free counter with statistics Book of the Dead by Patricia Cornwell | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

Patricia-Cornwell.jpg
Book of the Dead by Patricia Cornwell


Cannonball Read / Cher

Book Reviews | November 10, 2009 | Comments (21)


I’m not sure I can make this review stretch out enough, because I hated this book. I’ve been a big fan of Patricia Cornwell’s Scarpetta series, and even though the last few novels prior to this one have dropped the ball somewhat, I still enjoyed them enough to read them in one sitting. Not so with Book of the Dead. Oh, how I hated this book. A few books back, Cornwell changed her writing style and although I didn’t like it as much as her former style, the books still held my interest. Maybe it was because I was comfortable and familiar with Kay Scarpetta and her fellow characters, or because I’m a sucker for a book series. I’m not sure which it is, but I read Blowfly and Trace and liked them well enough. Not enough to read again, but not enough to hate passionately or really care either way.

I wanted to burn Book of the Dead. Light it on fire and dance around it celebrating its demise. It was choppy, the characters were horrible, even the old familiar characters, or at least the characters that should be old and familiar, were completely different. It was set in South Carolina and Lucy, Marino, Rose, and Benton were back, but the characters were so one dimensional and flat that it was hard to believe they ever had depth. The story rambles and stutters and at times shoots off into side tangents that were completely pointless. I had no problem when Cornwell moved the characters from Virginia and changed to a third-person writing style, although I felt the books weren’t as strong because of it, but something really went drastically wrong in this book.

I can usually breeze through a decent novel in an hour or so. It took DAYS to finish this one, because it was almost physically painful to try to read it. Every minute or so I kept having the urge to beat myself in the head with it because maybe a concussion would improve it. Then I started blanking out on full pages and found I had to go back several pages and re-read them which just added to the agony. I couldn’t read more than a few pages at a time before I was pissed off. I kept muttering for days how much I hated this book. I almost got to a point where I was going to completely write off the book and not finish it and I never ever do that. I’m not sure if it speaks to my perseverance or insanity that I finished it. Probably both. What a waste of time I spent trying to get through it to have it be so unsatisfactory at the end. I kept holding out hope that there’d be SOMETHING redeeming about it and there was nothing.

This stupid book made me doubt my feelings for her older novels, so I’ve gone back to the start of the Scarpetta series and although the books are dated, I’m still enjoying them. I’ve also read the book she wrote since Book of the Dead, which is a much better novel and closer in tone and character development to the older novels, but Book of the Dead is just plain horrible. I can’t state just how much I hated this book.

Just don’t read it. If you want a good firestarter or something with which to knock yourself into unconsciousness, it’s perfect. Other than that, not good at all. So very, very not good.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. For a list of this year’s participants, check here. For more of Cher’s reviews, check her blog, Cannonball Read Takes Two.


Blog Trends from My Bunk 11/09/09 | Twilight



Comments

I suppose this means I have to delurk now? If only just to repeat how much I despised this book? It went to the used bookstore as soon as I was done and was traded for something way better because I just wanted it out of the house. Bad bad book.

Posted by: Cher (aka alwaysalurker) at November 10, 2009 8:34 AM

Seeking a rich, then live a better life! It's human nature, (Sugarloves-com) is more directly, more professional!

Posted by: pinkaimee at November 10, 2009 8:51 AM

Cher, I have just one question. How do you breeze through a novel in "an hour or so"? How long are these novels? Have you had a speed reading course? Or am I just stupid?

-Ralphie

Posted by: Ralphie at November 10, 2009 9:05 AM

I don't know what happened to Patricial Cornwell. I used to enjoy the Scarpetta novels. Then she changed it up a little and wrote Hornet's Nest, which I absolutely loved...

...Then she wrote a follow-up to Hornet's Nest which was so unbelievably shitty that I had the same reaction you did, Cher--I wanted to set it on fire.

I haven't read any of her books since that one; but according to people I know who have, they're all shitty.

Posted by: Jerce at November 10, 2009 9:10 AM

Ralphie: I thought the same thing. Holy shit am I ever a slow reader. I iz a dum.

Posted by: ahamos at November 10, 2009 9:13 AM

Cher,
Thanks for posting your comment. Somewhere between the end of your review and the beginning of the comments section I had forgotten how you felt about the book.

Posted by: pissant at November 10, 2009 9:31 AM

I have the mad speed-reading skillz. My mother decided many years ago that she wanted to learn how to speed read, so she took a course. But with no babysitter for the 5 year old me, she was stuck taking me along. *I* picked it up, she did not (haha on you, Mother!). If a book holds my interest I can blow through it in about an hour or so, if not, a couple of hours. Though if it's absolute dreck, it takes me forever and hurts my head.

It absolutely sucked in school though because I'd finish whatever assigned reading in the first hour. Then had to re-read the same goddamned book for an entire semester/year. Not too many teachers were willing to let me read more while waiting for everyone else.

Posted by: Cher (aka alwaysalurker) at November 10, 2009 9:31 AM

how happy i got when i saw old PC's face in that header pic!
i love scarpetta. i love lucy. hell, i even love marino! 10 years ago, i was SURE that temple gault lived 4 doors down from me, and i am Still in Love with andy brazil.

how sad that this was unreadable, i may have to pick up a copy at the library just to see for myself. but i'll consider myself warned.

thanks for the review! (also, i loved the video of you on the battleship with all the sailors, rawr!)

Posted by: gp at November 10, 2009 9:38 AM

Patricia Cornwell depresses me so much. I LOVED the first few books and devoured each of them in a matter of days. I went to school in Richmond and loved reading about all of these locations that I frequented. Then she took just a stunning nose dive. She should have quit after killing Temple Gault. The whole Blow Fly/Werewolf/Benton is dead/Benton is alive story was just crap. CRAP.

Posted by: jdrueke at November 10, 2009 10:07 AM

I got out of there way ahead of you, Cher, when I started hating the Scarpetta books. Mainly because she kept acting exactly like a woman (why can't a woman be more like a man?).
---
"I don't know what happened to Patricial Cornwell."

I'm going to take a WAG and say that same thing that happens to a lot of authors: They change their job title from "author" to "celebrity." Right around the time their novels get made into movies.

Posted by: , (TCFKAB) at November 10, 2009 10:14 AM

Cher, I was just wondering how it's going with you and Chaz, and was Sonny any good in bed?

(Someone had to do it)

Posted by: Cindy at November 10, 2009 10:48 AM

I lost interest in the Scarpetta books awhile ago. I have read some, if not most, of them. But because I always picked them up at garage sales and book stores, I never read them in order and had to put the pieces together. But I got one a year or so ago (this one?) and put it down about halfway thru because I just didn't give a shit.

I believe her best book was the one about Jack the Ripper.

And why haven't they made any of the Scarpetta books into a movie or CW series?

Posted by: wsapnin at November 10, 2009 10:55 AM

Rumor around here not long ago was that a Scarpetta movie starring Angelina Jolie was in the works, but I hope and pray that doesn't actually happen.

Posted by: Nicole at November 10, 2009 11:18 AM

Loved the Scarpetta books. *Loved*. But once Temple Gault was killed the quality took a giant dive. Yet I still kept buying them, somehow hoping that the next one would regain the magic of the earlier books. And then I read the last book (Scarpetta?) and it was *so* bad that I read it on a flight from JFK to Jacksonville and as soon as I got off the plane I chucked it in the bin. I'm done with Cornwall. I still think the earlier books would make great films though. But Angelina Jolie is about as suited to the role of Scarpetta as Big Bird would be to the role of Marino.

Posted by: sheepeyes at November 10, 2009 11:32 AM

Cornwell dropped the ball after Temple Gault was killed, and then REALLY dropped it about 3 books later. I don't like what she did with Pete, with Benton, or with Kay. I tried to read "Scarpetta", got about halfway through and promptly gave up. I did finish "Book of the Dead", but barely. Stick a fork in it, Patty.

Posted by: K8WMA at November 10, 2009 11:32 AM

I hated what she did to Lucy most of all. I loved that character. Beyond super smart, funny, totally and completely flawed and fucked up, kinda crazy, and sort of the ying to Kay's yang. But then she went and ruined all that back story and what made Lucy, Lucy and made this flat, one-dimensional mess of a character.

Posted by: Cher (aka alwaysalurker) at November 10, 2009 11:40 AM

I LOVED her books, too. It was like she fell and hit her head and kept on writing and no editor wanted to say no.

Posted by: K8WMA at November 10, 2009 12:10 PM

never read PC, and am glad now that I don't have to bother. I love a good "hate this crap" review. They are just as important as the OOOHHH read this NOW ones!

Posted by: karen at November 10, 2009 12:54 PM

Cher, I have to ask... how can you really appreciate a book you read in an hour? I mean, how can you soak up the words and love them? I can't imagine it. Granted I rarely get more than an hour of uninterrupted reading time in a day but I'll spend that on a particularly good chapter or two.

I'm a slow reader, and signing up for Cannonball Read has only made it more clear to me how hopeless it is to even think that I can finish a book a week unless I dust off the old Hardy Boys series in the attic and start padding the stats, but I digress.

I've always been mystified by the idea of speed reading. It seems to exist on the fuzzy edges of plausibility- it seems possible yet unreal at the same time, like hypnosis, or mind reading. Can you really appreciate what you read that fast? Do you come away with more than just a cursory idea of major plot points strung together by context clues? Could you go back and find your favorite passages? Underline bits of clever wordplay or a particularly beautiful description? Do you shift into low gear for the good parts? Do you read really good literary fiction just as fast as genre fiction and junk-food books?

No offense- I'm only asking from curiosity. And I'm not judging. In fact, despite my plodding and methodical reading style my retention is for shit, too. Could I recall more than a hazy outline of something I read a few years ago (or a few months ago)? Probably not. Oh well, it's fun while I'm reading it, and that's the point.

Pardon the lengthy and off-topic comment. Cannonball has me spending a lot of time thinking about what I read, why I read, and how I read lately. This is all just a byproduct of that.


Posted by: Yossarian at November 10, 2009 4:28 PM

Yossarian, totally legitimate questions. I actually can't slow myself down. Because I learned how to do it (and I can't even explain how I do it well enough) when I was so young, and right around the time I learned to read, it's completely natural and I do read everything that fast. From fluffy books with no substance to university textbooks and everything in between. I can go back and pinpoint my favourite passages, quote with the best of them from my favourite books and when I've had my comprehension levels tested in the past it's been around the 85% mark. I get totally immersed in what I'm reading, just for a shorter length of time. I guess it's a blessing and a curse in a way, but I am lucky that I pick up as much as I do and enjoy a book to its fullest potential. If I didn't, I'd be pissed. But it's so natural and something I've always done, I can't help it.

I do reread favourite books however and have nothing against reading a book over and over again, so that may mix it up a bit and skew it. I crave the written word though so I'm constantly reading something, be it a cereal box, a ketchup container or whatever. I just do it faster than the average bear.


Posted by: Cher (aka alwaysalurker) at November 10, 2009 7:08 PM

I hated this book, too. I didn't finish it and had the urge to put it straight in the recycling bin rather than burden someone else with it (through paperbackswap.com). I used to love the Scarpetta books (except for yelling at Dr. S. every time she said "Not hardly") so it's heartbreaking to see them go all to shit like this.

Posted by: Lainie at November 10, 2009 11:25 PM





Post a comment

 (required)

 (required)


Preview of your comment: