web
counter
 

Waving Around an American Flag Does Not Make You a Patriot

By Jen K. | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (14)



jvowells.jpg

I finally get the big deal about Sarah Vowell! She was one of those authors that people kept raving about over on Pajiba, so I read her book Assassination Vacation, and while there were definitely parts of it I found amusing, I just didn’t get the hype. I figured I just wasn’t quite her audience and I don’t tend to have a good track record with essay collections. I have yet to click with David Sedaris (a few of his essays cracked me up; the whole collection … not so much) or Sloane Crosley (same issue as above). After reading Assassination Vacation, I commented that her style might work better with smaller topics, and apparently I was right.

While her collection of essays definitely has a theme, each essay approaches this theme from a different topic. Even though it is a collection of essays, for the most part they span from 2000 to 2002, covering the Gore-Bush campaign and election, as well as a few other essays about random historical sites and conflicts. “The Partly Cloudy Patriot,” the essay which gives the book its name, actually addresses 9/11 and her feelings about patriotism. I’ll get back to a few of these topics in a little bit, but I figure I’ll start with the funny stuff before moving on to the more reflective parts of the book.

The second essay in the book probably had me laughing the most, which was about her family coming to New York for Thanksgiving, and included this quote:

It is curious that we Americans have a holiday - Thanksgiving - that’s all about people who left their homes for a life of their own choosing, a life that was different from their parent’s lives. And how do we celebrate it? By hanging out with our parents! It’s as if on the Fourth of July we honored our independence from the British by barbecuing crumpets.

It also included a description of her father as “a man who moved us sixteen hundred miles away from our Oklahoma relatives so he wouldn’t have to see them anymore,” which I loved because I think my family could definitely relate to that. My parents and I first spent 8 years in Germany, then two years in Seattle before my parents finally decided to move to Illinois to be near my dad’s family, only to stop speaking to them after a few years.

Mostly though, I loved the fact that Sarah Vowell loves history, and is in fact a huge nerd about it as she would tell anyone, but is also conflicted about it (and, of course, the “Buffy” references make her awesome as well). She describes working in an antique map store, and how a customer would be looking at an old map of South Carolina and how pretty it was, and while she would agree, she would also immediately think “slave state.” I really appreciated reading about someone that clearly loves history and their country but also can look at how nuanced and complicated it truly is simply because I often have the same feeling. America’s history is not simple by any means but so many people try to simplify it that I often feel like a spoil sport for not being able to look at the story of American westward movement and progress without thinking, but what about the Native Americans? Or the slaves? Or the Japanese internment camps? Just as a few examples.

She also took a look at the election between Gore and Bush, and discussed the fact that at some point in America, being knowledgeable became something to hide or be embarassed about. Gore was clearly the more intelligent of the two candidates but Bush won on a platform of the “average guy” — do we really want an average guy in charge? I mean, why do we want someone in the White House that gets us rather than someone that not only gets us but also might have an understanding of how to solve our problems? Or recognizes that problems even exist?

The last essay I wanted to mention was “The Partly Cloudy Patriot,” written in December of 2001. Vowell explains that in the first few days after the attack, she thought seeing flags everywhere was a cheering sight but as time progressed, she felt like the symbolism changed. And I really understand what she meant there. In her view, “the true American patriot is by definition skeptical of the government … so by the beginning of October, the ubiquity of the flag came to feel like peer pressure to always stand behind policies one might not necessarily agree with.” I also am occasionally skeptical about seeing the American flag hanging everywhere … on the one hand, it can be nice to see but sometimes I wonder if people are just hanging it to be cool. Or to say they are patriotic. And like Vowell, I wonder, who is more patriotic, the person that hangs a bunch of flags up and says, “America, fuck yeah!” or the one who knows and loves the history of America with all its contradictions and tries to make sense of it? Personally, I prefer the one that involves some thought. I have never described myself as a patriot because it feels like such a loaded word, it feels like it’s been appropriated by people who think they represent the true America and I don’t agree with their views, and I don’t have an uncritical view of our country and its past. Yet I know many people would probably describe me as a patriot or assume I am one simply because of my job. I think part of this might be due to the fact that I spent K-7 in German schools so when I learned American history, I was already older and more likely to look at it critically rather than learning to love America in second grade (trust me, I was proud to be the American in my class of German students in elementary school but I just didn’t grow up with American history the same way as many of my peers; instead, I grew up under the shadow of the Holocaust, which definitely teaches people to be critical of their past rather than simply proudly embracing it).

Also, this whole idea of patriot and patriotism reminded me a bit of the current debate regarding the cultural center, which is being played up as a mosque, and some comments that Jill at Feministe made:

5. Republicans who hate on New York City 364 days of the year, and now use the evils of New York (sex! gays! immigrants! Jews! elitists!) for political gain, don’t get to suddenly claim to care when September 11th is involved.

I feel like this basically describes the people that say they are patriots and wave a flag around a lot but don’t necessarily think about the topics more (not that I’m saying all Republicans are like this, I’m quoting her). Actually, since I’m on that article anyway, there was other point, I really liked:

6. Don’t even get me started on the people who now call the World Trade Center site “hallowed ground,” but have had no problem coming to NYC and snapping smiling photos in gym shoes and fanny packs in front of the site, like it’s another attraction between Century 21 and Times Square. It is hallowed ground. Act like it … I just really liked that point because I have felt similar about people visiting the Concentration Camp at Dachau. I admit, when I was in Manhattan in May, I ended up going to the site and taking a picture of the flag flying overhead, but I wasn’t planning on going originally because I didn’t want to treat it like a tourist site. There’s a line between treating something like a tourist site and going due to genuine interest or to show respect, and I feel like it can sometimes be hard to tell which side of the line one is on during a particular visit. I ended up going when I realized I was a block away but as I said, I’d originally meant to avoid it because I didn’t want to turn it into something on a “Things to See in New York” check list.

Anyway, in case it isn’t obvious, I really enjoyed this book. It was thoughtful but also humorous and I agreed with much of what she said, and I am definitely looking forward to reading another one of her books. I just hope it’s similar to this one in its set up, and not like Assassination Vacation.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Jen K’s reviews, check out her blog, Notes from the Officer’s Club.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



One of the Weirdest Anomalies in Box Office History | Hatchet II Trailer | Just Another Happy Bloodbath









Comments

Sarah's intelligence, insight and love for the history of this country shine through in everything she writes. I'm glad that you brought this one to everyone's attention, Jen. Thank you.

Posted by: Spender at August 23, 2010 9:23 AM

This sounds fantastic and I will definitely check it out. And I agree with you on your assessment of David Sedaris. I love some of his stories (Jesus Shaves, Six to Eight Black Men, and Nuit of the Living Dead had me laughing to tears) but his overall collection is just OK.

5. Republicans who hate on New York City 364 days of the year, and now use the evils of New York (sex! gays! immigrants! Jews! elitists!) for political gain, don’t get to suddenly claim to care when September 11th is involved.

I love this point especially as applied to the whole Park 51 scenario. Now it’s all about “respecting the site” and “hallowed ground” and “thoughtless”. But according to Sarah Palin, NYC is not “real America” because Manhattan is all elitist. So why does she care what’s going on there?

Posted by: Scully at August 23, 2010 10:04 AM

I have often wondered: does one have to have one of those "little girl" voices in order to write for This American Life or similar monologue presentations? No attempt to detract from Sarah Vowell's talent here, but it strikes me that every time a female does a piece on TAL or Sound Opinions or even guests on David Sedaris' pieces they all have THAT voice. Is it genetic or do they cultivate it to fit in

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 23, 2010 10:06 AM

What really bugs me is people who refer to the WTC as "Ground Zero." The Pentagon was attacked that same day. The Pentagon is the most important military installation in the country. The WTC was an office complex. Why isn't the Pentagon "Ground Zero?"

Oh, right. No cool video.

Actually, shouldn't the crater in Pennsylvania be considered our "Hallowed Ground?" No, of course not. This is America, where victimhood is celebrated and heroism is ignored.

Posted by: The Mutt at August 23, 2010 11:14 AM

Actually, technically "ground zero" refers to any specific point where an explosion occurred. Therefore, there are two ground zeroes at the WTC (two explosions), one ground zero at The Pentagon and another in Pennsylvania.

As for hallowed ground, when the native Americans are given back all of the burial grounds that were unceremoniously ripped apart in the name of progress and development, I'll start believing that people care about "hallowed ground".

Posted by: PaddyDog at August 23, 2010 11:53 AM

Dear. Lolo. I met a Astralia guy on enternet last week. After chatting for 3 days. We have an unforgettable date. He is well-looking, very polite (what I want). Now he is my boyfriend. I hope you singles find your partner ASAP. i strong advise you to check. ```AussieSugardaddies``DOT com, coz I met match on there. If come, message me, let me help you yo use it.

Posted by: wolton at August 23, 2010 12:03 PM

Rowles:

Sarah Vowell made the exact point that Jill at Feministe made about Republicans' tricky relationship to NYC on the Daily Show in '08.

Clip from Jezebel here:
http://jezebel.com/5060506/sarah-vowell-slams-republicans-for-being-frenemies-with-new-york-city

Play on.
Amenfro

Posted by: amenfro at August 23, 2010 12:38 PM

Sarah Vowell is the real deal. "Take the Canoli" is one of my favorite books. EVER.

Posted by: Carolina Girl at August 23, 2010 12:51 PM

Sarah Vowell is the real deal. "Take the Canoli" is one of my favorite books. EVER.

Posted by: Carolina Girl at August 23, 2010 12:57 PM

do we really want an average guy in charge?
---
How's the "smart" guy working out so far? Hey-o!

And can I ask a question here, the question no one ever asks in all the fuss about the mosque? If two blocks from WTC ground zero is too close, how far away is it OK to build? Would three blocks be all right? Does it have to be at least one subway stop? What? Heard somewhere that there are more than 100 mosques in NYC, so chances are pretty damn good there's already one within a half mile. So: Somewhere between a half mile and two blocks. Can you clear this up, Mr. and Mrs. America, so the Muslims will know where you give them permission to worship in the land of the free and the home of the brave?

Posted by: , at August 23, 2010 4:13 PM

I love her books. Well... I couldn't get into the newest one, The Wordy Shipmates, but other than THAT, she's great.

Posted by: Sara at August 23, 2010 5:41 PM

There are 2 mosques within 11 blocks of the WTC site. (one is 3-4 blocks away, in Lower Manhattan, the other is 11 blocks north, in Tribeca.) Both are small and inadequate to their population size. If you go to google maps and ask it to show you Mosques in Manhattan, it will give you 10 hits, including the student one at NYU.

If you check out the demographics of Manhattan, you will see that there are over 30,000 muslims in Manhattan (which is a small percentage of 1.6 million residents, but it still shows that there is a 'community' in the city.)

The closest mosque (which, btw, is not involved with the community center organization, at least their leaders aren't) predates the WTC, it is also, according to it's website, to small for it's congregation. IT IS actually, according to it's website, looking for a new location in the area. So, there Is a mosque, independent of this whole kerfluffle involving a community center, that is looking to relocate to larger quarters in the immediate WTC area. (They've been 3-4 blocks from the WTC since 1970. Since BEFORE the WTC opened. ) The second closest mosque, in Tribeca, is involved with the community center organization. It is 11 blocks north of the WTC.

The reality is, community centers only get built for one reason, that there is a community to support it.

Take a look at a map of Lower Manhattan. It's the narrow triangle at the bottom of the island. Anything built in lower Manhattan will be within a couple blocks of the WTC... or it will be in the river. The area that the WTC was built on, 150 years ago it was under water. Manhattan was built out to 'make more land'.

I am still somewhat sadly amused by all this. And the concept of 'hallowed ground'. I wonder if all these people who consider this hallowed ground, sacred ground, know that they are building 6 new high rise office/commercial buildings, a shopping mall, and a performing arts center, on the WTC site. There will be a memorial, a garden and reflecting pools in the footprints of the foundations of the twin towers, but the majority of the site is not that. The plans for all this are easily and readily accessible, and have been, for years.

The new shopping mall at the WTC site will be, again, the largest shopping mall in Manhattan. It will be larger than the shopping mall that was there before 911. It is scheduled to open in 2012.

Be seeing you at the 'sacred ground' Victoria's Secret.

Posted by: Wrenn at August 23, 2010 8:47 PM

Thanks, Wrenn. That's pretty much what I figured.

Posted by: , at August 24, 2010 1:00 AM

*Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. It will always be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice a little something from their store. I’d prefer to use some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

Posted by: Gregory Deffick at March 22, 2011 11:31 AM