free counter with statistics Duma Key | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

duma1.jpg

Stop. Just Stop.

Duma Key by Stephen King / Daniel Carlson

Book Reviews | February 12, 2008 | Comments (93)


And as It threw him, as he felt his mind being swatted out of his body, he concentrated all of his being on seizing Its tongue … and missed his grip.
It, Stephen King

It was inevitable that the works of Stephen King would eventually cross the line from adrenaline-fueled, engaging stories to the kinds of self-indulgent and downright irritating books that only crotchety old men can create. And this is not a new development: King’s lifetime opus, The Dark Tower, ended in 2004, but King reached his literary and emotional peak in 1999 with Hearts in Atlantis, a gorgeous book of five novellas tracing the rise and fall of the Vietnam generation. However, three things have become agonizingly clear with King’s subsequent novels: (1) He no longer has any remote idea of how anyone under 30 thinks, or speaks, or acts; (2) He will only write what he knows, and this in an increasingly cloying way; and (3) He is determined to become a character in all his books, and this is pretty obviously a bad thing.

King’s latest novel, Duma Key, is an unfortunate confluence of all three of those things, and a book so flat and dull and uninvolving and irksome and just plain lame that I wound up quitting halfway through. It’s about 600 pages, but by about 317 I was wondering whether anyone would judge me too harshly for putting the book down for good — I have been reading almost nonstop since I was a kid, and whenever I finish a book I usually start a new one within a couple days, and I try to read often. I guess what I’m saying is I have what some would call a disproportionately high distaste for quitting books, and I don’t like to do it if at all possible. (Though Marisha Pessl damn near broke me with Special Topics in Calamity Physics.) But Duma Key, after beginning with all the reluctant energy of an old man coughing in a movie theater, promptly became boring, off-putting, and falsely suspenseful. It’s this last that’s probably the most damning for King, a man who made his name on creating some of the most chilling stories in modern pop literature. Duma Key purports to be a supernatural tale, complete with ghosts and some spooky paintings, but everything about it feels recycled from better ideas King had 20 years ago.

Edgar Freemantle is a wealthy building contractor with a wife, two grown daughters, and a nice little life when a crane at one of his construction sites accidentally plows into his truck, crushing Edgar and flipping him several times over. He loses his right arm in the aftermath, and some of the brain damage he suffered now manifests itself as powerful anger when he can’t place names or faces or even remember simple vocabulary. This all happens in the first few pages of the novel, and it’s written with a knowledgeable style that betrays King’s own history with vehicular accidents. In the summer of 1999, King was struck while walking by a van careening down Route 5 in Maine, and Edgar’s hip pain is an easy mirror of King’s injury. Instead of making his hero an author, as he’s done so many times before, King is simply casting a version of himself as the lead, complete with physical therapy and a crotchety outlook. Edgar is the most well realized character in the book, and it’s because he’s nothing but a mouthpiece for King’s increasingly inane chatter about the world we live in, and boy howdy it ain’t like it used to be, and what the hell is with this TiVo, and kids sure do make you proud, and etc.

After being served with divorce papers, Edgar splits up his fortune and takes his part to Duma Key, off the west coast of Florida, where he rents a house from a rich old woman who lives down the beach. Edgar is an impossibly stupid and saccharine guy, which makes him right at home with the rest of the characters King soon forces onto the stage. The old woman is Elizabeth Eastlake, proprietor of a number of lots on the key and victim of Alzheimer’s, so she’s taken care of by Wireman, a man who lives with her and has to rank as the most annoying thing Stephen King has ever done. Wireman speaks in a mix of hippie aphorisms — “Do the day and let the day do you” — and snatches of Spanish, which it turns out is because his dead wife was Hispanic, but in reality it just makes him sound pretentious and phony and deeply worrisome. Edgar and Wireman’s first meeting is equally cringe-inducing: Edgar, who saw Elizabeth the day before on the beach wearing a large hat similar to the one Marlon Brando wore in his garden death scene in The Godfather, refers to her absently as “the bride of the godfather,” and this “joke” inexplicably strikes Wireman as so damn funny that the two men wind up falling out of their beach chairs in fits of giggly hysterics. There’s nothing quite as discomforting as two characters laughing over something unfunny that the author is unironically portraying as hilarious. But that’s King now: He doesn’t care about what is, only what he thinks should be.

In fact, the only thing worse is King’s lifeless characterization of Edgar’s college-age daughter, Ilse. It’s always a shock to take a step back and think, “Wait, this girl’s young. Younger than I am, even. Should she be talking as if she’s been lobotomized?” Ilse is a mix of golly-gee innocence and cute phrases that betray King’s inability to fashion a realistic younger character. He blew it in Cell, he spectacularly choked it in The Colorado Kid, and he does it again here with Ilse. And her naivete and patent fraudulence can’t be excused by virtue of the novel being told via Edgar’s first-person narration. It’s one thing for King to simply write a POV narrative with the protagonist seeing his daughter as any father would, but it’s another for him to fail to give that girl a meaningful weight and believable edges. She never seems the least bit real; she could, sadly, only come from a Stephen King novel.

Soon enough, Edgar turns into King Lite when he realizes he wants to paint — hey, it’s an artistic outlet — and he begins to sketch and then paint things that, though King’s descriptions are murky, sound like a mix between Dali ripoffs and freshman art student ripoffs. Edgar does sunsets mostly, though sometimes there’s an eerie ship, or a CD where the sun should be, or maybe a beach scene at low tide with tennis balls floating on the water. When Edgar paints, though, he feels something possess him, and he also feels a tingle in his nonexistent right arm, which is how he knows the paintings will be Full Of Magical Import. Sometimes he paints things that he knows to be true even though he hasn’t seen them, and sometimes he paints things that become true after he creates them. Edgar is a tortured artist, which is something King plays to the hilt: Edgar gets nothing but sympathy and support from Wireman, who, along with the local community, find Edgar’s paintings to be alluring, powerful, stunning, and somehow way more amazing than King actually described. Edgar’s local celebrity for his paintings never rings true; it’s as if King couldn’t just give Edgar this power, but wanted him to be worshipped for it, and a successful hero is never as interesting as a struggling one. It would have been an interesting turn if Edgar’s drawings and paintings had been ordinary things, competent at best, but still held the power to reflect the present or control the future. A normal thing given extraordinary power: That’s like something out of a Stephen King novel, you know? Instead, Edgar is too busy subbing in for King, whether it’s churning out questionable works of art or doing the kind of terribly awkward pop culture name-dropping King can’t seem to get enough of these days; I counted three random and cumbersome references to John D. MacDonald before I quit.

There’s more to the book — much, much more, and you’re a better person than I am if you can wade through it — but I knew halfway through it that I didn’t care. Life is too short to read disappointing books, and Duma Key definitely qualifies. King has created some genuinely good stories, and there are moments in some that are great, soaring looks at life, love, and everything else. But King has long since passed his prime, and Duma Key is a sad example of what happens when you don’t leave well enough alone. He’s writing here with only a fraction of his former fire and talent, and it’s just sad. I’ve been let down by King before, but this is the first time I’ve walked away.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


Jericho, Season Two | Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins



Comments

After attempting and failing to read both The Cell and Lisey's Story (I know it's supposed to be good, but I just couldn't do it), I've decided to simply stick to re-reading his glorious older novels. The Shining will always be one of my favorite books of all time, and has the distinction of being the ONLY book that actually scared me. Damned topiary animals.

Posted by: Julie at February 12, 2008 1:39 PM

I can imagine ol' Steve flipping through the dictionary and choosing two random words to name his characters. "Free... Mantle! Perfect!" "East... Lake! Golden!" "Wire... Catheter. Man, that won't work. That's it! Wireman! You still got it, King!"

Posted by: Baboon at February 12, 2008 1:46 PM

That's disappointing, but not too surprising I guess. I had the same reaction with Lysey's Story; I really want to get into it, but if I'm past a third of the book and still not hooked, what's the point? I'd rather read Pet Semetary yet again.

Posted by: millie at February 12, 2008 1:47 PM

If a book can't grab me in the first chapter, I have to give up on it. I'm an avid reader...sometimes reading up to four books at once...I absolutely love to immerse myself in a great book. That being said...I haven't read anything Stephen King in the past ten years, barring finishing the Dark Tower series. He has gone past his prime significantly, and I'm now ashamed whenever I see a "new" book of his, remembering the glory days. Ah, King....at least we'll always have It...

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 12, 2008 1:51 PM

The inside flap didn't grab me, sad to see the rest of the book wasn't better.

I'm ok with it, though. Like Julie said, man's got a lot of hits. I enjoyed some of his later works, 'Rose Madder' especially. '1408' seemed like a weaker version of 'House of Leaves,' though and 'Hearts in Atlantis' made me unjustifyingly angry with the boy for being a coward in the first story.

'All that You Love Will Be Carried Away' really, really struck me, though (it's in Everything's Eventual.') No horror, no drama, just a man and a hotel room and a decision, and it's really good.

Posted by: twig at February 12, 2008 1:53 PM

I grew up reading King's novels in the 1970's, but gave up on him after reading CHRISTINE, which probably dates to 83/84, if I had to guess. By my mid-teens I felt like I had outgrown his work, which was already getting rather homogenized.

By then it had become apparent to me that in King's worldview, every inch of America was consecrated/haunted earth, and that the man would demonize any and all inatimate objects, which reached it's nadir within the films Pet Cemetary and Maximum Overdrive.

Plus, he's got no style.

Nowadays, I read his backpage column in EW magazine, but only for the unintentional humor found within.

Cream rises to the top, but shit also floats.

Posted by: Mohaski at February 12, 2008 1:54 PM

Shadows, I'm the same way, life is just too fucking short to finish a book I'm not invested in.

Pet Semetary, Salem's Lot, Dolores Claiborne, Misery, his short story collections...I love me some old school King

P.S. Steve Martin's Born Standing Up was phenomenal.

Posted by: Julie at February 12, 2008 1:56 PM

See, now, Julie, I have yet to pick that one up...despite the great reviews here. But if you're hyping it up, with your discerning tastes...I'm going to have to go buy it now. Thanks...that'll be book number four I'll be reading, hehe.

I have yet to find any short story collection that gripped me as much as Skeleton Crew did. I still get chills looking at some of the titles....

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 12, 2008 2:01 PM

I really enjoyed it, his writing has such style. I've been on a Martin kick since reading Shopgirl.

Ooh, I love Skeleton Crew...The Mist is so very creepy.

Posted by: Julie at February 12, 2008 2:08 PM

Oh, this makes me sad... Having been a faithful reader of King's throughout the years, it's been a steady slow decline, especially since he got smoked by that damned van. I swear to god, something got bumped outta his noggin...

Cujo was my first. I was eight, and I'd seen the foxy teen lifeguard at the local pool reading it, so I thought if she saw me with it she'd fall madly in love with me...

That was twenty-six years ago and in that time I've read and re-read everything of his I could get my hands on: the magazine shorts, the contributed story to horror anthologies, you name it.

Shadows of Dakaron nailed it with the ten-year remark. Something just kinda went away... I dunno, but it certainly sucks balls. I made it to book five of the Dark Tower, and then just kind of gave up. I've checked out a few pages of his new stuff when I see it, but I'm just not willing to plunk down the dough for it like I used to...

I've got two giant-ass tubs of his work - hardcover first-editions, early eighties Playboys with short stories, tattered paperbacks held together with packing tape, etc...

Reading a review like this makes we wanna shut down, go home, pour myself a stiff one, and lose myself in The Bachman Books and Skeleton Crew...

Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at February 12, 2008 2:18 PM

It's also sad that he'll let anyone turn any of his stories into a crap movie. How does encourage people to read his books? I'm all for the occasional cinematic stab at a literary work, but how much cred can you possibly lose (Dreamcatcher keeps screaming out in my mind) before you realize "maybe I should not let a book become a movie, not worry about that happening down the line, and just write a damn book for the sake of the written word, especially because I'm already loaded beyond words."

Posted by: vinniedelpino at February 12, 2008 2:21 PM

At the risk of being hunted down and beheaded, can I just say that I've never though Stephen King was a good writer? The sentence quoted from one of King's "classic" novels is a perfect example. "He felt his mind being swatted out of his body." How overwrought can you get? And "missed his grip?" Is that physically possible? How can you miss a measurement of strength?

As for his Mary Sue-ing, well, I'm not surprised, but neither do I blame him. Most writers insert themselves into their work. The fact that King can't get away with it further illustrates his mediocre talent.

Posted by: Minty at February 12, 2008 2:23 PM

Here's a "Get Out Of Beheading" card, Minty...

The only catch is you gotta read Different Seasons (but DO NOT think of the movies), a couple stories outta Skeleton Crew & Night Shift and AND try to find a copy of Rage. It's damn near impossible, (out of print, King has prohibited any future printings) but it's the first of four stories in the Bachman Books and it's fucking superb. I'd lend you mine, but I'm reading that sambatch when I get home...

Posted by: Skittimus Maximus at February 12, 2008 2:31 PM

Stephen King in his heyday was anything but a mediocre talent, but at some point it seems to have been decided that he didn't need an editor. Almost every writer needs an editor, whether they want to admit it or not. I haven't read anything by King in ten years on the theory that if I'm not interested in reading anyone else's drafts, why would I want to read his?

Posted by: sansho1 at February 12, 2008 2:32 PM

In all fairness, Minty, that line is taken out of context...the swatting out of the body and missing grip makes sense when you read the whole thing.

It can never be argued that King was a literary genius...yes, he used time-worn devices, overused many phrases, and yes inserted himself into his works too many times to count. But that's not what made him great. His imagination, his fantasies, and the way he managed to get beyond his limitations to communicate those to us readers were what made him great. He was able to take the mundane and give it a sinister cast. He was able to capture suspense. That's really what we read his books for. If you want literary achievement without imagination, there's plenty of that around (Hemmingway, for one). What we lament is that the well of inspiration that he was presumably sipping from ran dry a decade ago, and not only has he not realized it, but he seems convinced he's better than ever.

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 12, 2008 2:35 PM

The Bachman Books are amazing. Truly frightening and I just thought it was cool that he wrote under a pen name. And sue me - I thought "The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon" was very good. I agree that "Different Seasons" is a must for any reader.

I highly recommend just about any of King's short stories. I love many of his novels, but I do think short stories are his forte. He won the O. Henry Prize in 1995 for "The Man in the Black Suit", which was creepy as shit.

I'm reading "Lisey's Story" now and am on the fence. I was entertained at first, for sure, but I'm fading.

Posted by: samantha t at February 12, 2008 2:39 PM

Wow. I think some of you guys nailed it with the 10 year (or when he got hit by the van) remarks.
I love so many of Kings works, but the last few novels have been so disappointing. Granted, he's put out some pretty good short stories in that time...though part of me thinks he's using some old material never published.
Anyway, my point is that King's changed. Once he seemed like a guy who couldn't have cared less about what critics said about him. He had his own style and came up with some great stories. Now he seems like he is strictly writing for the literary elite.
One last thing...King suddenly seems to me to be someone who googles himself. In love with yourself much Uncle Stevie? SK, if you're reading this: please, please, know that I haven't lost complete faith in you and will keep reading the stuff you're putting out. I'd just like to believe that the guy who put out works like Dolores Claiborne, Carrie and collaborated on the great Talisman is still around.

Posted by: February's Baby at February 12, 2008 2:42 PM

"self-indulgent and downright irritating books that only crotchety old men can create"

So...what you're saying is he's now writing the kind of books he's written since day one?

Posted by: Case at February 12, 2008 2:46 PM

surprise surprise, a stephen king book blows. The only sad thing is that the shining, gunslinger, and quite a few more of his works were actually really good.

Posted by: jen'enplus at February 12, 2008 2:49 PM

read "Heart-Shaped Box" by Joe Hill. Brilliant.

Posted by: bam at February 12, 2008 2:50 PM

I've had a hard time working up any enthusiasm for King since the end of The Dark Tower. I know he warned about the ending, but Christ . . . I never wanted to throw a book at the wall so hard since The DaVinci Code.

Posted by: minorblue at February 12, 2008 2:50 PM

This really bums me out, too. I have always loved Stephen King- there was a time I would have read the back of a bag of cat litter if he had written it. The last thing I read was Lisey's Story, and I was underwhelmed and almost personally let down. Here's hoping he can get *it* back... bless his pea-pickin' lil heart.

Posted by: Blackwater Hattie at February 12, 2008 2:51 PM

Cell started out promising, and then just fizzled out like a premature ejaculation. Lisey's Story made me want to drive up to Boston and take a Louisville Slugger to his motherSMUCKING Sox cap. He's like that 42 year old kid hanging around the frat party, trying to make play off the fact he was in a band 15 years ago.

His kid, Joe Hill, has picked up the mantle. His first novel, Heart-Shaped Box, was outstanding, and his collection of short stories, 20th Century Ghosts, is just as good as his pops.

Posted by: insertclevernamehere at February 12, 2008 2:58 PM

Shadows of Dakaron: I'll concede you about the quote being taken out of context (Hell, even the "missed his grip" part, which I just don't see making sense in any context).

I'm not claiming King is unimaginative. In fact, I would argue that his status as the father of modern horror is well-deserved, given how often his ideas are hijacked by everyone else. Further, I neither expect nor want his writing to be "literary" in the Hemmingway-Joyce sense of the word. I just want it to be good, and it's not. I expect his early work to be shaky--he was learning his craft while simultaneously making horror a respectable genre. However, his basic writing stagnates, then goes downhill before ever reaching that "peak" of excellence it was heading for.

Oh, I just don't know. Maybe it's a generation thing. My first exposure to Stephen King was when my mother read It, and I think I was about seven or so.

Posted by: Minty at February 12, 2008 3:00 PM

This doesn't surprise me. Reading the dust jacket in Costco just about put me to sleep.

I've long thought that the real Stephen King was actually killed in that accident and someone else has been churning out his material since then. Dammit, there wasn't even a sex scene in "Cell". The man wrote a short story about people trapped in a grocery store by a fog full of boogies and there was sex in it. He wrote a story about kids stuck on a raft in the middle of a lake by some mysterious, carnivorous goo and there was fucking. Now he writes a whole novel about cell phone-induced zombies with no copulation whatsoever.

The real Stephen King is no longer with us, people.

I also second recommendations for his short stories. The short story and novella are his best mediums. I first read "Night Shift" and "Skeleton Crew" when I was around 9. The stories still creep the hell out of me.

Posted by: Alabamapink at February 12, 2008 3:01 PM

In the immortal words of Dorothy Parker:

"This is not a book to be tossed aside lightly, it should be heaved with great force."

Alas, Stephen King is going out with a sad, finger wagging whimper. Otherwise 600 pages would be fun to heave. Think of the thud!

-Amanda

Posted by: Amanda47 at February 12, 2008 3:12 PM

Alabama, that is a brilliant observation, as King ALWAYS finds a way to include sweet sweet lovin' in his novels.

I may be hallucinating or projecting or something, but didn't the main character in Bag of Bones fuck a pillow? Or his mattress? ...or the empty neck cavity of a baby doll?

:loses mind:

Posted by: Julie at February 12, 2008 3:13 PM

Poor Stephen King, he's one of my favorite authors, one I looked up to. Now reduced to writing crap. I'll hope Jeffery Eugenides does not do the same.(Even if they are completely different writers)

Posted by: Kamakaze Feminist at February 12, 2008 3:23 PM

'this "joke" inexplicably strikes Wireman as so damn funny that the two men wind up falling out of their beach chairs in fits of giggly hysterics.'
That goddamned laughter. Every King book I've read has a scene, or two, or a shitload, where characters laugh themselves silly over nothing. And he goes on to describe said laughter in minute, indulgent detail for a bloody paragraph or two. It's annoying and forced. Sticks out every time like a jab in the tit.

Posted by: Lauren at February 12, 2008 3:35 PM

Wasn't he going to retire a few years ago? Uh, you probably should have stuck with that plan, King.

It's strange that he should write the character of Ilse so badly, because I always thought it was eerie how real Trisha seemed in The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon, and that book isn't THAT old.

Posted by: june at February 12, 2008 3:36 PM

Bah. I love all seven volumes of THE DARK TOWER. I don't care what y'all say. The ending is perfect.

"The Long Walk" rules.

Posted by: Darth Corleone at February 12, 2008 3:54 PM

The Dark Tower series, even the cock-blocking ending, is still spectacular, and one of the greatest series ever. However, I'm glad he finally finished it, before his complete and total descent into mediocrity.

Maybe Richard Bachman was the talented one?

Posted by: Shadows of Dakaron at February 12, 2008 4:01 PM

Funnily enough, I'm currently reading Four Past Midnight, and my friend and I were discussing Desperation last night. Mostly about how he characterizes women as either stupid, easily corrupted, or agents of Satan.

Be that as it may, his work will generally scare the crap out of me. Not so much now that I'm older, but certainly when I was younger. Read my first King book at 11 (Eyes of the Dragon), and 10 years later I've read the majority of his work. My favourite stories have definitely got to be Rage and The Long Walk though. My dad has a (rather tattered) edition of The Bachman Books, and no matter how many times I read it, The Long Walk especially gets to me. It's that 'Oh, Garraty!' at the end. I also quite enjoyed Lisey's Story, though Cell was only so-so. I didn't even get to finish it due to getting kicked out of my apartment (it was the roommate's), but doesn't bother me much.

Where was I going with this... I guess it just sort of makes me sad to hear he's losing (lost) his touch. He's always been a hero to me, a girl who'd really love to get published some day. Maybe if my dad picks up this book, I'll read it, but for now I guess I'll just stick to the classics.

Posted by: Cuno at February 12, 2008 4:23 PM

Daniel, you definitely nailed this one. I used to buy King's hardbacks on the day of release. A practice that started with "Desperation"/"Regulators" and continued through "Cell". But I've barely glanced at "Blaze", and "Duma Key" I've passed by in the store several times. I own "Lisey's Story" and "Colorado Kid" and have never even opened them.

I have an entire book case dedicated to King first editions and my love of the earlier stuff hasn't wavered but the new stuff just is not up to par. The last truly great book really was "Hearts in Atlantis" and I'm at the point now I wish he'd left "The Dark Tower" unfinished. That last book should have been so much more than it was. I was fine with the ending, it wasn't that much of a shock. But everything leading up to it was just sub-par and anti-climactic and it never really came together.

Posted by: Rob at February 12, 2008 5:11 PM

despite the bad review, i will still read duma key...someday. i'm in the process of catching up since i've basically only read his dark tower series and all the books that relate to it plus a few of the short stories--i devoured night shift and skeleton crew as a kid.

i read the boogeyman in the fifth grade and have checked my closet every night since then. the other day i picked up cujo at a thrift store and figured, hey i know how this ends. this is just about a rabid dog. little did i know the damn boogeyman was in this book too (not the same boogeyman, but a boogeyman nonetheless)! i haven't finished it yet, i want to sleep tonight. ah, stephen king is the source of all my fears.

i've been wanting to watch that movie cat's eye again. i know the first two stories are from night shift, but it's that breath stealing troll bitch from the last part of the film that scares me. he is the reason i keep a fan on at night.

i scare quite easily.

and i agree with Darth Corleone.

Posted by: kelley at February 12, 2008 5:30 PM

I started reading King's works when I was in 8th grade (The Dead Zone was my first) and read him voraciously pretty much through high school (The Stand was my favorite). After college, marriage, finding a real job, etc. when I didn't have much time for pleasure reading anymore, I decided to pick up some of his works that I had missed when they were first released - Desperation, The Regulators, and Insomnia. I thought they all sucked. He seemed to be fascinated with this concept of ka, or whatever it was, which seemed like some sort of stupid copout explanation for the goings-on in the stories. Anyway, fast forward to about a decade later and I find myself having to take fairly long trips every couple of weeks for the past couple of months. So, I went down to a local used bookstore and picked up Cell, Bag of Bones, Lisey's Story, and Rose Madder to get me through the flights. I actually managed to finish all of them, but frankly I got so SMUCKING pissed off at Lisey's Story and all the stupid SMUCKING baby talk (or was it supposed to be hillbilly?) about bools and crap that I just wanted to scream. They all left me so incredibly empty. And the recycled plotlines were just too much to take (widowed author vs. author's widow; magical world brought about by thinking vs. magical world brought about by a painting). Gah.... I guess I'm done with him for good now.

Posted by: Elsie at February 12, 2008 5:33 PM

OK, don't laugh, but "Thinner" (a Bachman) is the scariest book I've ever read! (Just ignore the movie version!) I was an avid King reader back in the day until he started churning them out like penny dreadfuls.

Posted by: Bev M. at February 12, 2008 5:44 PM

I have to agree with Minty; King was a huge favorite of mine growing up, and deserves credit as the master of horror, but his work since (and for me, including) Dark Tower has been growing lamer and less professional with each release. (I guess that is still true - I stopped reading him a while ago).

Not only that, he committed the ultimate unpardonable sin: he held Princess Buttercup hostage for lo these many years!

Posted by: Pajibill at February 12, 2008 5:52 PM

I've read all King's books. This doesn't compare to the pre-being-hit-by-a-van stuff, but I liked it.

Posted by: kimmyhula at February 12, 2008 6:42 PM

Didn't King say he was gonna quit writing a while back?

Whatever happened to that?

Posted by: mightygodking at February 12, 2008 6:45 PM

I'm right there with everyone else. I will always love his pre-accident work and devoured every novel I came across from age 12. But other than the end of the Dark Tower, the last few novels have been such stinkers. I could barely get through The Cell. And I quite Lisey's Story halfway through. I think that story had potential, but the writing put me off that I just couldn't finish it.

Posted by: Lauri at February 12, 2008 6:48 PM

I think that everyone grew up with King's stories. From his books (The Shining, It, The Stand) to his short stories (Stand by Me, The Shawshank Redemption, Apt Pupil) and how they all turned into (mostly) quality movies.

But, for me, he reached his end with Dreamcatcher. That book read like a greatest hits. While I picked up Everything's Eventual (and found a few stories intriguing), it was obvious that King had stopped growing. He was now just rehashing what he knew fans wanted.

Posted by: BFFredo at February 12, 2008 7:12 PM

Stephen King used to be my favourite writer(and I know that's not cool for an English major to admit) but I haven't really liked any of his books since The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon. I tried to read From A Buick 8, but it didn't hold any interest, and I read Cell and it sucked. It's too bad, because the man used to be able to spin a good story, even if his work wasn't "significant". Different Seasons is still my favourite book, and probably always will be.

Posted by: Lannie at February 12, 2008 7:30 PM

I've always been torn by Stephen King. I remember when Cujo came out and scared the shit out of the older kids.

The way I always see it is this: Stephen King has (had?) a remarkable gift of taking fairly ordinary concepts and making them viscerally terrifying. Telekinetic girl? No big deal. A car with personality? No big deal. Rabid dog? No big deal...

But in King's hands, they became something more, something awful, terrifying. Pet Cemetary is a fairly drab little zombie story, yet it holds everyones attention despite that. No one calls it a zombie story, for all that.

That is his gift.

Not writing. Its never been writing. He has never been more than 'competent' in the writing department. With only a few exceptions (Eye of the Dragon and the first Dark Tower) I have always found reading his written word mildly irritating, bordering on painful. That is not to add my feelings about his reoccuring tropes. Cujo is actually weaker for the rabid dog being possessed by some evil spirit.

I could go on, but I'm wasting everyone's time as it is...

Posted by: Spike at February 12, 2008 7:39 PM

All of his work from the 70's is classic horror but then he became more and more irrelevant to me. 'It' was fun, and I liked the TV adaptation as well. The last really great novel was Delores Claiborne, although The Green Mile is rather charming. The last short story of his I really liked was published in The New Yorker, the one that was ultimately about a

SPOILER ALERT

survivor's reaction to a plane crash. Don't know the name of it, just remembered it as succinctly chilling.

Posted by: Matt at February 12, 2008 7:45 PM

I, too, am loathe to quit a book once I've started it. There is a way around it. I read the first couple of chapters at Barnes and Noble, and categorize it as 'ditch', 'buy', or 'library'. If it's a 'buy', I pick it up on my next trip to Chamblin Bookmine because I hate B&N. 'Duma Key' was my experiment last weekend; suffice to say it made it onto the 'ditch' list after 43 pages.

Posted by: Kris at February 12, 2008 7:51 PM

I make it a point not to read Stephen King novels because I've had so many bad experiences with them. Aside from the Bachman books, Carrie, and Misery, I find the writing to be self-indulgent, the characters to be lacking, and the violence and disturbing content tossed in just to make people go "Ewwww."

That said, I think he's one of the best short fiction writers able to consistently release collections today. There are distinct misses (Autopsy Room 4 and 1408 just to name two), but his ideas seem so much more relevant and powerful in a condensed form (All That You Love Will Be Carried Away - I genuinely consider that to be one of the greatest short stories ever written, and apologies for only referencing Everything's Eventual).

Thank you for reaffirming my distrust of King's long-form work and pointing out the existence of Hearts in Atlantis, which I had not heard of before.

Posted by: Robert at February 12, 2008 8:54 PM

Damn, I am surprised! I gotta call some of you out on the 'he USED to be so much better' gang-up - it really smacks of hipsterism. Frankly - shit inclusive - King is overall a bloody elite when it comes to novels and short stories. I'll be completely surprised if he isn't THE big name that outlasts every one of his contemporaries. He may not be as good as he was in his youth, but hell, who is? I'm not saying I think he should get a free pass, but people starting at Desperation? Good god, start from Carrie for christ's sake. I think a lot of his stuff works best if you go age-for-age. Also, the name Freemantle has a history - just like almost all of his work is somewhat intertwined. Abby Freemantle led the post-apocalyptic good guys in 'The Stand'.

Also - I have read It so many times I could quote it in my sleep, but '...he missed his grip.' still kills me. For me, it is the benign statement-of-fact thing matched with his incredible timing - letting you catch up internally to the horror he slings - that makes him well worth loving still.

Posted by: Rebeccah at February 12, 2008 8:55 PM

Sounds like more of the crap he tried to foist off in "From a Buick 8".

What a miserable excuse for a book THAT was! I went through the whole damned thing waiting for something to happen.

Never happened.

Cell only confirmed that the man cannot end a story to save his life!

Posted by: Uncle JR at February 12, 2008 9:00 PM

But I was wondering if Edgar Freemantle is any relation to Abigail, the savior of The Stand, my favorite of all the King books. Anyone?

Posted by: Sara at February 12, 2008 9:08 PM

Judge this book by it's terrible, unattractive cover.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at February 12, 2008 9:20 PM

I just literally squealed with joy that someone finally admits to not liking that fucking horrid tripe that was Special Topics in Calamity Physics! Emperor's new book, that one. Ugh. I've never hated a book as much as I did that one, and it seems my father and I were the only two who felt that way.

As for King, I just saw a pop-up book of The Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon. Seriously? A pop-up book? For fucking whom? That shit ain't for kids, yo. Damn book terrified me, I read it in one night and then couldn't sleep, just sat hunched under covers till dawn. I was pissed. But I think that's the last King book to do me in. I enjoyed Dark Tower, but now that I think about it, I lost the book in the break up and never finished the last one.

Huh. I didn't even realize till now that I never finished the series. Well, I guess that says it all.

Posted by: isabelle at February 12, 2008 11:28 PM

Anyone else scared shitless by The Dark Half, that King wrote? That one freaked me out. But It is/was still his best. The cover of this book says it all, I'll reserve it at the library but not gonna buy it...

Posted by: Be Adequite! at February 12, 2008 11:52 PM

The Stand is brilliant. After that the man can write whatever he pleases (we just hope he gets up to his old tricks soon!)

Posted by: clarity at February 12, 2008 11:53 PM

Be Adequite!: Nice one - I thought I was going to be the first to show some love for The Dark Half. That was the first King novel I ever read, after I found my dad's copy of it stashed in a cupboard when I was about ten.

King still gets a lot of love from me for the likes of 'Rage', 'The Long Walk', The Dark Tower series (frustrating ending notwithstanding - although to be fair, I can't think of a better way to end that cycle) and of course, 'The Stand' (the uncut edition of which I've actually read four times in a week on one occasion.

That said, he's been off his game for a while now. 'The Cell' started really promisingly, and then fizzled out, as has been said previously in this comment thread. Haven't even bothered reading anything he's come out with since.

Posted by: Dill The Devil at February 13, 2008 4:06 AM

I've read King for what seems like forever, and while I could never, ever, ever get into the Dark Tower series, I really enjoyed the last 3 I read; From a Buick V8, Cell and Lisey's Story. I have by no means read all his work, but will still if the book looks the least bit interesting. The premise of Cell is great (and I still think about the book when I see a group of people on their cell phones, or when I'm on mine), and I enjoyed it up until people started levitating, but overall is was a great read (and sadly I thought "they're going to make this into a movie, just wait and see"). There was a preview of Lisey's Story at the end of Cell, and I swear I tried to read it but thought I would never read the novel; but bought the paperback for a long flight, and found it more interesting than I thought it would be. That said, I'll probably read this when it's out in paperback.

Posted by: Bub at February 13, 2008 10:50 AM

Isabelle: I own the Girl Who Loved Tom Gordon pop up book. I read the book when I was 11, and the pop-up came out when I was just graduating high school. It makes me happy the way kitschy things do sometimes, but it's definitely not for everyone.

Here's what I love about King: people have wildly different opinions about what his "good" books are. Personally, most of what he wrote while going through his hard core drug years all runs together for me, but I love Bag of Bones, Carrie, and almost all of his short stories. I like most of the Bachman books but I haven't been able to get my hands on a copy of Rage yet. Got a new-ish one called "Blaze" that's allegedly the "last" Bachman book for my flight to Ireland. Didn't knock me off my feet, poignant little tale, and there was only one real moment in the story where I went "oh, bullshit".

I'm an English minor, and I firmly believe that somewhere, someday, King will be included in academic literature. Either on a class on the popular novel, or (my vote) a survey of short stories.

Posted by: Genny at February 13, 2008 10:53 AM

Reading Stephen King has given me an ENORMOUS amount of enjoyment over the years. I mean, looking back, it's just incalculable.

But oh, yes, he's gone downhill. The past ten years have been seriously hit-or-miss.

The thing is, though, the decline isn't consistent. He'll publish a good novel, then follow it up with an absolute howler.

After It and then The Tommyknockers (Jesus what an astounding waste of time), I really thought it was over. Then he published Desperation, which I thought was a fine novel, and I thought, "He's back! Hallelujiah!"

And then he published Dreamcatcher. Fuck me blind.

Cell was contemptible dreck. Lisey's Story went nowhere and took forever doing it.

Now, I just finished Duma Key and I thought it was quite good--far from his best, but good. It held my interest and gave me a couple chills here and there.

I'm still buying his books, because when he's good, he's still worth reading; and I just never know for sure.

Posted by: Jerce at February 13, 2008 12:35 PM

One thing about SK: I always thought he wrote women pretty well. So many male authors miss the mark.

Posted by: samantha t at February 13, 2008 12:43 PM

I always thought he wrote women pretty well. So many male authors miss the mark.
Agreed; with the glaring exception of Frannie Goldsmith from The Stand, whom I would gladly strangle with my bare hands were she a real person.

Posted by: Jerce at February 13, 2008 1:17 PM

Why do you hate NIGGERS so much?

Posted by: Saint Nightwalker at February 13, 2008 2:15 PM

Yes the ending of DT is perfect, though I have to admit, a couple of those were tough for even me to finish.

Yes King has faded, disappointingly so.

But Jerce said it best when he said you never know. Because you never do with King. He'll write crap for awhile (his phase in the early/mid-90's springs to mind) and then he'll turn around and write something with enough originality and depth that it's all worthwhile again.

That being said, . We're due for an upswing anytime. Hopefully.

Posted by: Smokin at February 13, 2008 2:19 PM

Why do you hate NIGGERS so much?
Posted by: Saint Nightwalker

What? Explain yourself, troll, or fuck off.

Posted by: Elron Hubble at February 13, 2008 3:37 PM

Can't remember which collection of short stories it was in, but "The Jaunt" scared the bejesus out of me in high school. Poor mice...

Posted by: patchfire at February 13, 2008 5:29 PM

Patchfire: "The Jaunt" was in Skeleton Crew. I can still hear that kid yelling "Long jaunt, Dad! Long jaunt!" Damn, that's creepy.

Posted by: Daniel Carlson at February 13, 2008 6:38 PM

The Langoliers was a short story (really a novella, I believe) and the best thing he ever wrote. Some other pieces come close to that, as well. But The Langoliers was written a HELL of a long time ago. Don't most people realize when they've lost it and stop? I love those artists who go out at their peak. I have no love for those who keep foisting their stuff on the world. King--keep writing if it makes you happy, but stop publishing the stuff, ok?

He was past it over a decade ago.

Posted by: Kathy at February 14, 2008 8:42 PM

"Longer than you think, Dad..... Longer than you think!" The Jaunt.


Oh, and from Rage (which I own, btw!!!)
"Wanna pull my trigger??
"Sure, is your safety on?"


King has definitely lost my interest. I will always love his older stuff though. My personal favorite was from the Tower Series.... "Wizard and Glass" ...Who knew King could write a love story? A good love story????

Posted by: LadyJane at February 14, 2008 10:24 PM

One of my favorite King short stories was the one with the toy soldiers that came to life. That one scared the bejeebers out of me.

Add my love to "The Stand", "It" and "The Shining". (The books, not the movies. SK movies generally blow)

Posted by: UncleJR at February 14, 2008 10:51 PM

"Long jaunt!" Sooooo fucking scary. Almost as scary as "We float!" in IT.

Posted by: samantha t at February 15, 2008 2:04 PM

As a Stephen King fan who threw Cell across the room when it "ended," I can SO relate to the pain, man.

I haven't been able to pick up any of his newer work since then; I forgave him Dreamcatcher because it seemed a necessary exorcism of his hit-by-a-truck nightmares... but it seems he really has given up on his true gift and is now slowly coasting to hell.

Favourites? The Stand, natch; Insomnia, which many people seemed to hate but which I found deeply spiritual; Rose Madder; The Dark Tower series, again, natch; and one of the better books I've read about writing -- On Writing.

Posted by: Maryscott O'Connor at February 17, 2008 8:50 PM

His last few books have been huge disappointments, but I was vastly entertained by this review. Excellent!

Posted by: Cydara at February 21, 2008 1:29 PM

rebeccah--
you took the words right out of my mouth!
i realize i'm posting this so far down the line that no one will read it, but i had to post anyway.
i can't remember exactly the year (without looking) that "carrie" came out, but i was 14 or 15. my paperback is first edition, as are almost all of my king books, and yup, i've got most of them.
i enjoyed duma key, maybe it wasn't his best (i think that was "the stand"), but i wouldn't put it out of hand because of a bad review, even from pajiba.
king will stand (no pun intended) as my favorite author, along with koontz (who allways manages to use the word "chitinous" in every damn novel) and others of their ilk.

i also loved steve martin's last book.

Posted by: bionic bunny at March 4, 2008 8:39 PM

i flew through duma key, never even came up for air from page 250-500. was fully tranced. i enjoyed your review, and the book even moreso.

cheers

Posted by: holla at March 24, 2008 4:24 PM

They're all good you people are nuts. I'm 27; he knows how people under thirty think and speak and act. He's got kids. Authors can't just stick to one particular kind of horror; he has over 80 books! Lisey's Story was different, but it rocked, and if anyone here says "Bag of Bones" was another bad one, I'll shank someone.

As for he's trying to become a character in his books? When, in the DK6 and 7? Who cares it made it interesting. King was hit by a car, not crushed to pulp by a crane!

Posted by: Kevin at March 25, 2008 7:26 AM

I was just reading some comments.. WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT RACE?? Quit using that word you hateful fuck.

I LOVED WIZaRD AND GLASS too!!!

And King hasnt lost it, hes just getting older. KOONTZ lost it.

Posted by: Kevin at March 25, 2008 7:30 AM

The King still rules.

Posted by: Larry at March 26, 2008 11:22 PM

The reason, Mr. Carlson, you can only write words that are your opinion only is because you can't write or have an opinion. Mr. Carlson, your opinions suck!

Posted by: Marcie A. Gonzalez at March 27, 2008 2:08 AM

I disagree. I enjoyed Duma Key and could not put it down. I like the fact that King includes ideas, phrases, and references to his past books. I see that as a tribute to those of us who have been reading his books for years. New comers would not get the connection. The best writers always put some of themselves in their writing. That's what makes them the best.

Posted by: Gwendy at April 1, 2008 6:56 AM

In a world of multitudes who are so quick to show their caprice, it's a wonder that SK continues to write at all. Could be for reasons of creating "art for art's sake". I, for one, am glad that he continues to tread in this sea of fatuous cynicism. Duma Key was riveting.

Posted by: RJ Duke at April 6, 2008 4:55 PM

Well I waded through the whole book and it does not get much better. It's corny, it's predictable, and completely w/o suspense. How many times does Wireman say "muchacho?" I put the over at 150. Damn...I'm a big King fan but the man does not write horror anymore...he writes goofball fantasies or Message books on how cell phones are the downfall of civilzation.

Read some old school King or selections from his short story collections instead.

Posted by: DJ at April 13, 2008 2:47 AM

OK I've been reading the comments section and people's favorite King books/short stories. That's always a good time; makes me remember when King enthralled me like no other writer.I loved all the 80s hits brought up here, It, The Stand, etc. Pet Semetary's my all-time. Scared the living shit out of me at age 14.

Favorite short stories include Gramma and Survivor Type from Skeleton Crew. The latter is particularly badass and nasty. I loved End of the Whole Mess from N & M; Dolan's Cadillac is very cool, too, as is The Moving Finger and You Know They Got A Hell of A Band. Everything's Eventual has three great tales: the title story, 1408, and LIttle Sisters of Eluria, a kind of Dark Tower precursor with Roland before he catches up to the man in black.

It's silly to complain about King's writing mechanics, by the way; he's not John Updike or Phillip Roth. Dude writes about killer clowns and the like. He's always said his books are the literary equiv of a Big Mac and fries.

Posted by: DJ at April 13, 2008 3:10 AM

I love Stephen King, the good, the bad and warts and all. I couldn't get into Lisey's story, but with Duma Key I am right there with him. Falling into the hole in the middle of the page as he so eloquently put it in his book Danse Macabre. He is not everyone's cup of tea, but read The Stand every year or so and you will know why the man can sell books. Yes, some bad accident happened to him, but it hasn't changed the way he looks at the world, and I guess I am just fuddy-duddy enough to still enjoy the old man's tales. Put me in front of a campfire on a spooky night and let him go at it for as long as he wants. I never feel I am reading a book when I read SK, I feel like I am being told a story. His previous "great works" were mostly written when he was way stoned, in fact he sez he doesn't even remember writing Cujo I believe it was. Don't turn your back on an old friend, give him some slack. After all we all have to grow up sometime right?

Posted by: Francine at April 16, 2008 12:51 AM

OK, last night someone suggested Heart Shaped Box by Joe Hill. I didn't realize Stephen King's son was a writer. Holy sh** I know it now. I ordered the book from the library last night and received it this morning. I picked it up about 5PM this evening and began reading it a few hours(I think) ago. My God does this boy have talent. There are echoes of the young Stephen King overlaid with his own unique voice that scares the crap out of me. The only novels I have read that have truly scared me witless were by Stephen King with Salem's Lot and Pet Semetary and Peter Straub's Ghost Story. Now his son has done it again for me for the first time in a very long time. If anyone needs to know where SK's talent went, right into his son. I am looking forward to reading his collection of short stories when I am through with Heart Shaped Box. It moves quickly and gives me the willies just thinking about it. I am a grown woman of 45 and I am scared to look into the living room where I can see the moonlight spilling in. What if Craddock is there? yet I can't seem to help myself from looking. Get this Book, read it and weep with relief that the mantle has been passed to one who is worthy. Steve and Tabitha must be so proud.

Posted by: Francine at April 18, 2008 2:44 AM

LOVED DUMA KEY!!!!!!!

NOT EVERYONE IS UNDER 30!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: vivian kirkbride at April 22, 2008 7:50 AM

After reading Duma Key and the reviews here, I believe I have an understanding that I did not have before - some read Stephen King because they are SK fans and some read SK because they are horror fans. Probably depending on which you are will determine how you perceive SK as a writer. Personally, I am a SK fan and have read all his works. It's true - his writing changed during the last 10-15 years, but that's not unusual for Stephen King who I think has evolved quite a few times over the decades. There is more than one period of his writing that became tedious to read, and I think the last 10 years is another of these periods. However, some of his works during these down cycles are very good, enjoyable reads. Duma Key is enjoyable but not riveting. Some one else here said it best: you read SK (for those of us who are SK fans and not horror fans) because he draws you in to the story and entertains. Someone else here was also accurate by stating that SK has lost touch how to write a young character. It's true - he was better at that in the old days. But outside of some very, very distinguished and brilliant books (off the top of my head - Catcher in the Rye) writing young people well is tough. I have read very few books that I thought were really believable when it came to portraying young people. That said Mr. King has lost his touch there, though I believe that is inevitable as we grow older - unless someone can show me an over-50 writer who still relates well to young characters.
I never really thought of Stephen King as just a horror writer and so finding Duma Key as not very shocking wasn't ...shocking. I do think that he - as someone pointed out earlier - needs an editor or a better editor if he has one now. Let us all hope that SK will again give us a brilliant book like some of those mentioned in this review. Personally, I think if he could write another story as crazy, riveting and suspenseful as The Long Walk, he would be back to his oldself.

Posted by: Warren Messer at April 28, 2008 12:22 PM

Just wanted to add something interesting; a friend just picked up this book - she's never read a King novel. She loves it. She likes the character development, the plot, everything. Perhaps those of us who are intimately familiar with King and his writings have certain expectations that no one author can deliver.

Posted by: Warren Messer at May 5, 2008 10:45 AM

I am half-way thru Duma Key and I find it an enjoyable read.

I couldn't finish Lisey's Story and there were a few more of his works I that never really "got into" but to all the folks here slamming him, "is it really necessary?"

Posted by: jdcin63 at May 6, 2008 4:19 PM

I'm a true fan of Stephen King since I was a child. I try to read all of his books. Last month I finished his novel "Colorada Kid".I believe that that was his worst novel. Than I started to read this novel called "Duma Key" just to refresh my thoughts about Stephen King. And I really, really liked it. I believe that it's one of his best novels.

Posted by: ece at May 8, 2008 6:02 AM

I can't believe this is a review of a book, and the writer of the review didn't even finish the book! That is about as lame as reviewing a movie you didn't watch.

I've been a King fan for a very long time, but had been disappointed in recent stories. I felt this was one of his best since reading Misery when it came out.

Great character piece that really gets exciting at the end. I had a great time reading this book. If you enjoy SK, this one is a quick read for a 600+ page book!

Posted by: Randy Avenell at May 14, 2008 1:34 AM

Duma Key boring?
The cover sucks?

We're in a parallel universe, right?
What the fuck are you saying?
DK is one of King's best book, period.

And this review really sucks ass, one of the worst reviews I've ever read in my life.
Man, find yourself a job and, if you already have one, just do it.
Leave reviews to who can write them.

Posted by: Luk at May 31, 2008 2:17 PM

I have been a King fan forever, as well. I read this book and couldn't put it down. I honestly think it WAS one of his best. Maybe you didn't like it because you didn't finish reading it. Towards the ending is the best part. How everything finally comes together and they realize how to stop Perse. They go to the old house and all the stuff they find there is pretty cool. I do agree that his stuff isn't what it used to be but I thought Duma Key was very thoughtful. You say he doesn't have style when you pick apart all the details of this book...your reference to the small, individual ideas of it-but when you put it all together as ONE idea, how can you say that? You can't help but praise him on coming up with some of this stuff. I can't even imagine some of this stuff let alone figure out how to put it in a book. Perse as a spirit capable of anything she'd like in a little porcelain china doll? Lawn jockeys that freak you out by zooming in and out of the space youre looking at? And taking two completely different stories, the first about Elizabeth and then of Edgar, and putting them together...I thought that was very thoughtful. The point in the book where you realize the "How To Paint a Picture" parts are actually ABOUT this Elizabeth woman...I LOVED that. I really enjoyed the book overall. Once again his attention to detail makes it so easy to imagine everything youre reading as you read it. Maybe a lot of people think SK's good stuff has ended but I totally disagree. Maybe next time you should READ THE ENTIRE THING. And ROSE RED? How can you say THATS not good writing? Once again, yes they ruined it with some B-Rated movie but the book was fantastic. And The Long Walk???? That is one of my favorites. SK can write in so many different forms...just because he changes his form from time to time doens't give you the right to say it's no good. The time he's taken on the Dark Tower Series boggles my mind. And again, the fact that he can come up with that much STUFF and IDEAS in his head to write that much! And I don't know any other writer that can write a short story as well and good as a novel like King can. Maybe it's just time for you people who aren't happy with him anymore to find a new writer and style. Maybe you're just bored with it. But I agree too...don't write an effin review on a book you didn't even finish...that's just embarassing to yourself.

Posted by: MMB at June 13, 2008 4:51 PM

My problem is less with the writing than it is with the bad editing and the latter's why I can't finish the book. To wit: We know by the second page that Edgar's lost his right arm. His stump twitches. There is no mention of a prosthetic arm. Yet on page 26, Edgar drives a car for the first time since his accident (after taking four oxycontin) and there's no mention of what it's like for him to drive one-handed! Ten pages later, Edgar's sitting in the living room of his Duma Key house, upset with himself for forgeting his caretaker Jack's name. He is so upset with himself that he is "sitting bolt upright, my hands clenched in my lap." Hands? Edgar only has one hand. SK's longtime editor let him down here. And at the beginning of a book it's just about unforgivable. I can't jump into a story if the real-world lapses in editing and proofing get in the way.

Posted by: NBurke at June 20, 2008 6:57 PM

I totally agree with your closing on Duma Key. I would have never been able to get through reading this boring book, but I had traveling to do and I listened to sixteen and a half painful hours of this book on tape. I have read probably eighty percent of all King's books. This novel ranks in the bottom five percent. He rambles on and on and over and over the same subjects. "My right arm itches, but it's not there." We know that the main character, Edgar Freemantle looses his right arm in an accident in the first three pages, but we have to read about it the entire boring book. Most of this book could have been eliminated; it takes him ten words to say what he could have said in five. The first seventy five percent of the book is very, very slow, the last quarter gets better. BUT the climax to the book with the three heroes defeating the monster is a total joke. The supposed scary evil spirit is a china figure that fits into a flash light, and bites Edgar on the leg while in his pocket. Wow, why didn't he just step on it and crush it under his foot. The book's ending was again just wrong also. It was like King realized that he had rambled on and on and then he just had to put a stop to a very boring story. The only character you like in the book, Wireman, gets killed off as an after thought, not as part of the story. I bought this book when it first came out in hard cover. This will be the last time I waste over $30 on any more Stephen King novels. Duma Key should have been called Trouble Sleeping For Dummies, Just Read This.

Posted by: Gregory at July 25, 2008 3:27 AM