free counter with statistics Almost Moon, The by Alice Sebold | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

M7W030L.jpg


Lovely Bones Redux

The Almost Moon by Alice Sebold / Jennifer McKeown

Book Reviews | October 30, 2007 | Comments (7)


Something is not quite right about Alice Sebold’s newest novel, The Almost Moon, even though at first it seems a solid enough effort. It’s not a lack of intriguing plot (a woman’s murder of her mother), nor is it what I like to call “the descent into cheese,” a problem that, in my opinion, plagued her first novel, The Lovely Bones. The novel instead suffers from flat characters, including what might be the dumbest murderer ever, a middle-aged woman without any real sense of self awareness. Furthermore, The Almost Moon lacks any real depth or insight — and yet, the book can still be deemed a success, for The Almost Moon is pretty much The Lovely Bones redux: disturbing, popular fiction that keeps readers riveted while leaving them relieved that their lives, however complicated they might be, are not quite so bad.

Like The Lovely Bones, The Almost Moon hooks the reader from its opening scene of murder. After that, it’s difficult to put the book down, and its almost 300 pages quickly fly by. The novel begins as Helen Knightly murders her elderly mother, Clair. Whether this murder is due to pity (Helen’s mother has been declining for some time) or vengeance (Clair, having suffered from mental illness her entire life, has hardly been a good mother, or even a passable one) remains to be seen, and Sebold spends the rest of novel exploring both the past and the present that has brought Helen to this moment of crisis.

Sebold takes us deep into the family’s past, exploring Clair’s mental illness and the havoc it has wreaked (and still continues to inflict) on the rest of the family, who are not without their own issues. Helen’s father suffered from his own initially unspecified illness, and Helen, an only child, was left to pick up the pieces and support her mother after his untimely death. Helen’s adulthood is also explored, from her early and troubled marriage (and her subsequent role as the imperfect mother) to her final state as a middle-aged divorcee who still, after all these years, must grapple with Clair’s stranglehold.

As the reader comes to understand the complex web that connects this family, it soon becomes clear that what appeared simple at first is actually much more complicated. It is not simple enough to say that Clair’s mental illness, which forced Helen into an early adulthood, created a rift between mother and child that would never heal. And while it is too facile to dismiss Helen’s murder of her mother as revenge for a childhood lost - even, it becomes clear, for an adulthood lost - so too is it impossible to judge Helen’s actions as mercy. The lines between victim and perpetrator are blurred, but finding a single point of blame is beside the point.

Sebold gives us no clear-cut answers; she allows the characters’ pasts and presents to speak for themselves, creating a maze of uncertainty that prohibits black-and-white judgments regarding anyone’s actions. But The Almost Moon is not about answers; ultimately, it’s about a family in crisis, about cause and effect. Perhaps it is for this reason that I cannot praise the novel, for, when it comes to such topics, Sebold doesn’t offer anything new. The characters’ plight evokes neither pity nor even amusement; in fact, after reading The Almost Moon, I was left as cold as Clair, and perhaps even an attempt at insight would have left me moved. Instead, Sebold offers exactly what we already know: Parents, whether living or dead, greatly affect their children. People make mistakes. Redemption is possible, but only if one seeks it. And so it goes.

Bibliolatrist possesses extraordinary powers that enable her to read tall books in a single bound. As Jennifer McKeown, she spends her days as a mild-mannered English teacher living outside Philadelphia. She blogs over at Bibliolatry.


Pajiba Love 10/29/07 | Webster's is my Bitch



Comments

I so badly wanted to like this book. I really enjoyed the first one, mainly because I thought that Sebold was so talented at evoking gushing, painful, unstoppable grief. I actually had to put The Lovely Bones down quite a few times because it was so painful.

You mentioned that her books both start with violence... I found it really interesting to learn that Sebold was violently raped as a college student. She wrote a short book on her experience, called 'Lucky' after one policeman told her that she was 'lucky' that she'd only experienced rape/bashing etc, because other girls had been killed. On my second reading of The Lovely Bones, I wondered whether her ability to evoke such pure grief and to discuss such violence was borne of her experiences or whether she always had those skills... purely pondering I know, I just always find it fascinating to find out where an artist is coming from.

Posted by: JJ McClay at October 30, 2007 9:20 AM

I suspect that "The Lovely Bones" was effective because it was a true story - or, at least, a story with the emotion of real events to fuel it. That's not to say those emotions could have carried the book - in the hands of someone without Sebold's natural abilities, the book might have been the literary equivalent of Lifetime. But perhaps she just needs some time to become accustomed to writing stories that are not reflections of her own life.

Posted by: Geetch at October 30, 2007 3:53 PM

Though it has been receiving mostly bad reviews, I'm still going to read it. I loved The Lovely Bones and I'm hurt that its predecessor isn't as entertaining or as good as her debut.

Posted by: Ben at October 30, 2007 6:03 PM

My take on both "The Lovely Bones", and her other book "Lucky" was that they we immaculate when covering the minutia of grief and recovery - when several chapters in a row covered only a few hours or days, it was riveting. But towards the end of both books time flows more quickly, covering months and even years in a matter of pages, and when Sebold starts covering her story so broadly, the prose falls apart. Sounds like this novel suffers too much of the latter. I'll still check it out, though.

Posted by: Bistro at October 30, 2007 7:16 PM

I have resisted reading The Lovely Bones ever since I heard the subject matter. I am glad I refused. I had the same feeling about this book. You have confirmed my decision! Thanks for saving me 25 bucks or so!

Posted by: Chiron at October 31, 2007 12:27 PM

i'm sorry for her suffering, but alice sebold is no great writer. "the lovely bones" is a fraction of a fraction of the soul chilling prose found in the truly dark novels of our time "The End of Alice" by A.M. Homes and Bret Easton Ellis's "American Psycho" (although his "Glamorama" is personally my favorite). I'm tired of the Oprah-fied idea of what edgy writing is. I do think that if writing helped this woman deal with having been raped that's a great thing- Unfortunatley personal tragedy does not always necessitate great literature. I hope Peter Jackson can do a better job adapting it into a movie.

Posted by: snarla at November 2, 2007 12:43 PM

I was looking forward to reading this, as I loved The Lovely Bones, but this is hard going. I am about a third of the way in and have put it down not knowing if or when I will pick it up again. The main reason is, I just don't care. Not about Helen, or her mother, or what happened between them to make Helen finally murder her. I can't relate to any of the things Helen has done since committing the act. I don't like her, nor understand her, and she hasn't given me any reason to endure the writing for a further 200 or so pages.

Posted by: Carrie at January 8, 2008 7:18 AM