free counter with statistics A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius Book Review | Pajiba - Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People

thumbnail.php.jpg
100 Books in a Year: A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius, by Dave Eggers.


Cannonball Read / Sophia

Book Reviews | March 12, 2009 | Comments (22)


I must have been at least somewhat conscious of A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius by Dave Eggers when it first came out in 2000. I was reminded of it recently and it sounded so familiar, and then when I picked it up in the library I knew I had at least flipped through it at a bookstore or seen it somewhere. Yes, maybe I should have read this book eight or nine years ago when it was the #1 National Bestseller, almost winning a Pulitzer, and when I was the same age as Dave Eggers at the beginning of his memoir. But I can be kind of clueless, sometimes completely oblivious to what is popular or well-known until it’s already blown over. Most of the time I feel I just accidentally stumble on books, music and movies that I like, and then I worry about all the others I haven’t found yet.

I searched this book out on a whim at the library, and it looked so interesting that after a moment of perusal, I was sucked in and had to check it out. The author, Dave Eggers, tells the story of the time he spent in Berkeley and San Francisco in his twenties after his parents’ death. Dave Eggers is only twenty-one and finishing up college when his mother and father die of cancer less than five weeks apart. His mother had been sick for quite awhile but his father’s cancer and death is more sudden and unexpected. Dave’s family now consists of his older brother Bill, his older sister, Beth, and his much younger brother Chris (who goes by Toph and is only seven-years-old). Beth, Dave, and Toph move to Berkeley where Beth goes to law school and Dave and Toph live together. Dave struggles with his own past and upbringing, dealing with the death of his parents, raising Toph, and figuring out what he’s going to do with his life—and all straight out of college.

Just the story of the two brothers’ lives after the death of their parents is tragic and fascinating. When I think of my maturity level when I graduated from college and the amount of pressure Dave Eggers must have been under, I do not understand how he managed to cope. But Eggers brings much more than just a straight re-telling of his personal tragedy: he is funny. The mundane but often hilarious details of his life and conversations as well as his random daydreams, and self-deprecating and often self-conscious statements that break into the middle of scenes add an entirely new dimension to the narrative. I was amused to find Egger’s rating on the sexual orientation scale graphically depicted on the copyright page along with his height, weight, and haircolor.

But there’s also more to the story than a simple recounting of the years with some tongue-in-cheek. Eggers sensitively explores why he’s even writing a story about his parents, his life, his friends. He wants to be powerful and important, to be well-known, and he often imagines himself as such. Is he just using his parents and some of his friends’ stories to gain fame or is there a greater good coming from this? Is the story helping him deal with his parents’ death? Most of the time when Eggers is challenging himself he does it through the dialogue between himself and another person: his brother or a friend. I could see myself easily being annoyed by this technique, but Eggers manages it so well that I found it a creative and interesting way to enlighten the reader about his inner thoughts.

One thing bothered me a little while I read the book, and even though I feel a bit like the politically-correct police here, I didn’t want to ignore it. Eggers was constantly pointing out the black man, black woman, or interracial couple in his life. Sometimes I was a little surprised and I wondered why he felt the need to mention that some neighbors of his, that were in no way a part of the story, were an interracial couple. Maybe he was just trying to show the difference between Berkeley and the very affluent, very white town where he grew up? Eggers also uses the phrase “run like an Indian” in places throughout the book, and it grated.

This review is part of the Cannonball Read series. Details are here and the growing number of participants and their blogs are here. And check here for more of Sophia’s reviews.


The Most Annoying Catchphrases | Nathan Fillion as Captain America?



Comments

This guy is hot looking in a Hispanic sort of way.

Posted by: Pookie at March 12, 2009 9:20 AM

I picked up this book while in high school and I swear I couldn't get further than 20 pages into it before throwing up my hands in frustration and defeat. I just could not work with Egger's writing style so I admire you for reading the whole thing.

Good review.

Posted by: Genny (also Rusty) at March 12, 2009 9:22 AM

I read this book at the reccomendation of a friend and enjoyed it to a point; but also found that yes, the racial commentary was unnecessary and kind of annoying and that it was written in an almost manic way. Which in the end made me want to eat a bullet after I finished it.

Posted by: albee at March 12, 2009 9:43 AM

I like Eggers's essays a lot, but this book proved too much for me. I got about 100 pages in and set it aside. Certain books deserve patience, such as Joyce's Ulysses. This one didn't.

Posted by: samantha t at March 12, 2009 9:55 AM

Oh, the inevitable backlash. I read this when it came out, loved it, and read parts of it again last summer when my friends and I took turns reading it aloud at the beach. It's all the things people said it was when it first came out, and if you're honestly going to compare this to reading Ulysses, then...I just don't know what to say... I hope I never meet you in my book club?

Posted by: AM at March 12, 2009 9:59 AM

I literally just finished reading this book a week ago, after having it in my possession for about 4 years (I got it as a gift). I did enjoy it and found it a worthwhile read, but I'll admit I found his obsession with being "powerful and important, to be well-known" rather off-putting -- in particular because I saw his "chellenging himself" in mock conversations to be a way of exonerating himself for having those desires. At the risk of sounding like an old codger, though, I think his obsession is characteristic of his generation and one reason why everyone in the world seems to have a blog these days.

Posted by: jimbob at March 12, 2009 10:01 AM

Sorry, samantha. I just realized I somewhat misread your comment. I see what you're saying now. I have defended this book so many times I go on autopilot.

By the way, everyone should check out the Best Non-Required Reading series Egger edits every year. A great way to keep your finger on the pulse of American literature and always eye-opening.

Posted by: AM at March 12, 2009 10:02 AM

This has always seemed to be a very polarizing book (am I right, AM and samantha t?). I often hear it described as pretentious, but it has such passionate defenders as well. I keep meaning to give it a shot, to see where my own opinion lands. Great review, Sofi!

Posted by: meaux at March 12, 2009 10:05 AM

I loved it when I read it years and years ago...early college I believe. I always wonder if I'd still enjoy it, but I can't bring myself to reread it.

Posted by: Julie at March 12, 2009 10:24 AM

RUN LIKE AN INDIAN, OUT OF CONTROL...

Posted by: Bucko at March 12, 2009 10:24 AM

I've mentioned this before, so why the hell not mention it again - I have been in love with this book since I first read it nine years ago. Of course, I'm also a memoir whore, so that may have something to do with it.

I loved Eggers' style; I enjoy the way he uses the conversations between himself and Toph, and himself and John, in addition to the Real World interview, to kind of break the fourth wall. The provide an interesting insight into what I can imagine was a lot of self-doubt about even putting this story out there for public consumption.

As for the racial bits, I always just went with the idea that Eggers is making a comparison between the diverse, multicultural upbringing that Toph is getting in Berkley and San Francisco and the one that Eggers himself had in a lily-white, wealthy Chicago suburb where the only black family in town was Mr. T's. I didn't think it was racist at all. I'm not touching the "run like an Indian" thing because my brain is too tired to form a cohesive arugment.

Congrats on the review. Anytime a new person reads AHWOSG an angel gets its wings.

Posted by: Nicole at March 12, 2009 10:33 AM

A lot of the book was beautifully written- but I sincerely believe it could have done without the three chapters of puking at the beginning. Maybe to weed out the weak?

Posted by: Sweetie Dahling at March 12, 2009 12:05 PM

I remember loving this book when I first read it, so yay! for the review. I remember thinking his writing style was very courageous. Plus he grew up in Chicago, and I'm a sucker for books set in my hometown.
I've found his subsequent books a little harder to get through. You Shall Know Our Velocity had a couple of gems - there's one story about how a father is making a sandwich for his kid and recounts how he and his wife saved the world. Pretty funny. But a few others seemed a chore to get through. What can I say? I think we become jaded WAY too quickly these days. Nothing has a chance to be New before it's already considered passe.

Posted by: Stella at March 12, 2009 12:05 PM

oops, wrong book. I meant How We are Hungry.

I found I did NOT like You Shall Know Our Velocity nearly as much as AHWOSG.

Posted by: Stella at March 12, 2009 12:08 PM

Is he the guy who's hooking up with hot models on ___Tallmingle Co m___ ? actually there're lots sexy people there, Online chat, blogs, forums, flirtation and messages! Start an May-December romance just a click away! Whether for heat or passion, you are gonna be surprised what you might be end with!!LOL :-)

Posted by: obamalove at March 12, 2009 12:24 PM

I don't understand the LOL at the end of the spambot's message.

Johnny 5 is still the only robot to understand humor.

And Bender.

Posted by: Bucko at March 12, 2009 12:28 PM

"What God wants, he keeps!"

Actually, maybe Johnny 5 didn't understand humor...

Posted by: Bucko at March 12, 2009 12:29 PM

This is perhaps my favourite book of all time, or at least it's in the top three. I was blown away by Eggers' humour and creativity-- this was a guy who made the acknowledgments and copyright pages hilarious-- while at the same time inspired and touched by what he and Toph had gone through.

I think AHWOSG has perhaps suffered a bit by how many of its unconventional concepts and style have already been borrowed from by other works, the same way old film comedies cannot be viewed objectively because we've seen the guy turning with a ladder and smacking people in the face gag a zillion times and couldn't possibly appreciate it at this point.

I can't believe this was released only 9 years ago. Eggers' stuff was kinda revolutionary at the time (even here on Pajiba you can see Eggers' influence on the 'angry youth' style of writing), and I'm not sure there's been as much excitement among the hipsters about a book since.

Posted by: Sackmemento California at March 12, 2009 12:57 PM

Great review, and count me in with the folks who applaud you for making it through the book. I liked a lot of things about it, but I only made it about a third of the way through the book before putting it aside.

Later I was talking with a friend about the fact that I was having trouble describing what I didn't like about the book, and she summed it up nicely: "He really, really wants to be Holden Caufield, but he's not."

Posted by: Jules at March 12, 2009 4:20 PM

I believe AHWOSG was recommended on this site, so I picked it up at the store. Eggers had me at:

"This is a picture of a stapler".

I had to buy it after that. I loved the first 1/3 of the book, but I thought that the rest slowly went downhill.

Posted by: Lauren at March 12, 2009 10:13 PM

(who goes by Toph and is only seven-years-old)

I don't mean to sound like a grammar Nazi but because 'seven years old' is an adjective, you don't need hyphens. As a noun, you would, i.e. 'a seven-year-old.'

Other than that, you've convinced me to pick up this book, although I'm sure the race-related comments will frustrate me, too.

Posted by: em-ess at March 13, 2009 5:48 AM

I picked this book up a couple of years back off of the strong recommendation of a good friend. Gave up after 60 or 70 pages.

I did find some of what I read to be genuinely amusing/entertaining and his writing style generally kept me engaged - just not for very long. The end result fell kind of flat for me. I find Jules' comment about Eggers wanting to be Holden Caufield to be pretty on point.

Posted by: LameAim at March 13, 2009 6:02 AM