free counter with statistics Dexter in the Dark Book Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

dexterad.jpg
100 Books in a Year: Dexter in the Dark by Jeff Lindsey


Cannonball Read / Genny (also Rusty)

Book Reviews | March 27, 2009 | Comments (11)


(Note, this review will contain spoilers for the three Dexter BOOKS. The books and television series had divergent plots from the first season on, so it’s unlikely that these would be spoilers for the TV series.)

Dexter in the Dark is the third installment in Jeff Lindsey’s Dexter series. It strays from the previous Dexter books by introducing a new narrative voice unrelated to Dexter, which I thought broke up the narrative and not always in a good way. I also found it significantly darker than the previous books due to the increased attention paid to Astor and Cody as characters and their involvement in the case that Dexter is working on in the book. (Last warning; if you really don’t want spoilers for either of the Dexter novels, you really want to stop reading now.)

The book starts off with a nameless formless narrator who refers to itself as IT observing the process of evolution. IT retraces it’s own history as the hub of all sociopathic tendencies which the book draws as existing separate from their hosts. In fact, in this book, Dexter actually loses his “Dark Passenger” for a significant portion of the story. This was my least favorite part of the book; I hate the need in current literature to explain away monsters or rationalize evil. Dexter in the books has always struck me with a cold detachment that was more sinister and frightening that anything he did to his victims. By presenting his sociopathic tendencies as an outside force rather than something that is genuinely a part of him, the character is neutered in a way. I know that not everyone feels the same way as me, but I prefer my monsters without sense, without reason, without redeeming qualities. It’s why I never watched or read Hannibal Rising and was disappointed enough that I’d read Hannibal.

Anyway, the rest of the story is concerned with Dexter and Deborah investigating ritualized cult related killings that begin on the University of Miami campus (The U! Represent!). It also traces Dexter’s impending marriage to Rita and his efforts to start Astor and Cody, who revealed their own sociopathic tendencies at the end of the last book, on Harry’s Code. His training of the children is probably the most disturbing part of the book and the most promising ongoing plot for any future books. It does make my skin crawl to think about a 10 year old and 7 year old who want to kill people, but it’s the closest Dexter is ever going to come to a real human connection and it’s interesting to see him try and replicate the lessons he learned from someone who DID have an emotional connection to him. Of course, given Astor and Cody’s increased involvement in the story, they inevitably become entangled in the case Dexter is working and are placed in harm’s way. Neither of them are hurt, though.

Dexter in the Dark is a mostly quick read and solid installment in the Dexter series. I got bogged down in the history of IT, but otherwise I enjoyed the story line and the way Lindsey brought in an ancient religion as the basis for the murderous cult rather than making one up.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details are here and the growing number of participants and their blogs are here. And check here for more of Genny’s reviews.


Television Ratings March 16 - 22 | Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs Trailer



Comments

I agree. The book was nowhere near as good as the first two, but not as bad as most people say it is.

Just to play devil's advocate here, though, doesn't a review lose some (most?) of its purpose if it reveals spoilers about the book it is reviewing?

Posted by: Leaf at March 27, 2009 9:45 AM

Uncomplicated villains -- monsters, if you will -- hold no interest for me at all. They're scary, but boring. There's no intellectual challenge if the villain is so foreign that I can't identify with him, there's no hook. The best villains, to me, are those who aren't so different from the hero. Great villains need to be the hero of their own story. Doom, because Pajiba is nothing if not a crew of geeks, is a great villain not because he's a megalomanic who thinks he deserves to rule the world. He's a great villain because he's a megalomanic who thinks he deserves to rule the world because, in his mind, he's the only one who can bring about worldwide peace and prosperity. He's noble but twisted and is much more engaging than unthinking evil.

Posted by: Tracer Bullet at March 27, 2009 10:28 AM

Have not read this one yet, but plan to. I am a HUGE fan of Dexter, and also find his detachment both compelling, and repelling.

But, I'd still do him.

Posted by: dammitjanet at March 27, 2009 10:44 AM

Dammit, Genny, I'm torn by my desire to read your review and my desire to not have the books spoiled for me. Maybe this is just the motivation I need to get off my ass and actually read the books.

Posted by: Macafee at March 27, 2009 10:54 AM

Genny, I feel the same way about stories that try to explain away a character's evil by attributing it to an outside source. A backstory is fine, like Dexter witnessing his mother's gruesome murder (thought that might just be in the show?), but changing his "Dark Passenger" from anthropomorphized instincts into a literal demon on his back decreases the impact of his actions; you can't blame someone for what they do if they're being controlled by someone else.

Posted by: Geetch at March 27, 2009 2:08 PM

Are you s e x y people? ___RichFriends.o r g___where you can hook up the wealthy s i n g l e s & s e x y beauties. Find your s e x y partner easier and more effective! What are you waiting for?

Posted by: weekendsfun at March 27, 2009 3:35 PM

I think Lindsey is kind of a hack..I liked the first novel, but his last two books feel episodic and most of the characters are one-dimensional. Especially Deb, who I love on the show. The TV show is much stronger than the books, as Lindsey's one-note characters have a chance to grow- the producers were also very smart to diverge from the plots of the last 2 novels. Lindsey's got a 4th dexter book coming out this summer if you're interested.

Posted by: stryker1121 at March 27, 2009 3:40 PM

I agree, stryker1121. I've only read the first book, but after watching the show, I found it lacking. Dexter the show is a richer, more complex story with more interesting characters than the Dexter book.

Posted by: dia at March 27, 2009 4:11 PM

I read this a few weeks ago and was pretty disappointed, for the reasons mentioned. Also, did no one wonder where he wandered off to at the end or how he found the kids? Really??

I did enjoy his training of Cody and Astor, though. Cutest sociopaths EVER!

Posted by: Sarah at March 27, 2009 4:27 PM

I prefer the show. I tried the first book, but it didn't compare. Besides, Michael C Hall!

I agree, making his 'dark passenger' literal is a cop-out. Dexter is who he is because he was born that way - or so it's been up to now. So this is cheating.

Posted by: Tarn at March 27, 2009 4:41 PM

The show is much smoother and tighter. I feel Micheal C. Hall really gave Dexter a voice that he doesn't have in the books. I think that the Dark Passenger is a part of Dexter and I am ignoring the notions to the contrary. I love the way it is going with Astor and Cody, they are way more interesting in the book.

Posted by: TWoP Fan at March 28, 2009 9:56 PM