free counter with statistics Child 44 Tom Rob Smith | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

child44.JPG

I Follow the Moskva
Down to Gorky Park …

Child 44 by Tom Robb Smith / Dustin Rowles

Book Reviews | June 12, 2008 | Comments (16)


As history student, I spent a lot of time in history class back in college. For me, no period in world history is more fascinating than the one between early 20th century — starting with the fall of the Romanov dynasty — and the rise and eventual fall of Communism. The most politically gruesome period during this time span was the reign of Joseph Stalin, a motherfucker whose sense of paranoia was only surpassed by his cruelty. By most accounts, more people were killed in the Soviet Union under Stalin’s reign than were killed in the Holocaust. The man not only killed his enemies, but those who he thought might be an enemy, others whose popularity or opportunism felt threatening, or even family members who took the big piece a chicken. The slightest whiff of suspicion led to interrogation and torture, and then eventually, a confession that justified the interrogation (the Communist Party didn’t like to have egg on its face, so if they thought you did something, then goddamn it, you did). To belong to the Communist Party required a great deal of balance — if you screwed up, even for something as minor as inadvertently talking to someone who ended up on a “list” five years later, then you’d also end up on a list of known associates, and likely be sent to prison, a forced labor camp, or to your death by execution; however, if you did your job exceedingly well and rose the ranks too quickly, you could just as well find yourself at the bottom of a mass grave.

Stalin’s regime provides the backdrop to Tom Robb Smith’s debut novel, Child 44, a crime thriller based loosely on the murders committed by Andrei Chikatilo, a.k.a., The Butcher of Rostov. Leo Demidov, a high-ranking member of the secret police, is an upstanding, by-the-books Communist who performs his duties diligently and without question, trusting in the system, even though he occasionally has some unspoken reservations about the guilt of many of the people he arrests. He gets himself in a spot of trouble, however, when he gets on the bad side of a fuckstick subordinate — a vicious son of a bitch who shoots first and justifies it later — who is jealous of Leo’s success. And because the Soviet Union was what it was, all it took was a baseless accusation to end your career or even your life. So, the jilted subordinate called the party loyalties of Leo’s wife, Raisa, into question, putting Leo in the awkward position of having to spy on his own wife. After the party digs up some made-up bullshit on Raisa, Leo is forced to either denounce her or, by virtue of not denouncing her, have his own loyalties called into question. He refuses and, in a stroke of brilliant luck, Leo and Raisa are not executed, but demoted to a lower position in a crappy city, where they are left basically to suffer a humiliation worse than death.

In the midst of all of this, Leo also discovers a series of related murders — all children with their stomachs pulled out and their mouths stuffed full of bark. However, to even suggest the existence of a serial killer — a symbol of Western capitalistic excess — would treasonously reveal doubt, since a serial killer would imply there’s a crack in the Soviet system. So, Leo is forced to investigate the murders on the down-low, knowing that if he’s discovered, his wife, his family, and everyone he knows will likely be imprisoned or executed by virtue of their association with him.

The detective story at the heart of Child 44 is gripping and suspenseful enough by itself, but by setting the investigation during Stalin’s reign and adding the element of life and death politics, Tom Rob Smith raises the stakes, creating a masterful piece of crime fiction. Every word, every sentence, every movement in the story is brilliantly orchestrated to achieve an almost perfect mystery. It’s incredibly paced and terrifyingly unpredictable, and he captures the intense, but justified paranoia, of living in the Soviet Union during that time. The novel is relentlessly bleak — dark and suffocating — and in Leo Demidov, Smith has created an indelible anti-hero, one that — thanks to Ridley Scott, who has already purchased the rights (please don’t fuck it up) — will eventually bring to the big screen (Richard Price is adapting). If the movie is half as good as the book, and if Tom Rob Smith follows through on his promised trilogy, Scott may have a very successful franchise on his hands.

Dustin Rowles is the publisher of Pajiba. He lives with his wife and son in Ithaca, New York. You may email him, or leave a comment below.









Jay and Seth Versus the Pajiba | Chaos Theory


Comments

Here's a fun fact for your lunch break: Andrei Chikatilo was only capable of reaching an orgasm while committing a murder. Put that in your tuna salad and suck it.

Posted by: fringecamp at June 12, 2008 11:43 AM

I can't wait to read this, Russian history is so full of true and horrifying stories. As for a movie adaptation, this sounds like a job for Daniel Craig.

Posted by: swimgrrl at June 12, 2008 12:08 PM

Wasn't an older movie with a similar premise as this reviewed here some time ago? Maybe I'm thinking of something else.

Posted by: katy at June 12, 2008 12:14 PM

Sounds like an amazing book - another one for the list.
Hope they don't screw up the movie. I'd like to see some total unknown in it. In my ideal world, it would be shot in Russian and subtitled. I'm really hoping we don't get another movie where everyone who isn't American has a fake British accent.

Posted by: Pea at June 12, 2008 12:20 PM

I think that was the HBO movie about the actual guy this is extemporizing on, "Citizen X".

Posted by: Jay at June 12, 2008 12:20 PM

amen to that Pea, amen to that

excellent review Dustin
and my "to read" list gets even longer....

Posted by: Bethy at June 12, 2008 12:27 PM

I knew the serial killer plot sounded familiar!

(Thanks, Jay, for the "Citizen X" answer before I even got to asking the question)

I love Russian history, and this period is fascinating to me, so i' excited that this book is getting a positive review.

Posted by: Ava at June 12, 2008 12:44 PM

I've said it before and I'll say it again: while the fall of the Soviet Union may have been a boon to the odd couple of million plus people living there, it really fucked things up by removing a major backdrop for those of us who like our crime/spy fiction to be dark, relentlessly chlling and never going to end well. So on balance, was it really worth it?

Posted by: PaddyDog at June 12, 2008 1:12 PM

I love the Scorpions.


Carry on.

Posted by: Mella at June 12, 2008 2:01 PM

paddy, most of the 200 million people of the former soviet union are actually worse off now than they were before, just saying

i actually oce had a discussion with a stalinist
quote: "stalin wasn't that bad, he didn't kill 20 million people, only 10 million"

Posted by: Maureen Tuckers Drumstick at June 12, 2008 3:07 PM

At least back then people didn't have to get their drunk on with jet fuel. So I echo PaddyDog: was it worth it?

Posted by: Geetch at June 12, 2008 3:16 PM

I read this book a couple weeks ago and thought it was pretty good. The ending was pretty predictable and falls short of the awesomeness of the first half off the book (which deals mostly with the innerworkings of the Soviet government).

I feel like this is one of those books that if adapted correctly, can be an even better movie.

Posted by: dmbmeg at June 12, 2008 4:43 PM

I read this book a couple weeks ago and thought it was pretty good. The ending was pretty predictable and falls short of the awesomeness of the first half off the book (which deals mostly with the innerworkings of the Soviet government).

I feel like this is one of those books that if adapted correctly, can be an even better movie.

Posted by: dmbmeg at June 12, 2008 4:43 PM

I don't know much about the fall of communism in Russia, but Joseph Stieglitz discussed it in 'making globalisation work' and he said that it wasn't the fall of communism per se that was the problem, but the Western economists that advised the country to change to the Western models as fast as possible, without taking time to plan things and to adjust before taking the next step. And that he was standing by saying, 'no that's stupid advice, what are you doing' But no one paid attention.
And then the oligarchs asset stripped the whole country.
Reading the book was kind of a relevation as I always though economics was bullshit, but now I realise how important it is to get it right (and that most of it is bullshit).

Posted by: ChrisD at June 13, 2008 5:15 AM

Hate to be a downer, but I ended up speed-reading this a few weeks ago as I found it so dull. It read to me like a history lesson with a thriller plot badly bolted on. Even James Patterson would have rejected the plot as too preposterous (maybe). And it was far too long. Try the "Martin Beck" series of novels, by Sjowall and Wahloo, for good lean thrillers and social history/ critique.

Posted by: De Selby at June 14, 2008 5:06 AM

I finished this yesterday. Really enjoyed it. A great review and an excellent recommendation.

Posted by: Sean at July 5, 2008 1:53 PM



searchthesite.jpg