web
counter
 

This Is How Sincere I Am

By Brenia | Posted Under Book Reviews | Comments (32)



sarah-palin4.jpg

A few of my friends thought it was odd for me to read Going Rogue: An American Life and my boyfriend was even a bit upset with me for “supporting” her and her message by renting it from the library. No, I didn’t pick up Sarah Palin’s memoir because I suddenly became a different person. I’ve always been curious by the thoughts of people with whom I starkly disagree. I’m not so much curious about Sarah Palin as I am curious as to why people are curious about her. She’s much loved by conservative moms everywhere who think they can relate to her. She’s much loved by the media because she is so easy to pick on, having a personality that’s almost cartoonish in nature. But politically, is she all that important? She just doesn’t seem that impressive a politician to me. Of course, Palin makes it a point not to look like a typical politician. She makes it a strong point. If there is anything I took away from Sarah Palin’s memoir, it’s that I doubt her sincerity more than I had before.

Sarah Palin’s memoir can be split into two parts that are entirely different in tone and language. There is the first half that deals with her life before the McCain-Palin campaign and the second half about her life during and shortly after the campaign. The first half is plagued by Palin’s well-known colloquialisms. I don’t know how much of this book was written by Palin or a ghost writer, but you can hear her voice in the words. The problem with all the idioms and simple language isn’t that it makes her sound dumb. Sarah Palin is not dumb; she’s just not an intellectual. There is a difference. The problem with the language was that it was annoying. Plus, I didn’t always understand all of her idioms and she didn’t bother to explain. (She does explain the word “mandate,” though.) When she does use “big words” she seems apologetic about it. I’ve never known anyone to try so hard to seem unpretentious. She isn’t even that successful. After bringing up the kitchen table so many times, she just sounds insincere. Besides, you can be unpretentious and still be arrogant and self-righteous. It was frustrating reading about someone who thought so highly of her own ideals. The words “common sense” must have been on every other page. I really think Sarah Palin believes that every idea she has in life is “common sense” and if anyone differs, they’re the weird one. A typical section reads that she once made some policy or other and while criticized for it later, she knew that she’d done the right thing. I kind of wanted to send her off to a distant and very different culture than hers so that she could learn that people can have different ideals and values and not be wrong, that her way isn’t always, necessarily, the right way.

The first half also has a lot of Alaska imagery and facts peppered throughout. I should mention that I lived in Anchorage from January 2005 until April of 2008, so I greatly appreciated the Alaska imagery. This means I also lived in Anchorage during Palin’s reign as governor. I will never say that Sarah Palin was a bad governor for Alaska (although her claims of being a tiny unknown grassroots candidate that miraculously won over the big guys is a bit ridiculous). Palin’s personality and ideas are very typical for Alaska. Alaskans are very independent. In a lot of ways, Alaska really is the last frontier. You can tell by the language Alaskans use for the rest of the country. They use terms like “the lower 48″ or “the outside.” I remember walking through one of the malls in Anchorage and I saw this man arguing with the security guards about his gun. “Why can’t I be here with my gun? It’s my right to be able to have my gun!” Obviously, this guy doesn’t represent the entire state — he’s kind of an extreme example of someone who doesn’t like the idea of the government being any kind of authority. Alaska’s ideals and needs are very specific to Alaska. Therefore, Alaskan politics are not always the same as national politics. Palin constantly says that she is on the people’s side, but she doesn’t seem to understand that the nation holds a lot of different sides to be on. It was all right reading about her life, but whenever she would bring up politics in that first half, she just came off as naive and self-righteous.

Despite the fact that Palin largely dropped the Palinisms in the second half of the memoir, after getting a few pages in, I found myself missing the first half. It was over two hundred pages of complaining. Now, I understand that maybe the media was pretty harsh towards Palin and her family. The media has a tendency to pretty evil now and again. But Palin went beyond just being ticked at the bad press she got during the presidential campaign. I’m talking all out self-pitying victimhood here. Somehow, she seemed to know every single mean thing anyone in the world ever said about her EVER and she needed to mention all of it. Palin had someone to blame every time she looked less than awesome in front of the world. She is especially unhappy with Katie Couric. Poor Katie Couric. She didn’t do anything wrong. I watched those interviews. Ms. Couric wasn’t condescending or badgering, as Palin insists. Palin was asked pretty straight forward questions and if she choked, she only has herself to blame. Palin went on and on about those interviews and about how it was all Couric’s fault. Couric apparently personally edited the interviews to make Palin look bad. Ugh. She was also pretty vindictive of the McCain campaign staffers. She accused the senior staffers of being controlling and mean and of cussing in front of her young children. I know that a lot of people have come out and said that this is all pure fiction, but I couldn’t tell you who is telling the truth. It’s all hearsay, really. I’m sure the campaign was genuinely a tough time in her life and I would have loved to have heard about it in a less self-serving way. I mean, reading about a presidential campaign could have been really interesting, but instead she whined.

Sarah Palin did inject some politics in there at the end. It was the only part where she sounded like the politician she probably is. I still don’t agree with Sarah Palin politically or philosophically. I’m not even sure I have any more insight into her as a person after reading her memoir. It just seemed a bit insincere. Not all of it. There were parts where I felt like I was hearing from Sarah Palin, the human, but not most of it. Most of the memoir sounded like she was trying to sell this every day, hockey mom vision of herself. To what end, I’m not sure. I suppose, we’ll just have to wait and see.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For more of Brenia’s reviews, check out Brenia’s blog.









Each Time You Like, Share, Tweet or Stumble a Pajiba Post, An Angel Does the Paul Rudd Dance



Pajiba After Dark 5/27/10 | For Your Consideration: Karen Gillan | More than Just the Doctor's Companion









Comments

I was at my library last night and considered taking out this book. I am curious about Palin's appeal as well, but frankly she just annoys me. I'm not sure I want to dedicate my any of my valuable time to reading about her.

So, I hereby award you, Brenia, a gold star for sticking it through and writing such a thoughtful review.

* <- there it is!

Posted by: mswas at May 28, 2010 9:08 AM

Oh for fuck’s sake! Seeing this face this early on Friday morning is just not good. Not good at all. Now I’m off to read the review because I clearly like to torture myself.

Posted by: Ursula at May 28, 2010 9:35 AM

Well done. Since this was such a measured and objective review I feel quite confident in stating that it would seem Palin is exactly who I thought she was.

Posted by: admin at May 28, 2010 10:04 AM

Thank you for the thoughtful review. I was expecting the typical smug & hysterical display of Palin-derangement syndrome found in these parts. I am impressed with your largely objective effort and discipline in not letting your politics color your review too much. You assessed the book on the merits and I like your personal insights into Alaskan culture as well. Thanks again.

Posted by: Ellie at May 28, 2010 10:06 AM

I had to come in hear to read who would be interested in this book and why, exactly. Also, curiosity killed the Cindy. I would never allow myself to pick up her book, but here in the safe womb of Pajiba, no one will know! (Unless, of course, I was dumb enough to make a comment.) So here I am, dumb and happy to have read your fair and balanced review. Nicely done, and as Che said, thank you for taking one for the team.

Posted by: Cindy at May 28, 2010 10:12 AM

Nice job, Brenia. Your genuine curiosity about what other people think will serve you well, even if it means wading through 200 pages of self-selving whining.

I've noticed a pattern in elections since after Nixon: The Left generally tries to paint Republican presidential (and VP) candidates as boobs and rubes (Reagan, Quayle, W, Palin) while the Right tries to paint Democratic candidates as pointy-headed intellectuals (Gore, Kerry, Obama). Palin is maybe the first one of the set to seem to sort of try to deflate that criticism by more or less embracing it (well, Reagan kinda did too, and was way more successful at it). Not that she's a boob, but by embracing that "I'm no smarter than you and I don't need to be" kind of thing. I can see why it's attractive in a NASCAR sort of way, besides the fact that Palin is not exactly Ruth Bader Ginsberg hard on the eyes.

FWIW, I didn't vote for McCain/Palin or Obama/Biden cause I thought both sides were right about that.

Posted by: , at May 28, 2010 10:14 AM

I have a copy of this book quite by accident. I'm serious: I returned from a trip to the grocery store, and a copy of Going Rogue was in one of the bags. (My only explanation is that the elderly gentleman in front of me purchased it, and it got left on the conveyor belt to co-mingle with my leftie, secular, lower-48 groceries.)
At any rate -- it really is a wonderful example of why some people should never to allowed to write books. So ham-fisted and over-reaching. We spent the Christmas holidays having dramatic readings from the book in various accents (Russian is, ironically, the funniest). I would not, however, recommend that anyone actually read it.

Posted by: Tira at May 28, 2010 10:15 AM

Thank you so much for this excellent review, and for exactly voicing my views on Palin as an Alaskan politician. I also left Alaska in mid-2008, so I also experienced her as a governor. It can be frustrating trying to explain why I think she's a horror as a national politician, but I thought she was fine as Alaska's governor.

But I could NEVER read this book, I mean for crying out loud that woman gets on the nerves. Bunch of "folksy" bullshit.

Posted by: Katers at May 28, 2010 10:20 AM

Great review. But I was distressed to hear that you had to "rent" the book from your library. Libraries used to lend books for free. Budget cuts I guess.

Posted by: Ned at May 28, 2010 10:21 AM

Tira - the dramatic readings sound hysterical. Makes me wish I'd borrowed the book from the library after all!

Posted by: mswas at May 28, 2010 10:49 AM

I thought it would have been pretty hilarious if her ghostwriter actually went all-out to make the book a serious intellectual and policy treatise, discussing and critiquing the philosophies of Edmund Burke, the relative merits of monetary policy moves at the Fed and its effect on M2 and M3, and the intricacies of game theory and how it would effect our diplomacy with new entrants to the nuclear club. Just the idea of her passing along something wonky and scholarly would have been worth the price of the book.

Posted by: Bd at May 28, 2010 11:24 AM

Hi Brenia, that was a very nice review. Way more fair then I would have expected from someone on this site. Plus I felt like I got an honest feel for what is in the book. I have to say I pretty much agree with your questioning of Sarah Palin's sincerity, as right wing as I am I find her pretty annoying also. But I am not being the least bit snarky when I say that as insincere, vacuous, and arrogant as she appears, she pales compared to Obama in all three.

Posted by: EricD at May 28, 2010 12:01 PM

Nice review.

I've considered reading it to try to understand how Palin supporters reconcile her personality with the whining she does in the second half of the book.

Like - No one tells me what to do! I'm an independent frontier woman with Bulldog lipstick! Except...I let McCain staffers tell me what to wear and wimpy little Katie Couric push me around.

It drives me batty that her supporters let her have it both ways.

Posted by: Sbrown at May 28, 2010 12:23 PM

Being a conservative-ish voice on this site I would imagine that I'm expected to either stand up for Palin and claim she's misunderstood or say she's an embarrassment and doesn't represent the party. The truth is that she is an embarrassment. She's a disingenous person of questionable intellect and knowledge of the workings and history of governance.

But here's the thing; that doesn't separate her from the rest of the political pack. The only thing that bugs me about this review and the responses is that people seem to say "Yep, she's what I thought she was, okay, I'll go back to my objective, agenda-less, well-informed politicians and media sources." What fucking ever. I hate all blanket statements so I'm not going to say there are no honest politicians, but there are so precious precious few, and how many of those actually have the requisite skills and knowledge to make thoughtful and responsible governing decisions? It's economics: the skill set that gets you elected has almost nothing whatsoever to do with the skill set that makes you a good politician. People are talking about Palin coming back strong, posturing for a Presidential bid. WHAT? Her performance last time and since should have completely destroyed that. Are we so blind that we're just going to buy whoever our party sells to us in a Starbucks Venti Latte or a six pack of Coors? Apparently.

Sorry for the mess, but I don't have time to clean up my comments today.

Posted by: Eep at May 28, 2010 1:13 PM

Way to actually engage in the reasoned and respectful discourse the country is lacking. Listening to what the other side is saying, regardless of whether you agree seems to be a lost art.

Also, now that you have reviewed I feel absolved of nay need to even think about reading it.

Posted by: FyreHaar at May 28, 2010 4:19 PM

Way to actually engage in the reasoned and respectful discourse the country is lacking. Listening to what the other side is saying, regardless of whether you agree seems to be a lost art.

Also, now that you have reviewed I feel absolved of nay need to even think about reading it.

Sorry about reposting an entire comment. But does anyone else see the problem here?

Posted by: EricD at May 28, 2010 7:20 PM

Good review. The book seems about as bad as I expected it to be.

I was amused by the anecdote about the dude in the mall, too. Apparently he thought malls are now government property, not private property that the mall owners can make pretty much whatever restrictions they want on?

Posted by: Shadowen at May 28, 2010 7:40 PM

(Disclaimer: Lifelong Republican talking here.)

When I first heard the name Sarah Palin in conection with the GOP VP nom, I thought "Well! Gutsy move, but who the hell is she?" So I started reading up on her.

The reading aside, the Couric interview and several of her stump speeches convinced me that this woman should never be allowed as close to the Presidency as she got. Never, never, never. To paraphrase another Republican, former House Speaker Thomas B. Reed of Maine, "She never opens her mouth without subtracting from the total of human intelligence."

When she quit as Alaska's governor (which, incidentally, gave the lie to her up-to-that-point constant assertions that conservatives never cut and run), I thought it was for one of two reasons. Feathering her nest was one of those conclusions, and we see that she's making a great deal of hay while the sun shines in speaking fees and book earnings.

Who should play her in the TV-movie? And not Tina Fey, please - no typecasting.

Posted by: The Wanderer at May 28, 2010 8:23 PM

"Not that she's a boob, but by embracing that "I'm no smarter than you and I don't need to be" kind of thing. I can see why it's attractive in a NASCAR sort of way, besides the fact that Palin is not exactly Ruth Bader Ginsberg hard on the eyes."

1. I don't ever want to see Palin's name in the same sentence with Ginsburg, nay, any Supreme Court Justice, again.
2. RBG is not unattractive. She has merely elected to trade on her formidable intellect instead of on an early-90s-inspired combo of streaked hair in a messy bun with frosted lipstick.

"I was expecting the typical smug & hysterical display of Palin-derangement syndrome found in these parts. I am impressed with your largely objective effort and discipline in not letting your politics color your review too much."

Right. Because the Republicans have been so even-handed, dispassionate, and reflective these days.

Posted by: samantha t at May 28, 2010 9:43 PM

I would submit photos of Ginsburg as evidence but I don't think any exist, as she melts camera lenses.

Posted by: , at May 28, 2010 10:32 PM

And of course, all the male Supreme Court judges exhibit Johnny Depp / RDJ levels of hotness.

Are you seriously slamming a very intelligent, highly accomplished woman because she isn't as pretty as you think she should be? Obviously the truest measure of a woman was, is, and always will be, her attractiveness.

We (females) should all just give up now. No matter how many women get into Congress, the Supreme Court, hell, even the Presidency, the main thing anyone's going to want to talk about is how we look.

Posted by: MM at May 28, 2010 11:35 PM

I'm saying she's ugly but that there's nothing inherently wrong with being ugly. You can be smart, you can be successful, and you can be ugly too. I love Iggy Pop, and he's one of the ugliest human beings allowed outside of a cage. But he's also smart and successful at what he does. Looked at Mick Jagger lately? Danny Trejo? Most politicians? These things aren't mutually exclusive. Plenty of pretty people without two brain cells to rub together. I'm pretty sure that under the ton of makeup Sarah Jessica Parker is ugly, but she gets millions of dollars to act like a vapid whore and wear stupid clothing, so she has the last laugh. I wouldn't mind her at all if everyone (including her) stopped pretending she was a paragon of beauty and a shining example for women everywhere and simply ADMITTED the fact, EMBRACED the fact that you can be as ugly as she is and still be a movie star and still command millions of dollars to act like a fuckhead and wear moronic shit on your head and feet.

THEN, my children, we will have made progress.

Posted by: , at May 29, 2010 1:14 AM

Dude, I respect you, comma, but:

"she melts camera lenses"

followed by

"there's nothing inherently wrong with being ugly"

does NOT track.

Posted by: MM at May 29, 2010 2:18 AM

I think your aim is off with those stones you are throwing MM. Comma isn't the one who brought up the looks of RBG.

The reviewer, Brenia, said "besides the fact that Palin is not exactly Ruth Bader Ginsberg hard on the eyes."".

Then samantha replied with, "RBG is not unattractive. She has merely elected to trade on her formidable intellect instead of on an early-90s-inspired combo of streaked hair in a messy bun with frosted lipstick"

At that point comma broke out with his "she melts camera lenses" crack. Which may have been over the top but he did not bring her looks into the conversation and only responded after someone else tried to redefine the concept of ugly.

Posted by: EricD at May 29, 2010 12:55 PM

The reviewer, Brenia, said "besides the fact that Palin is not exactly Ruth Bader Ginsberg hard on the eyes."

Nice try, but that was actually comma's earlier comment. He is the one who brought up RBG's looks, which samantha t then responded to.

See: Posted by: , at May 28, 2010 10:14 AM

Seriously, I'm not trying to attack comma (too hard - a small stone, maybe), I'm just disheartened that a woman who's accomplished more in her lifetime than most of us ever will, and worked hard to serve her country, can be dismissed with a flippant crack about her looks.

Posted by: MM at May 29, 2010 1:37 PM

He is the one who brought up RBG's looks, which samantha t then responded to

You are absolutely right. Teach me to rely on memory for who said what. They say memory is the second thing to go.

Posted by: EricD at May 29, 2010 2:26 PM

I must admit I stole the "camera lenses" crack from Jim Bouton, the baseball player who wrote "Ball Four." He said one of the players described another's girlfriend as like "Joe Torre with tits" and that he'd prove it with a picture but he wasn't sure any existed because "Joe Torre melts camera lenses."

But yeah, I made the crack. And what of it? There's nothing wrong with being camera-lens-meltingly ugly. It's a fact of her life, like someone else being phone booth-defyingly fat. (Are there any phone booths left anywhere?) Some people are so ugly that you risk your credibility as an observer if you pretend they're not. Which reminds me of the exchange often attributed to Winston Churchill.

Woman: Sir Winston, you're drunk!

WC: Madame, you're ugly. But when I wake in the morning I shall be sober.

My looks, on the other hand, melt female hearts.

Posted by: , at May 29, 2010 5:37 PM

Yeah, it really is annoying when people just sit and write about shit that annoys them. So goddamn self-righteous.

Posted by: Johnnyboy at May 30, 2010 10:51 PM

"Seriously, I'm not trying to attack comma (too hard - a small stone, maybe), I'm just disheartened that a woman who's accomplished more in her lifetime than most of us ever will, and worked hard to serve her country, can be dismissed with a flippant crack about her looks."

Very, very well-put. It's just minimizing and stupid. And the shit is lobbed at women far more than it is at men. I mean, imagine saying "That Scalia is a mess to behold"?

Posted by: samantha t at June 2, 2010 10:03 AM

That is what I am talking about. bookedmarked indeed!

Posted by: seo for miami plastic surgeons at March 11, 2011 3:51 PM

What an amazing story. I am really glad. Keep doing good job amigo

Posted by: mocneseo at March 20, 2011 5:45 AM

It's a shame you don't have a donate button! I'd definitely donate to this excellent blog! I suppose for now i'll settle for bookmarking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will share this website with my Facebook group. Talk soon!

Posted by: Keila Caira at March 22, 2011 10:57 PM