free counter with statistics Beautiful Children by Charles Bock | Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

51fG18diBnL._AA240_.jpg

Vegas: It’s More than Just Boobies

Beautiful Children by Charles Bock / Jennifer McKeown

Book Reviews | April 2, 2008 | Comments (15)


When I picture the great city of Las Vegas, I think decadence. I think neon. I think sequins, usually on or near feathers. And let’s not forget boobies. Big, fake, plastic boobies. It’s Vegas; what else is there? Sure, there are real people there, even non-synthetic people like you and me, but who thinks of them? They’re not what Vegas is all about.

Au contraire, says Charles Bock, whose debut novel features Vegas in a different light. Beautiful Children shows the reality of Vegas in its dirt and grime, not the shiny, glittering façade that most people imagine. Bock gives us homelessness, addiction, and filth. He portrays lost and neglected children and the people who exploit them for a quick buck. Included are, of course, big, fake, plastic boobies, but these are boobies in pain. Boobies with depth.

The axis upon which this portrait of Vegas turns is one Newell Ewing, a missing 12-year-old. That he is missing we know from the opening chapter, but it takes another 400 pages before we find out why. In the meantime, we see Vegas in all its filthy, degenerate glory: strippers whose painful implants are the only way to make a decent living; hustlers who will do anything, and I mean anything, for money; runaways whose lives on the streets eating trash and consuming drugs are preferable to their previous incarnations as abused children; porn dealers whose dishonest methods trap innocent girls into becoming “stars.”

But Newell comes from none of this. Despite being a kid in the most depraved city in America, Newell is pretty well-adjusted. True, he’s a spoiled brat, but his parents are well-meaning. Lincoln and Lorraine do all they can for their son, and even if their marriage isn’t perfect, Newell doesn’t have much to complain about: he’s given everything a child could want. What more can parents do?

So when Newell disappears after an evening out with his slightly-older friend Kenny, it is natural that his parents blame themselves for letting him go. Then again, their son is getting older; they can’t keep him in the house forever. Worse, they don’t even know why he disappeared. Did he fall victim to one of the thousands of depraved individuals roaming the city? Or did he simply run away?

We follow Newell as he spends his last known night in the city at the same time as we follow an assortment of equally lost souls. We follow Cheri Blossom (she of the painful plastic boobies) and her loser boyfriend Ponyboy as he manipulates her yet again into making money for him. Then there’s Bing Beiderbixxe, the overweight comic-book illustrator (bearing in my mind an uncanny resemblance to Comic Book Guy from “The Simpsons”) who spends most of his time in online chatrooms and drawing big-breasted characters. There’s also Lestat, a runaway who worships—you guessed it—Anne Rice, and his friend Daphne, a hugely-pregnant, drug-addicted teen who saves the milk cartons she’s featured on.

Clearly Bock has a talent for creating memorable characters, but he doesn’t stop there. He is able to move smoothly from plot to plot, from present to past. Only rarely does this movement become difficult to follow. Even better is his skill at using multiple voices and shifts in prose, relating with equal ease a chatroom exchange, an imaginary screenplay, and the twisting logic of a junkie.

But for all its strengths, Beautiful Children is not without its flaws. The multiple plots could converge at the end a bit more neatly, and a little editing would be helpful. A good quarter could be cut without losing the intensity or depth that characterize the rest of the novel. Also, some storylines seem unnecessary; for example, the one involving the comic-book artist adds little to the story and mostly only serves as a disruption. However, these are minor issues that hardly detract from the novel.

Bock proves that ultimately everyone is to blame for what happens to Newell. Simply put, our society is cold and unfeeling, each person only out for self-gain. There are only two choices in this world: hurt or be hurt in return. Charles Bock’s first novel is a joyride—the reader tears through glitter and neon and crashes on cold, hard reality. In this way, reading Beautiful Children is much like experiencing Sin City itself.

For more information about the novel and Charles Bock, check out the first episode of Titlepage.

Jennifer McKeown reads way too much and blogs about her experiences over at Bibliolatry.









DVD Releases 04/02/08 | Nightmare Fantasizing


Comments

He had me at his email address, which includes the phrase "bockstar." I love a pun.

Posted by: coveredinbees at April 2, 2008 1:04 PM

I am finally reading "The Brief Wonderous Life of Oscar Wao" and I am loving it so far, although I need an English/Spanish dictionary sometimes. So I am more than happy to give this book a try as well.

Posted by: ziva at April 2, 2008 1:11 PM

This sounds really fascinating, I'll add this to my "future library books" list.

Posted by: Julie at April 2, 2008 1:24 PM

Ooh, looks interesting; I'll have to check it out. Kind of sounds like Lullabies for Little Criminals, which was a pretty enjoyable read (maybe a bit overhyped, but good).

Posted by: MO at April 2, 2008 1:36 PM

Oh yeah, one more thing:

"...boobies in pain. Boobies with depth." Heehee! Very freakin' funny, Ms. McKeown!

Posted by: MO at April 2, 2008 1:40 PM

This sounds like an interesting but painful book to read. I'll tentatively add it to my book list but I'm worried the cold harsh reality of it all won't be for my literary tastes. I like my books to be an escapism type of adventure.

Maybe if I had more than one opinion on this book...... has anyone else read it?

Posted by: Wormer at April 2, 2008 1:57 PM

I am getting this one. I love, love Vegas but can't imagine what a hard place it would be to partly because I love Montreal. I guess I am just a sucker for setting.

Posted by: jenn at April 2, 2008 2:06 PM

Man, what happened to my comment, it got totally mangled. What I tried to say is that I liked Lullabies for Little Criminals, and what convinced me to read it was the Montreal setting. I am a total sucker for setting.

Posted by: jenn at April 2, 2008 2:14 PM

The last time I went to Vegas was the first time I left saying how awful the place is instead of "I love Vegas!" All facets of the dregs of humanity are on display there, and it's tiring and very sad. Not that I won't continue to go there to party every so often, but I now easily see through the facade.

This sounds like a good, entertaining book. If only I had time for fiction.

Posted by: katy at April 2, 2008 2:27 PM

This will go on my book list for when I'm getting ready to go home, because I have a feeling that after I read it I'll need to sit my 12 year old sister in my lap and pet her hair and tell her how much we all care about her and that she should never ever be afraid to tell us anything because we'll love her no matter what. She will, of course, wiggle away and give me her "Are all big people that weird?" face, but I'll get something through to her, I'm sure.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at April 2, 2008 2:28 PM

I don't know. I feel bad saying this for the Bockstar clearly poured his life into this novel, but Beautiful Children left me completely unmoved. There is nothing I love more than a breakthrough novel by a young author especially with a setting and subject so titillating, but I think he should have stopped laboring over this mess and moved on to write something more heart-full. A lot of the ideas in BC were wasted in the sprawl, they could have been put to better use - it's like he wrote everything and held nothing back, the convergences between plots and questions unanswered made this all the more obvious. Suffice it to say that I don't think the Bockstar would take a Pajibean attitude to the whole 'Crash' debate. His book isn't cloying, I didn't feel insulted by it, but it wasn't put together right either. sorry bock.

Posted by: Adrianne at April 2, 2008 3:54 PM

Whoa! I'm so glad to see Lullabies for Little Criminals getting some love at Pajiba. I heard about it from the Canada Reads competition, and ever since then have been trying to spread the word. I guess we live in different places, MO, because it's far from over hyped here. I felt like I was the only one. As far as this book is concerned, I was sold on it when I watched the first ep of titlepage.tv, and have been fumbling around waiting to buy it since then.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at April 3, 2008 1:35 AM

Just chiming in to say I LOVED this book. A commenter above wasn't into the ending, I feel just the opposite. The further I got into this, the deeper it pulled me, and the ending hit on just the right note.

Posted by: glimp at April 3, 2008 9:48 AM

Well, "overhyped" was a little strong, Kevin L., I just found that the CBC really latched on to it: Canada Reads, of course, and then I think there was a feature on the author on CBC.ca, AND it was one of the books that was read in excerpts every night on their evening programming. Not a bad thing, really, for the national media to pay attention to a good new author.

I guess I wasn't blown away by Lullabies, but would definitely read more of O'Neill in the future.

This is great! I don't have many friends who read, so I'm loving the Pajiba "book club"!

Posted by: MO at April 3, 2008 9:59 AM

Yeah, it's a regional thing. I live in the states, so I don't hear much CBC.

Posted by: Kevin Longrie at April 3, 2008 4:15 PM



searchthesite.jpg