web
counter
 

207546main_blackhole_art.jpg
100 Books in One Year: Death by Black Hole: And Other Cosmic Quandaries by Neil deGrasse Tyson

Cannonball Read / stipe42

Book Reviews | January 26, 2009 | Comments (22)


Neil deGrasse Tyson’s anthology of science articles only briefly deals with the eponymous scenario, but delves into a myriad of other scientific details in a meandering book that is sometimes brash, sometimes humorous, but always fascinating. At the center of Tyson’s writing is the idea central, but often ignored, in all science: We are not special or unique. This simple realization is at once obvious and terrifyingly unbelievable, but is also critical to making the smallest headway in scientific understanding. What exists out there is fundamentally the same as what exists here. Without that basic understanding, there is no way to understand at all what goes on in the universe outside our insulated sphere.

The universe is vast and old. So vast and so old that we cannot even really understand it on familiar terms, but only at several removals of distance. We can only understand the scale logarithmically, like Russian dolls. The sun is so big that we could fit a million earths inside it, and it is so far away from us that we could fit ten thousand earths between us and it. Space is so vast and distant that the fastest spacecraft we have ever built would still take over 70,000 years to reach the nearest star. That’s ten times longer than we’ve had civilization. The galaxy is so big that it would take 700 million years for us to send that same spacecraft across it. That’s ten times longer than the dinosaurs have been extinct. And the galaxy is not just vast, but filled up with a mind-boggling number of stars: at least a couple for every human being who has ever been born in all of history. Top that off with the fact that in the known universe, there are at least as many galaxies as there are stars in our galaxy. In the grand scheme of the universe, our entire planet and history are less proportionately significant than a single cell of your skin.

The other point I took from Tyson is the phenomenon of the God of the Gaps. When we understand something, it is explainable, we only attribute the hand of God to things that we don’t understand. Even physicists like Newton took this shortcut, attributing the stability of orbits (something his own work could not reconcile, and which waited another century for LaPlace to figure out) to the periodic intervention by God himself. We see God in the gaps in science’s understanding the same way that primitive man explained the rising and setting of the sun with God’s hand. The key is that the things science can’t explain at the moment should not be scoffed at or defined as limitations in the concept of science itself. This is the central belief in science that has never been disproved: the universe is fundamentally knowable. It obeys laws and rules which we can work out, however shallow our current understanding of those laws may be.

Here’s the topper, the great equalizer of science: all those unimaginably distant and huge and alien objects are composed of the same materials as your body. We are billion year old stardust. That doesn’t make us special, it makes the universe knowable.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details are here and the growing number of participants and their blogs are here. And check here for more of stipe42’s reviews.









The Saturday Night Show Your Ass Thread | Paul Blurgh Cleveland Steams













Comments

All this science-talk makes me hot.

Posted by: Anna von Beaverplatz at January 26, 2009 9:23 AM

NDT gets me hot.

Posted by: Marra at January 26, 2009 9:52 AM

I like the ties he wears. THey are always cosmic in theme, but in an understated, tasteful way.

Also, he looks and sounds like he LOVES what he does, and that makes for an awesome teacher.

Posted by: Stella at January 26, 2009 9:55 AM

Ah! If you want to get randy reading some science-talk, read Bill Bryson's A Short History of Nearly Everything.

That book taught me so much. Such as: Newton once stuck a knitting needle in his eye just to see what would happen. He hit the bone and pulled it out with no lasting effects.

I got a nerd boner reading it.

Posted by: JakesAlterEgo at January 26, 2009 10:02 AM

This guy is my hero. He is just. so. GEEKY. And his ties are just the beginning. I want to be him when I grow up.

He is my favorite Colbert guest EVAR. Still my favorite line: "We astronomers call it like it is, not like those chemists. It's black, it's a hole; it's a black hole. Spots on the sun? Sunspots!"

Posted by: Vermillion at January 26, 2009 10:11 AM

I second the Bill Bryson love!

Posted by: Pants at January 26, 2009 10:18 AM

The thing about life is the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. If you're thrown in a blender and then miraculously unblended, stripe42 is back together, but we don't have another stripe42. You were gone when you hit that blender, and that same fact holds true for all life.

Be you stripe42, Vermillion, Sofia, Dustin Rowles , or me George, when the blender hits, and you are unblended, that's it.

Posted by: George at January 26, 2009 10:20 AM

Stipe, I was very impressed with your review of Tyson's work. You have a way of fleshing out Tyson's main themes that show your zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted by: Pookie at January 26, 2009 11:08 AM

George: To slobber that in even more geekery, does that mean than when a Trek character is transported, that individual actually dies? So then, coming out the other side is someone else who only thinks they are the same person? (My answer is "yes," by the way.)

Also, that Tyson is one goddam sexxay motherfucker -- gotta be swimmin' in high-class poon. He has that smart/cool demeanor that says "you DAMN right I know how to stick it in."

Posted by: firedmyass at January 26, 2009 11:09 AM

I haven't read this book, but whenever I see Tyson on television, I'm not changing the channel. The guy is the closest thing to a rock-star scientist we have these days.

And I agree with the above - that Bryson book is fantastic.

Posted by: DarthCorleone at January 26, 2009 11:30 AM

I've liked Bryson's travel books, so I picked up A Short History and just could not get into it at all. Probably because I had just read some Dawkins and Singh's "Big Bang," so it was mostly information I already knew. It seems like I'd have the same problem with NGT's book, which is unfortunate, since he's so fun and nerdy on Colbert.

Posted by: Sabrina at January 26, 2009 12:05 PM

Such as: Newton once stuck a knitting needle in his eye just to see what would happen. He hit the bone and pulled it out with no lasting effects.

Ewwwwwwwww, JakesAlterEgo. That just makes me shiver all over. It grosses me out, because once I got some hair caught in my eye. Not like an eyelash, oh no, that happens all the time. But a hair got caught in my eyelash and then in my eye and at least 3 inches of it got caught in there before I realized it was actual hair attached to my head and not a lash. I had to pull it out super slow to make sure it didn't break.

Why is it that when I get grossed out i feel the need to gross people out so that they suffer with me.

I'm awful.

Posted by: Kayanne at January 26, 2009 12:46 PM

love dr. tyson. i haven't given bryson a try, yet. am i the only one that thinks Kaku is also a rock star of all things cosmological? he's fantastic! parallel worlds?

Posted by: Shannon at January 26, 2009 12:47 PM

Neil deGrasse Tyson is a wildly funny man, on top of being mind-bogglingly brilliant.

Posted by: chenry at January 26, 2009 1:12 PM

Joining the Bryson lovefest here.

AvB, Stay hot, my sweet, it's almost Tuesday!

Posted by: bucdaddy at January 26, 2009 2:33 PM

After watching Tyson and Michio Kaku ad infinitum on the History Channel and Discovery Channel, I sought out Death by Black Hole.

It's a great book that makes serious physics accessible to most people. That said, it's not a light read. Expect to have your brain switched on for this one.

Posted by: Fredo at January 26, 2009 5:37 PM

I adore Dr. Tyson. He makes things that hurt my brainspace (read: Physics) understandable and almost enjoyable. I loathe physics.

Posted by: Melody at January 26, 2009 7:49 PM

Holy cow, take a day off Pajiba and I get a story posted. I'm going to take a picture of the screen to show my mom. I'm famous on the internet now.

Posted by: stipe42 at January 27, 2009 12:06 PM

We are billion year old stardust. That doesn't make us special, it makes the universe knowable.

Late to the thread but irascible as ever.

Any word yet on what it is that animates that "billion year old stardust"?

Posted by: Che Grovera at January 28, 2009 11:28 AM

I also enjoyed Death by Black Hole. It led the way to Michiko Kaku's books. I've read Physics of the Impossible, where he discusses technology in sci-fi stories and then discusses how possible they are and when we can expect them, and Parallel Worlds where he talks about, well, you know, parallel worlds.

I was an English major in college, these two authors made me understand some physics.

Posted by: lilah012 at January 28, 2009 2:06 PM

Any word yet on what it is that animates that "billion year old stardust"?

Not yet. But to explain that animation away by the hand of god is no different than saying that god's hand held aloft birds before the Wright brothers, or that god's hand made people get sick before we invented microscopes. Explaining the gaps in our understanding by invoking god is a terribly flawed way of looking at the universe.

God is the reason cavemen invent to explain why the sun rises in the morning.

Posted by: stipe42 at January 28, 2009 2:49 PM

Hmmmm. Can't seem to let this thread go, even as its expiration date has probably come and gone. At some risk of being the lone deist in the room, I would offer up that a cogent conception of "god" is more than just an attempt to explain away the gaps in one's personal -- or manhood's collective -- understanding of the physical universe. Science often answers "What?" and "How?" fairly capably, but it still lags in addressing "Why?" (if, in fact, that ability falls within our powers of observation and reasoning at all). Since damn near everyone feels the pull of the last question at one time or other, it's probably unrealistic to expect that there would never be any attempt to fill in the blanks on even an interim basis. I'm not in thrall to any systemic belief system -- as I'm generally suspicious of anything with the slightest whiff of dogma (which can also occur just as easily in the scientific domain) -- but I'm also not willing to abandon all hope and faith that there is more purpose behind the animated "billion year old stardust" than there is in the inanimate variety. Call me an egoist if you will; you certainly wouldn't be the first.

Posted by: Che Grovera at January 30, 2009 3:06 PM


















Viral Hits

>> Pajiba Movie Posters

>> Pop Culture's 20 Greatest Dancing GIFs

>> Mindhole Blowers

>> The 100 Greatest Insults of All Time

>> The "Other" 100 Greatest Movie Quotes

>> The 100 Greatest Movie Threats of All Time

>> The Sean Bean Death Reel

>> Chicks Dig Beards: It's Science

>> The Coolest TV Show Title Sequences

>> The Most Rewatchable Movies

>> The Most Expensive Movies of All Time