<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Pajiba</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.pajiba.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2009-03-07://1</id>
    <updated>2012-02-09T01:15:33Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Scathing Reviews for Bitchy People</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.35-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Which One of These Three Men Is Not Like the Other (Hint: Not the Black Guy)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/pajiba_love/which-one-of-these-three-men-is-not-like-the-other-hint-not-the-black-guy.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15201</id>

    <published>2012-02-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-09T01:15:33Z</updated>

    <summary>I literally spent 90 minutes last night trying to do the math on this post (and still needed some correcting from commenters), but the ultimate figure is striking: .0127 percent of the American population has ALL the power over what...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dustin Rowles</name>
        <uri>http://www.pajiba.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Pajiba Love" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I literally spent 90 minutes last night trying to do the math on this post (and still needed some correcting from commenters), but the ultimate figure is striking: .0127 percent of the American population has ALL the power over what shows are cancelled or renewed. (<a href="http://warmingglow.uproxx.com/2012/02/fact-000217-of-the-american-population-determines-what-tv-shows-we-watch">Warming Glow</a>)</p>

<p>Genital mutilation, you say? Here are 8 horrifying reminders of it in film. (<a href="http://www.screenjunkies.com/movies/movie-lists/junk-destruction-8-horrifying-scenes-of-movie-genital-mutilation/">Screenjunkies</a>)</p>

<p>Nerve lists the 50 Greatest Love Songs of all time, and they won me over immediately by ranking Crowded House at #50. Bless. (<a href="http://www.nerve.com/music/best-love-songs-of-all-time">Nerve</a>)</p>

<p>Ummm. There's a game that exists on elementary playgrounds called rape tag, that's like freeze tag except, instead of unfreezing someone by touching them, you <I>hump</i> them. So, home schooling it is, then.  (<a href="http://theweek.com/article/index/224094/rape-tag-the-disgusting-new-schoolyard-gamenbsp">The Week</a>)</p>

<p>Will 2012 be to Tom Hardy what 2011 was to Ryan Gosling, which is to say: A lot of great films, and not enough recognition. Also, I totally forgot that Idris Elba, Tom Hardy, and Gerard Butler shared a screen in <I>RocknRolla</i>. Butler should hang the picture above on his wall to remind him that he was once capable of working with great actors. (<a href="http://unrealitymag.com/index.php/2012/02/08/2012-the-year-of-tom-hardy/">Unreality</a>)</p>

<p>Look, AskMen: You can't write an article called <a href="http://www.askmen.com/top_10/dating/top-10-subtle-ways-to-tell-her-shes-getting-fat.html">10 Subtle Ways to Tell Your Girlfriend She's Fat </a> and then write up a list of 5 Great Neil Patrick Harris moments. Just because he plays a douchebag on TV does not give you the right to appropriate his cultural cachet for your sinister cabal of toolbags. (<a href="http://www.askmen.com/top_10/dating/top-10-subtle-ways-to-tell-her-shes-getting-fat.html">AskMen</a>)</p>

<p>Here's a piece on religion and video games and how the next video game might just be a religion and ... ow, ow, ow. That hurts to think about. I'm still wrestling with my junior high idea of turning hackey sack into a religion. (<a href="http://kotaku.com/5883361/the-rules-of-religion-and-why-the-next-one-just-might-be-a-game">Kotaku</a>)</p>

<p>Don't watch this near meal times, but it's striking: An eye-opening look at Ramen actually being digested by the stomach. The lesson: Don't eat processed foods because body doesn't actually process them. (<a href="http://www.geekosystem.com/ramen-during-digestion/">Geekosystem</a>)</p>

<p>This list of 19 famous people who started out as extras includes Ayn Rand, and one day will hopefully include Brian Prisco. (<a href="http://www.mentalfloss.com/blogs/archives/112909">MentalFloss</a>)</p>

<p>Morphing GIFs. Watch David Tennant turn into Matt Smith before your very eyes. (<a href="http://www.uproxx.com/webculture/2012/02/10-morphing-gifs-that-will-have-you-seeing-double/#page/4">Uproxx</a>)</p>

<p>Awesome reader, <b>Luke</b>, would like to remind us that Netflix's first original series, Lilyhammer, is now available on Instant. We will have a review up soon. (<a href="http://movies.netflix.com/WiSearch?oq=lilyh&ac_posn=1&ac_rec=true&ac_count=-1&ac_match=true&v1=Lilyhammer">Netflix</a>)</p>

<p>I think it's great that our boy Joseph Gordon Levitt is going to direct his first film, which he will also star in. But why does he have to cast HER as his co-star? BOOOO. (<a href="http://www.movieline.com/2012/02/07/joseph-gordon-levitt-to-star-in-own-directorial-debut-opposite-scarlett-johansson/">Movieline</a>)</p>

<p>The good news: Vince Vaughn and Owen Wilson are re-teaming for another comedy written by Vaughn himself. The bad news? Shawn Levy is directing. Still, decent premise. (<a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/wedding-crashers-duo-vince-vaughn-owen-wilson-reunite-interns/">Slashfilm</a>)</p>

<p>Vince's headline: "Star Wars Episode I Set to Death Metal Surprisingly Tolerable." My headline: "Star Wars Episode I Set to Death Metal Just Gave My Nightmare a Nightmare."  But I do love the idea of the two conflicting senses ripping TK in half. (<a href="http://filmdrunk.uproxx.com/2012/02/star-wars-episode-i-trailer-set-to-death-metal-is-surprisingly-tolerable">FilmDrunk</a>)</p>

<p>This is the sort of thing I like to imagine Steven Lloyd Wilson sits around and looks at on Saturday nights: Reimagining Art History as Science Fiction. (<a href="http://gammasquad.uproxx.com/2012/02/reimagining-art-history-as-science-fiction">GammaSquad</a>)</p>

<p>If you go to BYU and interview students in an effort to demonstrate how much race consciousness they lack, you completely ruin the point if you GO IN BLACKFACE.  Idiot. (<a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mjs538/guy-in-blackface-asks-bringham-young-students-abou">Buzzfeed</a>)</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Best Films You Never Want To See Again </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/guides/the-best-films-you-never-want-to-see-again-.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15202</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T23:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-08T22:19:13Z</updated>

    <summary>Some films stick with you for good reasons. Maybe the images speak to you, the characters win you over or the dialogue is snappy and eminently quotable. And then some stick with you for other reasons. They claw into your...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Joanna Robinson</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Guides" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Some films stick with you for good reasons.  Maybe the images speak to you, the characters win you over or the dialogue is snappy and eminently quotable.  And then some stick with you for other reasons.  They claw into your brain, into your heart and make an uncomfortable harrowing home there.  They fill your nightmares and the very thought of them can make you burst into tears.  These are the flicks that you never ever want to see again. No no, I'm not talking latter day Sandler.  I mean good films. Films where the artistic merit is unquestionable, the performances are top notch and you would rather claw your own eyeballs out than endure it again.  These are the films that have broken our hearts, wrecked our sleep and turned our stomachs.  We'd recommend you see them, but not more than once.  </p>

<p><strong><i>Brokeback Mountain</i> (2005)</strong>: This is, without a doubt, one of the most deeply moving movies I've ever seen. Both the leads conveyed so much through the course of the movie; apprehension, affection, desire, frustration, self-loathing, love, hate, and despair. All of this in a movie with extremely sparse dialogue. The story is tragic but as I was watching I found it impossible not to become engrossed in a love story that I knew could not end happily. It was beautiful and it absolutely destroyed me. I walked out of the theater emotionally shattered and while I knew it was an incredible film, I never wanted to see it again. Since Heath Ledger has died, my resolve has only strengthened for fear of what I'll refer to as 'atomic weeping.' In fact, I won't even watch clips of it so here's the 30 second version as acted out by bunnies. (Uh, some spoilers.) --<em>Genevieve Burgess</em></p>

<p><iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/zDbsfawgtpI?rel=0" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p><strong><i>Buried</i> (2010)</strong>:  I was blown away by Rodrigo Cortes' <i><a href="http://www.pajiba.com/film_reviews/buried-review-through-the-darkest-hour-grace-did-not-shine-on-me.php">Buried</a></i>.  It's an amazing film for many reasons -- it's innovative, it's brilliantly directed, it's gripping, intelligent and fascinating.  It proves that Ryan Reynolds is more than capable of turning in an intense and dramatic performance with none of his trademark smarm.  It manages to deal with politics without judgment, to tackle international relations without xenophobia.  From a technical standpoint, it's amazing -- an entire film focusing on one man in a wooden box with a cell phone, <i>and nothing else</i>.  Which is also why I will never watch it again.  I'll recommend it to everyone I know, but I'll be god<i>damned</i> if I'm going to watch it with them.  <i>Buried</i> is not a film to be enjoyed, it's a film to be <i>endured</i>.  It's claustrophobic and nerve-wracking and it's one of the most terrifying films I've ever seen, and it's not even a horror movie.  To make things even worse, Reynolds has a phone that does him almost no good -- he has to deal with automated call centers and bureaucrats and officious jackholes, all while TRAPPED IN A MOTHERFUCKING BOX AND BURIED UNDERGROUND.  Even writing about it makes me short of breath, like the walls are closing in.  If someone turned off the lights in this room right now, I'd punch them in the mouth, no joke.  Kudos to Cortes for capturing it all with amazing deftness, but I can't imagine that the film is gonna make a <i>dime</i> on DVD.  All I can say is, watch it in broad daylight with the windows open, because if you're even the least bit anxious about tight spaces, <i>Buried</i> is going to flat-out ruin your shit.  But seriously, you should totally see it.--<i>TK</i></p>

<p><object style="height: 335px; width: 550px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j1Yyhxq56Xg?version=3&feature=player_detailpage"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j1Yyhxq56Xg?version=3&feature=player_detailpage" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="550" height="335"></object></p>

<p><strong><em>Earthlings</em> (2005)</strong>: Like everybody, I inhabit the world I do by the grace of cognitive dissonance. There are a good many things I believe in my heart to be true, but these realities are sufficiently remote that I'm able to ignore them and continue to behave in opposition to these principles. For instance, I believe that factory farming is wrong, but still, at my great remove, I love eating steak. Earthlings, a documentary made in 2005, is about the way that we as humans treat animals. It's political, I suppose and not what you'd call an objective presentation, but the moral weight of the images presented are inarguable. We see the truth written in the faces of the animals, and we see in factory farming a twisted, Medieval manifestation of hell. Peter Singer, the Australian Bioethicist and Philosopher said, "If I could make everyone in the world see one film, I'd make them see Earthlings." It's not an easy watch, but none of us who benefit from the harvesting of animals has a right to turn away.--<i>Michael Murray</i></p>

<p><iframe width="550" height="335" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/o6Fh4t5okIk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p><strong><em>The Godfather</em> (1972) and <em>The Godfather: Part II</em> (1974):</strong> I watched the first two Godfather films all in one go, six straight hours on a Christmas Day when there was no family in town. They were enthralling, fantastic films that sucked me in like good books. When I got to the end of the first, there was absolutely no way that the second disc wasn't getting popped into the DVD player. By the time I got to the end of the second, I was worn out, done, finished. Ate an epic dinner and slept it off. It wasn't that the films weren't a couple of the best I'd ever seen, it's that their sheer size and scope dwarf other films. Watching them is like reading <i>War and Peace</i>. You've got to do it once, but after that the investment of time and energy for a second run never quite beats out watching something shorter that you haven't seen yet.--<em>Steven Lloyd Wilson</em></p>

<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/pF4kCgi9fDM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p><strong><em>Irréversible</em> (2002)</strong>: The direction is brilliant, with Gaspar Noé disorienting the viewer with blatant camera moves, as well as what lingers within the frame. The cast is stunning in more than one sense of the word, as real-life couple Monica Belucci and Vincent Cassel deliver the performances of their careers, and their physical perfections are only presented as such at the very end (or the beginning). The story is told backward more literally than Memento, and because it does follow an actual chronological order, that final shot after the Great Reveal is both hopeful, and ultimately, heartbreaking. The context of Irreversiblé's irreversible events comes into full relief, making the horrific violence and single-take rape scene even more sickening and depressing than they already were. There's a brief glimpse of what might have been, but it will always end (or start) the same and nothing can be changed. It's worth seeing, but I would never see it again, and I could never recommend it. Six people left the theater when I saw Irreversiblé. I can't say I blame them.--<em>Rob Payne</em></p>

<p><iframe width="480" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/OU-ZOHeWLkU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p><b><i>Kids</i> (1995):</b> I remember seeing <i>Kids</i> when I was in college (at the stalwart indy Philly theater, what up Ritz?). I remember what it was about (a day in the life of young kids in NYC, consisting of copious amounts of sex and drugs and general inner-city scummary). I remember who was in it (it was the debut film for Chloe Sevigny and Rosario Dawson, among others). I vaguely remember the overall storyline (a sleazy kid named Terry bangs virgins to avoid getting STDs, but he unknowingly has and is spreading AIDS, and the film culminates with his friend raping a girl who got AIDS from Terry). I don't really remember any of the dialogue (though I do remember being by its very naturalistic feel). I remember a good soundtrack. But most importantly, I remember how I felt watching the film. Uncomfortable and dirty. And how I felt afterwards. Drained and sad. <i>Kids</i> was a good movie and even an important one for, among other things, introducing us to its writer Harmony Korine (for better or for worse) and for trying to present an eye-opening account of the AIDS epidemic in the 90s. It's possibly a <i>very</i> good movie, but I'd have to see it again to really make that assessment. And as uncomfortable as I was watching this when I was a relative contemporary of the kids being portrayed, how much worse will be it be now, a generation later? I'll leave that assessment for someone else. --<i>Seth Freilich</i></p>

<p><object width="550" height="298" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="http://static.movieclips.com/embedplayer.swf?shortid=9hxjP" style="display:block; overflow:hidden;"><param name="movie" value="http://static.movieclips.com/embedplayer.swf?shortid=9hxjP" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed src="http://static.movieclips.com/embedplayer.swf?shortid=9hxjP" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="550" height="298" wmode="transparent" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>

<p><strong><i>Life is Beautiful</i> (1997)</strong>:  This entry deviates from others on the list. No, <i>Life is Beautiful </i> doesn't contain harrowing drug or sex scenes, but Roberto Benigni's Academy Award-winning 1997 film can be just as difficult to watch. Like its title, the story -- first one of romantic love, then one of a Jewish man, Guido (Benigni), protecting his son from the horrors of their Nazi concentration camp life -- is beautiful, an inspiring ode to the human spirit. And it's heartbreaking. Most war films and those that deal with cruelty are, and even as they are important to view and consider and learn from, they can be just as difficult to revisit. Terry George's <i>Hotel Rwanda</i> is the same way -- an amazing story I don't ever want to relive again. <i>Life is Beautiful </i> just about broke me when I watched it almost a decade ago, Guido's final act leaving me sobbing. I'm glad I watched it, and I'm glad Benigni took to standing on the chairs of the Kodak Theatre when he won his Oscar for it. But I just can't go back to it. It's too, well, beautiful. -- <em>Sarah Carlson</em></p>

<p><iframe width="550" height="373" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/WKh0-Xg8i5A" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p><strong><em>The Machinist</em> (2004)</strong>:  Thanks to an insanely brilliant performance by Christian Bale, I was completely sucked into <i>The Machinist</i> and in between trying to figure out what the hell was going on, positively horrified by his appearance and demeanor.  Gotta hand it to the dude for taking method acting to a new level. Never mind the weight loss, Bale looked utterly haunted and desperate and hollow. Brad Anderson gave the film a beautiful look and feel that matched Bale's physique, with everything pared down to a bare minimum...color, lights, sets, with cleverly planted clues everywhere we looked--we just had to wake up and see them. And at the end, I couldn't decide if I despised or felt sorry for Trevor Reznik--all I could do was say, "well done." But <i>The Machinist</i> is so damned dark and sad and soul-crushing, I really can't imagine watching it again. Once you know what happened, well--it can't unhappen--and why would you want to watch that shell of a man go through it all again?--<i>Cindy Davis</i></p>

<p><iframe width="550" height="309" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZGsQ8PSVw_g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p><strong><i>Mouth to Mouth</i> (2005):</strong> Ellen Page stars in this little indie flick about a cult with the stated objective of "chang[ing] the world." Her character gets sucked in by a charismatic leader played by August Diehl, and soon her dream of entering the "perfect world" transforms into an environment filled with brainwashed drones, slave labor, harrowing punishments, and broken promises. As Page's character begins to see through the cult's nefarious practices, she begins to rebel only to be confronted with mental and physical abuse. While it is a painstakingly gorgeous film from a cinematic and acting standpoint, it's difficult to watch the characters endure days at the bottom of a dried-up well to earn shaved heads as a sign of solidarity and commitment. Spoiler Alert: When members of the cult begin to die off from the leaders' negligence and willful disregard for human life, Page's talent goes into high gear. It's a great film, but I'll never be able to stomach it again. -- <i>Agent Bedhead</i> </p>

<p><iframe width="550" height="403" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/vYTHJKy_EFY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> </p>

<p><strong><em>Requiem For A Dream</em> (2000)</strong>:  Stories of addiction have always unnerved me.  There's a terrifying aura of rot and decay that inevitably cling to these kinds of films.  Director Darren Aronofsky is a mad genius of nightmares.  You need only look at his CV to know that an Aronofsky film will likely make you cringe.  He never shies from the grimy, gritty reality.  And while he portrays it oh-so-artistically, the harrowing images he presents are hard enough to watch the first time.  This film is one of its finest and he wrings absolutely stunning performances from his cast.  (Marlon Wayans? I never dreamed you had that in you.)  But, if I'm being perfectly frank, I've never been able to think of Jennifer Connelly the same way again and just looking at Ellen Burstyn gives me chills.  The altered states of his protagonists gave Aronofsky the perfect excuse to go grotesque carnival with his camera and design choices.  It's scarier than <i>Black Swan</i> and more tragic than <i>The Wrestler</i>.  It's a gut-wrenching b*tch of a film and I never ever want to see it again.--<i>Joanna Robinson</i></p>

<p><iframe width="550" height="335" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lgo3Hb5vWLE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p><strong><em>Tyrannosaur</em> (2011)</strong>: Oohf.  I'm tempted to call this last year's <i>Blue Valentine</i>, but to perfectly honest Paddy Considine's film makes that look like a fucking Care Bears movie.  I'm accustomed to Considine being a jester, a capering monkey who pretended to be a rapper and does wacky zaniness.  But like Martin McDonagh, behind that laughter is an incredible amount of searing pain.  <i>Tyrannosaur</i> is a film about a horrible lonely bastard -- the fucking brilliant Peter Mullan -- who sits around his homestead basically waiting to die. How big a bastard?  The title <i>Tyrannosaur</i> comes from a term of endearment he used on his dead wife, who gained an enormous amount of weight.  When she walked, water glasses would vibrate like the scene in <i>Jurassic Park</i>.  Hence, <i>Tyrannosaur</i>.  Sunshine and fucking lollipops, friends.  Like some infectious leper of despair, he spreads misery and scorn on whomever he touches.  He takes the sweet proprietress of the local thrift shop (Olivia Colman, also just fucking spectacular) and basically grinds her and her faith down.  It's a brutal tale of violence and woe, not just a gut punch, but getting shot in the liver and then being punched repeatedly in the gunshot wound.  It's astounding and bleak, and I was stunned at the performances, but I don't think I could endure the wistfulness and pain.  Considine compared the making of this film to an exorcism, and those demons have fucking claws.--<i>Brian Prisco</i> </p>

<p><iframe width="550" height="335" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/nvyqXFmV-LI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>5 Shows After Dark 2/8/12</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/miscellaneous/5-shows-after-dark-2812.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15203</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T23:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-08T20:33:26Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Happy Endings&quot; on ABC at 9:30pm ET. &quot;Inside Nature&apos;s Giants&quot; on PBS at 10:00pm ET. So last week&apos;s shark episode was pretty awesome, and I loved the moment where they brought the kid up close to the partially hacked up...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Genevieve Burgess</name>
        <uri>http://rustymiami.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Miscellaneous" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>"Happy Endings" on ABC at 9:30pm ET. </p>

<p>"Inside Nature's Giants" on PBS at 10:00pm ET. So last week's shark episode was pretty awesome, and I loved the moment where they brought the kid up close to the partially hacked up shark corpse so they could point out how you tell boy sharks from girl sharks. This week might be a little harder on some people, since they're going to be dissecting big cats. Specifically a lion and a tiger. </p>

<p>"The Real World/Road Rules Challenge" on MTV at 10:00pm ET. I know there's several of you that follow this series religiously. I don't understand it, but I won't condemn it either; MTV is at least fairly honest regarding the motivations of the people they feature in their reality series. Namely, that they really enjoy being on TV. Whether or not they deserve to be on TV is not actually a consideration, but at least we're not forced to listen to people claim how they're looking for true love or some other similar line of bullshit. </p>

<p>"Revenge" on ABC at 10:00pm ET. </p>

<p>"The Soup" on E at 10:00pm ET. </p>

<p><i>Genevieve Burgess is an under-employed, double-degreed 25 year old who knows more about music copyright, licensing, and contracts than is strictly healthy. You can find her online at her <a href="https://twitter.com/rustyheadedgirl">twitter account</a>, <a href=" http://rustymiami.blogspot.com/">her blog</a>, or her brand spanking new <a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Genevieve-Burgess/163013763805860">Facebook page</a>.</i></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Practice for Personal Armageddon: Why We Watch Procedurals</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/think_pieces/practice-for-personal-armageddon-why-we-watch-procedurals.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15198</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T20:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-08T18:40:24Z</updated>

    <summary>So much of prime time is saturated with procedurals, one would think that half our population was looking into medical degrees and forensic training. They&apos;re all the same damned show. We&apos;ve got a cast of regulars, and a shifting cast...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Steven Lloyd Wilson</name>
        <uri>http://www.pajiba.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Think Pieces" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>So much of prime time is saturated with procedurals, one would think that half our population was looking into medical degrees and forensic training. They're all the same damned show. We've got a cast of regulars, and a shifting cast of guest stars to whom bad things happen. Over the course of several seasons, the regulars run through a round robin rotation of sleeping with each other, while dealing with the usual hodge podge of career advancement, personal growth, and making impressive speeches.</p>

<p>But why not set these soap operas in the cubicle farms that are so much more familiar to us? I used to think that it was a simple matter of the exotic being interesting. When death is on the line, the stories must be more dramatic. But I don't think that's quite it anymore. I think that we watch these endless iterations because we need to see the characters of the week, we need to see people dying over and over again, on the streets in legal shows and in intensive care units on medical shows. Medical shows aren't about the doctors, legal shows aren't about the cops and lawyers. They're all about the patients, the accused, the victims. They're really about the things that terrify us.</p>

<p>Sure, there are the petty dramas, who is screwing who, promotions and bickering, but these don't just serve as soap opera titillation. Those little dramas serve to convince us that the arbiters of our fates, those figures who appear when bad things happen like angels of death or mercy, are people too. The main characters of these shows are almost beside the point, they are there in order to offer constancy in the face of the constant stream of dead and dying that pass through their doors.</p>

<p>Stories have never been just entertainment, and not just because of their power at tying us together with common understandings, common memes. They are also our first form of instruction. It's the iron law of storytelling to show not tell. Textbooks excel in the telling, in delineating exactly what is and is not with the precision of ten thousand years of language sculpted for exactly this purpose. Purely educational texts contain more information per unit of measure than anything else that is human readable. They can convey raw information in staggering quantities. But they are ill-suited to making us feel, to teaching us on an emotional level. That's what stories are, underneath the entertainment, they are vehicles for emotional instruction.</p>

<p>And that's why we are so forgiving in our stories, why with the exception of our own peculiarities of pedantry, we see past all of the informational problems with so many stories. It isn't because we are necessarily ignorant, or too lazy to bother, it's because getting the literal truth right matters less than getting the emotional truth right, so long as the errors aren't so jarring that they allow our brains to overrule our hearts.</p>

<p>We seek instruction on an instinctual level in the things that scare us. Generation after generation we watch the same procedurals, soaking up hundreds of dying patients and murder victims, who all hope they manage to get a last word in so they might get a SAG card.</p>

<p>It's not perfect, it's not real, almost everything we learn on a factual level is wrong, but it isn't entirely about that. It's about the emotional practice for the biggest moments of our lives. So that when the doctor comes in and says that it's time, we don't stare blankly, we don't have the freight train that's already hitting us loaded down with extra cars of incomprehension.</p>

<p>When the terrible things come, the things that have terrified us in the backs of our minds for all of our lives, we're not caught completely by surprise. When the monitor cries out with the flatline whine, when the cuffs we didn't see coming click tight, when there's the phone call at three AM, we're not ready, you can never be ready for the end of your world, but at least we have something like an emotional script. We've watched it like voyeurs enough times to have a hint of what's coming, so that even if we can't ride the wave of grief, maybe on numb autopilot we can manage at least not to drown.</p>

<p><em>Steven Lloyd Wilson is a hopeless romantic and the last scion of Norse warriors and the forbidden elder gods. His novel, ramblings, and assorted fictions coalesce at <a href="http://burningviolin.com/">www.burningviolin.com</a>. You can email him <a href="mailto:steven@pajiba.com">here</a>.</em></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>The Bourne Legacy Trailer: It&apos;s Not Jason Bourne, But It Might Be The Next Best Thing</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/trailers/the-bourne-legacy-trailer-its-not-jason-bourne-but-it-might-be-the-next-best-thing.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15200</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T18:41:22Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-08T18:56:30Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;There was never just one.&quot; There&apos;s been some trepidation over the idea behind The Bourne Legacy, the next entry in the Bourne films that, well, won&apos;t feature Jason Bourne. Instead, it features Jeremy Renner as another soldier in the Treadstone...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>TK</name>
        <uri>http://gimmebackmybanana.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Trailers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>"There was never just one."</p>

<p>There's been some trepidation over the idea behind <i>The Bourne Legacy</i>, the next entry in the <i>Bourne</i> films that, well, won't feature Jason Bourne.  Instead, it features Jeremy Renner as another soldier in the Treadstone program, with a whole new set of problems.  Yet the fact remains that the cast for this is absolutely top-notch, featuring some returning from the original trilogy -- namely Joan Allen and Albert Finney.  Add in Edward Norton and Rachel Weisz, and good god -- that's a hell of a cast.</p>

<p>And the teaser trailer below is a nice one.  It's moody, atmospheric, and sets a strong tone for the film, which comes out this summer.  No, Jeremy Renner isn't Jason Bourne, but he might be the next best thing.</p>

<p><iframe width="550" height="309" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/paVLyvA5S1g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p><img alt="d746d1ef-47e5-4494-8f0f-619193ff4408.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/d746d1ef-47e5-4494-8f0f-619193ff4408.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>11 Crappiest Movies Of Denzel Washington&apos;s Career</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/seriously_random_lists/11-crappiest-movies-of-denzel-washingtons-career.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15157</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T18:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-08T18:41:46Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Agent Bedhead</name>
        <uri>http://www.agentbedhead.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Seriously Random Lists" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Yes, we're talking about Denzel Washington this week, who received a rather <a href="http://www.pajiba.com/career_assessments/denzel-washington-career-assessment.php">glowing assessment</a> a few years ago. Still, the man is capable of churning out his fair share of crappy movies too, so we are here to celebrate that fact.</p>

<p>At the time of publication, this weekend's <i>Safe House</i> was not eligible for inclusion to this list. From the looks of the trailer, it could've been a contender.</p>

<p><strong><i>The Book Of Eli</i>:</strong> This movie had great atmosphere but an execution that turned it into post-apocalyptic nonsense.</p>

<p><img alt="bookelisrl1.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/bookelisrl1.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong><i>Heart Condition</i>:</strong> Here's an action comedy with very little action and really awful comedic stylings from Denzel himself.</p>

<p><img alt="heartcondsrl1.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/heartcondsrl1.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong><i>The Bone Collector</i>:</strong> Yet another adaptation of a bearable book that's been turned into a formulaic clich&eacute;.</p>

<p><img alt="bonessrl1.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/bonessrl1.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong><i>Fallen</i>:</strong> (SPOILER ALERT) Deus Ex Machina in the form of a cat? Really.</p>

<p><img alt="fallen.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/fallen.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong><i>The Preacher's Wife</i>:</strong> This one was sort of charming but still crappy in terms of Denzel's career.</p>

<p><img alt="preacherwifesrl1.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/preacherwifesrl1.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong><i>Deja Vu</i>:</strong> Sometimes, a pretty good sci-fi/thriller story gets Bruckheimered to death. This would be one of those times.</p>

<p><img alt="dejavusrl1.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/dejavusrl1.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong><i>John Q</i>:</strong> Such propaganda.</p>

<p><img alt="johnqsrl1.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/johnqsrl1.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong><i>The Pelican Brief</i>:</strong> Julia Roberts' character should've just looked up her info on Lexis-Nexis and spared us this adaptation.</p>

<p><img alt="pelicansrl1.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/pelicansrl1.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /> </p>

<p><strong><i>The Taking Of Pelham 123</i>:</strong> Here's an entry for the "Terrible, Pointless Remakes" file.</p>

<p><img alt="takingpelhamsrl1.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/takingpelhamsrl1.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong><i>Virtuosity</i>:</strong> This campy movie might be a guilty pleasure for some, but Denzel can do better.</p>

<p><img alt="virtuositysrl1.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/virtuositysrl1.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p>And a little unexpected bonus number for you...</p>

<p><strong><i>Man On Fire</i>:</strong> Yes, I enjoyed the hell out of this movie and have mentioned it elsewhere on a few occasions. Still, it's pretty damn crappy in spite of ol' Creasy Bear.</p>

<p><img alt="manfiresrl6.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/manfiresrl6.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><i>Agent Bedhead lives in Tulsa, Oklahoma. She and her little black heart can be found at <a href="http://www.celebitchy.com">Celebitchy</a>.</i></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Justified&quot; -- &quot;The Devil You Know&quot;: &quot;Son, You Ain&apos;t Gonna Make It Back&quot;</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/tv_reviews/justified-the-devil-you-know-son-you-aint-gonna-make-it-back.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15195</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T17:30:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-08T17:25:25Z</updated>

    <summary>Things We Learned: Following suit (ha! because he always wears them) from last week, Quarles employs someone else to do his dirty work. This time manipulating poor, stupid, clumsy, badly-dressed Devil into killing Boyd. Also, can we refer to Harlan...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Joanna Robinson</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="TV Reviews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Things We Learned</strong>:  </p>

<p><li> Following suit (ha! because he always wears them) from last week, Quarles employs someone else to do his dirty work.  This time manipulating poor, stupid, clumsy, badly-dressed Devil into killing Boyd. Also, can we refer to Harlan as "Shit Kick Holler" from now on?  Also, I'm going to take Tanner's line "Devil I'm taking you to see the wizard, brother," as a "Veronica Mars" reference.  Because I can. </p>

<p><li> If there is ever a spin-off of "Justified," can it please be The Dickie Bennett And Old Dewey Crowe Medicine Show? Who wouldn't want to watch "an imbecile and an undernourished half-cripple" getting in and out of scrapes, Dukes of Hazzard style. The opening credits could just be one minute of Dewey Crowe thrashing around in that body bag. </p>

<p><li> LORETTA!  Alive and well and stuck in babysitting hell. </p>

<p><li> According To Raylan, Noble's Holler (as opposed to Shit Kick Holler) is a "nice" predominately black community which Limehouse apparently rules with a reign of terror, fertilizer and BBQ.  Did we enjoy Raylan flirting with Deputy Marshall Rachel Brooks (the Ambassador of African America)? Sharpen your fanfic pencils: "I believe Ol' Miss has the best looking girls in the country."  Oh Raylan, you scamp. </p>

<p><li> Raylan also scampers over to Boyd's Bar & Grill & Headquarters for some good ol' fashioned information gathering, Givens family backstorying and neo-Nazi baiting. I love when Boyd and Raylan work together. </p>

<p><li> Sadly, prison guard Ash learned the hard way that you don't bring a gun to a car fight.  The Lincoln wins every time.    </p>

<p><li> The clever folks of Harlan vandalized the "Bennett General Store" sign to read "Benedict General Store."  That's some fancy book learnin' graffiti! </p>

<p><li> According to Limehouse, the Bennett fortune has gone from "way North of $3 million" to $46,313 worth of dirty bills in a cooler.  And Dickie, taking a page from Boyd's book, finds his way back into the slammer. </p>

<p><li> Just when I was reflecting on how happy it made me that Kevin Rankin was getting regular work, ol' Devil met his maker. Boyd Crowder, always two steps ahead. </p>

<p><strong>Carnage</strong>:  </p>

<p><li>Harlan Goon Jr. and Harlan Goon Sr. (Cause of Death: Limehouse and Limehouse's Henchmen.)</p>

<p><li>Devil (Cause of Death: Boyd's Incredibly Sympathetic But Resolute Sense Of Self-Preservation.) <br />
<img alt="boyd.jpg" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/boyd.jpg" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong>Deputy Marshall Rachel Brooks and Deputy Marshall Tim Gutterson Line Count</strong> </p>

<p><li> Rachel=Too many to count!  Like a <i>real</i> supporting character! <br />
<li> Tim=0</p>

<p><strong>Winona B*tchwatch</strong></p>

<p><li>Not even a mention of the old ball and chain.  0 b*tch points for Winona this week. </p>

<p><strong>Favorite Line</strong>:</p>

<p><li> "You get hungry, you come on up. I'm gonna hook you up with some bacon you ain't ever gonna forget."<br />
<img alt="Limehouse.gif" src="http://www.pajiba.com/image/Limehouse.gif" class="mt-image-none"  /></p>

<p><strong>The Gist</strong>: Though this episode didn't sing the same way last week's did, it was a damn fine hour of television.  The show keeps bringing back the "lesser" characters we've come to know and love.  Boyd and Raylan took a backseat this week to Devil, Dewey and Dickie.  (With bonus Loretta!)  Both Dewey and Devil have been around since the very first episode and it provides such a nice sense of continuity and a clearer sense of the Harlan universe to have them both pop up.  I really do have a fondness for Kevin Rankin and will miss Devil and his sleeveless shirts.  The death of Devil, however, plays into a larger "issue" the writers have with Boyd Crowder.  How do you write a villain, a criminal that we can continue to root for?  It's paramount in this series that we're on the side of both Boyd and Raylan.  Their push and pull drives the whole thing.  Ava Crowder does a lot to humanize Boyd and lord knows Walton Goggins is a phenomenal actor and can pull off as much nuance as anyone could ask for.  But it was hard to watch Boyd kill Devil, despite having both good reason to do so and a reservoir of compassion in the execution. The character of Boyd has come a long way from the pilot where he flippantly assassinated a henchman and as he climbs higher it will be harder and harder for him to keep his hands clean. I prefer Boyd the clever schemer to Boyd the killer.  That being said, the writers are doing a phenomenal job bringing all the threads together.  Quarles is deep in the mix earlier than I expected and as Limehouse, Boyd, and The Dixie Mafia dance around each other getting closer and more tangled, it'll be so much fun to see Raylan try to unravel it all.  </p>

<p>P.S. God bless Jeremy Davies for this call back. He is a national treasure. <br />
<img alt="dickiearm.gif" src="http://www.pajiba.com/assets_c/2012/02/dickiearm-thumb-250x246-38187.gif" class="mt-image-left"  /><img alt="Thumbnail image for dickiearm.gif" src="http://www.pajiba.com/assets_c/2012/02/dickiearm-thumb-250x246-38187-thumb-250x246-38188.gif" class="mt-image-right"  /><br />
<img alt="dickiegunleft.gif" src="http://www.pajiba.com/assets_c/2012/02/dickiegunleft-thumb-245x241-38183.gif" class="mt-image-left"  /><img alt="dickiegunright.gif" src="http://www.pajiba.com/assets_c/2012/02/dickiegunright-thumb-245x241-38185.gif" class="mt-image-right"  /></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>W.E. Review | The King&apos;s Piece</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/film_reviews/we-review-the-kings-piece.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15188</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T17:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-07T18:17:30Z</updated>

    <summary>&quot;Please, I beg of you, carry me out of this awful movie.&quot; Madonna is a phenomenal musician. Much like Michael Jackson, her influence on the industry, on the style, on the artists that are currently playing alongside her and writhing...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Brian Prisco</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Film Reviews" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p><i>"Please, I beg of you, carry me out of this awful movie."</i></p>

<p>Madonna is a phenomenal musician.  Much like Michael Jackson, her influence on the industry, on the style, on the artists that are currently playing alongside her and writhing on the worldwide stage making asses of themselves -- all bow before the pop genius that is Madonna.  And much like Michael Jackson, the fame has caused Madonna to go crazy with her own power.  Michael Jackson tried to become a ten year old white girl; Madonna convinced herself she was British.  But for some reason we let this slide -- if we were going to allow Gwen Stefani to think she's turning Japanese to think she's turning Japanese she really thinks so -- then who were to question the Material Girl?  Because Madonna, even at half strength weakass club Madonna, is still terrific.  Because Madonna is a phenomenal musician.  What she is not is a filmmaker.  </p>

<p><i>W. E.</i> would have been an unholy mess no matter who was at the helm.  But it was not helped in the least by being in the hands of Madonna, who has no concept of story or cinematography.  She can't hold a single sustained shot for longer than 2 minutes, cutting arbitrarily and frenetically between different angles and body parts, mostly of staring down at feet or arms or hands rather than faces.  It's the style of an action movie or music video, not the allegedly quote greatest fairy tale romance of all time endquote endlife.  The result is a stuttering narrative that feels like listening to a crackhead teach British History.  This may have worked had the story even been remotely palatable or coherent.  It's a dual love story: the love story of Wallis Simpson and King Edward VIII from Wallis's perspective interspersed with a dull as dishwater modern day romance between a modern day socialite also named Wallis as she tries to shrug off her loveless marriage.  It's a drooling simpleton of a framework, crushed down beneath a somber and dreadful atmosphere and combined like a halfwit bashing two vegetables together over a pot and calling the fragmented mush soup. </p>

<p>Remember <i>The King's Speech</i>?  The one where Colin Firth got an Oscar for repeatedly saying "fuck" like an overeducated Kennedy?  Okay.  Remember Guy Pearce's part?  This is what the movie is mostly about.  Wallis Simpson (Andrea Riseborough) was a divorcee who married a sweet businessman and lived in Britain.  She became enamored with The Duke of Windsor, Edward David William Jeffery Devadonder Abercrombie Fitch His Majesty Bubblebuns (James D'Arcy), he who would be next king.  From brief and embarrassing scenes, we find out that Wallis's first marriage basically involved a mad soldier who whooped her ass and frowned like the only guy in a Lifetime Movie.  Her second marriage was happy to a lovely man named Ernest Simpson (David Harbour).  But she decides she'd rather do the do with the Duke.  Of course, once he becomes king, it's not acceptable that he should be dropping the scepter in a married woman.  And so, in a move that made lots of spinsters swoon, Edward gave up the monarchy to be with the woman he loved.  And she told her husband, it's been real, but honestly, Disney convinced me little girls need to hump royalty.  And so they die alone, banished, and living in a foreign country, but you know in love.  A true love that probably had nothing to do with Edward's admiration of Hitler.  </p>

<p>Anyway, we get this story through hallucinatory flashbacks of Wally Winthrop (Abbie Cornish), a former Sotheby's scholar who lives a life of luxury with her cheating asshole of a husband, William Winthrop (Richard Coyle).  William is a doctor who comes home to drink scotch and look like an elderly member of Weezer, and then he stays out and probably does it with everyone else.  So Wally, named for Wallis Simpson by a mother and grandmother obsessed with the story, becomes also obsessed with The Duke and Dutchess of Windsor.  Like Wallis, she's in a loveless marriage.  Like Wallis, she can't conceive.  Like Wallis, she is a rich woman who has nothing better to do with her time than go stare at the auction block of artifacts from The Duke and Dutchess of Windsor, on sale by Mohammed al-Fayed in 1998, when this part takes place.  It is here she draws the eye of the meaty yet intellectual Russian security guard, Evgeni (Oscar Isaac).  Get it?  Wallis/Edward - Wally/Evgeni?  Madonna, you mensch, you've done it again!</p>

<p>For a romance, Madonna films sex scenes like fight sequences.  People get hurled on the bed, they grunt and writhe, and then it's over after two punches.  When people are doing it, they yell at each other, or else they spend their time drinking, smoking, and dancing.  And the dancing -- save me, Tony Todd Jesus!  There are several scenes of unforgivable awfulness involving dancing, including an older woman kind of doing The Twist.  The modern portion of the film is unnecessary and weak.  If Madonna actually wanted to tell the story of Wallis Simpson from her perspective, she doesn't need to couch that with an awful "Poor Widdle Rich Girl" narrative.  It's distracting and cliche, easily surpassed by the actual story of Wallis and Edward, which is also cliche but somewhat less so.  Wally finds herself staring in to mirrors, and as her husband gets increasingly distant, only coming close to breath angry scotch on her before punching her with his words or fists, she begins to have conversations with a vision of Wallis Simpson.  Yes, rich young girl speaks to dead people in her mind.  Augh.  </p>

<p>The acting's pretty terrible, and unfortunately, fault falls to the women.  Because the men are bad too, but they're also bare sketches of character.  Ernest is the nice guy who's gonna get fucked over.  Edward looks like an ad for the British remake of Mad Men, looking cool even when he's being a chickenshit, but posing is for magazines, not films.  Vogue.  Evgeni.  Oh.  They try to give him character depth, but it's difficult to stick traits to a slab of meet.  He's Prince Charming, here to rescue the damsel in distress.  Nobody give a fuck what Prince Charming's policies on taxation are or his backstory.  Then, we've got the gals.  Andrea Riseborough is probably the best part of the film, even if Madonna portrays Wallis Simpson as Dorothy Parker by way of Lydia Deetz.  She drolly and dryly quips throughout the film, pale as a Ricci.  It helps accentuate how terrible Abbie Cornish is.  Awards talk?  The only thing she deserves is the Odette Yustman Scholarship to the school of Katie Holmesing.  </p>

<p>Now might not have been the right time to release a film where we are expected to feel sorry for extremely wealthy people who have nothing better to do than be really sad.  And as for romance?  The general message seems to be that Wallis Simpson's perspective was everyone wanted the fairy tale, and they forgot to mention that happily ever after lasts into menopause.  <i>W.E.</i> is simply dreadful.  It's like someone took a Bret Easton Ellis novel that was edited for the tween crowd and got it mixed up with that same kid's "um" and "uh" filled report on Wallis Simpson.  She brings all the same passion and vibrancy she brought to <i>Swept Away</i>, and most of the general story -- socialite falls for servant.  I'll make you a deal, Madge.  You don't write or direct any more fucking movies, and I'll never write a pop song?  Capisce?<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Conservative Movies Make more than Liberal Movies, But Only If You Think that Liberal Means Satan-Worshiping Crack Addicted Serial Killer</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/think_pieces/conservative-movies-make-more-than-liberal-movies-but-only-if-you-think-that-liberal-means-satanworshiping-crack-addicted-serial-killer.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15199</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T16:59:55Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-08T16:45:20Z</updated>

    <summary>There&apos;s some jack-assy organization out there called Movieguide, which apparently sits around and writes reports about whether a movie is &quot;liberal&quot; or &quot;conservative,&quot; and then finds ways in which to demonstrate that &quot;conservative&quot; movies are better than liberal movies because...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Dustin Rowles</name>
        <uri>http://www.pajiba.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Think Pieces" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>There's some jack-assy organization out there called Movieguide, which apparently sits around and writes reports about whether a movie is "liberal" or "conservative," and then finds ways in which to demonstrate that "conservative" movies are better than liberal movies because conservative movies -- according to their latest report -- make more money at the box office. According to their report, 91 movies with a conservative or moral message averaged $59 million at the box office (including 7 of the top 10 films of the year), while 105 movies that fit into the "liberal" category averaged around $11 million.  </p>

<p>My question, however, is how the hell do they decide what is a conservative film and what is a liberal film? Apparently, factors include violence, sex, political correctness, revisionist history, environmentalism, feminism, and homosexuality, although I have no idea whether feminism, environmentalism and political correctness falls into the "liberal" category or the "moral" category, although I'm guessing that MovieGuide considers those factors to be liberal. Still, I have no idea how one could consider the advancement of women's rights, saving the planet, and not offending minorities, women, or disabled people as <I>immoral</i>. </p>

<p>What i do, know, however, is that <I>Twilight</i> is considered "liberal" because it promotes "fringe worldviews" and "obscene behavior," this despite the fact that the vampires are totally abstinent before marriage/conversion. </p>

<p>They also list the films that have been nominated for the Best Movie of the Year, according to their weird factors: </p>

<p><em>The Artist<br />
Captain America: The First Avenger<br />
Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close<br />
Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol<br />
Pirates of the Caribbean: On Stranger Tides<br />
Sarah's Key<br />
Seven Days in Utopia<br />
Thor<br />
The Tree of Life<br />
The Way</em></p>

<p>OK, I'll give them <I>The Tree of Life</i>, and I haven't seen <I>The Way</i> yet, but who considers <I>Mission Impossible</i> or <I>Pirates</i> or even <I>Thor</i> to be "conservative" films? What? Liberals hate it when superheroes win? Apparently: "Most moviegoers want good to conquer evil, truth to triumph over falsehood, justice to prevail over injustice and true beauty to overcome ugliness," according to Movieguide editor Ted Baehr. So, the converse implication is that "liberals" prefer evil, lies, injustice, and ugliness? Because the hated "liberal" films include <I> Super 8, Red State, A Good Old Fashioned Orgy, We Need to Talk About Kevin, Bad Teacher</i> and <I>Happy Feet Two.</i> </p>

<p>What? <I>Super 8</i> is liberal? <I>Happy Feet Too</i> is liberal? Because why? <I>We Need to Talk About Kevin</i> is not "liberal" it's sad and dark. <I>Good Old Fashioned Orgy</i>, I'll give them because <I>obviously</i>, all us liberals love a good sex party. </p>

<p>Basically, what I'm saying is: F*ck you, Movieguide. Justice, honesty, and goodness are not traits exclusive to conservatives. Liberals are not evil; we just curse more and have sex in weirder places. But that doesn't mean who don't enjoy seeing crazy-cakes Cruise bounce around a tall building and kill bad guys. It's just that, while we're watching, we like to smoke pot and f*ck in the theater seats. </p>

<p>(<a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/conservative-liberal-movies-politics-profit-study-287816?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+thr%2Fnews+%28The+Hollywood+Reporter+-+Top+Stories%29">THR</a>)<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>&quot;Awake&quot; Extended Preview: Lucius Malfoy Loses His Family, Breaks Your Heart</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.pajiba.com/trailers/awake-extended-preview-lucius-malfoy-loses-his-family-breaks-your-heart.php" />
    <id>tag:www.pajiba.com,2012://1.15179</id>

    <published>2012-02-08T16:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2012-02-07T19:13:15Z</updated>

    <summary>There are few television shows that I actually get excited for -- Dustin is consistently disappointed in me for lack of interest in television that doesn&apos;t involve zombies or dragons. And yet, I&apos;m finding myself fascinated by the promo trailer...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>TK</name>
        <uri>http://gimmebackmybanana.blogspot.com/</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Trailers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.pajiba.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>There are few television shows that I actually get excited for -- Dustin is consistently disappointed in me for lack of interest in television that doesn't involve zombies or dragons.  And yet, I'm finding myself fascinated by the promo trailer for "Awake," the new NBC mid-season show created by Kyle Killen.  It's caught my interest for two reasons, the first being a genuinely interesting and original, Twilight Zone-esque premise:  </p>

<p>Detective Michael Britten wakes up after a terrible car accident to find that he's lost his son, and deals with living with his wife in the aftermath... until he goes to sleep, and immediately wakes up to find out that his son survived, and he lost his wife.  And that happens every single time he goes to sleep.  Each day is lived in a distinctly separate reality, with different partners, cases, even different psychiatrists that he sees.  No explanation, either.  As someone who constantly dreams about losing loved ones, the idea is a pretty gripping one.  Is he crazy? Is one reality a complete hallucination? And... shouldn't he be <i>really tired</i> all the time?</p>

<p>It's bolstered by an impressive cast -- Jason Isaacs (aka Lucius Malfoy) plays Detective Britten, while his shrinks are played by Cherry Jones ("24") and the phenomenal B.D. Wong ("Law & Order: SVU," <i>The Salton Sea</i>, "Oz").  Rounding things out are Steve Harris and Wilmer Valdemarra (?!) as his respective partners.  </p>

<p>Take a look at the new extended preview:</p>

<p><iframe width="550" height="309" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2AoSM4UzyX8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>

<p>In case you're interested, here's the longer preview that came out last year (which I found far more affecting):</p>

<p><iframe width="550" height="309" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aDbF8b9wkMs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
