kingsmen2.jpg
Fast Times in Southern Louisiana

All the King's Men / Daniel Carlson

If Robert Penn Warren’s All the King’s Men is one of the best American political novels, then writer-director Steven Zaillian may have delivered the least political film possible inspired by such a classic. Faithfully adapted by Zaillian, who reportedly avoided the 1949 film version in order to focus more in crafting his own vision, this latest iteration of All the King’s Men straddles the fence between drama and melodrama, between political intrigue and murky relationships, but mostly between being a legitimate epic and suffering from delusions of grandeur. Don’t get me wrong: This is a good film, or a well-made one at least, with another engaging performance from Sean Penn, who, in the past decade, has become one of the most gifted and dominating performers of his generation. And there are some moments here of genuine poetry, glimpses at a country and a way of life that exists more in the nostalgic hearts and minds of storytellers than it ever did in the real world. But it’s marked throughout by a detached coldness, and the film’s reach exceeds its grasp, causing the tale to shrink in the telling until all that’s left is an idea of the movie that might have been.

The film tells the story of Willie Stark (Penn), a low-level politician in Depression-era Louisiana who winds up becoming governor and drawing a lot of attention along the way for his shady ethics. The film begins in medias res, with Willie taking a midnight ride through the country, with assistant and general right-hand man Jack Burden (Jude Law) in tow. The action then jumps to five years earlier, when Jack was working for the local newspaper and Willie was just a state treasurer being walked all over by the big players in state politics. Penn plays a convincing bumpkin, his wild hair, Southern drawl, and exaggerated arm movements adding up to a likable but not very bright guy who can’t understand why people won’t just take his word and vote for him. He’s so shortsighted that he accepts an offer from Tiny Duffy (James Gandolfini), another local politico, to run for governor.

Tiny just wants Willie to split the vote, and when Willie finally realizes this, he awakens from the idealistic stupor that’s defined his weak campaign so far and begins to go on a tirade against Tiny and all the rest of the big boys that have been keeping down the poor and the ignorant. His first such speech is a remarkable moment, with Penn striding across a stage at a state fair, spewing brimstone, with a fire in his eyes and righteous anger in his voice as he addresses his fellow hicks and rednecks. Zaillian keeps the focus as much on the people as he does on Willie, with cinematographer Pawel Edelman capturing every frayed hem and hopeful eye cast on Willie. The speech is a moment of regrettable growth for Willie: He’s finally figured out how to capture the public’s attention and win an election, but he’ll never again have the honest belief in the system that propelled him to run for office in the first place. Zaillian preserves this small but defining trait from Warren’s story: Willie winds up ruling the state with an iron fist and almost no scruples whatsoever, but he started out wanting to do some actual good.

The film eventually catches up to that initial moonlight ride, and Willie and Jack pay a visit to Judge Irwin (Anthony Hopkins), who’s also Jack’s godfather. Willie’s under some severe political pressure and, when his efforts to recruit the judge to his causes fall flat, he instructs Jack to dig up some dirt on Irwin for leverage. Perhaps it’s a sign that Hopkins can do whatever he wants, but he never takes a stab at anything remotely resembling a Southern accent. Granted, his natural Welsh inflection is less distracting than Law’s muddled attempts to sound American, so maybe it’s for the best. Still, it’s a curious choice: Did Zaillian decide Hopkins’ Southern inflections weren’t authentic enough? Or did Hopkins not even want to try? Or was Donald Sutherland unable to take the part? Whatever. Hopkins brings gravitas to the role, but a decidedly European one.

It’s Jack’s attempts to unearth dirt on Judge Irwin that form the crux of the story, particularly in Warren’s novel, where Jack discourses at length about previous investigations into his own ancestry that first begin to form his beliefs about the unknowable but inevitable consequences to everyone’s actions. It’s a stirring subplot, but one that is easily excised in the process of turning a sprawling novel into a somewhat streamlined film. Jack’s digging into the past brings him back into contact with siblings Adam (Mark Ruffalo) and Anne (Kate Winslet) Stanton, childhood friends who get drawn into Willie’s dealings, and the growing web of deceit and abused relationships sets in motion a predictable but unfortunate series of events.

Law’s a fine enough actor, but he’s all wrong for the part, conveying too much of Jack’s distaste for most of the world around him and not enough of the passions that drive him. He’s just too British to be convincing as a young Southern man; he’s too light and airy, somehow not solid enough on screen. It would have been nice to see Ruffalo in the role, actually, or for that matter any other young actor who could pull off a Southern accent and create decent chemistry with Winslet (a task at which Law spectacularly fails). Penn’s performance overshadows the rest of the ensemble, but even he winds up taking a back seat to composer James Horner’s thundering score. The constant music stings and swelling strings sour more than a few moments, turning the dramatic into the melodramatic and not doing a fraction for the emotional development that could have been done with a more restrained score or even, dare I hope, a moment of silence.

Zaillian’s film aspires to some great heights, but becomes bogged down by everything from an acute awareness of its own importance to the film’s innate inability to reconcile itself with the novel’s true story. Warren’s book unfolds with a leisurely pace to match the region and the era, but Zaillian’s update has all (or most) of the facts but none of the heart. Ironically enough, the film’s emotional distance from the audience parallels with Warren’s original name for his hero: Willie Talos, named after the bronze man in Greek mythology who guarded the isle of Crete and hurled boulders at passing ships to ward them off. The entire film is Zaillian’s boulder, and the viewer never gets close enough to see anything other than a beautifully photographed but isolating story.

Daniel Carlson is the managing editor of Pajiba and a low-level employee at a Hollywood industry magazine. You can visit his blog, Slowly Going Bald.


Flyboys | | Feast |



Comments

Everyone besides Sean Penn was basically wasted/miscast. Characters were reduced to plot devices and lazily handed back stories through even lazier voice overs. This isn't a noir for Christ's sake, this is supposed to be an American epic. Show some effot in the storytelling! The narraration was so scattered and unengaging that I really didn't give a damn what Law's character's childhood was like. Kate Winslet and Mark Ruffalo were introduced so late and were so seemingly dispensible that I wondered why Zallian bothered introducing them at all. And the script... ugh. He sure loves his metaphors/similies. It felt as though every other line was some obscure analogy that the audience was being forced to relate to. "It's like... a... a blue bird flying against the summer wind. You can't fight what nature intends for you."

Admittedly a slight exaggeration, but definitely not far off. Overall I was very dissapointed and its only saving grace was Sean Penn's brilliant performance.

Posted by: Nat at September 23, 2006 2:30 AM

I just watched the film and thought Jude Law was the best thing about it. He played Jack as an observer whose idealism is actually an excuse for moral irresponsibility. It's a wonderful honest performance. On the other hand, Sean Penn was completely wrong. Aside from the distracting gesticulations, he is completely unconvincing as a leader and man of the people. In the end though, both Law and Penn were undone by Zaillian's lousy script and/or direction.

Posted by: Daphne at September 23, 2006 3:09 AM

penn`s roadkill face and pussyass ideas will keep alot of people away from this crap!!

Posted by: pasadenamike at September 23, 2006 4:06 PM

I'm confused! In the opening scene of the movie, jude Law is on a bed and telling about the story. I thought he said he was telling this story from his bed while in prison. If in fact he did say that, what was he in prison for? I left confused. I personally enjoyed the movie. I'm from the South and I recognized some of the political madness and corruption that I remember my mom and dad talking about. So it was kinda like taking a stroll back in time.

Posted by: sally boyd at September 25, 2006 1:35 PM

[Ed. - Spoilers ahead.]

I was fortunate enough to see the film premiere at the Toronto Film Festival, but I was quite disappointed. Extremely disappointed. I'm not one to fall asleep in movie theatres, but I was in that stage where I could just rest my head on my hands with my eyes closed and not really care about plots I was missing. Not to mention the bad accents. Not to mention the fact that Kate Winslet and Mark Ruffalo were barely in there. Not to mention the huge grin on my face when Stark gets shot in the last scene. Not to mention that they didn't turn the lights on in the celebrity box at the end, because they normally do so the audience can bask in their glow. My theory is that all the celebs up and R-U-N-N-O-F-T when they realized that everyone in the theatre wanted to kill themselves out of boredom.

Posted by: Curlz at September 27, 2006 5:15 PM

This movie is so overwrought and poorly written, I stayed through the entire credits waiting to see where Paul Haggis' name would show up. Possibly the most disappointing movie I've seen in the theatres this year.

And you were bang on about the score Daniel. Unbelievably overbearing and terrible. With that kind of music, I expect to see someone parting the Red Sea.

Posted by: Scott at October 5, 2006 10:27 PM

Being a Louisianian, I had the book thurst upon me many a time throughout my student career and grew to enjoy it. This movie, however? Dull. Dull dull dull. Awful writing and music aside, I couldn't get over the actors (although I did make allowances on the accents) -- I found them all to be quite miscast. May Confederacy of Dunces never make it to the cinema.

Posted by: Therese at October 6, 2006 11:59 AM