web
counter
 

Casino Royale by Ian Fleming

By jim of the lowercase | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (14)



CasinoRoyale_1.jpg

My next two books were my attempt to read my first Ian Flemming James Bond novels. For years I have read the film adaptions of the films that were never based on novels. For example Raymond Benson’s adaptatin of The World Is Not Enough on a fantastic, dawn of the millenium, observation carriage train journey from Indianapolis to Chicago. But I had never tucked in to Fleming’s work. For my first I chose his very first novel, Casino Royale. I had heard that the literary James Bond was less the bombastic action hero of the films but instead a much more downplayed English gent with a hard streak and intelligence. This definitely holds true and Bond’s actions are barely that of the film Bond before Daniel Craig.

Although seemingly having a knack for womanizing, this Bond is a post-war product who reacts indignantly when he realises he is to work with a woman. Taking away all the times I laughed at outdated mentalities, though, this was a very different Bond, less showy (unless on the poker table) and more interested in keeping his nose out of trouble if he can. But if he cannot he is still willing to go all out to get his man and to accomplish the mission. This Bond lends itself to the writing style of the novel which is economical and exactly the opposite of the bombastic nature I was expecting. This impacts perfectly on the poker scenes. Meaning that they are very easy and simplistic to follow, allowing Fleming to rachet up the tension and the stakes throughout.

The novel bears up well in comparison to the recent film version. Up until the end the film adds and changes things in an organic way, be it the chase through the bodies exhibition in Miami to showing Bond being smart and athletic in his chase of the terrorists in Miami and Africa. This worked much better to me than the book which contains mostly passages about French seaside towns (these bogged the book down in that I worried so much about where in France the book was set and what the purpose of the town explanations were that it became stagnant) and failed bombings by terrorists from the Balkans. Where it failed and where the book excels is the ending. In the film, Bond realises Vesper Lynd’s betrayal and follows her and enemy agents through a sinking Venice house. Vesper gets trapped in a lift and dies while Bond tries to save the traitor. In the book Vesper commits suicide from the guilt of her betrayal. This turns Bond from the fairly involved (romantically) man of this mission in to the cold-hearted bastard he has to be. The film’s version means that Bond’s change into the man who intones “the bitch is dead” makes less sense. In the film Vesper is given too many outs. The book makes it clear that whatever the status of his lover Bond cannot forgive her.

Overall though the book was a fun romp and a quite fascinating insight into the origins of a classic character. I enjoyed it so much I immediately went out and snapped a set of James Bond short stories.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of jim of the lower case’s reviews, please check his blog, Everyone’s Favourite Nobody.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Blog Trends from My Bunk 03/30/10 | News: Roland Emmerich Tackles Shakespeare | The End of the World as We Know It









Comments

Interesting review. I'm a huge Bond fan but have never read any of the books. I may need to check this out.

As for Bond's change of heart at the end of the movie, when Bond says "The bitch is dead." he really is still processing what has happened. Vesper broke through his defenses and it is evident throughout Quantum of Solace (which let's face it, should have been called "Casino Royal: Part 2")that he is in no way over her which is why he is so dedicated to revenge and figuring out why she was working with Quantum. Only by sparing (sort of) Greene at the end, and turning over Vesper's traitorous boyfriend rather than kill him does Bond let go of Vesper and become the cold and calculating bastard we all know and love.

Posted by: TylerDFC at March 31, 2010 8:35 AM

Hmm, I've never even thought about reading the books, since all anyone can ever seem to talk about is the movie versions of the books. Thanks for the review, jim. You've motivated me to read Fleming's work (beyond Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, which I loved as a kid) and to finally watch a Bond film with Sean Connery in it.

Posted by: Jelinas at March 31, 2010 8:40 AM

Uh, minor point. In the book I believe Bond is playing Baccarrat or Chemin de Feur, not poker.

I've read all the bond novels, (read them while I was in high school because I thought there were "racy" parts.)

I'd highly recommend reading them all, and take them for what they are. Don't try to compare them to the movies because there just isn't any comparison.

Posted by: UncleJR at March 31, 2010 8:52 AM

My first introduction to Bond was also through the books. When I watched the movies, I found the movie Bond a less compelling and nuanced character than the book Bond. And jim (and the rest of the eloquents), if you purchased "Moonraker," I strongly recommend that you read the last 2-3 pages. Bond was so human on those pages that it broke my heart.

Posted by: KV at March 31, 2010 12:19 PM

I'm with UncleJR...they're really worth reading, if only to give one a different take on the movie Kabuki-Bond we all know and love.

Some are better than others, and the short stories are IMO the best (little snapshots of Bond's life, or in a couple of cases, other people's lives...Quantum of Solace is one of the best, and has nothing to do with Bond...it's not even espionage-themed).

The really cool things about the novels are 1) that they let you know what Bond is thinking (he actually really hates his work most of the time, and has a lot of prejudices, some of which make no sense to modern ears), and 2) they give a flavor of what Bond does when not on the job, esp. what his home life is like (he has a maid and spends a lot of money modifying his personal car).

And if you think the movies are all about product placement, you'll be surpised to find it originated in the novels, often quite specifically (book Bond wears a Rolex). Fleming did it to heighten the sense of reality of the fictional world in which Bond lives. However, much of the very specific stuff that Bond likes isn't available in the states, or even made at all anymore...

Posted by: Jacktrade at March 31, 2010 12:25 PM

Uh, minor point. In the book I believe Bond is playing Baccarrat or Chemin de Feur, not poker.

How the fuck can someone screw this up? Ian Flemming spent two pages of narrative explaining how to play Baccarrat, because he then ends up devoting an entire chapter to the incredibly intense game. Confusing it with poker is like watching Michael Rennie in The Day the Earth Stood Still and saying, "You know, Keanu wasn't too bad in this."

Posted by: longcoat000 at March 31, 2010 12:49 PM

I found an original first print of 'The Man With the Golden Gun' a few years ago and got around to reading it recently. Whoa! How different was that? One thing that struck me was how he appeared to hate unnecessary violence and death.

I grew up on Bond, have seen all the films, but hadn't seen the older ones recently. 'Golden Gun' was on last week,and I was surprised to see how outdated and ridiculous it seemed, same for 'The Spy Who Loved Me.' Hell, even 'Goldeneye' seemed a joke compared to the Craig Bonds. Of course, as everybody knows, 'A View to a Kill' is the best Bond movie ever, with the best Bond theme song ever.

Top Ten Best Bond Theme Songs:
1. A View to a Kill
2. Die Another Day
3. The Spy Who Loved Me
4. Live and Let Die
5. Another Way to Die
6. You Know My Name
7. Goldeneye
8. Goldfinger
9. You Only Live Twice
10. For Your Eyes Only

Now that's a nice CD right there.

Posted by: EJ at March 31, 2010 12:55 PM

Another reason to read the books:

The movies have never fully brought to life the great character of Felix Leiter, Bond's CIA buddy.

In the movies, he's at best a plot device to keep things moving...but in the novels, he's one cool guy (which is esp. telling, given the constant casual insults about Americans Fleming puts in).

Tough, brash, talks like he's in a David Mamet movie, has an encyclopedic knowledge of jazz, good restaurants and cocktails, and even losing his arm to a crocodile or finding himself in trouble on the streets of 1960s Harlem can't stop him from coming through when he's needed. He's my favorite of Fleming's reoccuring characters.

Posted by: Jacktrade at March 31, 2010 1:19 PM

Bond doesn't play Baccarat in the film because many audiences can't be expected to understand the way the game works. With poker, you can glance at a hand and get an instant idea of how strong it is, and it's pervasive enough in Western culture (especially in America) that you can expect almost everyone to be conversant with the rules.

Someone who is not experienced with Baccarat has to do math to determine how good a hand he's looking at, and that only if he actually knows the rules.

Stopping a movie for 5 minutes so that Bond can be shown teaching someone the game as an excuse to explain it to the audience..... Blech. And to do that, and still have the audience doing mental math instead of invested immediately in the tension of the scene.... Double Blech!

Posted by: ZombieScientist at March 31, 2010 3:39 PM

Stopping a movie for 5 minutes so that Bond can be shown teaching someone the game as an excuse to explain it to the audience..... Blech.

Agreed. But when you're referring to what's happening in the book, it's considered bad form to skip over 'boring' parts while going "Yadda yadda yadda" in your head, then saying that what happened in the movie is what happened on the page.

Posted by: longcoat000 at March 31, 2010 4:49 PM

Agree with longcoat, I read that book when I was 11 and still remember poker wasn't a part of the story.

Personal aside: my "middle school" library had every single Bond book, and I was asked to remain at school over the holidays for a week. I managed to read the entire set between sweeping the grounds - best punishment ever.

From Russia, with Love was my favourite. Cold war was great novel fodder.

Posted by: Peter G at March 31, 2010 6:35 PM

ha ha sorry i wrote poker everyone, serves me right writing the review in one draft... Dont worry I know the difference between poker and chemin de fer, though. I will admit I am a total snob when it comes to card games that involve money. I find them empty and lacking in actual physical card playing and rely on odds playing and proving your friend a dick. Although proving a friend a dick can be perfectly satisfying in games where you actually play the cards. When it comes to the use of money in card games I am a worrisome prick that would prefer to spend my time playing different games so I tend to be a bit blinkered in these cases.

I'm kinda a cribbage and nomination whist guy personally. By that I just meant that the succintness of the card playing fitted perfectly with the actual scenes and meant that people who knew little about the game could understand the scenes without knowing a lot.

Posted by: jim of the lower case at March 31, 2010 7:04 PM

It is said (Meaning that I can't remember where I picked this up back during my first Bond phase.) that Fleming was all the time cracking up while he wrote the Bond books. Bond is a famous spy, known to everyone, and even when the bad guys don't know him already, his cover is blown in the first chapter. The best black ops are the ones nobody ever finds out about.

Also, it's said that "Q" was modeled after a real person he worked with during the war. "The Man Who Never Was" is a wonderful read about a British deception op during WW-II. The movie version seems like an under-appreciated gem to me.

"Quantom of Solace" is my favorite Bond story. "From a View to a Kill" is a close second. There are also a couple of great reflective bits in "For Your Eyes Only" that remind me of Travis McGee soliloquies.

Posted by: BierceAmbrose at March 31, 2010 10:12 PM

BierceAmbrose, a great point. I was watching Man with the Golden Gun last week, and there's the scene where Bond spends a bunch of time tracking down the weaponsmaker that supplies Scaramanga with his unique golden bullets...the weaponsmaker's first comment: "Ah, Mr. Bond...your reputation precedes you!" That sort of scene is in most of the later Roger Moores.

Though Bond really isn't a spy...he rarely does traditional espionage stuff (one assumes the non-double 0s handle that). He's more of a secret agent, and really a government-sanctioned hitman at that. But yeah, he's not very secret about it.

Posted by: Jacktrade at April 1, 2010 9:43 AM