're simply not cut out for the job.)

Hm... bit of a long comment...

Posted by: Ling at August 21, 2009 9:18 AM

Geez Ted, who put snarfalous pus in your pumpkin juice?

I liked some of the very subtle things that showed up. Back in book 3 or 4, Harry sees the barman at the Hog's Head and thinks he looks familiar and then nothing else is mentioned about that until (do I really need to say SPOILER when everyone has read it?) SPOILER Harry meets Aberforth again in book 7 and finally realizes who he is.

I've reread Snape's memories so many times. I love that chapter. I always imagined Alan Rickman dancing up and down after book's 6 and 7 came out, and he found out what Snape was doing. I was rather disappointed to discover that he hasn't read the books.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 21, 2009 9:25 AM

I was also pleased to discover that Dumbledore wasn't this perfect wizard that everyone thought he was. It was nice to discover all the flaws.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 21, 2009 9:29 AM

I just reread this for the third time. And I bawled in all the same places.

Posted by: Julie at August 21, 2009 9:44 AM

BWeaves, I adore you - even though it would be Snargaluff pods. :nerd:

I remember reading Order of the Phoenix, when they are in the Hog's Head bar, and Harry thought the bartender was familiar. It is amazing (and a wee bit disturbing) when you put all of the pieces together: bartender with goat, Dumbledore's brother's run in with the law over a goat, Aberforth bitterly saves the day!

Seriously, who knew a "children's book" could so blatantly include a goat fucker? But I digress...

I have read each of these books more than 3 times each (can you tell?), but I have only gotten through DH barely twice. Picking it up the second time was so emotional, because I knew exactly what I was about to relive.

And with the possible exception of The Time Traveler's Wife, no book has made me cry like Deathly Hallows...

DOBBY!!!! WWWHHHYYY?!?!?

Posted by: Patty O'Green at August 21, 2009 9:50 AM

Me too Julie. Even though I know what's coming, no matter how many times I read it, the same scenes always sucker punch me right in the gut.
I remember the first time I read the book, and I couldn't see the pages anymore because I was crying so much - stupid JK Rowling and the stupid battle of Hogwarts and the stupid "NOT MY DAUGHTER, YOU BITCH" bit.
Makes me bloody cry (and cheer a little outloud) every time.

Anyway, good review!

Posted by: Squeeziee at August 21, 2009 10:05 AM

Ling, I absolutely agree with you about the battle and the epilogue falling a little flat. The seven books gradually became darker, more complex, more mature; the seventh was by far the darkest of them all. And yet, the ending was a little silly, a little childish.

And I'm really torn with the epilogue. In some ways I'm glad to know how Harry's future (up to a certain point) turned out, but I also think it would have been amazing to leave us wondering. There are no certainties in life, afterall, and that's why I enjoy cliffhangers in books and movies. You can always play the "what if?" game.

This doesn't diminish my love of the series in any way, however.

Posted by: lucy at August 21, 2009 10:11 AM

Of course, then there’s the prologue, which does seem to reinforce the idea that people do live happily ever after, you will marry your high school sweet heart and have loads of beautiful intelligent children with them.

Actually, J.K. has history on her side with that one. After World War II, the baby boomers had lots of children, likewise, after living through hell in the wizard world, Harry and Ginny probably spent a large part of time before the prologue in the sack, along with most of the rest of the wizard community, I assume.

Posted by: George at August 21, 2009 10:14 AM

You know what? The epilogue really doesn't bother me too much. I don't think it detracts from the horror that preceded it in the book, and I'm also positive that had she not written that, I would have really wanted to know how many kids Ron and Hermione had.

That being said, the naming got a little annoying, and she could made it with a bit less sugar coating.

It also seemed weird to me that they still had the sorting every year. I kind of figured that kind of blatant stereotyping would have died with the last piece of Volde's soul.

AND (sorry I'm a bit of a roll)

I know everyone hates the long bit in the middle when they aren't getting anything done and no one knows what to do, but think of how stupid and unrealistic it would be if they were just stumbling over Horcruxes and killing them with rocks. It needed to be frustrating and difficult. It had to be about luck and courage instead of careful planning because it stays true to the spirit of the book.

ok I think I'm done. But on the crying theme, I had to put the book down when Harry was walking into the forest to die because I was crying so hard.

Posted by: buttercup at August 21, 2009 10:46 AM

Patty: Oh crap. I completely forgot about Dobby. I must have cried for 15 minutes when I got to that part, the first time I read it. None of the other characters affected me quite as strongly. It was weird.

Buttercup: Hogwarts still has sorting, because that's how English schools are run. I went to school in England, and my four houses were Bailey, Chapman, Hume and Gray (named after old headmistresses). It was a public school and we didn't sleep there, but we still had the houses to promote competition and discourage misbehavior by the amount of points you won or lost for your house.

Posted by: BWeaves at August 21, 2009 11:00 AM

(Spoilers)

I was inter-railing across Europe when this book came out, so I figured I'd have to just wait until 4 weeks later when I got home to read it, and just try to avoid spoilers during that time. As sheer, blind luck would have it, the morning it came out I happened across an English version in a bookshop in a Berlin train station - while people back home were fighting over the handful of copies Tesco had, there were dozens in this station lying untouched. I still remember starting to read it while we lay in the sun waiting for our connection to Prague and the absolute shock I got when Hedwig died 20 pages in, because of everyone I thought might die, I *never* thought it'd be her. Over the rest of the day I tore through it - I finally finished at about 2AM, sharing a double bed with one of my friends, trying not to cheer at "NOT MY DAUGHTER, YOU BITCH!".

I have to say, I loved the book. I thought she hit the exact right mix of heartbreak and triumph - enough characters died that it felt real, and the victory felt deserved, but without dissolving into the relentless misery that it could have been. I found the whole middle part dragged the first time, but much less so on later readings, mostly because it's the bits and pieces of information that they pick up on that journey that allow them to finally defeat Voldemort. I've seen people complaining that the book essentially resolves itself on a technicality about wand ownership, but I have to say I loved that, and I can't think of a much better or more plausible way to have your 17-year-old hero triumph over the worst Dark wizard of all time. I loved that it wasn't just "love" that saved them all, but knowledge earned through hard work and sacrifice, rather than through the arrogant consumption of power.

As for the epilogue, yeah, it was a little simplistic and saccharine, but I liked it. I still don't buy, even after The Prince's Tale (which was a fantastic bit of character redemption), that Harry would name one of his children after Severus, and I think it's a bit convenient that all the kids are the same age at the same time, but as for the rest, I can get behind it. I agree with George about post-war baby-making (isn't that why Bill and Fleur's daughter is called "Victoire"?), and I can definitely see why, within the comparatively small wizarding world where college and careers and travel aren't going to pull people apart the same way they do in real life, why marrying your high-school sweetheart is that bit more common.

Posted by: Shay at August 21, 2009 11:18 AM

Um, probably not necessary but...

*SPOILERS ABOUND*

Okay, okay, so I cried buckets about Dobby - I really did. It was sad and horrible and not fair.

But Hedwig! Hedwig!! No one's mentioning her?!? I was immediately devastated and very nearly stopped reading the book for good. I was sobbing and cursing and my poor husband, who hadn't read the book yet, thought I'd gone mad. I looked at him, tears streaming down my face in a torrent and sobbed, "Why would she do that honey? Why? I hate her, I hate her, I hate her! Stupid fucking Rowling!". Then I threw the book down and fled the room.

I did manage to compose myself and start reading again in about 15 minutes but there was a certain bitterness that now coated the entire experience. Hedwig is the reason I've only read the 7th book once and I've read all other six at least 8 times.

A day later, after I'd finished the book and my husband started reading it, he got to the Hedwig part and finally realized why I'd been in such hysterics.

I have serious issues when it comes to animal death. I should probably seek therapy.

Posted by: Kelly at August 21, 2009 11:26 AM

I have no memory of how I felt when I finished this book. I remember being desperate to read it, I remember not really loving the epilogue, but not hating it either, but that's it. Did I cry? Was I upset by the deaths? Was I ever frustrated, or on the edge of my seat? No clue. I fear dementia is finally setting in.

I do plan on reading all the books again sometime soon. It'll be nice to read them all in one go and not have to wait forever for the next one.

Posted by: Carrie at August 21, 2009 11:36 AM

Dobby had it coming.

Posted by: idiosynchronic at August 21, 2009 11:43 AM

(isn't that why Bill and Fleur's daughter is called "Victoire"?)
Shay, I read somewhere that she was born on the one year anniversary of Voldy's defeat, which inspired the name. But that may have been a theory, not canon.

I am in the minority, I think, but I was not terribly torn up about Hedwig's death. It was sad, but to me it felt like an appropriate baby step into the more painful deaths. I see why it was devastating to Harry (first and constant connection to Wizarding World), but for me, it was manageable.

A year after I read it, I found a copy of Entertainment Weekly behind my couch with a list (and accompanying pics when possible) of all the people who died in DH. Holy Godtopus, I screamed and bawled because I had forgotten so many of them (read: FREEEEEEEEED!!!). Then I had to read it again.

Sidebar: When I read Half Blood Prince, I was at a summer theatre internship making sunflower seeds for pay (read: less than peanuts). My boyfriend at the time bought one copy for us to share, as our shifts were rarely timed at once. When I read The Cave, and subsequently DD's demise, I was alone in his apartment. He walked in, saw me BAWLING and covered in face-wetness, he started to rush to me asking what was wrong. Then he saw the book, covered his ears and yelled, "Don't tell me! I'm so sorry, but don't! I have to - got to go! Sorry!" and ran out of the room. When I finished the chapter, I walked outside, solemnly handed it to him, looked at him through puffy eyes and said, "Call me when you understand."

About an hour later, I get a knock on my door: said boyfriend, clutching book, tear-stained face. We literally just held each other and cried.

And somehow I married a man who won't read them...... the mind boggles. ; )

Posted by: Patty O'Green at August 21, 2009 11:56 AM

Wow, lot of comments on this one.

I really felt like this was a weak review for me, because there was no way I could encapsulate everything that's wonderful about this book in something that was less than 20 pages, and who'd want to read that? I'm glad that it's gotten everyone to share their memories and feelings on the book despite my relatively shallow treatment of the source material.

Posted by: Genny (actually Rusty now) at August 21, 2009 12:01 PM

idiosynchroni, you have waged war!

Posted by: Patty O'Green at August 21, 2009 12:06 PM

Folks, this is Pajiba. You are all gushing way too much over Harry Potter. I liked them too, but I hardly think Deathly Hallows was that great. It was choppy, inconsistent, and arbitrary. Don't get me wrong, I read the whole thing in one sitting, but maybe that is telling somehow as well.

Posted by: coryo at August 21, 2009 12:52 PM

(read: FREEEEEEEEED!!!).
Posted by: Patty O'Green at August 21, 2009 11:56 AM

I was so sad when Fred died! I mean, I know that statistically one of the Weasleys had to die, there was like 9 of them fighting, but really? Fred? Couldn't have been one of the brothers we knew nothing about? Poor dead Fred :(

Posted by: Jeni at August 21, 2009 12:59 PM

Oh man. I'm with all the other criers (cryers?) here. The chapter about Snape just had me bawling. He's basically the hero in the story! It was the "look at me" right before he died that set me off.

And Fred! I'm a twin as well and I just can't imagine a life without my sister. This book just had me dumbstruck with its awesomeness. It was such a catharsis for an HP fan like me that was in love with the series from the beginning. I recently finished it for the 2nd time (I've read the others maybe 5 times each already..) and I want to read it again, immediately. When I finished the book for the first time, I cried for about 10 minutes straight. It was like a chapter of my childhood had ended. Man, I love Harry Potter.

Posted by: Corinna at August 21, 2009 1:49 PM

I love all the Harry Potter books, and as an avid reader, I do not understand the hatred for these books from other avid readers; you have to give credit where credit is due. Rowling created an intensely vivid world and she layered all the books with such subtle clues that one cannot help being mesmerized during the subsequent readings.

I have a complaint though, and it comes from listening to the audiobooks: Rowling's editors suck big time. There are too many repetitive words and sentence structures. I will admit that I might not have realized these offenses if I had not listened to the audiobooks, but they are so obvious to me now. I am baffled that a professional editor did not pick them up. "Black cloak billowing" is a big one as are many words which were so obviously entered via thesaurus.

Anyway, Deathly Hallows suffers from a huge lag in the middle. When the trio (I will not call them "children") are in the forest I was super bored. However this lag provided a perfect pause for those of us who read the book over a two day period. Also, for the very first time I did NOT hate Ron. I was endeared by him, which is a major feat.

Posted by: Agent Scully at August 21, 2009 2:01 PM

This book came out when I had just moved to a new city. I had no friends, no cable, no internet (except for what I stole) and most of my books were still home waiting for the second trip.
You can see how I might have become a little more engaged in the book than usual.
I stayed up allllll night, finishing the book at 10 am, sobbing my fool head off.
Crying over the deaths, sure (they couldn't have offed Percy instead?) but also at the fact that it was over, I had no more HP books to look forward to.

And that is why I quite shamefully started reading fanfiction. I can't believe the depths of my geekitude.

Shut UP.

Posted by: myysharona (formerly Sharon) at August 21, 2009 2:22 PM

I cheaped out and bought the less expensive version of Beedle the Bard. Did anyone buy the expensive version? Was it worth it?

Posted by: BWeaves at August 21, 2009 2:59 PM

See, now I'm like 'Fred died? Snape died?' I really need to read these bloody things again.

Posted by: Carrie at August 21, 2009 3:41 PM

I read it really to see how it was all resolved. I loved the resolution of Snape's story (and how it tied in with his behaviour through the previous six books), that Ron overcame his insecurities and finally got the girl, and about a dozen other things I can't think of right now.

I did find the epilogue to be a bit of a let-down, but I think I read somewhere that Rowling wanted to finish the story in a way that no-one could come along later and mess her vision up on her - like the way certain people are continuing the stories of Frank Herbert, Douglas Adams, etc.

Posted by: csb at August 21, 2009 3:46 PM

I've read all of the books A LOT, but after reading this one it became my favourite book of the series - it was just so much different from the usual "Harry at school" bit and I found it an entirely appropriate ending to the saga. I suppose it was a little slow at times, but I never felt like it dragged and you really saw a new side to the trio's characters. I totally agree that the epilogue is a little too sweet, like someone else said I find it hard to believe Harry would name a child after Snape, even after all that. But all in all I was happy with the closure it provided, because that was my main worry.

Picked up my copy first thing that morning, started in at around 10 and was done by 9, pee breaks and lunch included. And the tears! I was bawling already when Hedwig died, and then again with Dobby, but Fred! Fred's was the worst! And with poor Percy just redeemed... totally devastating. And then again when Lupin and Tonks turn up dead, leaving little Teddy behind.

I'm currently nearing the end of number six again, so maybe I'll pick up this one again when I'm finished.

Posted by: sunset&camden at August 21, 2009 4:11 PM

Oddly enough, I just finished rereading this last night. It holds up a lot better than Book 6, I have to say. There are SO many loose ends to tie up, she did a pretty good job. I also love that ickle Duddy-kins actually gets a clue in this one. The list of people that die still makes me want to bawl. But she did put in some great stuff, the dragon escape from Gringotts and particularly Neville's Sorting Hat scene in the finale. I love that his part in the prophecy got addressed.

What really bugged me was earlier on in the series though - did anyone else think having Sirius fall through that arch and disappear was a weird cop-out? I kept expecting him to show up again since there was NO closure there.

Posted by: Anne (in Reno) at August 21, 2009 4:12 PM

I just want to say that I'm so glad that I wasn't the only person to cry...no sob while reading this book. My guy and I are long distance so we decided to read to each other over the phone. He had never read the Harry Potter series so we read through the whole thing over the phone. During the last one, I was reading out loud and then started crying uncontrollably even though it was my second time reading it. Needless to say, he had to take over from The Prince's Tale all the way to the end of the book.

Posted by: brenia at August 21, 2009 5:47 PM

Anne (in Reno) I was SOOO expecting something to happen with Sirius - he'd given Harry the mirror and I kept thinking "I wonder if he had that mirror with him when he went through the curtain? I wonder if he will be able to help Harry from The Great Beyond? I wonder if he's with Dumbledore and they'll bring that around?" I think that's what is normally called a Red Herring.

That said, I loved this book. I get on a kick from time to time and read the series all the way through. I love how the characters grow and change as the years go by. Not everyone gets the happy ending. Even the happy endings we see are tinged with the losses along the way. (I've made my opinion clear on other forums - that is one of my huge beefs with a certain Stephenie Meyer - well that and about eight billion other things.)

I cheered, out loud, in the middle of the night when I read "Not my daughter, you bitch!" Woke up Mr. O, whole nine yards. I cannot WAIT to see that in film.

Posted by: kellyo at August 21, 2009 8:32 PM

Oh my god...the part where he kisses the snitch...that just gets me right in the gut every time.

Posted by: AM at August 22, 2009 12:11 PM





Video ads popping up after each page view? Try clearing your browser's cookies.