![]()
The 11th Hour / Ranylt Richildis
Environmental doom n’ gloom has gotten so pervasive that, in the past six months, I’ve started turning off the radio and flipping past stories in National Geographic Magazine whenever topics like dying fish stocks or the dissolving Arctic crop up. It’s for this reason I still haven’t seen An Inconvenient Truth or Manufactured Landscapes (the latter of which looks like a kicking documentary, cinematographically speaking, and really beckons me with its streamlined industrial visuals). Even Baraka messed me up good all those years back when it first appeared. So when Dustin asked me to review The 11th Hour, I did so against every screaming instinct in my body — out of professionalism, I tell you, and the Pajiba Way. But as I marched to the theater with my flashlight and notepad, this ostrich couldn’t help regretting the nice little hidey-hole she’d abandoned out of service to her fellow cinemaphiles. Fortunately for the truly traumatized, The 11th Hour concludes with a merry-merry-love-love look at all of the wasteless resources and clean, green technology waiting in the wings once New Thoughtâ„¢ takes hold and mobilizes governments and citizens to revolutionize industry as we know it.
Sorry, I don’t mean to sound snide. I’m on board with the science, always have been, and couldn’t agree more with the filmmakers’ sense of the gravity of things. I’m just overwhelmed. The 11th Hour, rather than tell us anything new, or present information to us in an original way, combines everything they’ve been throwing at us for years — the impact of the Industrial Revolution, the virulence of corporate and consumer greed, the rising global thermometer, the population explosion — into one big red ball of fiery admonition. Simply put, it’s a summary, a succinct gathering-up and dots-connecting of the environmental crisis, how we got here, and what we can do about it, presented to us with loads of relatable context (e.g. the average twelve-year-old can identify hundreds of corporate logos but less than five native plant species in his own backyard; when JFK was alive, there were only 3 billion people on the planet, etc.) This summary is packaged in the form Errol Morris perfected and popularized with his (far, far superior) documentaries: a succession of direct camera addresses by the talking-head interviewees, interspliced with spinning, epic object-vistas laden with hyper-sound. There isn’t a single innovative thing about the film cinematically or in terms of content (watch Discovery Channel for a week and you’ll get the same information in a more piecemeal fashion). But if you want to get your hands on an up-to-date edition of Dying Planets For Dummies, to try to convince your Creationist neighbors with His and Her SUVs, or your best friend the belligerent conspiracy theorist, The 11th Hour is the tool for you. (We welcome the inevitable it’s-all-an-alarmist-hoax and sham-science comments in the space provided for your convenience, below.)
The film’s roster of experts is impressive. Directors Nadia Conners and Leila Conners Petersen have cobbled together a mind-boggling number of environmental scientists, biologists, oceanographers, anthropologists, cultural critics and political analysts from the best-respected research organizations around the world. They’ve also thrown in a few spiritual leaders and reformed corporate offenders like Ray Anderson of Interface, Inc. (the world’s largest maker of sustainable modular carpeting) who similarly brought his message of green manufacturing to 2003’s The Corporation. Everything is made nice and warmly legitimate by the inclusion of Stephen Hawking, David Suzuki and Wangari Maathai — if not somewhat curious, as well, by the participation of both Mikhail Gorbachev and James Woolsey, former Director of the CIA, now batting for the same team. George W. Bush himself is paraded out via newsreel, demonstrating how even the traditional Fat-Cat devil’s advocate now accepts that oily humans have messed things up in whole new ways. This morass of expertise coheres passably in the hands of producer Leonardo DiCaprio, who emcees the show from a modest corner, giving the main of the room over to researchers, forecasters and technological optimists. (We welcome further predictable outcry in the comments section about celebrities and their political hobby-horses).
The movie’s as manipulative as they come, of course, with its opening sequence of toxic pits and cadaverous children; all films — all art forms — are so, by their very nature, but The 11th Hour goes to the outer reaches of audience domineering, rhythmically thumping its cudgel into its meaty palm. The film is filled with desperate pleas to save our only home, to cure a planet which has begun to behave like an infected organism, to reverse the damage inflicted on our inestimable web of life. As the movie progresses, we understand that these calls aren’t so much for earth’s own sake but for the sake of civilization and the human species which is eating itself alive (I kept waiting for them to trot out Ronald Wright to talk about Easter Island, but the opportunity somehow sailed the producers by).
The 11th Hour is, ultimately, a film about systems: environmental, political, biological and economical, and it does a fine, if surface-brushing, job of demonstrating how human nature and our undying, Age of Reason ideal of progress are woven into the fabric of hard manufacturing and modern lifestyle. As an academic, I always appreciate an attempt to step back and give an interconnective, bird’s-eye view of a problem, lifted out of the simplicity of one narrow field of reference (which is what critical thinking is all about). It’s a shame The 11th Hour wastes, in a sense, its own intellectual resources by presenting its data in a way sure to turn off the very people it wants so earnestly to convince — it’s sure to set the Limbaugh ditto-heads a-laughing. Rather than operating as a wake-up call, the film is a hackneyed, maudlin, uninspired look at the science and the undeniable solipsism of the human condition, with its paradigm-shifting agenda in no way concealed. But then again — tailor-made as it seems to be for the classroom set — as far as agenda-pushing goes, we could do worse than to feed The 11th Hour to the rising generation; we can lose nothing by trying to brain-shift them into admiring solutions with solid economic and philanthropic potential.
Ranylt Richildis lives in Ottawa, Canada, and is busy building her archive bunker deep into the granite of the Gatineau woodlands, hoping to preserve the sum of human knowledge from the ravages of the oncoming apocalypse.
Fierce People | | Is That a Pajiba in Your Pants?
Comments
Coming soon to a classroom near you!
Posted by: melladior at September 6, 2007 3:50 PM
The sad thing with movies like these is that they preach to the choir. Most of the people viewing them are already the sort of folks who are probably recycling, lowering their carbon footprints, etc.
It's trying to convince the "Creationist neighbors" and "your best friend the belligerent conspiracy theorist" that's so hard, people who just don't want to change. Maybe a movie like this could be just the repetitive message necessary for people to start listening?
eh, probably not.
Posted by: Stella at September 6, 2007 3:52 PM
If repetitive messages prevent the SUV driving douches' kids from growing up to be SUV driving douches, then fine, I'll bear with it.
It's a losers battle to teach the parents, but the kids can still be taught.
Posted by: Brook at September 6, 2007 4:09 PM
We don't care. Bottom line is, we are all going to be long gone and dead when this hits the fan, so why would we care? Name one generation that give a flying crap about how their behavior would affect anyone 200 years later. This is why the Constitution is open for interpretaion (Bear arms, anyone?) the Bible will continue to have version after version after version and Kevin Federline hasn't been forcibly neutered.
Posted by: courtney at September 6, 2007 4:18 PM
Courtney, I have to disagree, but just barely. Thing is, there ARE people who care about stuff like that, there's just not enough of us to make a difference.
Still, I don't mind putting out the energy to try to convince just one person to join my way of thinking. If I convince one, and you convince one, who knows what might happen? The pessimist in me says, not a damn thing. The optimist in me hopes some change will happen.
Posted by: Stella at September 6, 2007 4:30 PM
I don't know, Courtney, how about the feminist movement or civil rights movements? Sure, things aren't perfect, but I certainly wouldn't change places with my grandmother (and not just because she's really old).
The problem with movements like this is that they take a really long time. I think the environmental movement has a shot, if there's enough time before it all goes tits up.
And, even if there's not time, I think of what MLK said: "Even if I knew that tomorrow the world would go to pieces, I would still plant my apple tree."
Posted by: megbon at September 6, 2007 4:53 PM
The Pajiba Way? I suddenly have a hankerin' for a tee-shirt with that stamped on it.
Posted by: Kolby at September 6, 2007 4:56 PM
While I'm unlikely to see this film (I've studied Environmental Science and already know the story) I'm more than happy to encourage others to see it.
I see the repetition as a new form of nagging and while those people in their SUVs may not watch it, they will certainly hear about it from others.
Posted by: Camilla at September 6, 2007 6:18 PM
I wonder if the cast will return for The 12th and 13th hour.
Once they get to 25 they're going to need to think of a different title.
Posted by: Kevin Longrie at September 6, 2007 7:30 PM
In all honesty I don't know of anyone who doesn't care about man kind's survival. It's just like with everything else in life I and everyone else like me tend to take a 'what the hell can I do about it' stance once we've already done the minimal that is required. What can we do when we live in a world that is dependent on the same components that are destroying it? From my point of view the only thing I can do except recycle and try to conserve as much energy that I can (try that in 100 degree weather) is play the blame game.
Posted by: Candy at September 6, 2007 7:49 PM
Wow, talk about being snotty. It's so cool that someone can condescend and seemingly predict comments from the common man! You bloggers deserve all the fame and money and critical acclaim and...
oh, right. Never mind.
Posted by: Just Jim at September 6, 2007 8:39 PM
You may find it hard to believe, but Creationist and environmentalist are not necessarily mutually exclusive, although many of the more vocal anti-evolutionary Creationists out there might have you thinking that.
I will go see this movie. And I will try to get all my friends and family, Creationist or other, to do the same.
Posted by: jana at September 6, 2007 8:59 PM
Courtney- I think there are plenty of people who care about what shape the world will be in 200 years from now. But that aside we're in much deeper shit than that environmentally. Research indicates that although the changes may seem gradual, it's likely that we'll be living in a very different world in 50 years or less. I think that's something to care about.
I don't see why everyone is so pessimistic about movies like these. Everytime one comes out all you hear is "Yeah, that's fine but it's not going to really change anything". I think this is the big problem with gen x and yers--we're so apathetic about everything that it's almost like we've already accepted our own doom. Sure movies like these are overwhelming and sometimes overly idealistic (write your congressman, buy an electric car, hold hands around the campfire and sing Kumbayah, etc.) but are we so jaded that we can recieve all this information and not want to do anything?
I personally think that the people who really contribute to this problem are those who are politically and morally apathetic. Conservatives may get the most press as the group who "hates the environment" but as many others pointed out it's unlikely that Leonardo DiCaprio is going to change their minds. I think the people who can really make a difference on this issue are the ones who constantly say that they don't want to jump on the environmentalism bandwagon because it's a political issue and they hate politics. Maybe the benefit of these films is that if people see them enough they'll stop seeing global warming as being affiliated with a poltical party.
Posted by: Allie at September 6, 2007 9:51 PM
I wonder how much electricity DiCaprio's mansions use, or how many trees were cut down and animals displaced during their construction. Or how many private jets he's flown in the past 5 years.
Seriously, he can kiss my ass.
Posted by: Right... at September 6, 2007 10:22 PM
Right... :
Actually he flies commercial, and drives an electric car. There was an article awhile back about "environmentally friendly" celebs and he was the only one who put his money where his mouth is, the rest enjoy flying private jets etc. He's no Ed Begley, but it'll do.
Posted by: The Stew at September 6, 2007 11:43 PM
from what i hear leo flies commercial(first class i'm sure), has solar panels on his homes, and drives a prius. doesnt he also have one of those little eletric cars or a smart car? who knows...but huh since he's shilling for the environment it makes since to at least have some sort of responsilbilty. my house is automated and we are looking into getting wind mill since we plenty of wind on my lovely mountain. of course our incentive is the money we save from doing such things
Posted by: najee at September 6, 2007 11:46 PM
Doesn't Leonardo DiCaprio have like, a carbon neutral island or something? I think he practices what he preaches a lot more than others.
Posted by: Ruby at September 6, 2007 11:51 PM
i can get behind a positive message,it`s the Escalade, Hummer, Armada, Driving douche nozzles that should see this movie.right SLIM??
Posted by: pasadenamike at September 7, 2007 12:37 AM
Video Cliffnotes for the junior high set and just in time for school! Teachers across the U.S. America and South Africa and such are rejoicing now that there is another video they can put in front of the class to teach for them. Kids, get extra credit if you quote Leo in your next social studies paper. Solid review, BTW.
Posted by: JP at September 7, 2007 2:07 AM
I don't need pretty boy Leonardo "flies on private jets" DiCaprio and his cronies gettin' all up in my grille and telling me how to do my business.
Posted by: BarbadoSlim at September 7, 2007 10:42 AM
Climate hysteria (warming or cooling, ozone or CO2) may have replaced the Book of Revelations interpretation as the favorite for "the end is near" crowd. Who says we are a secular society, we've just changed religions...
Don't worry kids, the world is bigger than your liberalism, it will surive just fine - and so will the humans just trying to get by after coming down from the trees in the first place.
Posted by: Hank Reardon at September 7, 2007 11:20 AM
I can't believe people still think global warming is a hoax. I love going to gatherings and hearing the usual contingent of idiots talk about the "normal cycle of the earth", as if they have any idea what they are talking about and the majority of environmental scientists are simply wrong. It's that kind of arrogance that is killing the planet through willful disregard for anyone but themselves. Fucking jackasses.
Posted by: Rob at September 7, 2007 11:55 AM
I am so tired of people equating Creationists with people who don't believe in science. I believe God created our world and I believe in sceince. There, chew on that for awhile.
Posted by: Timartoonies at September 7, 2007 4:31 PM
I work with activists on a daily basis who pound the pavement in hopes of finding more people who give shit. All is not lost. Not all twenty-somethings (like me and 2/3rds of the people I work with) are apathetic douche bags. The more you tell the kids that they don't care, the more they won't give a fuck. I call it learned apathy. "No one talks to me about this because they think I won't understand/care/do anything about it so screw them. Politics is boring. Nothing ever changes, etc." Give us some credit. We feel the burden that our elders have placed on us. And it sucks but we have to deal with it. There might not be a next generation to deal with it. It's that crucial. I saw this film and even if it doesn't changes 1,000 peoples' lives, it can't hurt right? The information is out there and it is every citizen's right and responsibility to do as much as they possibly can about IT.
www.texasenvironment.org
Posted by: meg at September 7, 2007 5:02 PM
Intelligent and enjoyable review...
... and a nice break from some of the crap-ajiba is appearing around the site of late.
Posted by: dabuti at September 8, 2007 5:59 AM
Come to Newfoundland, we've got things pretty much figured out down this way.
Posted by: Dee at September 9, 2007 9:51 AM
Are humans responsible for climate change on the outer reaches of the solar system, or is it the sun? How will altering human activity halt climate change when the evidence clearly indicates that the sun itself and not SUV's is heating up the entire solar system?
Global warming has finally been explained: the Earth is getting hotter because the Sun is burning more brightly than at any time during the past 1,000 years, according to new research.
The simple fact is that throughout the ages the earth has swung wildly between a warm, wet, stable climate, to a cold, dry and windy one - long before the first fossil fuel was burned.
Fearmongering about an imminent climate doomsday also hogs news coverage and important environmental issues like GM food, mad scientist chimera cloning and the usurpation and abuse of corporations like Monsanto flies under the radar.
We are all going to die people.
Posted by: Eli at September 9, 2007 2:16 PM
Come on, Eli, first you denounce climate doomsday and then you proclaim your own doomsday.
And, yeah, we are all going to die. Duh!
Posted by: PauPau at September 9, 2007 9:25 PM
i am so fucken tired of people btiching at me about the fucken earth. I just have one thing to say:
SHUT UP!
I will throw my big gulp cup out the window into the stream where it will kill the fish that I don't care about. While simultaneously I will eat beef, spray aerosol, and drive my gas guzzling SUV down the street. No I will not ride a fucken bike either. I hate vegans. I also want them to stop putting fucking bumper stickers on there car that say "you should be earth friendly." All I want to say if FUCK YOU.
Posted by: kate at September 15, 2007 8:10 PM
Kate, you sound really unhappy. Try to not take it out on the rest of the world (literally).
Maybe if you rode a bike once in a while you wouldn't be so miserable (endorphins and all that).
Posted by: Kathryn at September 19, 2007 1:26 AM
Earth's recent history has been a series of ice ages followed by warm interglacial periods. To quote physicist Freeman Dyson:
"Another environmental danger that is even more poorly understood is the possible coming of a new ice-age. A new ice-age would mean the burial of half of North America and half of Europe under massive ice-sheets. We know that there is a natural cycle that has been operating for the last eight hundred thousand years. The length of the cycle is a hundred thousand years. In each hundred-thousand year period, there is an ice-age that lasts about ninety thousand years and a warm interglacial period that lasts about ten thousand years. We are at present in a warm period that began twelve thousand years ago, so the onset of the next ice-age is overdue. If human activities were not disturbing the climate, a new ice-age might already have begun."
During an Ice Age, It is likely that a great number of species would become extinct and that only a fraction of the present population of humans could be supported.
If you want to do your part for future generations... SUPPORT NASCAR!
Posted by: threadkiller at September 27, 2007 8:31 PM

